mate tee

You guys are really gonna regret giving Barry this much latitude, because as always, a Republican will be in the Oval Office again someday, and Congress will shift back as well and all the “powers” and “latitude” you’ve given these morons will fall into the hands of people you don’t like at all.

Picture the media war from the white house, only it’s President Palin, or some other Republican you loathe threatening the voices at NBC,CBS,ABC, MSNBC etc…what goes around comes around and your “tolerant liberal leaders” are setting a precedent you ain’t gonna like at all when you are on the receiving end, and as history shows, you will be on the receiving end again.

OUCH… oh, OUCH… Teddy, you hurt my feelings so bad.

Anyway… as to the substance of what you said (you know, the stuff before you let the voices in your head take over)… who determines what is “independently produced” and what isn’t? Did GOP dollars officially go to the Clinton project? Sure it was an advocacy piece, but I’d include election day part of the “campaign,” even if not the primary (as if the primary status would matter)? And while Obama isn’t running, one could make the argument that a program like this could help the Democratic candidate pretty easily.

Again, I’m not suggesting that’s the purpose here. I haven’t seen the doc, I don’t know what’s in it, how Obama’s portrayed, etc. I’m asking about the legal comparison. Nobody here is outraged… well, that’s not true, Ted appears to have sand in his… well, somewhere… and thusly outraged… but I’m not. Just wondering how specific the legal language is to allow this, but not all that.

Oh, and Teddy… do some jumping jacks, it might knock the sand out…

But that won’t stop the perpetual outrage machine that is the modern GOP from trying to make a big deal out of it. They will assume that their followers are all as ignorant as Imnotblue.

Anyone have a more enlightened perspective on it?

What we need is a LEADER, not a charismatic speaker.