<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barry Levinson Is Unhappy Alessandra Stanley Didn&#8217;t Like His Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike_S</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/#comment-9478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=44830#comment-9478</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Stanley will one day realize her disregard for facts discredits her, her editors and the newspaper she writes for.  As to consumers, she simply insults them by assuming they are so ignorant as to embrace her broad brush strokes and overlook her disregard for inconvenient truths.  

Hmm, maybe it applies to this article as well given Levinson focused on several GROSS factual errors that Stanley committed in her critique, while this article concludes that he&#039;s simply pissed off that she didn&#039;t like his work and he&#039;s picking on her because she&#039;s an easy target given she&#039;s committed even grosser errors in the past.

If the bar really is that low in journalism these days, than perhaps Levinson should of instead focused on praising her for at least getting the title correct.      

Mike S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Stanley will one day realize her disregard for facts discredits her, her editors and the newspaper she writes for.  As to consumers, she simply insults them by assuming they are so ignorant as to embrace her broad brush strokes and overlook her disregard for inconvenient truths.  </p>
<p>Hmm, maybe it applies to this article as well given Levinson focused on several GROSS factual errors that Stanley committed in her critique, while this article concludes that he&#8217;s simply pissed off that she didn&#8217;t like his work and he&#8217;s picking on her because she&#8217;s an easy target given she&#8217;s committed even grosser errors in the past.</p>
<p>If the bar really is that low in journalism these days, than perhaps Levinson should of instead focused on praising her for at least getting the title correct.      </p>
<p>Mike S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrystyris</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/#comment-9319</link>
		<dc:creator>harrystyris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=44830#comment-9319</guid>
		<description>Levinson just doesn&#039;t seem to get that there just is no respect for great artistic vision like his in Hollywood anymore.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.karte-r4.at/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;r4i&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levinson just doesn&#8217;t seem to get that there just is no respect for great artistic vision like his in Hollywood anymore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.karte-r4.at/" rel="nofollow">r4i</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWHarper</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/#comment-9254</link>
		<dc:creator>DWHarper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=44830#comment-9254</guid>
		<description>The point Levinson was making is that Stanley&#039;s topic sentence about his film was just dead wrong.  As he points out, the 2008 Election was just back drop to their treatise on the mixture of celebrity and politics.  If she not only gets facts wrong, but actual meaning behind films and TV, that is even more damning and should be flagged too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point Levinson was making is that Stanley&#8217;s topic sentence about his film was just dead wrong.  As he points out, the 2008 Election was just back drop to their treatise on the mixture of celebrity and politics.  If she not only gets facts wrong, but actual meaning behind films and TV, that is even more damning and should be flagged too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/barry-levinsons-delusions-about-alessandra-stanley/#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=44830#comment-9250</guid>
		<description>Sooo... just because she&#039;s known to be wrong... a lot... doesn&#039;t mean someone should call her on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo&#8230; just because she&#8217;s known to be wrong&#8230; a lot&#8230; doesn&#8217;t mean someone should call her on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

