<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gawker Decade: How Gawker Media Defined The 2000s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennielynsan</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-381495</link>
		<dc:creator>jennielynsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 05:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-381495</guid>
		<description>This is wonderful of the greatest blogs in the area of educational activity. If I don&#039;t came in for a couple of days, there are so many stakes that it&#039;ll lead me a couple of hr just to go all over whatever I missed!! Congratulations.

Thanks. wonderful great info. here keep up &lt;a href=&quot;http://culinary-skills.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Culinary Skills&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://eggsalad-recipe.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Egg Salad Recipe&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://frenchonionsouprecipess.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;French Onion Soup Recipe&lt;/a&gt;  the great work. I cannot genuinely provide a more constructive commentary as i&#039;m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wonderful of the greatest blogs in the area of educational activity. If I don&#8217;t came in for a couple of days, there are so many stakes that it&#8217;ll lead me a couple of hr just to go all over whatever I missed!! Congratulations.</p>
<p>Thanks. wonderful great info. here keep up <a href="http://culinary-skills.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Culinary Skills</a>  <a href="http://eggsalad-recipe.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Egg Salad Recipe</a>  <a href="http://frenchonionsouprecipess.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">French Onion Soup Recipe</a>  the great work. I cannot genuinely provide a more constructive commentary as i&#8217;m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvin81</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-137457</link>
		<dc:creator>corvin81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-137457</guid>
		<description>Hello,hi i celebrate your special article, I would be glad if you would want me to blog a bloomy review on this wordpress site in my little Blog Site would you grant me permission to? 

Sincerely, John Peds
Author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://how-to-cook-delicious-salmon.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how to cook salmon&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,hi i celebrate your special article, I would be glad if you would want me to blog a bloomy review on this wordpress site in my little Blog Site would you grant me permission to? </p>
<p>Sincerely, John Peds<br />
Author of <a href="http://how-to-cook-delicious-salmon.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">how to cook salmon</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magister</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-13798</link>
		<dc:creator>Magister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-13798</guid>
		<description>@abesauer: I&#039;m still weighing my potential comment on the post as a whole, but as an avid Gawker consumer, I have to say that out of all the blogs I read, I&#039;m pretty confident that I click on Gawker ads more than those from any other source. 

If I were in charge of Denton&#039;s ad department (or if I was otherwise employed by his empire), I might do a couple of things differently, but I think one of the true measures of internet advertising is the click-through rate and based on my own behavior, I&#039;d think the Gawker conglomerate is doing well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@abesauer: I&#8217;m still weighing my potential comment on the post as a whole, but as an avid Gawker consumer, I have to say that out of all the blogs I read, I&#8217;m pretty confident that I click on Gawker ads more than those from any other source. </p>
<p>If I were in charge of Denton&#8217;s ad department (or if I was otherwise employed by his empire), I might do a couple of things differently, but I think one of the true measures of internet advertising is the click-through rate and based on my own behavior, I&#8217;d think the Gawker conglomerate is doing well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abesauer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-13796</link>
		<dc:creator>abesauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-13796</guid>
		<description>*Adweek*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Adweek*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abesauer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-13795</link>
		<dc:creator>abesauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-13795</guid>
		<description>@Robert. Maybe. I would hazard that part of why this seems true is that the media types who read/write Agweek and Gawker and such blogs THINK this is true because the media they consume has been so influenced. From the Gawker stable I would point to Deadspin being FAR more influential on its overall niche. It changed sports journalism completely and, unlike Gawker which snarks ON the media conversation, Deadspin actually drives and crafts the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert. Maybe. I would hazard that part of why this seems true is that the media types who read/write Agweek and Gawker and such blogs THINK this is true because the media they consume has been so influenced. From the Gawker stable I would point to Deadspin being FAR more influential on its overall niche. It changed sports journalism completely and, unlike Gawker which snarks ON the media conversation, Deadspin actually drives and crafts the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Quigley</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-13786</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-13786</guid>
		<description>@abesauer: I read the Gawker award as a roundabout way to recognize Gawker Media as a brand. The techier/geekier blogs got way more votes from readers, Gawker traffic isn&#039;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quantcast.com/gawker.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;astonishing&lt;/a&gt;, compared to some of what&#039;s out there, and there&#039;s the resistance to advertisers thing you mentioned.

But in terms of being an &#039;influencer&#039; and coming up with the template by which people write on and for the Internet, Gawker is the pivot point, even as others pilfer and tweak what they&#039;ve done. Hey look, the topic of this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@abesauer: I read the Gawker award as a roundabout way to recognize Gawker Media as a brand. The techier/geekier blogs got way more votes from readers, Gawker traffic isn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/gawker.com" rel="nofollow">astonishing</a>, compared to some of what&#8217;s out there, and there&#8217;s the resistance to advertisers thing you mentioned.</p>
<p>But in terms of being an &#8216;influencer&#8217; and coming up with the template by which people write on and for the Internet, Gawker is the pivot point, even as others pilfer and tweak what they&#8217;ve done. Hey look, the topic of this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abesauer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comment-13782</link>
		<dc:creator>abesauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=54792#comment-13782</guid>
		<description>Drudge must be fuming. (Or does he think himself above &quot;blog?&quot;)

Anyway, I find it incredibly ironic that Gawker would receive this award from AdAge. It remains a mystery to me why an advertiser would pay to be on Gawker, a site whose user demographic largely disparages the kind of ad messages often found on the site. Sure the pageviews are there but... How is &quot;snarky&quot; an attractive psychographic to any advertiser? Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel have much more attractive readers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drudge must be fuming. (Or does he think himself above &#8220;blog?&#8221;)</p>
<p>Anyway, I find it incredibly ironic that Gawker would receive this award from AdAge. It remains a mystery to me why an advertiser would pay to be on Gawker, a site whose user demographic largely disparages the kind of ad messages often found on the site. Sure the pageviews are there but&#8230; How is &#8220;snarky&#8221; an attractive psychographic to any advertiser? Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel have much more attractive readers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

