<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times Touts AOL&#8217;s Inflated Traffic; Ignores Internet Trickery Behind It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-touts-aols-inflated-traffic-ignores-internet-trickery-behind-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-touts-aols-inflated-traffic-ignores-internet-trickery-behind-it/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colby Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-touts-aols-inflated-traffic-ignores-internet-trickery-behind-it/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=13829#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Hi Conrad - thanks for your interest. Not sure if you and I are looking at the same page (or maybe our definitions are different) but I count plenty of links to their own blogs. Which is fine - great for traffic. And I don&#039;t that bloggers are getting unwanted editorial direction from AOL either.

I just think that the traffic reports for AOL blogs are somewhat misleading, without disclosure of the promotional real estate they get for free on the aol welcome screen.

Colby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Conrad &#8211; thanks for your interest. Not sure if you and I are looking at the same page (or maybe our definitions are different) but I count plenty of links to their own blogs. Which is fine &#8211; great for traffic. And I don&#8217;t that bloggers are getting unwanted editorial direction from AOL either.</p>
<p>I just think that the traffic reports for AOL blogs are somewhat misleading, without disclosure of the promotional real estate they get for free on the aol welcome screen.</p>
<p>Colby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="283900920">Conrad Quilty-Harper</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-touts-aols-inflated-traffic-ignores-internet-trickery-behind-it/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="283900920">Conrad Quilty-Harper</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=13829#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>Wrote a little post in response, entitled &quot;AOL’s blog traffic comes from AOL.com? Idontthinkso&quot;

http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/08/17/aols-blog-traffic-comes-from-aolcom-idontthinkso/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrote a little post in response, entitled &#8220;AOL’s blog traffic comes from AOL.com? Idontthinkso&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/08/17/aols-blog-traffic-comes-from-aolcom-idontthinkso/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/08/17/aols-blog-traffic-comes-from-aolcom-idontthinkso/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
