<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview: AMC Goes Meta Marketing Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/interview-amc-goes-meta-marketing-mad-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/interview-amc-goes-meta-marketing-mad-men/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carri Bugbee</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/interview-amc-goes-meta-marketing-mad-men/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Carri Bugbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=8433#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>As one of the three Mad Men Tweeters (@PeggyOlson) who was affected by the Twitter take-down, I can clarify why it is everyone thought it was a DMCA issue initiated by AMC: it was widely reported in the press. Journalists and bloggers reported that Twitter responded to a DMCA takedown notice and then Deep Focus “nudged” AMC in a different direction (see links below).

Whatever the reason, we (and tens of thousands of Mad Men fans on Twitter) were very happy to be re-instated and continue tweeting for the characters. As a marketer, I certainly never intended to “brand-jack” AMC. I’d never even heard of the term. Nor had I heard of fan fiction. While I love the show, I’m not the type to engage in fandom. It’s very time consuming to research plots and attempt to speak authentically in a TV character’s voice – in 140 characters. This is why Twitter is littered with abandoned fictional characters.

I did it because I wanted to explore all the ways Twitter can be used for marketing. I was already managing multiple Twitter accounts when I started tweeting for @PeggyOlson, so I did to create another proof point. I thought it would be a great case study.

It turned out that I also enjoyed it. I’m a writer and a performer (I sing jazz under another pseudonym), so I got a charge out of entertaining people in this milieu – which I didn’t expect.

Here are a few links about the Mad Men on Twitter kerfuffle from August 2008:

http://bit.ly/vbeat 
“Apparently it wasn’t a spam issue, but rather a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice that Twitter’s support team responded to, co-founder Biz Stone tells me.”

http://bit.ly/binsider
“Deep Focus, the Web marketing group that works for AMC, tells us that they gently nudged their client into rescinding the DMCA takedown notice they&#039;d sent to Twitter.”

@CarriBugbee
Social Profiles: http://bit.ly/CarriB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the three Mad Men Tweeters (@PeggyOlson) who was affected by the Twitter take-down, I can clarify why it is everyone thought it was a DMCA issue initiated by AMC: it was widely reported in the press. Journalists and bloggers reported that Twitter responded to a DMCA takedown notice and then Deep Focus “nudged” AMC in a different direction (see links below).</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, we (and tens of thousands of Mad Men fans on Twitter) were very happy to be re-instated and continue tweeting for the characters. As a marketer, I certainly never intended to “brand-jack” AMC. I’d never even heard of the term. Nor had I heard of fan fiction. While I love the show, I’m not the type to engage in fandom. It’s very time consuming to research plots and attempt to speak authentically in a TV character’s voice – in 140 characters. This is why Twitter is littered with abandoned fictional characters.</p>
<p>I did it because I wanted to explore all the ways Twitter can be used for marketing. I was already managing multiple Twitter accounts when I started tweeting for @PeggyOlson, so I did to create another proof point. I thought it would be a great case study.</p>
<p>It turned out that I also enjoyed it. I’m a writer and a performer (I sing jazz under another pseudonym), so I got a charge out of entertaining people in this milieu – which I didn’t expect.</p>
<p>Here are a few links about the Mad Men on Twitter kerfuffle from August 2008:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/vbeat" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/vbeat</a><br />
“Apparently it wasn’t a spam issue, but rather a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice that Twitter’s support team responded to, co-founder Biz Stone tells me.”</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/binsider" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/binsider</a><br />
“Deep Focus, the Web marketing group that works for AMC, tells us that they gently nudged their client into rescinding the DMCA takedown notice they&#8217;d sent to Twitter.”</p>
<p>@CarriBugbee<br />
Social Profiles: <a href="http://bit.ly/CarriB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/CarriB</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

