As the Obama administration and lawmakers get closer to agreeing on the terms of a Shield Law, investigative reporters (and even unpaid bloggers) might soon be protected from subpoenas and legal pressure to reveal their sources.

At the end of September, President Obama said that he would oppose a bill that protects reporters who don’t reveal sources that leak national security information from serving prison time.

From the New York Times‘ Caucus blog:

Under the proposed agreement, a so-called media shield law would allow federal judges to quash subpoenas against reporters if they determine that the public interest in the news outweighed the government’s need to uncover the leaker – including, in some circumstances, disclosures of classified national security information …

“We’ve come a long way in these negotiations and have now reached a compromise that strikes the right balance between national security concerns and the public’s right to know,” [Senator Chuck] Schumer said in a statement. “This new version preserves a strong protection for reporters interested in protecting their sources, while also making sure that the government can still do the job of protecting its citizens.”

Investigative reporters need protection now more than ever, but we certainly don’t envy any judge who has to weight the public’s right to know against national security. Sounds like a disaster.

Related: Obama Pushing For Legislation That Might Have Sent Woodward & Bernstein To Jail [Mediaite]

Read Shield Law Compromise Would Protect Reporters and Bloggers [NYT Caucus]