Comments on: WaPo: Money Talks, But Not for Froomkin http://www.mediaite.com/online/wapo-money-talks-but-not-for-froomkin/ Mediaite Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06 By: Timothy Dee Micheli http://www.mediaite.com/online/wapo-money-talks-but-not-for-froomkin/#comment-413 Timothy Dee Micheli Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:55:13 +0000 http://www.mediaite.com/?p=4045#comment-413 Cute... delete my comment and fix your typo (which, of all things, lampooned WaPo typos!). It's as if it never occurred! Raising the public's opinion of MSM one whitewash at a time. Is this standard procedure at Mediaite? If so, this will be one of my last visits. Accountability, we hardly knew ye. Just wanted to reiterate my initial critique of the "substance" in this post: Accepting their defense at face value without follow-up is evidence of nothing. "It looks the theory he wasn’t generating enough hits on his blog may be more accurate than he would let on" Without objective evidence to the contrary, this is meaningless If this is deleted again, I'll know never to come back and to report your policies to the blogosphere. Stay Classy, Mediaite!. Cute… delete my comment and fix your typo (which, of all things, lampooned WaPo typos!). It’s as if it never occurred! Raising the public’s opinion of MSM one whitewash at a time. Is this standard procedure at Mediaite? If so, this will be one of my last visits. Accountability, we hardly knew ye.

Just wanted to reiterate my initial critique of the “substance” in this post: Accepting their defense at face value without follow-up is evidence of nothing. “It looks the theory he wasn’t generating enough hits on his blog may be more accurate than he would let on” Without objective evidence to the contrary, this is meaningless

If this is deleted again, I’ll know never to come back and to report your policies to the blogosphere. Stay Classy, Mediaite!.

]]>