It’s completely obvious she just made it up isn’t it? She doesn’t have access to classified information about China, and she made it up.

Yes, there should be an investigation. Oh,you mean into O’Donnell.

The kind of thing you say when you’re an obscure candidate running in a small state?

Now if you want to talk about dealings with China look no further than Bill and Hillary Clinton

Extra, Extra! Let’s discuss one of the most obscure points by a candidate that has very little chance of winning!
mmm, unemployment?, what ever happened to Iran(no big deal), iraq, Afghanistan?(everyday on the news when Bush was in office), economy? Gas(went up $,.10 yesterday, must be those nasty oilmen in the WH).

Nope let’s focus attack machine on this woman, maddow(the smartest woman in the world……….)

Mediaite is doing their part as the Leftist MSM to vilify Conservatives and not post articles about Liberal candidates.

Yo, Rach….the criminal investigation should be done to find out why/how/what` you, Olbie, Angry Edie, Angry Larry and Chris Tingle are doing on the airwaves period. I mean, is msNBC trying to become the new comedy central? What a waste of tv time.

What’s the big deal? Maybe she needs a few bucks? She can just do a Clinton and sell them off to the Chinese.
But do we really need to worry as long as we have Al Frankin’ guarding things, it’s all good!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvgMIerTXl4

Check it out — on November 2, voters will decide who wins

435 seats in the House of Representatives
37 Senate seats
37 Governorships
and many, many state and local positions, initiatives, etc.

Yet the leftwing media is obsessed with one race, namely the Delaware senate race — a supposedly safe Democrat senate in a Blue State against a supposedly unelectable candidate. And why is that? Because the Left picks issues to discuss based on what subjects work best in comedy routines.

So, clearly, if you think politics is joke, and just good for laughs, you really ought to vote Democrat. But if you have a genuine concern for the economy, the war on terror and all those other issues that never get mentioned by Maddow, Olbermann, Stewart, Colbert, Maher, etc., you are advised to go with the people who take matters seriously.

The GOP mouthpiece returns. Do you get paid to be a cheerleader?

Baggers don’t want their jokes to be talked about, but shes your nut, own her!

Good luck wth Steele and Mad Dog Grayson, now that’s comedy.

felixw said:
Check it out — on November 2, voters will decide who wins 435 seats in the House of Representatives37 Senate seats37 Governorshipsand many, many state and local positions, initiatives, etc. Yet the leftwing media is obsessed with one race, namely the Delaware senate race — a supposedly safe Democrat senate in a Blue State against a supposedly unelectable candidate. And why is that? Because the Left picks issues to discuss based on what subjects work best in comedy routines. So, clearly, if you think politics is joke, and just good for laughs, you really ought to vote Democrat. But if you have a genuine concern for the economy, the war on terror and all those other issues that never get mentioned by Maddow, Olbermann, Stewart, Colbert, Maher, etc., you are advised to go with the people who take matters seriously.

You have lied. Again. There has been tremendous amounts of coverage about a number of races, AK-Senate, AR-Senate, CA-Gov, CA-Senate, CT-Senate, DE-Senate, Fl-Senate, IL-Senate, MO-Senate, PA-Senate, SC-Gov, TX-Gov, WA-Senate, WI-Senate and others have all been covered rather extensively.

I assume the reason you lied is because you couldn’t articulate your whine without lying.

There needs to be an investigation in to how Rachel Maddow got a tv show?
She should be the big star on the new lesbian network.

Penguin60 said:
Good luck wth Steele and Mad Dog Grayson, now that’s comedy.

See Phelix, even Penguin has helped me. Yet another race garnering attention.

gordonbloyershow said:
There needs to be an investigation in to how Rachel Maddow got a tv show?She should be the big star on the new lesbian network.

That’s vile. Your hideousness is far more than skin deep.

There, there, old timer.

I believe, technically, an investigation is triggered when such a breach of security is confessed. However, it is so obvious that Randi the witch is just a pathetic, attention-seeking yet media eschewing liar that an investigation is not warranted.

This reminds me of some pesky neighbor eyeballing the mailbox next door to make sure there’s no termites in it while their own house is burning to the ground. Aren’t there any bigger fish to fry, Rachel? They should call it “The Rachel Maddow Show featuring Christine O’Donnell.” Even Glynnis sees that.

Often during King’s Navy JAG days, a recess would be called so they could change him.

timcajun said:
Baggers don’t want their jokes to be talked about, but shes your nut, own her!

All the Marys in Heaven know we have our own, but I find Randi particularly enjoyable. As nutty and self-absorbed as the Drop Out Governor, but in a fun sort of way ….

That’s okay, King. Lots of people your age get cranky. Of course, your meanness and hatefulness is taking it a bit far, but we understand.

gordonbloyershow said:
There needs to be an investigation in to how Rachel Maddow got a tv show?
She should be the big star on the new lesbian network.

If you have a show (of any kind) the standards must be nonexistent. And you have the humor of an adolescent male who is concerned because he’s discovering that he is not attracted to the opposite sex.

You gotta love the Harry Potter/O’Donnell backdrop, though. Clever, if a little snarky. Christine should embrace it.

The Real Royal King said:
See Phelix, even Penguin has helped me. Yet another race garnering attention.

Has maddow even mentioned either of these 2 embarrassments?

paulmdoro said:
If you have a show (of any kind) the standards must be nonexistent. And you have the humor of an adolescent male who is concerned because he’s discovering that he is not attracted to the opposite sex.

He doesn’t have a show.

He spent a cable of years boring some old guy who lost his remote and had to stay on cable access. Somehow, he lost that. I can’t imagine how one loses a cable access show. For years, we had a late Saturday night show called “Painting With Poo”. I’ll let figure out the plot.

Penguin60 said:
Has maddow even mentioned either of these 2 embarrassments?

Grayson, for sure, and Steele, I believe.

paulmdoro said:
If you have a show (of any kind) the standards must be nonexistent. And you have the humor of an adolescent male who is concerned because he’s discovering that he is not attracted to the opposite sex.

When is your brain transplant? We will all be awaiting the outcome. I know the chimps brain will be an improvement for you.

gordonbloyershow said:
When is your brain transplant? We will all be awaiting the outcome. I know the chimps brain will be an improvement for you.

Is that the best you can do? Now I just feel bad. It’s like arguing with a third-grader. Or someone with learning disabilities. Oh wait….

The Real Royal King said:
He spent a cable of years boring some old guy who lost his remote and had to stay on cable access. Somehow, he lost that. I can’t imagine how one loses a cable access show. For years, we had a late Saturday night show called “Painting With Poo”. I’ll let figure out the plot.

Should we call the grammar police on you? ……….I’ll let figure out the plot.

RRK you really need to take your crap some place where it is welcome. Maybe the White House?

paulmdoro said:
Is that the best you can do? Now I just feel bad. It’s like arguing with a third-grader. Or someone with learning disabilities. Oh wait….

When you get a real name I might try harder for you. When you stop taking the drugs you might stop watching the Cartoon Network.

gordonbloyershow said:
When you get a real name I might try harder for you. When you stop taking the drugs you might stop watching the Cartoon Network.

Maybe you should start making sense, difficult as that might be.

The Real Royal King said:
I believe, technically, an investigation is triggered when such a breach of security is confessed. However, it is so obvious that Randi the witch is just a pathetic, attention-seeking yet media eschewing liar that an investigation is not warranted.

You, Mediaite and the dumbest “Rhode Scholar” on the planet have no clue. All you need to get a clearance is…

Secret clearance is a background check going back 10 years. Top Secret goes 15 or 20, and no polygraph. You want get this factual information from MSM, MEDIAITE or Media Matters…

The Real Royal King said:
You have lied. Again. There has been tremendous amounts of coverage about a number of races, AK-Senate, AR-Senate, CA-Gov, CA-Senate, CT-Senate, DE-Senate, Fl-Senate, IL-Senate, MO-Senate, PA-Senate, SC-Gov, TX-Gov, WA-Senate, WI-Senate and others have all been covered rather extensively.

I assume the reason you lied is because you couldn’t articulate your whine without lying.

Can you count, RRK? If you can, go and count the number of articles here on O’Donnell and Witchcraft, and you will see that this issue is dominating the coverage in the leftwing media.

Whoops, I forgot…that would require you to count to double digits, and when you run out of fingers you are in deep trouble. As we have seen by your frequent mathematically-challenged posts here.

Maybe you should just stick with nursery rhymes.

Like saying he went to college, law school, then was in JAG during Vietnam. But if you say he must be pushing seventy, he gets upset. Oops.

That’s a remarkably clumsy effort to cover your lie. You said the “leftwing media is obsessed”. You did not say “Mediaite is obsessed”. Clumsy. CLUMSY. C L U M S Y.

The hypocrisy of Maddow is astounding, I don’t seem to remember this level of outrage whenever TNYT or the WaPo prints leaked information. Also, isn’t she the same person who recently lamented that ODonnell’s people kicked her out of campaign headquarters? And all the poor girl was doing was being respectful of O’Donnell, I recall her saying.

This girl must be scarring the hell out of Democrats? The constant, Ms.Madd-cow attempt to make her look crazy is really becoming transparent. Ms.Madd-cow “doth protest too much”!!

“You, Mediaite and the dumbest “Rhode Scholar” on the planet have no clue. All you need to get a clearance is…

Secret clearance is a background check going back 10 years. Top Secret goes 15 or 20, and no polygraph. You want get this factual information from MSM, MEDIAITE or Media Matters…”

Um…. how to best say this….

Got it. You are wrong.

Those are the, approximate, details of the requirements for the background checks for a clearance (though completely and validating an EPSQ, is also needed, as well as some more detailed checks, even for a Secret depending on agency and access desired, but I digress).

The most important part, however, is an agency (be it a part of the DoD, DoE, Dept. of State, etc.) has to request it. Then, once the justification for the clearance has been seen to be proper, the background check can be started.

Once the clearance is granted (from as little as 2-3 months for a secret, as long as 2 years for a TS/SCI, or a Q (which is a DoE specific clearance, relating to issues of Nuclear Proliferation, and always added as a form of SCI to a TS, but again, I digress), then the person is cleared to see classified materials for which that person has a need to know.

So, if I have a TS/SCI:Q, and a Secret document, about a program I have not been read on to comes into the office, my boss can’t show me, nor may I demand of a subordinate that I be shown the information. I may have a clearance which is higher than the material but without a need to know it’s a federal felony to tell me about it.

If O’Donnel had a clearance, she would be committing such a crime to share the information. Her declarations of having had one, and that she was sharing classified information, is presumptive evidence to deny her a clearance. She does not show the discretion needed to be trusted with information which cannot be shared.

(I apologise for the jargon, but 16 years dealing with such issues makes it hard to explain without using technical terms.

Maddow is such a drama queen. Voters from both parties, in November, will be willing to vote for Lucifer, just to get rid of the DC political establishment, of both parties. Change takes time.

ChickaBOOMer| Rachel Maddow: Plum Wrong
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2010/10/rachel-maddow-plum-wrong.html

Something tells me that Maddcoww is just jealous, knoing it is a lie, and she couldn’t have gotten the information had it been true. What a terrible person who thinks she is a journalist. All she does is try to dig up dirt on a person, and if she can’t, WELL she just makes it up. That goes for her brother in politics, KEFF Olberrmmaann!

gordonbloyershow said:
There needs to be an investigation in to how Rachel Maddow got a tv show?
She should be the big star on the new lesbian network.

You spew hatred just like your identical cousin Rushbo.
Still, they’re cousins,
Identical cousins and you’ll find,
They laugh alike, they walk alike,
At times they even talk alike –

You can lose your mind,
When cousins are two of a kind.

gordonbloyershow said:
There needs to be an investigation in to how Rachel Maddow got a tv show?
She should be the big star on the new lesbian network.

Rachel Maddow does not need defending, but she is being denigrated because she is a lesbian woman, not because she is wrong. She is one of the most intelligent political commentators on TV, and yet it is pointed out time and again, that she’s a lesbian woman. Does that mean we should discard her opinions?

Please, add a brilliant idea to conversations such as this instead of writing for the thousandth time that Rachel Maddow is a lesbian woman as if that were a pejorative.

It is so easy to make the libs go crazy. Just mention the truth about a lib. I do this on purpose and they fall for it everytime.
Tell lies about conservative women or make a false attack on Limbaugh or Bush and you never hear a peep of outrage. They are sooooooooooooooooooooo funny.

What difference does it make if Maddow is a lesbian? Are the conservatives upset because Maddow won’t go out with Dick Cheneys daughter?

“A conservative women” Really? Subject and verb should agree in gender and number.

Does this have any relevance to your comment? Sort of, because this sort of irrelevant, non-related fact is an ad hominem attack; her sexual preference, no matter if she likes women, men, singly, in mixed groups, or not at all, has nothing to do with her merits as a commentator.

As to your allegation of lies…. care to point at them? O’Donnell claims to have classified information. One of the requirements of access to classified information is a legal obligation to not disclose it to anyone who does not have both the appropriate level of clearance, and the need to know.

The public at large does not have either (in the legal sense. Were China actually bent on, “taking over” the US, that would be a different matter, they aren’t so it’s not. If you want to argue they are using their ability to provide cheap labor, rare earth minerals, the purchase of our debt, in the hope of establishing hegemony, the case might be made, but that’s not, “taking over,” and so not material).

So, either O’Donnell is, to use a technical term, making shit up, or committing a crime.

To argue that she lied, in a cheap attempt to gain national security credibility with credulous is probably the most charitable gloss one can put on the matter.

Latin2 said:
Now if you want to talk about dealings with China look no further than Bill and Hillary Clinton

And while you’re discussing that part of the globe, how about Madame Halfbright who danced around with Kim Jong Il, as she passed the technology that enabled North Korea to build its atom bomb?

MerryMarjie said:
Rachel Maddow does not need defending, but she is being denigrated because she is a lesbian woman, not because she is wrong.

I didn’t know she was a lesbian. All I know is that I don’t find much ground with those who support socialism, communism, fascism, marxism, or the so-called “progressive” movement. Oh, and I also don’t support people who cannot speak in a civil manner on those matters with which they do not agree. As far as being a lesbian is concerned, I’ve gotta tell you, had I been born a woman, I would probably have been a lesbian, too. There’s NOTHING sexy about any men I’ve ever seen.

CAconservative said:
This girl must be scarring the hell out of Democrats? The constant, Ms.Madd-cow attempt to make her look crazy is really becoming transparent. Ms.Madd-cow “doth protest too much”!!

People tend to react irrationally when they are afraid.