Thanks. great massive info(information) here keep up Culinary Skills Egg Salad Recipe French Onion Soup Recipe the great worked. I cannot truly leave a more creative comment as i’m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.

It is bizarre to me that some claim Drudge writes the articles when clearly he compiles a variety of stories from a variety of sites. The thing I like best is links to ALL kinds of sites. I use his site to link into the Huff Post and Kos just to see the stupid stuff they are saying today. Like Sarah Palin using Canadian health care. It was her family using it in the 70s when she was under the 6 years old, idiots.

Of the few that do ask this obvious question, most will further extend the attacks to the people who read Drudge (and of course watch Fox news). They’ll call those people rednecks, hicks, tea-baggers, and even racists. They’ll portray them as hateful, intellectually inferior, and simple-minded but only a scarce few will ever confront the fact that people are just plain old sick and tired of only hearing one side of the story.

To distill what CalFel88 said above, “Your Time is UP!”

I go to sites from both sides of the aisle, read them all and make my own decisions and am gratified that I can get all sides. Take the “Tea Party” for instance and look at what light NBC and CNN puts on them then check Fox News and see what they say then perhaps go to the Tea Party website and see what they stand for and go to one of their rallies, then and only then tell me who is biased!

If this interview gets the attention it deserves he should be laughed out of the WH press corps.

1) Let’s be honest. They just flat out HATE that someone like Drudge interferes with their pro-Obama agenda. Case in point, right after the election, Todd’s comrade in arms Chris Matthews declaring…on the air no less…that it was his JOB to “make sure that Obama succeeded”. Which was obviously the height of hypocrisy. After all, when Bush was elected did Matthews say THEN that it was his patriotic duty to “make sure” Bush succeeded? Hell no. He…like the rest of the staff at MSNBC…felt it was his patriotic duty to always question things and to press at Bush in an aggressive Woodward and Bernstein Washington Post / Watergate style.

2) But the BIGGEST problem with Todd’s whiny brat complaining is there is a BIG difference between Fox and MSNBC. And that’s the pure simple fact that even if you accuse Fox of taking a few “talking points” from the Drudge web site, at least Fox DOESN’T have Drudge actively on the air all the time, peddling his personal politics.

Meanwhile, in direct comparison at MSNBC, not only DO they pick which stories to cover based on “talking points” from the Huffington Post and the Daily Kos — but worst of all, the network DOES actively promote Arianna Huffington and Markos Moulitsas as two of their core political commentators, at which point they are NEVER challenged. MSNBC just gives them unfettered air time to use MSNBC as their personal propaganda broadcast outlet.

Before you say something, Chuck, think how it might be used against you.

Drudge allows the reader to see all sources of info and make decisions based on facts…not liberal ideological filters!

http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=22069

Chuck Todd is nothing but a partisan hack now, and has zero credibility just like all the rest of these has-beens in the LSM.

http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=21729

Um, if it isn’t bias that keeps them spiking the stories, what is it? Stupidity? Just ‘forcing’ something into the spotlight doesn’t say anything about bias, but spiking things does. Think before you speak M, you prove yourself a fool otherwise.
http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=22306&cpage=1#comment-27030

And the worst thing a journalist can do is pick up a Drudge story? How about the worst thing a journalist can do is not report the news? Or let a dictator control what you say? Or pull stuff out of your ass?

Or how about calling yourself a journalist when you’re not?