<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steal This Post! You&#8217;ve Got Permission.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/steal-this-post-youve-got-permission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/steal-this-post-youve-got-permission/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Seward</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/steal-this-post-youve-got-permission/#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Seward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=16002#comment-3198</guid>
		<description>To be fair to old media, Somari, I think Business Insider was inspired by Reuters, which also allows embeds of its content. They &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-publish-reuters-copy-on-your-site-for-free-legally-2009-6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;praised&lt;/a&gt; it in June. A few other thoughts...

Blodget &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-go-ahead-embed-this-post-2009-8#comment-4a8d9eb6e17c333a616290a1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt; he might try finding a sponsor for this, which makes sense. But I wonder if he isn&#039;t also motivated by keeping BI&#039;s text out of search results for other sites. Duplicate content hurts SEO. And what happens if BI folds or stops supporting this feature? Copying and pasting plain text has its advantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to old media, Somari, I think Business Insider was inspired by Reuters, which also allows embeds of its content. They <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-publish-reuters-copy-on-your-site-for-free-legally-2009-6" rel="nofollow">praised</a> it in June. A few other thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>Blodget <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-go-ahead-embed-this-post-2009-8#comment-4a8d9eb6e17c333a616290a1" rel="nofollow">said</a> he might try finding a sponsor for this, which makes sense. But I wonder if he isn&#8217;t also motivated by keeping BI&#8217;s text out of search results for other sites. Duplicate content hurts SEO. And what happens if BI folds or stops supporting this feature? Copying and pasting plain text has its advantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Gotkin</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/steal-this-post-youve-got-permission/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gotkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=16002#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>More evidence that sharing news is better than trying to keep it quarantined and cut off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More evidence that sharing news is better than trying to keep it quarantined and cut off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shomari Hines</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/steal-this-post-youve-got-permission/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Shomari Hines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=16002#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>Again a new media operation trumps old media. This is something that would have been great for newspaper websites such as NYtimes, WSJ etc. It carries the brand of the original publisher and it it will no doubt send traffic back to the original source if readers find a particular article interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again a new media operation trumps old media. This is something that would have been great for newspaper websites such as NYtimes, WSJ etc. It carries the brand of the original publisher and it it will no doubt send traffic back to the original source if readers find a particular article interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

