<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; El Completo Ginsburg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/el-completo-ginsburg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on Univisión: Lost in Translation</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-on-univision-lost-in-translation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-on-univision-lost-in-translation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jose Simian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Completo Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge Ramos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jose Simian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meet The Prensa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Univision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=26328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what did President Obama <a href="http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml;jsessionid=JH3PSF3SQJSRUCWIAA4SFFIKZAADWIWC?cid=2094571">say to Univisión</a>? It was hard to tell.</p> <p>As I began to watch the interview he gave to Jorge Ramos, I found myself moving closer and closer to the TV, as if I were deciphering a strange language. The premier Spanish network had made the awful choice of dubbing instead of subtitling the interview.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Obama-Univision.jpg" alt="Obama Univision" title="Obama Univision" width="280" height="201" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26340" />So what did President Obama <a href="http://www.univision.com/content/content.jhtml;jsessionid=JH3PSF3SQJSRUCWIAA4SFFIKZAADWIWC?cid=2094571">say to Univisión</a>? It was hard to tell.</p>
<p>As I began to watch the interview he gave to Jorge Ramos, I found myself moving closer and closer to the TV, as if I were deciphering a strange language. The premier Spanish network had made the awful choice of dubbing instead of subtitling the interview.<span id="more-26328"></span></p>
<p>It took me back to my childhood, watching Hollywood films on Chilean TV on endless school afternoons—suffering because cowboys, pirates, lawyers and superheroes shared the same toothpaste-commercial voices. Later on, my brother and I turned this nonsense into a game: who could name more films or series in which this same overdubbing artist had taken over a famous actor.</p>
<p>But the miseries of being born on the wrong side of English stop being funny when you are trying to understand what the President is saying on relevant matters, and another voice paired with a lousy sound mix make it impossible. (The internet version sounds much better.)</p>
<p>Yet, the problem is not only that sound mixing may be tricky and the dubbing artist may remind you of the Latin American translation of Homer Simpson (which <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ER84JDZffg&amp;feature=related">it did</a>). Univisión’s choice was regrettable because what makes dubbing movies simply wrong (beautifully explained by Dolores Prida in the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/latino/2008/08/06/2008-08-06_i_lost_it_at_the_movies.html"><em>Daily News</em></a>) applies to politics, too: much of what is being said resides in accents, pauses and inflections.</p>
<p>So yesterday I didn’t really watch President Obama talk to the millions of Hispanics who regularly tune into Univisión—a historic occasion, indeed.</p>
<p>It was something else. And I hated it.</p>
<p>And this is not to say that the interview wasn’t good. Jorge Ramos is a solid interviewer and displayed his skills by asking Obama three times if he had the votes to approve health care reform, pressing him to clarify his stance on health benefits for illegal immigrants; reminding him of the economic cost of forcing immigrants to use emergency rooms; questioning his switch from talking about “undocumented immigrants” to “illegal immigrants;” and reminding him of his promise of immigration reform during his first year in government.</p>
<p>Particularly on the last two topics, Ramos dealt significant blows to Obama: his change of words to refer to illegal immigrants is a sensitive topic among many Hispanics, and his answer (that he was merely replying to the attacks from the right in their own terms) was not convincing; on the latter, it is by now obvious that his promise of immigration reform in 2009 will not be fulfilled.</p>
<p>In other words, Ramos made the President tumble in the eyes of Hispanics.</p>
<p>But it was all lost in translation, and by that point, most of Univisión’s audience (who can most likely read subtitles and understand English at the same time) may have switched to another outlet—one in which they could hear their President with their own ears.</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="380" src="http://www.univision.com/content/flashvideo/embed.jhtml?vars=videoCID%3D2094467" width="400"></iframe> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-on-univision-lost-in-translation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Rude! President Obama&#8217;s Favorite Four-Letter Word To Describe The Media</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/president-obamas-favorite-four-letter-word-to-describe-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/president-obamas-favorite-four-letter-word-to-describe-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glynnis MacNicol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessandra Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Completo Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Face the Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanpoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanye West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Morning Talk Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week with George Stephanopoulos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=26171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did <strong>President Obama's</strong> Sunday media blitz make a difference?  It's hard to tell, though the headlines would suggest that the takeaway thus far seems to be split between issues of race and Obama's ability to manage the media.  So what if anything did this uber media savvy President have to say about the press is spends so much of his time courting?  Mostly that the media loves <em>rude</em>.   And he said it a lot. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-67.png" alt="Picture 6" title="Picture 6" width="265" height="221" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26215" />Did <strong>President Obama&#8217;s</strong> Sunday media blitz make a difference?  It&#8217;s hard to tell, though the headlines would suggest that the takeaway thus far seems to be split between issues of race and Obama&#8217;s ability to manage the media.  Also, the lack of a takeaway line &#8212; beyond the fact Obama is still holding out for the White Sox &#8212; is telling.  <strong>Kanye West</strong> may be a jackass but he also has his own viral twitter avatar &#8212; rude works!  As the President is apparently painfully aware.  Alas, considering the White House prides itself on being our first 2.0 presidency they don’t appear to package soundbites all that well these days!<span id="more-26171"></span></p>
<p>However!  That&#8217;s not to say the President didn&#8217;t repeat himself.  In today&#8217;s <em>New York Times</em> <strong>Alessandra Stanley</strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/21/us/politics/21watch.html?_r=1&#038;ref=todayspaper">says</a> the interviews were &#8220;as tightly choreographed — and eerily similar — as the multiple Magritte bowler-hatted men milling in the remake of “The Thomas Crown Affair.”&#8221;  Snap!  But what if anything did this uber media savvy President have to say about the press is spends so much of his time courting?  Mostly that the <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-21/america-mouths-off/?cid=hp:blogunit1">media loves</a> <em>rude</em>.   And he said it a lot.  </p>
<p>Obama used the word <em>rude</em> in no less than four interviews when talk turned to media coverage (perhaps this is the PC translation of &#8216;jackass&#8217;).  So there you have it, turns out the President know exactly what it takes to get on a TV in a &#8220;hot second&#8221; he&#8217;s just not employing it because, in the words of <strong>Peggy Noonan</strong> he&#8217;s doing so much TV because &#8220;because he can, because people do what they know how to do.&#8221;  Maybe he will embrace his own &#8220;rude&#8221; side this evening when he stops by <strong>David Letterman</strong>.  One can only hope.  The health care bill needs a slogan!  In the meantime here&#8217;s a &#8216;rude&#8217; look at Sunday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obamas-magical-media-tour-who-had-the-best-interview/">magical media tour</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><strong>“The media encourages some of the outliers in behavior, because, let&#8217;s face it, the easiest way to get on television right now is to be really rude.”</strong></span></span></em></p>
<p><strong><br />
ABC&#8217;s <em>This Week With George Stephanopoulos</em></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>And &#8212; and sometimes I think that, frankly, the media encourages some of the outliers in behavior, because, let&#8217;s face it, <strong>the easiest way to get on television right now is to be really rude</strong>. If you&#8217;re just being sensible and giving people the benefit of the doubt and you&#8217;re making your arguments, you don&#8217;t &#8212; you don&#8217;t get &#8212; you don&#8217;t get time on the nightly news.</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: You might on Sunday morning, but&#038;</p>
<p>OBAMA: But if you &#8212; if you say something outrageous, you&#8217;re there in a hot second. </p></blockquote>
<p><strong>CBS <em>Face the Nation</em></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>And I have to, one last point I&#8217;ve got to make, Bob, and that is I do think part of what&#8217;s different today is that the twenty-four-hour news cycle and cable television and blogs and all this, they focus on the most extreme elements on both sides. They can&#8217;t get enough of conflict, it&#8217;s catnip to the media right now. <strong>And so the easiest way to get 15 minutes of fame is to be rude to somebody.</strong> In that environment I think it makes it more difficult for us to solve the problems that the American people sent us here to solve.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>NBC <em>Meet the Press</em></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
And— unfortunately, we&#8217;ve got, as I&#8217;ve said before, a 24-hour news cycle where what gets you on the news is controversy.  What gets you on the news is the extreme statement.  <strong>The easiest way to get 15 minutes on the news, or your 15 minutes of fame, is to be rude</strong>&#8230;Well, you know, the— I— I— I do occupy— a pretty special seat at the moment.  But— but I do think that— look I mean, let&#8217;s face it, the— if you look at the news cycle over the last— over the last week— you know, it— it— it hasn&#8217;t been the— the sensible people who, you know, very deliberately talk about the important issues that we face as a country.  That&#8217;s not the folks who&#8217;ve gotten a lot of coverage.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>CNN <em>State of the Union</em></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think it&#8217;s important for the media, you know &#8211; not to do any media-bashing here &#8211; to recognize that right now, in this 24-hour news cycle, <strong>the easiest way to get on CNN is or Fox or any of the other stations, MSNBC is to say something rude and outrageous</strong>&#8230;If you&#8217;re civil and polite and you&#8217;re sensible and you don&#8217;t exaggerate the-bad things about your opponent and you know, you might get on one of the Sunday shows. But you&#8217;re not going to be on the loop. And, you know, part of what I&#8217;d like to see is all of us reward decency and civility in our political discourse.</p></blockquote>
<p>(h/t <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/09/20/sunday-obamathon-turns-media-critique-says-press-perpetuating-rude-behavi">Newsbusters</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/president-obamas-favorite-four-letter-word-to-describe-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Magical Media Tour: Who Had The Best Interview?</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obamas-magical-media-tour-who-had-the-best-interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obamas-magical-media-tour-who-had-the-best-interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Krakauer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Completo Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Face the Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meet the Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week with George Stephanopoulos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=25920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pres. <strong>Barack Obama</strong> has now completed his <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-pull-off-unprecendented-quintuple-sunday-show-circuit-but-no-fox/"target="_blank">unprecedented Sunday show media blitz</a> ("<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/el-completo-ginsburg/">El Completo Ginsburg</a>"), and all the interviews have aired.

We took a look at how the four interviews went (excluding Univision for this post), and what was learned, looking at several categories: number of questions, first, last and best question and how the host handled <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/are-there-people-out-there-who-dont-like-me-because-of-race-im-sure-there-are/">the all-important</a> "race" question. Here are the results:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pres. <strong>Barack Obama</strong> has now completed his <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-pull-off-unprecendented-quintuple-sunday-show-circuit-but-no-fox/"target="_blank">unprecedented Sunday show media blitz</a> (&#8220;<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/el-completo-ginsburg/">El Completo Ginsburg</a>&#8220;), and all the interviews have aired.</p>
<p>We took a look at how the four interviews went (excluding Univision for this post), and what was learned, based on several categories: number of questions, first, last and best question and how the host handled <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/are-there-people-out-there-who-dont-like-me-because-of-race-im-sure-there-are/">the all-important</a> &#8220;race&#8221; question. Here are the results:<span id="more-25920"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/thisweek_9-19.jpg" alt="thisweek_9-19" title="thisweek_9-19" width="276" height="226" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26013" /><b>ABC: <em>This Week</eM></b><br />
Total: 13 questions<br />
First question: &#8220;Senator Rockefeller and several other Democrats say that this bill by Senator Baucus is a big middle class tax increase. Do you agree and does that mean you can&#8217;t sign it?&#8221;<br />
Last question: &#8220;What&#8217;s the moment, in the last eight months, where you took a step back and said: ‘Wow, I&#8217;m going to have to step up my game’?&#8221;<br />
Race to the &#8220;race&#8221;: 9th question<br />
Best exchange: Stephanopoulos- &#8220;Merriam Webster&#8217;s Dictionary: Tax &#8211; &#8216;a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.&#8217;&#8221; Obama- &#8220;George, the fact that you looked up Merriam&#8217;s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you&#8217;re stretching a little bit right now.&#8221;<br />
Takeaway: <strong>George Stephanopoulos</strong> probably had the best closing question (there&#8217;s no doubt who had the worst &#8211; more on that later), and it really made the President come up with a unique answer. Also, the exchange about the dictionary was a lighter moment that gave Obama a nice opportunity for some ribbing. Stephanopoulos is a solid, fair interviewer. While most of the interview was serious and touched on the key points, the exchange felt a bit like an adviser to the President playing devil&#8217;s advocate. It gave a chance for some other perspective (Stephanopoulos talked about how certain topics would be perceived politically), but the tone of the interview made the questions less pointed.<br />
(<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/thisweek">See more here.</a>)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obama_9-18.jpg" alt="obama_9-18" title="obama_9-18" width="244" height="183" class="alignright size-full wp-image-26009" /><b>CBS: <em>Face the Nation</eM></b><br />
Total: 11<br />
First question: &#8220;Have you promised too much, Mr. President?&#8221;<br />
Last question: &#8220;Even people who agree that that missile system is out of place are asking questions. Shouldn&#8217;t you have tried to get something from the Russians in exchange for doing that?&#8221;<br />
Race to the &#8220;race&#8221;: 5th question<br />
Best question: &#8220;Seven former directors of the CIA have sent you a letter today asking you to reverse the decision of the Attorney General to reopen the criminal investigation of CIA interrogations that took place after the attacks on September 11th. Would you consider that?&#8221;<br />
Takeaway: <strong>Bob Schieffer</strong> conducted a calm, focused interview that hit the key points while extending to other areas like the CIA letter. It put Obama on his heels &#8211; but even with Schieffer&#8217;s follow-up, Obama didn&#8217;t give much of an answer. The final question ended the interview on a newsy note as well.<br />
(<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/20/ftn/main5324034.shtml">Here&#8217;s more.</a>)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cnn_9-19.jpg" alt="cnn_9-19" title="cnn_9-19" width="265" height="239" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26015" /><b>CNN: <em>State of the Union</em></b>-<br />
Total: 19 questions<br />
First question: &#8220;I get out of Washington every week for the show, in Connecticut and Rhode Island this week.  And I knew I was going to be seeing you, so I asked 20 people, &#8220;What would you ask if you had the privilege that I have at this moment?&#8221;  Eighteen of the twenty, eighteen, asked a variation of where are the jobs?  When are they coming back?&#8221;<br />
Last question: &#8220;I was on a college campus this week and at a lab where they&#8217;re trying to make an H1N1 vaccine.  As a parent with two daughters in school, how are you dealing with this?  And does the Obama family plan include a vaccine for you?&#8221;<br />
Race to the &#8220;race&#8221;: 16th question<br />
Best question: &#8220;Do you think President Karzai stole the election?&#8221;<br />
Takeaway: <strong>John King</strong> fit in 19 questions and didn&#8217;t rush the &#8220;race&#8221; question into the front of the a very wide-ranging interview. He even admitted in his final question he had gone over time &#8211; but he got in a question, and got an answer, sure to make headlines today. The very pointed exchange about Pres. Karzai was a winner as well &#8211; in fact, many of the foreign policy questions gave the CNN audience a perspective not seen in the other three.<br />
(<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/20/obama.king/index.html">More here.</a>)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mtp_9-19.jpg" alt="mtp_9-19" title="mtp_9-19" width="308" height="231" class="alignright size-full wp-image-26016" /><b>NBC: <em>Meet the Press</em></b>-<br />
Total: 10 questions<br />
First question: &#8220;At this point have you said, &#8216;I&#8217;ve laid out my plan. Take it all or nothing&#8217;?&#8221;<br />
Last question: &#8220;Who is your pick to win the World Series?&#8221;<br />
Race to the &#8220;race&#8221;: 5th and 6th question.<br />
Best exchange: Gregory- &#8220;Like the public option. You effectively said to the left, &#8216;It&#8217;s not gonna happen.&#8217;&#8221; Obama- &#8220;No, that&#8217;s not true. What I&#8217;ve said is the public option, I think, should be a part of this but we shouldn&#8217;t think that, somehow, that&#8217;s the silver bullet that solves health care.&#8221;<br />
Takeaway: <strong>David Gregory</strong>&#8216;s health care-related questions were strong, well-researched, and his follow-ups pushed the President to take a position. That said, he only got in 10 separate questions, and two related to the &#8220;race&#8221; issue. And one &#8211; well one was about baseball. It&#8217;s one thing to want to end the interview on a lighter note, as Gregory said, but it&#8217;s another to ask a question with such little relevance to the national debate as who the President wants in the World Series. Sure, maybe it&#8217;ll get ESPN to replay that portion. But John King going overtime to get the President to take a stand on vaccines, an important, but not pressing issue, only highlights the missed opportunity here by Gregory to really make each minute count.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32935752/ns/politics-white_house/">More here.</a>)</p>
<p><b>Winner</b>: CNN. Here&#8217;s their video:<br />
<script src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/js/2.0/video/evp/module.js?loc=dom&#038;vid=/video/politics/2009/09/20/king.obama.interview.cnn" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Embedded video from <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video">CNN Video</a></noscript><br clear="all" /></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&raquo; <a href="http://www.twitter.com/stevekrak">Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obamas-magical-media-tour-who-had-the-best-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Megan Fox Has In Common With Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/print/what-megan-fox-has-in-common-with-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/print/what-megan-fox-has-in-common-with-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Sklar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Samberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Completo Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer's Body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox Powerful Vagina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox Rolling Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox Vagina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Barack Obama Has In Common With]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=25923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You heard me. Aside from being an object of reverence fo millions and having a rather <em>shayna punim</em>, these two have something very specific in common.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-25924" title="megan-fox-cosmo-cover-photo-october-20091" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/megan-fox-cosmo-cover-photo-october-20091.jpg" alt="megan-fox-cosmo-cover-photo-october-20091" width="280" height="385" />You heard me. Aside from being an object of reverence for millions and having a rather <em>shayna punim</em>, these two have something very specific in common, tied to recent events. Yes, <strong>Megan Fox</strong> may give boys <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/about-800-pairs-of-megan-foxs-boobs/">the kind of heart palpitations requiring proper health care</a>, and yes President <strong>Barack Obama </strong>may be accused of <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1213056/Up-million-march-US-Capitol-protest-Obamas-spending-tea-party-demonstration.html">feeding on the taxpayer like a bloodsucking socialist vampire</a>, but actually it&#8217;s far more mundane than that: They&#8217;re both pretty expert at packaging — and using — their soundbites.<span id="more-25923"></span></p>
<p>We pointed that out about Obama yesterday, noting <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/are-there-people-out-there-who-dont-like-me-because-of-race-im-sure-there-are/">how similar his answers were</a> to <strong>John King</strong> and <strong>George Stephanopoulos</strong> for his <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/el-completo-ginsburg/">El-Completo-Ginsburg-Sunday-show-blitz</a>. But then we noticed that, for all the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/megan-fox-stimulus-media-leaves-no-stone-unturned/">kerfuffle about the pay-to-read Megan Fox <em>Rolling Stone</em> cover</a>, she&#8217;s on the cover of <em>Cosmopolitan</em>, with a coverline advertising &#8220;Juicy stuff she could only say in Cosmo!&#8221; Well&#8230;not quite. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Megan Fox in <em>Rolling Stone</em>, <a href="http://gawker.com/5362906/gawkers-guide-to-coverage-of-rolling-stones-coverage-of-megan-fox">talking about</a> her &#8220;powerful, confident vagina&#8221;: &#8220;Men are scared of vaginas&#8230;[a woman is most powerful when she is] completely in charge of her sexuality.&#8221; </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Megan Fox in <em>Cosmopolitan</em>, <a href="http://www.popcrunch.com/megan-fox-cosmopolitan-magazine-october-2009/">talking about</a> the power of &mdash; yep &mdash; vaginas: &#8220;Women hold the power because we have the vaginas. If you’re in a heterosexual relationship and you’re a female, you win.&#8221; </p>
<p>Fox also talks in both magazines about using that power to mess with men&#8217;s heads, saying in RS something to the effect of, she has harnessed her sexuality and knows how to use it to mess with men&#8217;s heads. (Paraphrased from scanning it earlier in a Duane Reade.) This, however, is backed up by what she told <em>Cosmo</em>: “It’s fun when someone intends to put you in his back pocket, but instead, he walks away wounded. I make it a mind game so they don’t know if I’m hitting on them or mocking them.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Rolling Stone</em>’s <strong>Erik Hedegaard</strong> also asks her, twice, if she&#8217;s ever drawn blood during sex. She responded by being &#8220;stonily silent.&#8221; <em>Cosmo </em>asked her about her ideal date. She responded with a Rosh Hashanah gift to Jewish men for the ages: &#8220;A sexy sandwich with <strong>Andy Samberg </strong>and <strong>Jonah Hill</strong>.&#8221; Verdict: <em>Cosmo</em> FTW!</p>
<p>To clarify: Barack Obama does <em>not </em>have that last bit in common with Megan Fox. And we&#8217;re sure he likes <strong>Michael Bay</strong> just fine. </p>
<p>Upshot: Both <em>Cosmo</em> and<em> Rolling Stone</em> were a-twitter about their Megan Fox exclusive, but as we have seen in the past, Megan Fox <a href="http://chitchatchica.com/2009/05/13/megan-fox-likes-to-toy-with-boys/">doesn&#8217;t <em>reeeaaaallly </em>seem to care about what she says</a>. But hey, it&#8217;ll sell magazines. </p>
<p><strong>Related:</strong><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/09/16/megan-fox-americas-sexiest-bad-girl-new-cover-of-rolling-stone/"><br />
Megan Fox, America’s Sexiest Bad Girl: New Cover of Rolling Stone</a> [RollingStone.com]<br />
<a href="http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/08/megan-fox-hearts-jewish-men-vagina-power/">Megan Fox Hearts Jewish Men, Vagina Power</a> [The Hollywood Gossip]<br />
<a href="http://www.popcrunch.com/megan-fox-cosmopolitan-magazine-october-2009/">Megan Fox Cosmopolitan Magazine October 2009</a> [PopCrunch]<br />
<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/about-800-pairs-of-megan-foxs-boobs/">About 800 Pairs of Megan Fox’s Boobs</a> [Mediaite]<br />
<a href="http://gawker.com/5362906/gawkers-guide-to-coverage-of-rolling-stones-coverage-of-megan-fox">Gawker&#8217;s Guide to Coverage of Rolling Stone&#8217;s Coverage of Megan Fox</a> [Gawker]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/print/what-megan-fox-has-in-common-with-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Nation&#8217;s Health Care Headlines And What Obama&#8217;s Sunday TV Blitz Is Up Against</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/print/the-nations-health-care-headlines-and-what-potus-is-up-against-this-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/print/the-nations-health-care-headlines-and-what-potus-is-up-against-this-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glynnis MacNicol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Completo Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=24289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>President Obama</strong> -- who has made more <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/15/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5313854.shtml">public appearances</a> than perhaps any sitting president in history -- will be doing a "<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-pull-off-unprecendented-quintuple-sunday-show-circuit-but-no-fox/">El Completo Ginsburg</a>" on Sunday, hitting five Sunday shows, plus <em>Letterman</em> on Monday.  Judging by the headlines he has a lot of explaining to do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/43245378.jpg" alt="43245378" title="43245378" width="250" height="165" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-24501" />Yesterday we reported that <strong>President Obama</strong> &#8212; who has made more <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/15/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5313854.shtml">public appearances</a> than perhaps any sitting president in history &#8212; will be doing a &#8220;<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-pull-off-unprecendented-quintuple-sunday-show-circuit-but-no-fox/">El Completo Ginsburg</a>&#8221; on Sunday, hitting five Sunday shows.  On Monday he&#8217;ll be on <em>Letterman</em>.  It may be that the health care bill gets passed based purely Obama&#8217;s persistent willingness to shill for it.<span id="more-24289"></span></p>
<p>Then again, maybe not.  The media deluge of the last few weeks certainly hasn&#8217;t appeared to change the tone of the debate or the headlines.  This morning ABC&#8217;s <strong>Rick Klein</strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/thenote/status/4026734380">twittered</a> out &#8220;read through healthcare headlines today and tell me why POTUS wouldn&#8217;t want a full Sunday circuit &#8211; if only to try to regain some order.&#8221;   I still <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/should-obama-pitch-his-health-care-plan-kanye-west-style/">think</a> the President should consider taking a chalkboard with him (or <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/tmz-posts-audio-of-obamas-jackass-remark/">employ</a> the term jackass <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-obamas-brilliant-jackass-remark-boosts-image-and-makes-fools-out-of-abc-et-al-2009-9">more liberally</a>).  In the meantime, here&#8217;s a quick look at today&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/09/mustreads.html">headlines</a>.  It&#8217;s not encouraging. </p>
<p>&#8220;Baucus Offers Health Plan, Trimming Cost to $856 Billion&#8221; (<a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/16/baucus-releases-bipartisan-proposal/?hp">NYT</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;Alarm Bell on Health Reform&#8221; (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/15/AR2009091502978.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">WaPo</a>)  </p>
<p>&#8220;Senate Health Bill Draws Fire on Both Sides” (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/16/health/policy/16health.html">NYT</a>)</p>
<p> “Revolving door for health care aides” (<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27155.html">Politico</a>) </p>
<p>&#8220;Young Adults Likely to Pay Big Share of Reform&#8217;s Cost&#8221; (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/15/AR2009091503716.html?hpid=topnews">WaPo</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;Clergy focus on ethics of health overhaul&#8221; (<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-09-15-clergy-health-care_N.htm">USAT</a>) </p>
<p>“Mandated Health Insurance Squeezes Those in the Middle (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125304790936413347.html">WSJ</a>) </p>
<p>&#8220;Health costs to rise again&#8221; (<a href="http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2009/09/16/health_insurers_plan_10_rise_in_rates/">Boston Globe</a>)</p>
<p>“Snowe falls away, leaving Senate Dems without GOP health support” (<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/58929-democrats-to-go-it-alone">The Hill</a>)</p>
<p>“Obama takes heat from other side of immigrant healthcare debate” (<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/09/mustreads.html">LAT</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/print/the-nations-health-care-headlines-and-what-potus-is-up-against-this-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

