<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert Murdoch Wants All His Sites Removed From Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: THEMEDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-10734</link>
		<dc:creator>THEMEDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-10734</guid>
		<description>Please, please, please, how do we encourage this to happen? The positive impact on humanity of having &quot;Faux News&quot; removed from Google News results is incalculable. Do we need a petition? Heck, I&#039;d be willing to donate. Dear, god, I need to go change my pants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please, please, how do we encourage this to happen? The positive impact on humanity of having &#8220;Faux News&#8221; removed from Google News results is incalculable. Do we need a petition? Heck, I&#8217;d be willing to donate. Dear, god, I need to go change my pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9215</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9215</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Joe Callan says: 
November 10, 2009 at 7:06 am&lt;/i&gt;

We should all be so lucky to &quot;flail&quot; like him.  Multiple highly profitable media outlets, while the rest of the landscape contracts... yeah, I think I&#039;ll defer to him on this one, he&#039;s got the experience and resume to suggest he knows what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Joe Callan says:<br />
November 10, 2009 at 7:06 am</i></p>
<p>We should all be so lucky to &#8220;flail&#8221; like him.  Multiple highly profitable media outlets, while the rest of the landscape contracts&#8230; yeah, I think I&#8217;ll defer to him on this one, he&#8217;s got the experience and resume to suggest he knows what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Callan</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9184</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Callan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9184</guid>
		<description>Rupe doesn&#039;t have to listen to anyone. He can keep kicking himself in the balls until his stone cold body is buried beneath the outback. He clearly can&#039;t cope with a changing world, and his flailing is rather entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupe doesn&#8217;t have to listen to anyone. He can keep kicking himself in the balls until his stone cold body is buried beneath the outback. He clearly can&#8217;t cope with a changing world, and his flailing is rather entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFPhoto</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9169</link>
		<dc:creator>SFPhoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9169</guid>
		<description>Why would Rupert Murdoch, a grillionair, listen to a putz like m?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Rupert Murdoch, a grillionair, listen to a putz like m?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9154</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9154</guid>
		<description>Google will never give a cut of their revenue. Why should they? Even suggesting something like it is just ridiculous and preposterous. Makes no business sense. Google News isn&#039;t the Apple App Store or iTunes Store. 

If anything, it should be the reverse: News Corp ought be begging for Google to even allow them to be apart of the search results.

Markos Moulitsas had a great point: Google should just pre-emptively block all of News Corps search results (in Google News). Just do it right now. It&#039;s not that difficult. After a while Murdoch will realize its insanely stupid. Yes, it cuts into your own revenue. But the amount of traffic getting lost not just from lack of Google hits, but also from blocking out timid web surfers through locking content, will probably make him reconsider his strategy. He&#039;s in the news providing business - not exactly something that&#039;s unique on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will never give a cut of their revenue. Why should they? Even suggesting something like it is just ridiculous and preposterous. Makes no business sense. Google News isn&#8217;t the Apple App Store or iTunes Store. </p>
<p>If anything, it should be the reverse: News Corp ought be begging for Google to even allow them to be apart of the search results.</p>
<p>Markos Moulitsas had a great point: Google should just pre-emptively block all of News Corps search results (in Google News). Just do it right now. It&#8217;s not that difficult. After a while Murdoch will realize its insanely stupid. Yes, it cuts into your own revenue. But the amount of traffic getting lost not just from lack of Google hits, but also from blocking out timid web surfers through locking content, will probably make him reconsider his strategy. He&#8217;s in the news providing business &#8211; not exactly something that&#8217;s unique on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9114</guid>
		<description>I wonder if we&#039;re missing part of the story here.  Are we talking about Google the search engine, providing links to NewsCorp websites... or are we talking about Google News, taking stories?  You know, when you search for a story, and it comes up as part of Google News.  Either way, I&#039;m not sure this is a solid strategy.

Although... I do understand some of the argument.  I know, I know... a &quot;real journalist&quot; isn&#039;t supposed to put themselves in someone else&#039;s shoes, when that person is on the right, associated with FOX in any way, or somehow doing something not Democratic Party approved ... but hear me out.  Google has become a HUGE empire, and has done so on the backs of other people&#039;s hard work.  They&#039;re a search engine, so they direct people to the stuff that other people have done, and make money in the process.

From a business and financial point of view, why should they make money of MY effort?  If it weren&#039;t for me producing a product someone wants, they wouldn&#039;t have anything to point to, and thusly wouldn&#039;t be able to make huge profits.  Shouldn&#039;t I then get some of that money?

Now, IMO, Google  return is seen by increased traffic to the site, and that&#039;s how money is made... so the going through the effort of trying to collect from Google (or any search engine) might prove difficult, and a net negative... especially if Google takes you off the map.  So, this could all be for show... perhaps Google caves first, saying &quot;We want your product on our site, we&#039;ll give you a cut of the revenue.&quot;  But perhaps Google sees it as a slippery slope, ignores NewsCorp, and then who&#039;s the winner?  If I had to guess, it&#039;s a little pushing and shoving, and we&#039;ll see who blinks first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we&#8217;re missing part of the story here.  Are we talking about Google the search engine, providing links to NewsCorp websites&#8230; or are we talking about Google News, taking stories?  You know, when you search for a story, and it comes up as part of Google News.  Either way, I&#8217;m not sure this is a solid strategy.</p>
<p>Although&#8230; I do understand some of the argument.  I know, I know&#8230; a &#8220;real journalist&#8221; isn&#8217;t supposed to put themselves in someone else&#8217;s shoes, when that person is on the right, associated with FOX in any way, or somehow doing something not Democratic Party approved &#8230; but hear me out.  Google has become a HUGE empire, and has done so on the backs of other people&#8217;s hard work.  They&#8217;re a search engine, so they direct people to the stuff that other people have done, and make money in the process.</p>
<p>From a business and financial point of view, why should they make money of MY effort?  If it weren&#8217;t for me producing a product someone wants, they wouldn&#8217;t have anything to point to, and thusly wouldn&#8217;t be able to make huge profits.  Shouldn&#8217;t I then get some of that money?</p>
<p>Now, IMO, Google  return is seen by increased traffic to the site, and that&#8217;s how money is made&#8230; so the going through the effort of trying to collect from Google (or any search engine) might prove difficult, and a net negative&#8230; especially if Google takes you off the map.  So, this could all be for show&#8230; perhaps Google caves first, saying &#8220;We want your product on our site, we&#8217;ll give you a cut of the revenue.&#8221;  But perhaps Google sees it as a slippery slope, ignores NewsCorp, and then who&#8217;s the winner?  If I had to guess, it&#8217;s a little pushing and shoving, and we&#8217;ll see who blinks first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timzank</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9108</link>
		<dc:creator>timzank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9108</guid>
		<description>Take this with a huge grain of salt. The entire article and it&#039;s subsequent speculation is based upon the opening phrase &quot;Rupert Murdoch has suggested&quot;.....

That&#039;s a far cry from a &quot;done deal&quot; from the shrewdest guy in the media business. Sounds more like an opening salvo for some sort of negotiation regarding compensation &amp; use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take this with a huge grain of salt. The entire article and it&#8217;s subsequent speculation is based upon the opening phrase &#8220;Rupert Murdoch has suggested&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a far cry from a &#8220;done deal&#8221; from the shrewdest guy in the media business. Sounds more like an opening salvo for some sort of negotiation regarding compensation &amp; use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/rupert-murdoch-wants-all-his-sites-removed-from-google/#comment-9087</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43988#comment-9087</guid>
		<description>Bad business strategy. A large percentage of steady hits come from Google. Blocking yourself from Google is like slitting your own throat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad business strategy. A large percentage of steady hits come from Google. Blocking yourself from Google is like slitting your own throat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

