Annoying “Juice Drink Tax” Ads Explained


juiceIf you’re a frequent MSNBC viewer, you have no doubt sat through that mopey-faced lecture on how a tax on “sodas and juice drinks” will cause foreclosures and business closings. It’s the kind of whiny appeal that I hate no matter who makes it, but I decided to get to the bottom of this one anyway, and maybe take a stand.

If you missed it, here’s the ad:



It’s annoying because it makes an empty, stupid argument. Pennies add up. Genius, you saw Superman 3.

My knee-jerk response to the chilly mom’s declaration that “Pennies add up when you’re trying to feed a family,” was “Well, don’t feed your family crap, then.” The heart of this issue is that (non-diet) sodas and “juice drinks” are really, really bad for us, and a tax would rein in consumption while funding health care programs.

So, what the frak is a “juice drink?” For purposes of this kind of tax, it’s any beverage that contains added high fructose corn syrup, and less than 70% fruit juice. The ad makes it sound like congress is attacking all fruity goodness.

The New York Times gives the issue the famously useless “balanced” treatment by presenting, equally, both the New England Journal of Medicine’s finding that HFCS drinks contribute greatly to obesity and related illnesses, plus the American Beverage Association’s finding that “all calories count.” Who can say which is true?

The tax proposed is a 1-cent-per-ounce levy on the targeted drinks, with the goal of reducing consumption and funding health care programs.

So far, I’m sold. I love the refreshing 1 calorie goodness of Pepsi One, and my 4 year-old makes up for his narrow diet by drinking loads of V8 Fusion. The tax also excludes milk, water, and lots of other healthier alternatives. Why doesn’t commercial mommy love her family that much?

The problem is, V8 Fusion, for example, costs $4.39 for a 2 quart bottle that lasts 2 or 3 days. $4.39 will buy you a kiddie-pool full of juice “drink.” Just ask Dave Chappelle about that difference.

So, while this tax removes the option of serving your kids cheap crap, it does nothing to help them afford good, healthy alternatives. If you grant that the government should be doing something about this, maybe they should also create incentives for real juice and dairy producers to make their products more affordable. That would go a long way toward bolstering their motives beyond raising money to plug budget holes by saying “Eff the fatties!”

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


5 comments

  • doffy99 doffy99 says:

    I’d like to see, in the Constitution, where it is the Federal, or even a state, governments job to keep me and my family eating right and healthy?

    The government taxes alcohol and Tobacco the same way. That hasn’t made people stop drinking alcohol or stop smoking cigarettes. I’m sure the recent jump in the cost of tobacco has convinced some to quit, or not pick up the nasty habit but I’m willing to lay odds that most quit or never started because of education on the dangers of tobacco and nicotine. Same with alcohol.

    Now I can see an argument for why the government should step in on the alcohol and tobacco issues. With drunk drivers and second-hand smoke a danger even to those who never touch a cigarette (Remember Dana Reeve?) or a can of beer, there’s an argument to protect the greater good or some such. It isn’t much of an argument but it’s some justification for why the government needs to tell me how to live and raise my family.

    There is NO SUCH argument for sodas and juice drinks! Fine, these things may lower the general health of those who drink them. They may raise health care costs for the insured and the uninsured but so do a lot of things. Will we be taxing Twinkies next? Chocolate cake maybe? Or how about Bill Cosby’s favorite, Pudding?

    The government should not be even considering TAXING juice drinks and sodas. If they are unhealthy, start a campaign to educate people about other options. Put warning labels on the cans and bottles. There are better ways to do this than yet ANOTHER tax… oh wait, Obama promised not to raise any more taxes. I guess this is another FINE.

  • Dandee Dandee says:

    This is only the beginning of taxes. He will also add taxes on Food and air. You will be allowed just a certain number of times to breathe in and out.!

  • Magister Magister says:

    At least one or two of the Native American nations impose a “junk food tax” and they seem no worse for wear, plus whenever I’ve been on tribal land, I’ve gladly paid it.

  • mileysmiley mileysmiley says:

    I saw this ad recently as well. What % are these juices taxes going to be? The reason I ask is that I have heard some folks talk about a juice tax or taxes on water bottles when those are really deposits for recyling efforts. As people get there 5 cents back when they return the bottles of juice or water, these should not be called taxes, though some politicians/.interests call them that to scare people. So if their is a juice tax for health issues plus additional cost for the deposit (which they pay until and if they return it), discussions could get heated. But in the later case, it is the environment that would suffer. It looks like all the supporters of this are beverage companies and retailers and if the retailer is only making 2 cents on the dollar they would not want to have any additional taxes or costs added to the equation. But then let them be accountable for what gets thrown out later.

  • sweettbat sweettbat says:

    “That would go a long way toward bolstering their motives beyond raising money to plug budget holes by saying “Eff the fatties!””

    Interesting sentence. Because it seems that this is the actual motive…”eff the fatties.” The reason this tax is being proposed is not to encourage a healthier lifestyle bla bla bla. They want to tax soda and juice drinks because they KNOW that people will NOT stop drinking these drinks, and when it comes down to it, nobody who drinks soda religiously really cares if it is going to be a few pennies more expensive. What a CROCK to say that a tax would discourage people from consuming these types of drinks. 63% of Americans are overweight (since the issue seems to be going in this direction) and 31% are obese. Let’s pretend that 100% of those individuals consume soda or juice drinks. LOOK AT ALL THE MONEY THAT CAN BE MADE! Let’s be real here!

    “The heart of this issue is that (non-diet) sodas and “juice drinks” are really, really bad for us, and a tax would rein in consumption while funding health care programs.”

    My FOOT! The heart of this is not to encourage a healthier lifestyle, or more healthy choices, rather it is to CAPITALIZE ON THE CHOICES THAT THEY ARE CLAIMING TO DISCOURAGE.

    Typical of the government. Mask the real, selfish, controlling attempts to tax the crap out of us because of their own feeble, ignorant spending with a sugar-coated message tricking the stupid into believing that the government actually cares about their well-being. OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    The Seven Best (Or, Somewhat Memorable) Moments Of The Jay Leno Show

    video

    After 95 episodes, the epic failure known as The Jay Leno Show airs its final episode tonight. Of course, Leno himself will be back after the Olympics, comfortably at 11:35pm all over again. Which was pretty much the problem to begin with - the 10pm offering started as a similar product to the Tonight Show, and only became more like the old format as time went on.

    No Surprise Here: FNC Dominates Ratings For Palin Tea Party Speech

    ratings

    • With all three cable news networks carrying Sarah Palin's tea party speech and Q&A after on Saturday night, Fox News was the clear winner in the ratings. During the 9pmET hour, FNC had more viewers in the A25-54 demographic than MSNBC, CNN and HLN combined. In total viewers, Fox News had more than double the combined total of the other three cablers.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS