<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Reason For White House Feud With Fox? Health Care Reform.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8320</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8320</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;m says: 
October 31, 2009 at 11:13 am&lt;/i&gt;

Why don&#039;t you enlighten me then, M?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>m says:<br />
October 31, 2009 at 11:13 am</i></p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you enlighten me then, M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeclever</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8281</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeclever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8281</guid>
		<description>Check out this website about global warming:

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9406</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this website about global warming:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9406" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9406</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeclever</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeclever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>I believe in the scientific method.  However, if you believe that all &quot;empirical&quot; research is true you only have to go as far as Grayson&#039;s use of a paper on how many people have died without insurance.  Michelle Malkin has a complete summary of the paper on her website.  Studies are misused all the time.

Gore wrote &quot;An Inconvenient Truth&quot; but he also the creator of the internet (so he has said).  There is a new film coming out about the public has received a pack of lies concerning global warming and other issues related to it.  I try to have an open mind and I watch different networks to not be locked into a belief system but right now I am thinking the Fox is telling the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in the scientific method.  However, if you believe that all &#8220;empirical&#8221; research is true you only have to go as far as Grayson&#8217;s use of a paper on how many people have died without insurance.  Michelle Malkin has a complete summary of the paper on her website.  Studies are misused all the time.</p>
<p>Gore wrote &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; but he also the creator of the internet (so he has said).  There is a new film coming out about the public has received a pack of lies concerning global warming and other issues related to it.  I try to have an open mind and I watch different networks to not be locked into a belief system but right now I am thinking the Fox is telling the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8264</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8264</guid>
		<description>&gt;And get their funding from governments, who like to use “global warming” and “climate change” as campaign issues.

Wow. You have absolutely no idea how science works.  If that properly qualifies to you as an argument &quot;against global warming&quot; then you&#039;re jaw-droppingly uninformed about the scientific process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;And get their funding from governments, who like to use “global warming” and “climate change” as campaign issues.</p>
<p>Wow. You have absolutely no idea how science works.  If that properly qualifies to you as an argument &#8220;against global warming&#8221; then you&#8217;re jaw-droppingly uninformed about the scientific process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinac</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>martinac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>I am not sure of the thing that the administration is after Fox for that particular reason. We can&#039;t  say anything before the air is cleared. But I don&#039;t know what you wnat to mean by saying &quot;Anita Dunn — who wasn’t mentioned once in August — has been referenced 121 times this month&quot;. How soon you will update your blog? I want to have more updates regarding this issue.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vitabits.co.uk/vitamins&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vitamins&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure of the thing that the administration is after Fox for that particular reason. We can&#8217;t  say anything before the air is cleared. But I don&#8217;t know what you wnat to mean by saying &#8220;Anita Dunn — who wasn’t mentioned once in August — has been referenced 121 times this month&#8221;. How soon you will update your blog? I want to have more updates regarding this issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vitabits.co.uk/vitamins" rel="nofollow">vitamins</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lanquihue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>lanquihue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>I disagree. I think the administration went after Fox for two other reasons. First, Beck, a non-journalist alcoholic disc-jockey, did what &#039;real&#039; journalists avoided on purpose, and exposed a bunch of Obama&#039;s people as radical leftists with outrageous views. Obama is used to being worshiped by adoring but ignorant south Chicago rabble and given a free ride by Pravda, and Beck pisses him off. Second, and this is the biggie, Fox was the only one who ran with the Acorn story initially, and had they not, it would have been the lore of right wing blogs, and something that would have been passed off as a couple of bad-apple employees that were quickly dumped. Acorn took a huge financial and PR hit, and these are the people who&#039;re really responsible for Obama and the people who pull his strings. Without Acorn, the SEIU, and the vast network of radical left wing entities that make up their family, Obama would still be just another unknown race baiter in Chicago, and he knows it. When Acorn gets pissed, and you know that they were mega-pissed, Obama had better try something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. I think the administration went after Fox for two other reasons. First, Beck, a non-journalist alcoholic disc-jockey, did what &#8216;real&#8217; journalists avoided on purpose, and exposed a bunch of Obama&#8217;s people as radical leftists with outrageous views. Obama is used to being worshiped by adoring but ignorant south Chicago rabble and given a free ride by Pravda, and Beck pisses him off. Second, and this is the biggie, Fox was the only one who ran with the Acorn story initially, and had they not, it would have been the lore of right wing blogs, and something that would have been passed off as a couple of bad-apple employees that were quickly dumped. Acorn took a huge financial and PR hit, and these are the people who&#8217;re really responsible for Obama and the people who pull his strings. Without Acorn, the SEIU, and the vast network of radical left wing entities that make up their family, Obama would still be just another unknown race baiter in Chicago, and he knows it. When Acorn gets pissed, and you know that they were mega-pissed, Obama had better try something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8238</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8238</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ays: 
October 30, 2009 at 9:18 pm

There’s a reason why stronger welfare states weren’t hit as hard in this recession.&lt;/i&gt;

Which states are you talking about... specifically... M?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ays:<br />
October 30, 2009 at 9:18 pm</p>
<p>There’s a reason why stronger welfare states weren’t hit as hard in this recession.</i></p>
<p>Which states are you talking about&#8230; specifically&#8230; M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8237</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8237</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ted Silliman says: 
October 30, 2009 at 6:44 pm&lt;/i&gt;

Gee... Ted, I&#039;d sure like to know where you got your numbers from.  Because they&#039;re all wrong...

Here&#039;s the info from Real Clear Politics:

Generic Congressional Ballot - Dem +5.5 (45.0/39.5)
Congressional Approval - 24.8% (to 66.4% neg)

And from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/123854/Conservatives-Maintain-Edge-Top-Ideological-Group.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gallup...&lt;/a&gt;
Political Party Identification:
40% Conservative
36% Moderate
20% Liberal

So there you have it.  Thanks for playing, please try again.

&lt;i&gt;m says: 
October 30, 2009 at 9:12 pm
Even if 99% of Americans don’t believe in global warming doesn’t mean it isn’t occurring.&lt;/i&gt;

Um, I believe it&#039;s supposed to be called &quot;climate change,&quot; because people realized the world wasn&#039;t getting &quot;warmer,&quot; and this was generic enough to sound like something and still be nothing.  Be prepared for future warnings of &quot;Global Precipitation Plummeting&quot; followed by &quot;Fragmented Glacial Dissention of H2O Molecules.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;I trust the scientific community, which is in basically 99% agreement (give and take a couple of 0.01%) that climate change and global warming is underway.&lt;/i&gt;

Man... I hope that &quot;climate change&quot; fends off &quot;global warming.&quot;  Maybe we can get them to work together!

&lt;i&gt;I trust scientists, because they study the empirical.&lt;/i&gt;

And get their funding from governments, who like to use &quot;global warming&quot; and &quot;climate change&quot; as campaign issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ted Silliman says:<br />
October 30, 2009 at 6:44 pm</i></p>
<p>Gee&#8230; Ted, I&#8217;d sure like to know where you got your numbers from.  Because they&#8217;re all wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the info from Real Clear Politics:</p>
<p>Generic Congressional Ballot &#8211; Dem +5.5 (45.0/39.5)<br />
Congressional Approval &#8211; 24.8% (to 66.4% neg)</p>
<p>And from <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123854/Conservatives-Maintain-Edge-Top-Ideological-Group.aspx" rel="nofollow">Gallup&#8230;</a><br />
Political Party Identification:<br />
40% Conservative<br />
36% Moderate<br />
20% Liberal</p>
<p>So there you have it.  Thanks for playing, please try again.</p>
<p><i>m says:<br />
October 30, 2009 at 9:12 pm<br />
Even if 99% of Americans don’t believe in global warming doesn’t mean it isn’t occurring.</i></p>
<p>Um, I believe it&#8217;s supposed to be called &#8220;climate change,&#8221; because people realized the world wasn&#8217;t getting &#8220;warmer,&#8221; and this was generic enough to sound like something and still be nothing.  Be prepared for future warnings of &#8220;Global Precipitation Plummeting&#8221; followed by &#8220;Fragmented Glacial Dissention of H2O Molecules.&#8221;</p>
<p><i>I trust the scientific community, which is in basically 99% agreement (give and take a couple of 0.01%) that climate change and global warming is underway.</i></p>
<p>Man&#8230; I hope that &#8220;climate change&#8221; fends off &#8220;global warming.&#8221;  Maybe we can get them to work together!</p>
<p><i>I trust scientists, because they study the empirical.</i></p>
<p>And get their funding from governments, who like to use &#8220;global warming&#8221; and &#8220;climate change&#8221; as campaign issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>&gt;Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.

Socialism saved us from that already. Thanks to government rules &amp; interference and a social welfare network, we&#039;re not experiencing another Great Depression. The free market is that it doesn&#039;t establish any safety net from ensuring we all don&#039;t live on the streets and eat dog food. If a recession brings the entire country down with it - so be it - it&#039;s the free market! Fortunately, since we already experienced that in the early 20th century and enacted proper policies, we didn&#039;t slip into that slope this time. There&#039;s a reason why stronger welfare states weren&#039;t hit as hard in this recession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.</p>
<p>Socialism saved us from that already. Thanks to government rules &amp; interference and a social welfare network, we&#8217;re not experiencing another Great Depression. The free market is that it doesn&#8217;t establish any safety net from ensuring we all don&#8217;t live on the streets and eat dog food. If a recession brings the entire country down with it &#8211; so be it &#8211; it&#8217;s the free market! Fortunately, since we already experienced that in the early 20th century and enacted proper policies, we didn&#8217;t slip into that slope this time. There&#8217;s a reason why stronger welfare states weren&#8217;t hit as hard in this recession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8234</guid>
		<description>&gt; Most Americans do not believe in global warming

Even if 99% of Americans don&#039;t believe in global warming doesn&#039;t mean it  isn&#039;t occurring. If a majority of Americans didn&#039;t believe in theory of relativity or gravity doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re not true. Personal opinion has no influence in what the scientific facts are. The truth is the truth. I trust the scientific community, which is in basically 99% agreement (give and take a couple of 0.01%) that climate change and global warming is underway. I trust science, because it&#039;s about the empirical truth. I trust scientists, because they study the empirical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Most Americans do not believe in global warming</p>
<p>Even if 99% of Americans don&#8217;t believe in global warming doesn&#8217;t mean it  isn&#8217;t occurring. If a majority of Americans didn&#8217;t believe in theory of relativity or gravity doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not true. Personal opinion has no influence in what the scientific facts are. The truth is the truth. I trust the scientific community, which is in basically 99% agreement (give and take a couple of 0.01%) that climate change and global warming is underway. I trust science, because it&#8217;s about the empirical truth. I trust scientists, because they study the empirical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeclever</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeclever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.  Sorros and Obama are aware of this.  If you read about Saul Alinsky (sp?) and Soros and you look at decisions that President Obama is making, it is obvious where we are headed.

Really enjoyed Beck&#039;s show tonight about global warming.  Most Americans do not believe in global warming yet policies are being developed and have been developed that are trumping more important issues.

I am hoping that the health care plan the dems are putting together will fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.  Sorros and Obama are aware of this.  If you read about Saul Alinsky (sp?) and Soros and you look at decisions that President Obama is making, it is obvious where we are headed.</p>
<p>Really enjoyed Beck&#8217;s show tonight about global warming.  Most Americans do not believe in global warming yet policies are being developed and have been developed that are trumping more important issues.</p>
<p>I am hoping that the health care plan the dems are putting together will fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeclever</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8232</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeclever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8232</guid>
		<description>Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.  Sorros and Obama are aware of this.  If you read about Saul Alinsky (sp?) and Soros and you look at decisions that President Obama is making, it is obvious where we are headed.

Realy enjoyed Beck&#039;s show tonight about global warming.  Most Americans do not believe in global warming yet policies are being developed and have been developed that are trumping more important issues.

I am hoping that the health care plan the dems are putting together will fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top economists have said that the US is headed towards third world status.  Sorros and Obama are aware of this.  If you read about Saul Alinsky (sp?) and Soros and you look at decisions that President Obama is making, it is obvious where we are headed.</p>
<p>Realy enjoyed Beck&#8217;s show tonight about global warming.  Most Americans do not believe in global warming yet policies are being developed and have been developed that are trumping more important issues.</p>
<p>I am hoping that the health care plan the dems are putting together will fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisNH</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8229</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8229</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what the context of &#039;truce&#039; really is here. Does it mean that FNC will stop turning over the numerous rocks in this administration? With an utterly compliant congress and a media that is, too, where else to turn when someone wants an analysis of 1,990 pages of stuff that will affect us and our children? I&#039;m not about to take MSNBC&#039;s word for it that &#039;all will be swell.&#039; I need someone to turn to page 819 and tell me that, yep, &#039;Death Panels&#039; are still in there. Seriously, I want someone to READ this thing and tell me what&#039;s in it. I don&#039;t expect that will come from the NYT, MSNBC, CNN or any other the other members of Obama&#039;s compliant media friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what the context of &#8216;truce&#8217; really is here. Does it mean that FNC will stop turning over the numerous rocks in this administration? With an utterly compliant congress and a media that is, too, where else to turn when someone wants an analysis of 1,990 pages of stuff that will affect us and our children? I&#8217;m not about to take MSNBC&#8217;s word for it that &#8216;all will be swell.&#8217; I need someone to turn to page 819 and tell me that, yep, &#8216;Death Panels&#8217; are still in there. Seriously, I want someone to READ this thing and tell me what&#8217;s in it. I don&#8217;t expect that will come from the NYT, MSNBC, CNN or any other the other members of Obama&#8217;s compliant media friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1203235293">Ted Silliman</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8227</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1203235293">Ted Silliman</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8227</guid>
		<description>Of course this is what I&#039;ve said numerous times here and elsewhere.  Repubs getting played, falling right into the trap while HCR is being negotiated.  Reform is a foregone conclusion, just a matter of what the final bill will look like.

This is an administration that is busy making policy.  It obviously knows that it can only get this done by distracting the gullible cable news stations, Fox in particular.

At the same time it appears that Fox is winning this &quot;battle&quot; with the White House, here is evidence that the White House is winning the war:

51-39 edge in generic congressional ballot (bigger spread than in &#039;06 and &#039;08)
20% self-id as Republican (lowest in a quarter century)
(R) congressional approval 14% (-10 since Sept.)
(D) congressional approval  41% (+8 since Sept.)

The vast majority of America does not watch cable news, nor do they follow the day to day punditry of the insular DC crowd.  We are part of a hyperinformed community that lives and dies on the &quot;game&quot; of politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course this is what I&#8217;ve said numerous times here and elsewhere.  Repubs getting played, falling right into the trap while HCR is being negotiated.  Reform is a foregone conclusion, just a matter of what the final bill will look like.</p>
<p>This is an administration that is busy making policy.  It obviously knows that it can only get this done by distracting the gullible cable news stations, Fox in particular.</p>
<p>At the same time it appears that Fox is winning this &#8220;battle&#8221; with the White House, here is evidence that the White House is winning the war:</p>
<p>51-39 edge in generic congressional ballot (bigger spread than in &#8216;06 and &#8216;08)<br />
20% self-id as Republican (lowest in a quarter century)<br />
(R) congressional approval 14% (-10 since Sept.)<br />
(D) congressional approval  41% (+8 since Sept.)</p>
<p>The vast majority of America does not watch cable news, nor do they follow the day to day punditry of the insular DC crowd.  We are part of a hyperinformed community that lives and dies on the &#8220;game&#8221; of politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=40597#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>Okay, let&#039;s assume this is true (I remain unconvinced)... but we&#039;ll assume for argument&#039;s sake.

Did it work?

That&#039;s the big question... did it work?  I think we&#039;d be hard pressed to conclude that this was somehow a win for the White House.  Let&#039;s look at the two stories:

1) FNC War - The WH (as the article says) didn&#039;t win the war, came out looking foolish and petty, and FNC reaped the benefits of higher ratings, while forcing many of their competitors to defend them.  So that’s a big negative.

2) Healthcare - If they wanted to distract the public from healthcare, well the feud didn&#039;t last long enough.  We talked about the war for what, 3 weeks?  Now it will be back to healthcare almost 100%, and with the &quot;release&quot; of the almost 2000 page document, I think we&#039;ll be talking about it.  Perhaps the plan was to fight up until the bill was about to get voted on... but that didn&#039;t happen.  Now people think the WH is petty, AND they&#039;re skeptical about the healthcare bill... a lose lose.

Personally, I think the WH really can&#039;t stand criticism, and decided to go after FNC as a punishment for Van Jones, ACORN, and others.  The timing in regards to healthcare is just a coincidence (a month later and it would have been to distract from the November elections... or Iran... or Afghanistan... or whatever).  As the AP story demonstrated, they don&#039;t like being told &quot;You&#039;re wrong,&quot; and this attack on FOX was simply an attack on ALL media outlets, warning them to watch their tongues.  It has since backfired big time... and now, limping away from a fight they should never have gotten into, they have to try to sell healthcare to the &quot;morons and idiots&quot; they just spent October insulting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let&#8217;s assume this is true (I remain unconvinced)&#8230; but we&#8217;ll assume for argument&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>Did it work?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the big question&#8230; did it work?  I think we&#8217;d be hard pressed to conclude that this was somehow a win for the White House.  Let&#8217;s look at the two stories:</p>
<p>1) FNC War &#8211; The WH (as the article says) didn&#8217;t win the war, came out looking foolish and petty, and FNC reaped the benefits of higher ratings, while forcing many of their competitors to defend them.  So that’s a big negative.</p>
<p>2) Healthcare &#8211; If they wanted to distract the public from healthcare, well the feud didn&#8217;t last long enough.  We talked about the war for what, 3 weeks?  Now it will be back to healthcare almost 100%, and with the &#8220;release&#8221; of the almost 2000 page document, I think we&#8217;ll be talking about it.  Perhaps the plan was to fight up until the bill was about to get voted on&#8230; but that didn&#8217;t happen.  Now people think the WH is petty, AND they&#8217;re skeptical about the healthcare bill&#8230; a lose lose.</p>
<p>Personally, I think the WH really can&#8217;t stand criticism, and decided to go after FNC as a punishment for Van Jones, ACORN, and others.  The timing in regards to healthcare is just a coincidence (a month later and it would have been to distract from the November elections&#8230; or Iran&#8230; or Afghanistan&#8230; or whatever).  As the AP story demonstrated, they don&#8217;t like being told &#8220;You&#8217;re wrong,&#8221; and this attack on FOX was simply an attack on ALL media outlets, warning them to watch their tongues.  It has since backfired big time&#8230; and now, limping away from a fight they should never have gotten into, they have to try to sell healthcare to the &#8220;morons and idiots&#8221; they just spent October insulting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
