<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; Dunn Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/dunn-fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>White House&#8217;s Anita Dunn Shreds Fox News Again, Fox Responds</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-houses-anita-dunn-shreds-fox-news-again-fox-responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-houses-anita-dunn-shreds-fox-news-again-fox-responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunn Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunn Mao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunn White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fnc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News vs. The White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News vs. White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck Anita Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griff Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannity Anita Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major garrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mao Zedong Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Christopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House vs. Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=46279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outgoing White House Communications Director <strong>Anita Dunn</strong> made a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/dunn-takes-parting-shot-a_n_357202.html">parting strafing run</a> at Fox News on Friday, calling the network out for <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-apologizes-for-inadvertent-use-of-912-crowd-footage/">airing misleading crowd footage</a>, jumping the gun on<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-major-garrett-to-interview-president-obama/"> an announcement of a Presidential interview</a> and letting its <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-29-2009/for-fox-sake-">opinion tail wag the news dog</a>. In doing so, she heavily name-checked her should-be successor, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/hannity-tea-party-footage-daily-show/"><em>The Daily Show</em>'s Jon Stewart</a>. Fox News' spokespeople responded swiftly, passively and aggressively.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-46334" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/610x-300x289.jpg" alt="Obama's Team" width="216" height="208" />Outgoing White House Communications Director <strong>Anita Dunn</strong> made a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/dunn-takes-parting-shot-a_n_357202.html">parting strafing run</a> at Fox News on Friday, calling the network out for <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-apologizes-for-inadvertent-use-of-912-crowd-footage/">airing misleading crowd footage</a>, jumping the gun on<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-major-garrett-to-interview-president-obama/"> an announcement of a Presidential interview</a> and letting its <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-29-2009/for-fox-sake-">opinion tail wag the news dog</a>. In doing so, she heavily name-checked her should-be successor, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/hannity-tea-party-footage-daily-show/"><em>The Daily Show</em>&#8216;s Jon Stewart</a>.<span id="more-46279"></span></p>
<p>Fox News&#8217; spokespeople responded swiftly, passively and aggressively.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a sampling of Dunn&#8217;s remarks (<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/dunn-takes-parting-shot-a_n_357202.html">via HuffPo</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A fun fact from this week is that an opinion show on a certain news network was <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-apologizes-for-inadvertent-use-of-912-crowd-footage/">using edited footage to make it appear </a>that a rally last week, and political opposition to the president, was much larger than it appeared,&#8221; said Dunn, during her appearance at the Bloomberg News Washington Summit. &#8220;Some of you may have heard about it. The people who went in and did fact checking on that, and actually exposed the spliced edited was&#8230; Jon Stewart of the &#8216;Daily Show&#8217; on Comedy Central. Well that is where you are getting fact-checking and investigative journalism these days folks. It is a different media environment.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>She rewound a little bit to talk about the bleed-through of Fox&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/whats-right-and-wrong-with-the-white-houses-posture-on-fox-news/2/">opinion programs to their news desk</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;&#8221;Jon Stewart actually did one of the most <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-29-2009/for-fox-sake-">amazing pieces of journalism</a> last week or a couple of weeks ago,&#8221; she said, &#8220;in which he looked at the way Fox, on their opinion shows, raises some issue that then gets reported on by their news division as &#8216;a controversy.&#8217; &#8230; Now, that&#8217;s a point of view. That&#8217;s fine. That&#8217;s entertainment. It helps their ratings. But I think if you go downstairs and walk through the Newseum that&#8217;s not traditionally what you think of as traditional news &#8212; to some extent inventing the story.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On reports <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-major-garrett-to-interview-president-obama/">leaked to Drudge</a>, and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/11/obama-to-give-interview-t_n_354457.html">confirmed by Fox News</a>, that <strong>Major Garrett</strong> had scored an interview with the President on his current Asia trip:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have on past foreign trips done what are called round-robins where there are short interviews with all of the networks that travel with us,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We have not made a decision network on whether or not we are going to do those. There are no confirmed television interviews in china. And if, oh, some network sent out a press release announcing that was going to happen you&#8217;d have to ask about that network and whether or not they really had their facts confirmed before they leaked that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/fox-news-responds-to-anit_n_357645.html">Fox News responded</a> by wishing Dunn well. <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/architect-of-white-house-attacks-on-fox-news-anita-dunn-leaving-at-end-of-month/">Again</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We wish her well in her new position where we&#8217;re sure she&#8217;ll continue providing brilliant strategic vision,&#8221; a Fox News spokesperson told the Huffington Post in response to Dunn&#8217;s parting shots against the network.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fox&#8217;s laudatory view of Dunn&#8217;s strategy may have been sarcastic, but as our own <strong>Colby Hall</strong> pointed out, that strategy <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-reason-for-the-white-houses-feud-with-fox-health-care/">did accomplish a very important mission</a>. Furthermore, although the White House <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/when-the-president-wrestles-fox-news-who-wins-pundits-weigh-in/">took heavy criticism</a> while the feud raged on, since the<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-confirms-meeting-with-white-house/"> ostensible truce</a>, Fox has been reinforcing the White House&#8217;s view. In addition to <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-apologizes-for-inadvertent-use-of-912-crowd-footage/">the Hannity incident</a>, Fox&#8217;s response to Dunn points up a more recent example. Of the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-major-garrett-to-interview-president-obama/">reported Presidential interview</a>, Fox News issued a strangely damning correction:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Once again, Anita has her facts wrong,&#8221; the spokesperson said. &#8220;Fox News never issued a press release.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Anita was only half-wrong. While she did reference a press release, she also characterized the story as a leak. By denying issuing a press release, Fox appeared to be copping to the leak. And if Fox New was in fact behind the leak &#8212; did their zeal to juxtapose Dunn&#8217;s exit &#8212; with news of a &#8220;major&#8221; get &#8212; prove the White House&#8217;s point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/white-houses-anita-dunn-shreds-fox-news-again-fox-responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

