<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News&#8217; &#8216;White House Bans Fox News&#8217; Story Is Starting To Unravel Become Clearer &#8211; Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colby Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7799</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7799</guid>
		<description>Not sure that there is a conflict. Steve reported on Saturday that Michael Clemente claimed that the Robert Gibbs admitted a mistake to Major Gibbs. We wrote the following headline  &quot;Fox News: White House Apologized For Pay Czar Interview Snub “Mistake”&quot;

Gibbs now claims that the did not &quot;apologize&quot; per se, and FNC&#039;s is sticking to their version of events - that Gibbs admitted a mistake. Semantically there is a difference between &quot;Apologizing&quot; and &quot;Admitting a Mistake&quot; -- which can be found here: http://www.mediaite.com/online/robert-gibbs-white-house-did-not-apologize-to-fox-news/

Hope this clears thing up for you.

Colby Hall
Managing Editor, Mediaite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that there is a conflict. Steve reported on Saturday that Michael Clemente claimed that the Robert Gibbs admitted a mistake to Major Gibbs. We wrote the following headline  &#8220;Fox News: White House Apologized For Pay Czar Interview Snub “Mistake”&#8221;</p>
<p>Gibbs now claims that the did not &#8220;apologize&#8221; per se, and FNC&#8217;s is sticking to their version of events &#8211; that Gibbs admitted a mistake. Semantically there is a difference between &#8220;Apologizing&#8221; and &#8220;Admitting a Mistake&#8221; &#8212; which can be found here: <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/robert-gibbs-white-house-did-not-apologize-to-fox-news/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/online/robert-gibbs-white-house-did-not-apologize-to-fox-news/</a></p>
<p>Hope this clears thing up for you.</p>
<p>Colby Hall<br />
Managing Editor, Mediaite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RazorsEdge</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7792</link>
		<dc:creator>RazorsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7792</guid>
		<description>OK, MEDIAITE!

I Think You have contributed to confuse readers to What&#039;s is truth or fact surrounding this story! Which is it, WH apoligized/admitted mistake, WH did not, the Fox WH ban story &quot;completely unravels&quot; (URL title)?

&quot;I think&quot; it&#039;s fair to state readers just want to know the facts and truth on what&#039;s going on with this story.

Now shouldn&#039;t Mediaite issue a correction to this story: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-house-admits-to-fox-news-pay-czar-interview-exclusion-a-mistake/ by Steve Kraukauer and Updates made by Colby Hall?

Right now, Mediaite is currently running two stories with multiple updates on this very subject that CONFLICTS each other.

MediaiteEditor, can you clear up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, MEDIAITE!</p>
<p>I Think You have contributed to confuse readers to What&#8217;s is truth or fact surrounding this story! Which is it, WH apoligized/admitted mistake, WH did not, the Fox WH ban story &#8220;completely unravels&#8221; (URL title)?</p>
<p>&#8220;I think&#8221; it&#8217;s fair to state readers just want to know the facts and truth on what&#8217;s going on with this story.</p>
<p>Now shouldn&#8217;t Mediaite issue a correction to this story: <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-house-admits-to-fox-news-pay-czar-interview-exclusion-a-mistake/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-house-admits-to-fox-news-pay-czar-interview-exclusion-a-mistake/</a> by Steve Kraukauer and Updates made by Colby Hall?</p>
<p>Right now, Mediaite is currently running two stories with multiple updates on this very subject that CONFLICTS each other.</p>
<p>MediaiteEditor, can you clear up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Media Is Totally Corrupt</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7644</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Media Is Totally Corrupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7644</guid>
		<description>Did Fox make up the story about Obumbles going on every other Sunday show by Fox News Sunday?  Did Fox News make up the story of El Presidente on tv saying FNC is not a &quot;real&quot; news channel?

And we wonder why all the newspapers are going down the toilet.  All the same, all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Fox make up the story about Obumbles going on every other Sunday show by Fox News Sunday?  Did Fox News make up the story of El Presidente on tv saying FNC is not a &#8220;real&#8221; news channel?</p>
<p>And we wonder why all the newspapers are going down the toilet.  All the same, all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFPhoto</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7643</link>
		<dc:creator>SFPhoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7643</guid>
		<description>Somehow I knew that the Tommy Christopher who did such a dishonest and slipshod story about the Tea Parties would be incapable of writing an honest story about FoxNews. Tommy, read WfT&#039;s comments and either STFU or approach your job with less of a bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I knew that the Tommy Christopher who did such a dishonest and slipshod story about the Tea Parties would be incapable of writing an honest story about FoxNews. Tommy, read WfT&#8217;s comments and either STFU or approach your job with less of a bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7642</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7642</guid>
		<description>Self serving and overblown, like I said last night after reading the Mediaite and TPM direct reporting on the matter, among others, all denying Fox&#039;s questionable presentation of the events.

It&#039;s no big deal though, just Ailes throwing an elbow and proving the WH contention Fox is a 24/7 political operation that creates their own reality to flog incessantly, duh. Welcome back to the Clinton years, and it&#039;s only the beginning.

Anytime a Democrat is in the WH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self serving and overblown, like I said last night after reading the Mediaite and TPM direct reporting on the matter, among others, all denying Fox&#8217;s questionable presentation of the events.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no big deal though, just Ailes throwing an elbow and proving the WH contention Fox is a 24/7 political operation that creates their own reality to flog incessantly, duh. Welcome back to the Clinton years, and it&#8217;s only the beginning.</p>
<p>Anytime a Democrat is in the WH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TfT</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7641</link>
		<dc:creator>TfT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7641</guid>
		<description>From CBS (via newsbusters):
----------------------------------------
GREENFIELD: And the White House has gone beyond words. Last September 20th, the President went on every Sunday news show -- except Chris Wallace&#039;s show on Fox. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude Fox News from pool coverage of interviews with one of its key officials. It backed down after strong protests from the press.

CBS NEWS WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT CHIP REID: All the networks said, that&#039;s it, you&#039;ve crossed the line.
------------------------------------------

The WH war on FNC is hurting the WH and helping FNC.

The &quot;not a real news organization&quot;  broke the ACORN, NEA, and Van Jones stories that the rest of the media tried to spike but ultimately couldn&#039;t and admitted their own failure -- that is why the WH is going after FNC, because they DO break the stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From CBS (via newsbusters):<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
GREENFIELD: And the White House has gone beyond words. Last September 20th, the President went on every Sunday news show &#8212; except Chris Wallace&#8217;s show on Fox. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude Fox News from pool coverage of interviews with one of its key officials. It backed down after strong protests from the press.</p>
<p>CBS NEWS WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT CHIP REID: All the networks said, that&#8217;s it, you&#8217;ve crossed the line.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The WH war on FNC is hurting the WH and helping FNC.</p>
<p>The &#8220;not a real news organization&#8221;  broke the ACORN, NEA, and Van Jones stories that the rest of the media tried to spike but ultimately couldn&#8217;t and admitted their own failure &#8212; that is why the WH is going after FNC, because they DO break the stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/foxs-white-house-bans-fox-news-story-completely-unravels/#comment-7640</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38384#comment-7640</guid>
		<description>Attack the White House (like a Fox),
Skip interview (like a Fox),
Get called on it (like a Fox),
Spin story (like a Fox),
Get called on it (like a Fox),
Show hypocrisy (like a Fox),
Prove White House&#039;s point (like a Fox),
Now they&#039;re sad (like a Fox).

So, basically Fox News proved the White House&#039;s point? Creating a controversy out of nothing just to trash the White House. This was reported on the supposed &quot;news&quot; shows as well? Wowza!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attack the White House (like a Fox),<br />
Skip interview (like a Fox),<br />
Get called on it (like a Fox),<br />
Spin story (like a Fox),<br />
Get called on it (like a Fox),<br />
Show hypocrisy (like a Fox),<br />
Prove White House&#8217;s point (like a Fox),<br />
Now they&#8217;re sad (like a Fox).</p>
<p>So, basically Fox News proved the White House&#8217;s point? Creating a controversy out of nothing just to trash the White House. This was reported on the supposed &#8220;news&#8221; shows as well? Wowza!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
