<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; End of Decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/end-of-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Documenting the Decade:  NYT Prompts Astonishing Act of Citizen Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/documenting-the-decade-the-nyt-prompts-astonishing-act-of-citizen-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/documenting-the-decade-the-nyt-prompts-astonishing-act-of-citizen-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Sklar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the aughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=63100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>All The News That’s Fit To Print</em> used to be about picking what readers should see and know, and now readers are not only deciding for themselves, they’re making the content themselves, too. That is what you think when you look through some of the 667 reader images the NYT selected to showcase this decade, and impart its events and its impact. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-30-at-8.54.43-AM.png" alt="nyt" title="nyt" width="280" height="166" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-63103" />Wow. That is what you think when you look through some of the 667 reader images the NYT selected to showcase this decade, and impart its events and its impact. It&#8217;s an extremely meta feature, summing up the inexorable switch to interactivity of the last ten years &mdash; All The News That&#8217;s Fit To Print used to be about picking what readers should see and know, and now readers are not only deciding for themselves, they&#8217;re making the content themselves, too &mdash; but also, on its face, is just an amazing collection of images that are beautiful even when they are heartbreaking (photos of September 11th smoke against a blue, blue sky will always have a terrible beauty to them) and far-flung in their origin, subject matter and the stories they have to tell. <span id="more-63100"></span></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/30/readers-7/">NYT &#8220;Lens&#8221; blog</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>
No further proof is needed that we’re in the era of the “citizen journalist” than the images coming daily from Tehran. But this gallery reminds us that most of the traumas of the last decade — as well as its triumphs — had public witnesses who were as well-equipped to record the moment as many professionals. The Times asked you to help us document the decade and you responded with some astonishing photographs and essays. Thank you.</p></blockquote>
<p>There were over 2,360 submissions, and I can see how they settled on 667 for the slideshow &mdash; how possibly to pare down this collection? It&#8217;s amazing. Here are just a few of the images: A teacher <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2004_1_30110">working abroad in China</a>. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2009_1_29004">Bill and Chelsea Clinton in Nashua, New Hampshire</a> during the 2008 primary. A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2005_9_30500">march against the Iraq war</a>. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2007_1_30333">debris of Hurricane Katrina</a>, and the pieces of lives that were lost; a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2001_12_29753">memorials</a> at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2001_11_28906">Ground Zero</a>; a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2003_10_30495">little girl in Zambia</a>, in the midst of the African AIDS crisis, and a flourishing sex trade; the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2003_8_30832">Blackout</a>; the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2009_1_29004">35W Minneapolis bridge</a>; Sully&#8217;s plane, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2009_1_30230">half-submerged</a>; the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/2009-decade.html#/2004_12_28788">Tsunami</a>.</p>
<p>There are more &mdash; obviously &mdash; including images from Iraq and Israel, of Obama on the rise and as a new president; of people homeless and jobless; and &mdash; despite the fact that the NYT dubs it &#8220;<a href="http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/30/readers-7/">A Brutal Decade</a>&#8221; &mdash; even some sweet, uplifting photos.</p>
<p>This is an amazing thing the NYT has put together. I recommend it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/documenting-the-decade-the-nyt-prompts-astonishing-act-of-citizen-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Aughts: A Decade Of &#8220;Huh?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-aughts-a-decade-of-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-aughts-a-decade-of-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Sklar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[It's The End Of The Decade As We Don't Really Know It]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Sklar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Branson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 00s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the aughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y2K]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=53601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the decade's close drew nearer it seemed prudent to actually call it something, and the Oh-Ohs, Double-Os and Two-Thousands frankly sound dumb. "The Aughts" is nice, clean, short, simple and definitive, and also sounds vaguely British which means it's classy. That is why, here at Mediaite, our end-of-decade retrospective series is called...<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/the-aughts/">The Aughts</a>. This new decade has snuck up on us, but we're not letting the old one go just yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-11-22-at-12.40.54-PM-224x300.png" alt="Screen shot 2009-11-22 at 12.40.54 PM" title="Screen shot 2009-11-22 at 12.40.54 PM" width="224" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-55896" />This new decade has snuck up on us. It&#8217;s mid-December and only just now has the media world seemed to have awoken to the fact that, wow, we&#8217;re about to enter a new decade. I myself had not even realized it until I got an email from <em>Newsweek </em><a href="http://2010.newsweek.com/top-10/most-overblown-fears/bloggers.html">inviting me to participate in their end-of-decade package</a>. What a difference from ten years ago, when a millennium was drawing to a close and we lived in fear of the havoc to be wrought by Y2K even while we were partying like it was 1999. (I was dreaming when I wrote that.) </p>
<p>By contrast, this year has been so crazy that just chronicling the madness of 2009 has seemed like more than enough work, let alone reflect on the past decade. But part of the import of a passing decade being so overlooked lies to in how un-unified it seemed. The 90s were a big deal because they were so different from the 80s and <em>so</em> different from the 70s. And when we left the 90s behind, we left them for&#8230;what? <span id="more-53601"></span>Sure there was Y2k and The Year 2000 and A New Millennium, but beyond that, who knew what to call it? I certainly didn&#8217;t and never really <em>called it</em> anything, and certainly not anything generally-accepted or official-sounding (the Oh-Ohs? No-oh.) . In fact, it wasn&#8217;t until I started working with <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/how-i-ended-up-with-aught-com/">Colby Hall</a>, our managing editor here at Mediaite, that I even heard a term for the decade: <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/time-got-this-decades-name-right-ten-years-ago/">The Aughts</a>. Flying in the face of our Gmail generation, Colby&#8217;s email address is at &#8220;aught.com&#8221; which I wondered about, asked about, and subsequently learned was what this decade was supposed to have been called. (Colby registered the domain in the late 90s thinking he was sitting on a gold mine. Aw. Read his account of that decision <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/how-i-ended-up-with-aught-com/">here</a>.) </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><strong>It was the decade of September 11th, which really changed everything &mdash; but even in a world fraught with the scary realities that were made manifest that day, it was also the decade of that world getting so much smaller.</strong></span></span></em></p>
<p>So &#8211; The Aughts. As the decade&#8217;s close drew nearer it seemed prudent to actually call it something, and the Oh-Ohs, Double-Os and  Two-Thousands frankly sound dumb. &#8220;The Aughts&#8221; is nice, clean, short, simple and definitive, and also sounds vaguely British which means it&#8217;s classy. That is why, here at Mediaite, our end-of-decade retrospective series is called&#8230;<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/the-aughts/">The Aughts</a>. And you &#8216;aughta&#8217; call them that too! Ha, ha. </p>
<p>But whatever we call them &mdash; and none of us agree, which is actually sort of appropriate for the decade in which everything nichiefied and individual opinion gained primacy &mdash; there&#8217;s obviously no question that they contained multitudes. The Aughts changed the way we lived, and worked, and thought about the present and the future, and <em>became</em> the future way quicker than ever before (Seriously? Just <em>think</em> about the iPhone. A marvel). It was the decade of September 11th, which <em>really </em>changed everything, but even in a world fraught with the scary realities that were made manifest that day, it was also the decade of that world getting so much smaller. For those of you reading this on the go on a little screen on a device you&#8217;re holding in your hand, that you will soon use to make a phone call, watch a video, send an email, self-publish your thoughts in an instant or receive any of the above from someone halfway around the world, you know what that means. You&#8217;re living it. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s much to grapple with in this decade and we&#8217;ve invited our staff, columnists and contributors to think about it from any and every angle &mdash; politics, movies, music, TV, technology, religion, demographics, art and architecture, fashion, sports, feminism, human rights, science, ridiculous trends like Crocs &mdash; and how all of those categories relate to and can be viewed through the media prism. (We&#8217;re also accepting submissions so if you have an idea let me know at <a href="mailto:rachel@mediaite.com">rachel@mediaite.com</a>.) Lots has happened since we all held our breath waiting for our computers to implode at midnight on January 1, 2000, and we&#8217;re <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-375-worst-actors-and-directors-of-the-past-decade/">already</a> <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/my-top-ten-fave-films-of-the-00%e2%80%99s/">having</a> <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/miley-kate-michelle-our-top-fashion-scandals-of-the-decade/">fun</a> breaking it down for you. (And when we <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/a-retrospective-28-media-leaders-who-died-this-decade/">miss something</a>, please <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/columnists/a-complete-list-or-myopic-look-at-just-the-white-people-we-think-matter/">do let us know</a>.)</p>
<p>In the meantime, we&#8217;ve got 20 days to go until&#8230;the Tens? The Teens? The One-Oh&#8217;s? Whatever it&#8217;s called, by the end of the next decade what we&#8217;ve come to take for granted in this one will be obsolete. So please join us in marking it here, before <strong>Richard Branson</strong> buys it and sends it into space or <strong>Mark Zuckerberg</strong> <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/facebook-declares-war-on-your-privacy-with-new-settings/">just takes it</a>. Enjoy it while it lasts, folks. If there&#8217;s anything the Aughts have taught us, it&#8217;s that over the next decade, everything is gonna change. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/the-aughts/">The Aughts</a> [Mediaite]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-aughts-a-decade-of-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Got This Decade&#8217;s Name Right Ten Years Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/print/time-got-this-decades-name-right-ten-years-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/print/time-got-this-decades-name-right-ten-years-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Groner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Groner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the aughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Whatevers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Decade From Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=50810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As writers scramble for their last-ditch efforts to name this decade, attention has landed on Time Magazine for their proposed name: &#8220;The Decade From Hell.&#8221; But what&#8217;s more interesting is to consider what Time suggested &#8211; and today&#8217;s editors subsequently neglected to revisit &#8211; in their first issue of the decade. Back on New Year&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/T120709-226x300.jpg" alt="T120709" title="T120709" width="226" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-50312" />As writers scramble for their <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/weekinreview/15segal.html" target="_blank">last-ditch efforts</a> to name this decade, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/time-names-2000s-the-decade-from-hell/" target="_blank">attention has landed</a> on <em>Time </em>Magazine for their proposed name: &#8220;The Decade From Hell.&#8221; But what&#8217;s more interesting is to consider what <em>Time </em>suggested &#8211; and today&#8217;s editors subsequently neglected to revisit &#8211; in their first issue of the decade.<span id="more-50810"></span></p>
<p>Back on New Year&#8217;s 2000, Time ran <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,995818,00.html" target="_blank">the following blurb</a> attributed to several of the magazine&#8217;s writers:</p>
<blockquote><p>The new decade is upon us, and according to the readers of TIME, this decade will be called the Aughts&#8230;or the MMs, depending on your level of skepticism. Last year Notebook conducted an online poll to find out what name should be given the next decade. Of the Zips, Two Thousands, Zeros, Ohs, Double Ohs, 2Ks, MMs, Aughts or Singles, readers clearly put the Aughts ahead, until the last week of polling, when the MMs took the lead&#8211;so suddenly (and implausibly&#8211;the MMs?!) that it aroused suspicions of a Mars candy campaign. Despite hints of vote tampering, several advertising agencies agreed to create ads to sell the new names to the public. Enjoy yourself in the&#8230;<strong>whatevers</strong>!</p></blockquote>
<p>That was written as the staff looked ahead at what they could only expect to be a decade full of promise and profits. How quickly that plan went awry. Compare the message of that comment from nearly ten years ago with a portion of the magazine&#8217;s cover story in the most recent issue. Reflecting on the decade gone by, writer<strong> Andy Serwer</strong> says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bookended by 9/11 at the start and a financial wipeout at the end, the first 10 years of this century will very likely go down as the most dispiriting and disillusioning decade Americans have lived through in the post–World War II era. We&#8217;re still weeks away from the end of &#8217;09, but it&#8217;s not too early to pass judgment. Call it the Decade from Hell, or the Reckoning, or the Decade of Broken Dreams, or the Lost Decade. Call it <strong>whatever </strong>you want — just give thanks that it is nearly over.</p></blockquote>
<p>And there it is, as clear as night and day. &#8220;The Whatevers&#8221; started with a looser and more upbeat tone to them and now end with a much different feel. Through terrorism, wars, a severe recession and more, we&#8217;ve somehow managed to persevere through &#8220;The Whatevers.&#8221; During that period, the term&#8217;s connotation has changed.</p>
<p>It emerged as a last-resort option to appease everyone who&#8217;d rejected all other names. It rejected no offerings as being too stupid or lame because it recognized that <em>all </em>of the proposals were stupid and lame; this strategy made everything &#8211; and everyone &#8211; acceptable. Over time, though, &#8220;whatever&#8221; morphed into something else. &#8220;Whatever you want, you got&#8221; turned into  a less involved, less enthusiastic and less caring &#8220;whatever&#8221; attitude. Some Americans have adopted a doomsday outlook to cope with a world where bad news never fails to stop piling on. The &#8216;Whatever&#8221; generation rolls its eyes, shakes its head, and talks about how things can&#8217;t get any worse. What hurts most is remembering times when things weren&#8217;t nearly as bad.</p>
<p>So was this the decade from hell? It very well may have been. But <em>Time</em>&#8216;s first prediction says a lot more about how this decade  impacted Americans emotionally. And as we look ahead at the next decade, one can only hope that fortune will shift to a new era of &#8220;Whatever&#8221; defined by a more hopeful approach of &#8220;Que sera, sera.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Related: </strong><br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1942834,00.html#ixzz0Y5ou8y6n">The &#8217;00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell</a> [Time]<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,995818,00.html">The Zips Were Robbed</a> [Time, Jan. 1, 2000]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/print/time-got-this-decades-name-right-ten-years-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

