<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did 30 Rock Name-Check A C-list Conservative Pundit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magister</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>Magister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>@marquis: I really don&#039;t see a media angle to poll data, but we get it -- Obama is down in a poll... Now do you have to append it to every thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@marquis: I really don&#8217;t see a media angle to poll data, but we get it &#8212; Obama is down in a poll&#8230; Now do you have to append it to every thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marquis</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13427</link>
		<dc:creator>marquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13427</guid>
		<description>Notice how Mediaite isn’t reporting this tiny little bit of news out today: (ya gotta remember who’s running this site, NBC’s uber-left Dan Abrams of course)

Barack Obama’s presidential approval index number has dropped to -19.
Obama has dropped a stunning 49 points in less than one year.
In less than a year Obama has lost the independents. Only 21% strongly support his radical agenda while 49% of independents strongly disapprove.
Rasmussen reported:

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19.

Today is the second straight day that Obama’s Approval Index rating has fallen to a new low. Prior to the past two days, the Approval Index had never fallen below -15 during Obama’s time in office (see trends).

The 23% who Strongly Approve matches the lowest level of enthusiasm yet recorded. Just 41% of Democrats Strongly Approve while 69% of Republicans Strongly Disapprove. Among voters not affiliated with either major party, 21% Strongly Approve and 49% Strongly Disapprove.

Real Clear Politics has more on Obama’s decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how Mediaite isn’t reporting this tiny little bit of news out today: (ya gotta remember who’s running this site, NBC’s uber-left Dan Abrams of course)</p>
<p>Barack Obama’s presidential approval index number has dropped to -19.<br />
Obama has dropped a stunning 49 points in less than one year.<br />
In less than a year Obama has lost the independents. Only 21% strongly support his radical agenda while 49% of independents strongly disapprove.<br />
Rasmussen reported:</p>
<p>The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19.</p>
<p>Today is the second straight day that Obama’s Approval Index rating has fallen to a new low. Prior to the past two days, the Approval Index had never fallen below -15 during Obama’s time in office (see trends).</p>
<p>The 23% who Strongly Approve matches the lowest level of enthusiasm yet recorded. Just 41% of Democrats Strongly Approve while 69% of Republicans Strongly Disapprove. Among voters not affiliated with either major party, 21% Strongly Approve and 49% Strongly Disapprove.</p>
<p>Real Clear Politics has more on Obama’s decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13338</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13338</guid>
		<description>Oy vey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy vey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florence Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13334</link>
		<dc:creator>Florence Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13334</guid>
		<description>Mark Hemingway is a gifted communicator and always professional journalist.
This essay? Nothing more than undeserved invective against a more gifted peer, especially when he&#039;s compared to this particular critic.  Mike, your sarcasm is just tiring.
Mark Hemingway has earned no such criticism or &quot;rating&quot;. In fact the article speaks only to the shallow insight and unmerited arrogance of its author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Hemingway is a gifted communicator and always professional journalist.<br />
This essay? Nothing more than undeserved invective against a more gifted peer, especially when he&#8217;s compared to this particular critic.  Mike, your sarcasm is just tiring.<br />
Mark Hemingway has earned no such criticism or &#8220;rating&#8221;. In fact the article speaks only to the shallow insight and unmerited arrogance of its author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmbltmbl</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13328</link>
		<dc:creator>rmbltmbl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13328</guid>
		<description>And they used a picture of PBO to represent muslims too, yes?  Seems like you could mention in an article ABOUT 30 rock I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they used a picture of PBO to represent muslims too, yes?  Seems like you could mention in an article ABOUT 30 rock I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timzank</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-30-rock-name-check-a-c-list-conservative-pundit/#comment-13306</link>
		<dc:creator>timzank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=56377#comment-13306</guid>
		<description>Gee, it&#039;s NBC...let me think...would they take a gratuitous shot at a conservative?


nahhhhhh...gotta be a coincidence, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, it&#8217;s NBC&#8230;let me think&#8230;would they take a gratuitous shot at a conservative?</p>
<p>nahhhhhh&#8230;gotta be a coincidence, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

