<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; Fimoculous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/fimoculous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fimoculous: 30 Best Blogs of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/fimoculous-30-best-blogs-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/fimoculous-30-best-blogs-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rex Sorgatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4 Chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anil Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANIMAL New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian Poses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Shirkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Curtis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eat Me Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fimoculous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gotcha Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper’s Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hipster Runoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Is Beautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters of Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Look At This Fucking Hipster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men Footnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediaite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nieman Journalism Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT Picker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OK Cupid: OK Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Sorgatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Script Shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit My Dad Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaughterhouse 90210]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snarkmarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Awl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rumpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Tropes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ Speakeasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=65506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time to stop being wishy-washy about our value assessments. A few years ago, someone convinced me to drop the title "Best Blogs" from this annual list and change it to "Most Notable" blogs of the year. It made sense at the time, when the medium was still figuring itself out: chiefs were being chosen, voice still being refined. But as I began to assemble this year's list, it became clear that, no, these blogs actually were my favorites, not merely the most interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-695" title="rex12" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/rex12.jpg" alt="rex12" width="150" height="150" /><em>Rex Sorgatz is Mediaite&#8217;s site designer and an occasional columnist. This list originally appeared at Fimoculous.com.</em><br />
<style> 
#main .slice .posts .d {
border-top:1px dotted #CCCCCC;
margin:0px;
padding-top:10px;
clear: both;
}
#main .slice .posts .post0 .i {
float:left;
border:2px solid #275f7d !important;;
margin: 5px 5px 5px -7px;
}
#main .slice .posts .p {
margin-top:0;
margin-left: 70px;
}
</style>
<p>While compiling this list, I asked a few people a dumb question: What was the biggest online event of the year?</p>
<p>Random answers included Oprah <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10222030-2.html">joining</a> Twitter, Michael Jackson&#8217;s death <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-dies-death-dead-cardiac-arrest/" target="_blank">breaking on TMZ</a>, and Susan Boyle coming and going. Someone even tried to argue that a writer <a href="http://gawker.com/5248669/dan-baum-details-new-yorker-hiring-and-firing-on-twitter">who detailed his firing from The New Yorker on Twitter</a> was momentous. <em>Sigh</em>.</p>
<p><span id="more-65506"></span></p>
<p>But frankly, I&#8217;ve got nothing better. So try this out: Matt Haughey selling PVR Blog <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&#038;item=300376905731">on eBay</a> for $12k was the most emblematic online event of 2009. Why? Because the amount seems both ridiculously high and preposterously low at the same time. It proved that if there was ever a time when you couldn&#8217;t tell what the fuck something was worth, this was it.</p>
<p>With Kim Kardashian <a href="http://entertainment.oneindia.in/hollywood/top-stories/scoop/2009/kardashian-salad-tweet-301209.html">making $10k per tweet</a>, even internet fame seemed synchronously bankrupt and filthy rich. Or as someone else <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/09/the-shadow-editors-when-did-perez-hilton-become-more-famous-than-paris-hilton-and-why-were-we-not-informed">asked</a>, how didn&#8217;t we notice that Perez Hilton had accidentally become more famous than his namesake Paris? And how is it possible that more people are reading <a href="http://rebloggingns.wordpress.com/">Reblogging Julia</a> than <a href="http://julia.nonsociety.com/">Julia</a> herself?</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s time to stop being wishy-washy about our value assessments. A few years ago, someone convinced me to drop the title &#8220;Best Blogs&#8221; from this annual list and change it to &#8220;Most Notable&#8221; blogs of the year. It made sense at the time, when the medium was still figuring itself out: chiefs were being chosen, voice still being refined. But as I began to assemble this year&#8217;s list, it became clear that, no, these blogs actually were my favorites, not merely the most interesting.</p>
<p>So here they are, the <strong>30 Best Blogs of 2009</strong>:</p>
<p>[Previous years: <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-464.cfm">2002</a> | <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-661.cfm">2003</a> | <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-748.cfm">2004</a> | <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-1825.cfm">2006</a> | <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-3535.cfm">2007</a> | <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-5554.cfm">2008</a>.]</p>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/dc.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>30) <a href="http://dustincurtis.com/">Dustin Curtis</a></strong><br/>Woe, the personal blog. It&#8217;s a small tragedy that the decade began with the medium being used primarily by single individuals to gather and share small insights, but ends with the impersonal likes of Mashable and HuffPo. In the age of more more more, it&#8217;s remarkable to see someone dedicate so much time to a single post, making sure the pixels are aligned and the words are all just right. Dustin Curtis&#8217; personal site is one of the dying breed of personal bloggers who care about such things (similar to how Jason Santa Maria puts art direction into every one of <a href="http://jasonsantamaria.com/articles/">his posts</a>). Start with: <a href="http://dustincurtis.com/incompetence.html">The Incompetence of American Airlines &#038; the Fate of Mr. X</a>.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://topherchris.com/">Topherchris</a>, <a href="http://weloveyouso.com/">We Love You So</a>, <a href="http://www.acontinuouslean.com/">A Continuous Lean</a>, and <a href="http://clientsfromhell.tumblr.com/">Clients From Hell</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/nytpicker.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>29) <a href="http://www.nytpick.com">NYT Pick</a></strong><br/>The bloggers behind NYTPicker had quite a year: they got Maureen Dowd to <a href="http://www.nytpick.com/2009/05/dowd-admits-plagiarism-to-nytpicker.html">admit to plagiarism</a>, they pointed out several <a href="http://www.nytpick.com/2009/07/alessandra-stanleys-reign-of-error-in.html">errors in the Times obituary of Walter Cronkite</a>, and Times contributor David Blum was <a href="http://gawker.com/5355036/who-is-nytpicker-dont-ask-the-new-york-times">revealed and then un-revealed</a> as one of them. In the process, they showed that blogs can comment on the New York Times in a more substantial way than making fun of silly Sunday Styles trend pieces. If anyone really still thought blogs couldn&#8217;t be the home of original reporting and research, NYTPicker proved them wrong. They watch the watchdogs! Just wait for an enterprising blogger to start NYTPickerPicker in 2010.</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/gotchamedia.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>28) <a href="http://www.gotchamediablog.com/">Gotcha Media</a></strong><br/>Every year it seems like a site should emerge to take the video aggregator trophy, but the space is still a hodgepodge of sporadically embedded YouTube clips. Gotcha Media was the closest to the quintessential destination for finding video events we remembered through the year, whether that be <a href="http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2009/09/kanye-apologizes-to-jay-leno-performs.html">Kanye crying on Leno</a> or <a href="http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2009/12/michele-bachmann-leads-prayer-at-anti.html">Michele Bachmann leading a anti-health care prayercast</a>.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://tv.gawker.com/">Gawker TV</a> and <a href="http://mag.ma/">Mag.ma</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/animal.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>27) <a href="http://animalnewyork.com/">Animal</a></strong><br/>As Virginia Heffernan recently asked in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/magazine/03FOB-medium-t.html">a recent NYT essay</a>, what exactly should a magazine look like in the digital age? Once a sporadic print title, Animal is now one of the last remaining examples of what an underground magazine could look like online.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://bbook.tumblr.com/">Black Book Tumblr</a> and <a href="http://scallywagandvagabond.com/">Scallywag &#038; Vagabond</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/shitmydadsays.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>26) <a href="http://twitter.com/Shitmydadsays">Shit My Dad Says</a></strong><br/>Several people tried to convince me to change this entire list to &#8220;Best Twitterers of the Year,&#8221; a listicle that someone probably should compile but which exceeds my pain threshold. <a href="http://twitter.com/shitmydadsays/status/5427015317">In the meantime</a>: &#8220;Son, no one gives a shit about all the things your cell phone does. You didn&#8217;t invent it, you just bought it. Anybody can do that.&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/therumpus.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>25) <a href="http://therumpus.net/">The Rumpus</a></strong><br/>As literary magazines go, The Rumpus is something of a mess. Created by Stephen Elliott, who spent most of the year jostling around the country in support of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1555975380/ref=nosim/fimoculouscom-20/">his novel</a>, The Rumpus defined itself mostly in opposition to what <a href="http://therumpus.net/2009/02/the-editors-desk-also-no-more-legos/">it</a> <a href="http://therumpus.net/2009/02/the-editors-desk-f-pop-culture/">is</a> <a href="http://therumpus.net/2009/01/welcome-to-rumpus-books/">not</a>. But columns by Rick Moody and Jerry Stahl, along with a rambling assemblage of interviews, links, anecdotes, reviews, and whatever fits onto the screen, make it the best case going for a reinvented online literary scene.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://htmlgiant.com/">HTML Giant</a>, <a href="http://www.themillions.com/">The Millions</a>, <a href="http://www.electricliterature.com/">Electric Literature</a>, and <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/">London Review of Books Blog</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/bestofwiki.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>24) <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/">Best of Wikipedia</a></strong><br/>&#8230;<a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/133148743/coprolalia">Coprolalia</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/130219026/foreign-accent-syndrome">Foreign Accent Syndrome</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/152505560/stendhal-syndrome">Stendhal Syndrome</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/149089752/dude">Dude</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/145611350/mopery">Mopery</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/144649720/sokushinbutsu">Sokushinbutsu</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/139267131/tyvek">Tyvek</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/232783993/shm-reduplication">Shm-reduplication</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/229646803/soap-opera-rapid-aging-syndrome">Soap Opera Rapid Aging Syndrome</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/235349540/pica">Pica</a>, <a href="http://bestofwikipedia.tumblr.com/post/233901424/kayfabe">Kayfabe</a>&#8230;<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/">Double Tongued</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/wsjspeakeasy.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>23) <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/">WSJ Speakeasy</a></strong><br/>It didn&#8217;t start off very well. In the backdrop of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> announcing Speakeasy in June was the chatter about Rupert turning the internet into a clunky vending machine (put a quarter in, junk food drops out). And the coverage at this culture blog was spotty at first, but the gentility eventually morphed into a more conversational aesthetic.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/">NYT Opinionator</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/scriptshadow.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>22) <a href="http://scriptshadow.blogspot.com/">Script Shadow</a></strong><br/>&#8220;I was just thinking what an interesting concept it is to eliminate the writer from the artistic process,&#8221; said Tim Robbins&#8217; cocky producer character in <em>The Player</em> in 1992, and Hollywood seems to have listened. By reviewing movie scripts before they get made into movies, this site turns the focus back onto the written word.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.firstshowing.net/">First Showing</a>, <a href="http://movieoftheday.tumblr.com/">Movie of the Day</a>, and <a href="http://www.gointothestory.com/">Go Into The Story</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/newsweek.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>21) <a href="http://newsweek.tumblr.com/">Newsweek Tumblr</a></strong><br/>It isn&#8217;t enough that Newsweek is the only mainstream media organization dangling their toes in the rocky stream of Tumblrland; it also happens to be doing it better than most of the kids. (NYTimes.com <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/11/profiles-in-courage-social-media-editors-at-big-media-outlets323.html">has been threatening</a> to do &#8220;something interesting&#8221; with the medium for a couple months, but there&#8217;s still nothing to show for it.) It&#8217;s tricky for an established old media company to find the right voice on a new platform, but the Newsweek Tumblr has figured out how to mix their own relevant stories with the reblog culture.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://thetodayshow.tumblr.com/">Today Show Tumblr</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/asianposes.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>20) <a href="http://asianposes.com/">Asian Poses</a></strong><br/>The Nyan Nyan. The Bang! The V-Sign. The Shush. These are just some of the poses Asian Poses introduced us to this year, illustrated by photos of cute Asian ladies. Is it offensive? Maybe, but many of the most interesting blogs straddle that offensive/not-offensive line. Also, based on the well-known &#8220;members of a group can make fun of that group and you can&#8217;t&#8221; rule of comedy, this is not offensive since it is run by a Chinese guy. But maybe it objectifies women! Color me <a href="http://asianposes.com/pose-14-confused/">confused-pose</a>.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://antiduckface.com/">Stop Making That Duckface</a>, <a href="http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/">This Is Why You&#8217;re Fat</a>, <a href="http://www.reallycuteasians.com/">Really Cute Asians</a>, and <a href="http://awkwardfamilyphotos.com/">Awkward Family Photos</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/latfh.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>19) <a href="http://www.latfh.com/">Look At This Fucking Hipster</a></strong><br/>If you thought the Internet had run out of ways to mock hipsters, Look At This Fucking Hipster and Hipster Runoff proved you wrong this year. Look At This Fucking Hipster took the more direct approach, simply asking you to look at photos of <em>these fucking hipsters</em>, complete with caustic one-line captions. It may come as no surprise that the author, Joe Mande, appears to be a self-loathing hipster, posing in black-rimmed glasses and a flannel shirt on his website. Literary-minded hipsters are surely jealous of LATFH&#8217;s book deal.</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/hipsterrunoff.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>18) <a href="http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/">Hipster Runoff</a></strong><br/>Hipster Runoff&#8217;s Carles took a more satirical approach, blogging about pressing hipster issues such as the <a href="http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2009/03/the-memefication-of-your-band.html">music meme economy</a> and whether you should do blow off your iPhone in fractured, &#8220;ironic quote-heavy&#8221; txt-speak. Many people suspected that &#8220;Carles&#8221; was actually Tao Lin, since Carles&#8217; writing was so similar to Lin&#8217;s affectless prose, but Lin denies this. Whoever Carles is, he is most certainly another self-loathing hipster. He <a href="http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2009/01/animal-collective-is-a-band-created-byforon-the-internet.html">knows far too much about Animal Collective to be a civilian</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/reddit.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>17) <a href="http://www.reddit.com/">Reddit</a></strong><br/>There&#8217;s a long-standing joke on this annual list to mention Metafilter every single time. But this was the first year it seemed that more people were paying attention to what was going on in the conversation threads on Reddit. For the uninitiated: Reddit takes some of the features of Digg, mixes it with the aesthetic of Twitter, adds the editorial of Fark, and accentuates it with the comments of Metafilter. But better than that sounds.</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/smartfootball.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>16) <a href="http://smartfootball.com/">Smart Football</a></strong><br/>If you had told me at the beginning of 2009 that Steve Pinker and Malcolm Gladwell would get into a heated debate about football esoterica, and that this debate would happen, in all places, within an <a href="http://gladwell.typepad.com/gladwellcom/2009/11/pinker-on-what-the-dog-saw.html">internet</a> <a href="http://gladwell.typepad.com/gladwellcom/2009/11/more-on-quarterbacks.html">comment</a> <a href="http://gladwell.typepad.com/gladwellcom/2009/12/pinker-round-two-.html">thread</a>, I would have said, &#8220;Yeah, and Brett Favre will have the best season of his life at 40.&#8221; But every once in a while intellectuals wander into sports, and recently the NFL seemed the place where the <em>Chronicle of Higher Ed</em> crowd is hanging. So if you want to get smart about football, this is the place to do it.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://deadspin.com/">Deadspin</a> and <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/sports/">The Sports Section</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/informationbeautiful.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>15) <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/">Information Is Beautiful</a></strong><br/>Is it? Yes, but only in the hands of those who know its power.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://infosthetics.com/">Infosthetics</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog">Data Blog</a>, and <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/">NYT Bits Blog</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/snarkmarket.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>14) <a href="http://snarkmarket.com/">Snarkmarket</a></strong><br/>It looks like a conspiracy that Snarkmarket has made this list a few times now, but unlike most blogs that become sedentary in their success, it just keeps innovating. This year, <a href="http://robinsloan.com/">Robin Sloan</a> quit his job at Current TV to become (among other things) a fiction writer &#8212; and one of the most <a href="http://robinsloan.com/annabel-scheme">fascinating</a> ones on the scene in some time. <a href="http://mthomps.com/">Matt Thompson</a> had been gigging at the Knight Foundation, but recently <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-npr-hires-key-staff-for-local-news-effort-finalizes-station-list/">hopped to a new gig at NPR</a>. With them being so busy, <a href="http://writing.upenn.edu/~carmody/Home.html">Tim Carmody</a> settled in as the new scribe of ideas. If they let me give it a tagline, it would be &#8220;The BoingBoing it&#8217;s okay to like.&#8221;<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://heyitsnoah.tumblr.com/">Hey, It&#8217;s Noah</a> and <a href="http://waxy.org/">Waxy</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/nieman.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>13) <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/">Nieman Journalism Lab</a></strong><br/>Where were these guys when we needed them? Sure, it&#8217;s another think tank, but Nieman Journalism Lab has been putting its not-for-profit money where its mouth is by also breaking news, such as the item about <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/google-developing-a-micropayment-platform-and-pitching-newspapers-open-need-not-mean-free/">Google developing a micropayments sytem</a>, the <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/08/how-the-associated-press-will-try-to-rival-wikipedia-in-search-results/">crack-ass idea</a> from the Associated Press to game search, and little factoids like NYT&#8217;s <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/ny-times-mines-its-data-to-identify-words-that-readers-find-abstruse/">most frequently looked-up words</a>. It also happens to be the only place <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/12/come-work-for-the-nieman-journalism-lab/">still hiring journalists</a>.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/">Reflections of a Newsosaur</a> and <a href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/">Newspaper Death Watch</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/anildash.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>12) <a href="http://dashes.com/anil/">Anil Dash</a></strong><br/>At some point during the year, I asked Anil for an explanation in the upsurge of blog posts on his site. He said it was merely recognizing an opening: there are so few people writing intelligently about technology today. True! <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a> may have the links, and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a> may have the coverage, but there are scant intellectuals left in the space. When it <a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/dash-dc-tech-guru-will-head-govt-incubator-digitize-democracy">was announced</a> last month that he was leaving Six Apart to work for a new government tech startup within the Obama administration, the techno-pragmatism all made sense.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://obamafoodorama.blogspot.com/">Obama Foodorama</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/slaughterhouse.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>11) <a href="http://slaughterhouse90210.tumblr.com/">Slaughterhouse 90210</a></strong><br/>Slaughterhouse 90210 combined lowbrow TV screencaps with highbrow literary quotes, making it kind of the Reese&#8217;s Peanut Butter Cups of Tumblr blogs. Another comparison: an intellectual I Can Has Cheezburger. Seeing a quote from, say, <em>The Bell Jar</em> underneath a <em>Friends</em> screencap is pleasantly shocking &#8212; especially after you realize the quote fits the show <em>perfectly</em> &#8212; and a reassurance that it&#8217;s okay for smart people to like stupid things. Could be a good candidate for a book deal, if it weren&#8217;t for those pesky copyright issues.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.thegmanifesto.com/">The G Maniesto</a> and <a href="http://fuckyeahsubs.tumblr.com/">Fuck Yeah Subtitles</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/lettersofnote.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>10) <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/">Letters of Note</a></strong><br/>We&#8217;ve known for a while that the best blogs are dedicated to a precise nano-topic, but there is also a new thread emerging: the blog dedicated to disappearing technologies. The tagline of Letters of Note, &#8220;Correspondence deserving a wider audience,&#8221; says it all. There&#8217;s <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/09/okay-you-lazy-bitch.html">Hunter S. Thompson starting a screed &#8220;Okay you lazy bitch,&#8221;</a> there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/11/slaughterhouse-five.html">Kurt Vonnegut writing his family</a> from Slaughterhouse Five, there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/09/i-leave-it-in-your-capable-hands.html">the letter from Mick Jagger asking Andy Warhol</a> to design album cover art, and there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/12/holden-caulfield-is-unactable.html">J. D. Salinger&#8217;s hand-written note</a> aggressively yet delightfully shooting down a producer who wants to turn <i>Catcher in the Rye</i> into a movie.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://significantobjects.com/">Significant Objects</a>, <a href="http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/">Iconic Photos</a>, and <a href="http://unconsumption.tumblr.com/">Unconsumption</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/mediaite.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>9) <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/">Mediaite</a></strong><br/>Launching another media blog didn&#8217;t sound like rearranging Titanic deck chairs; it sounded like booking a flight on Al Quada Airlines to Jerusalem. But not even six months after launching, Mediaite was already on the <a href="http://technorati.com/blogs/top100">Technorati 100</a>, eventually landing somewhere around #30 on a list of players who have been there for years. Sure, it can go a little bananas with the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/my-bad-romance-with-lady-gaga-59-close-ups/">seo/pageview bait</a>, but it&#8217;s also one of the few entities in the whole bastardly New York Media Scene to actually have the will to <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/">take on Gawker</a> (or its pseudo-sibling, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-awl-ironically-plays-the-twitter-race-card-goes-bust/">The Awl</a>).<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/webnewser/">Web Newser</a> and <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/">Politics Daily</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/clayshirky.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>8) <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/">Clay Shirky</a></strong><br/>There were only, what, a dozen or so essays on his blog this year? But one of them, <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/">Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable</a>, caused such a little earthquake in the industry that tremors were still echoing months later. Shirky is the only guy in the whole space who doesn&#8217;t sound like he has an agenda, who doesn&#8217;t have a consulting agency on the side that he&#8217;s pumping his half-baked theories into.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/haque/">Umair Haque</a> and <a href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/index.php">The Technium</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/oktrends.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>7) <a href="http://blog.okcupid.com/">OK Cupid: OK Trends</a></strong><br/>Even the breeders in the crowd will be fascinated by the data porn on display here.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://musicmachinery.com/">Music Machinery</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/harperstudio.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>6) <a href="http://theharperstudio.com/category/26th-story/">Harper&#8217;s Studio</a></strong><br/>The book industry is about to go through the same disruptive changes that the music industry set upon a decade ago &#8212; this, it seems, almost everyone agrees upon. But just as with the previous natural cultural disaster, no one is sure how to prepare for the earthquake. The editors at the new Harper Studio are the most likely candidates for turning all the theory behind &#8220;the future of books&#8221; into actual functional products. An <a href="http://theharperstudiobooks.com/">impressive list</a> of inventive works on the horizon hints at their agenda, but the blog, which is something of a clearing house for discussing everything that has to do with the future of publishing, is like an R&#038;D lab for print.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.omnivoracious.com/">Omnivoracious</a>, <a href="http://thesecondpass.com/?cat=8">The Second Pass</a>, <a href="http://thepenguinblog.typepad.com/the_penguin_blog/">The Penguin Blog</a>, and <a href="http://tomorrowmuseum.com/">Tomorrow Museum</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/eatmedaily.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>5) <a href="http://www.eatmedaily.com/">Eat Me Daily</a></strong><br/>As one competing food blogger put it to me, Eat Me Daily is the Kottke of food blogs. Which, if you want to follow that obtuse metaphor, makes <a href="http://eater.com/">Eater</a> the genre&#8217;s Gawker and <a href="http://www.seriouseats.com/">Serious Eats</a> its Engadget. And which, if you understand any of that at all, means that this blurb can end now.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://eater.com/">Eater</a> and <a href="http://www.seriouseats.com/">Serious Eats</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/footnotes.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>4) <a href="http://madmenfootnotes.com/">Mad Men Footnotes</a></strong><br/><a href="http://bygonebureau.com/2009/12/16/best-new-blogs-of-2009/">As I wrote</a> earlier, Mad Men Footnotes revived the moribund genre known as tv recaps.</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/tvtropes.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>3) <a href="http://tvtropes.org/">TV Tropes</a></strong><br/>If you don&#8217;t know TV Tropes, it&#8217;s too bad, because I probably just <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TVTropesWillRuinYourLife">ruined your life</a>. If you&#8217;ve ever recognized a hackneyed plot device on a tv show and thought &#8220;I wonder if anyone else has thought of this,&#8221; the answer is: <i>yes, a lot</i>. I don&#8217;t even know where to suggest starting in this labyrinth, but try entries like <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ButterflyOfDoom">Butterfly of Doom</a> or <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ptitle54psy2mkt9lx?from=Main.ChekhovsGunman">Chekhov&#8217;s Gunman</a> or <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitleutvwuc2h">Bitch In Sheep&#8217;s Clothing</a> &#8212; or just hit <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/randomitem.php">the random item generator</a>. My dream is to have Tarantino spend a month here and come out with his <i>Twin Peaks</i>.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/">Television Without Pity</a> and <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/">Urban Dictionary</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/theawl.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>2) <a href="http://www.theawl.com/">The Awl</a></strong><br/>The Awl is too good to exist, or so goes much of the catty banter in the media business scene. There is seldom a conversation of The Awl lately that doesn&#8217;t ask, &#8220;How the hell will they make money?&#8221; But let&#8217;s set aside that gaudy little question for a second and instead ask, &#8220;Why has The Awl become an internet love object?&#8221; I&#8217;ve done the math, and I have a theory, involving at least two factors: 1) It winks at all the sad internet conventions while both debunking and adopting them at the same time (<a href="http://www.theawl.com/tag/listicle-without-commentary">Listicles Without Commentary</a> and those <a href="http://www.theawl.com/tag/the-shadow-editors">Tom Scocca chats</a> are the best example). And 2) it is willing to go to bat for the unexpected without sounding like one of those intentionally counter-intuitive Slate essays (<a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/12/flicked-off-with-mary-hk-choi-avatar">Avatar</a> and <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/12/real-america-with-abe-sauer-garrison-keillor-will-die">Garrison Keillor</a> are two good recent examples). In short, it&#8217;s just less dumb than everything else. Even Nick Denton <a href="http://twitter.com/nicknotned/status/1568277442">joked</a> about it at launch, and I don&#8217;t know how they&#8217;ll survive either, but The Awl already exists in an admirable pantheon that includes Spy and Suck.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://kottke.org/">Kottke</a> and <a href="http://katiebakes.tumblr.com/">Katie Bakes</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<div class="d"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html"><img class="i" src="http://www.fimoculous.com/images/4chan.jpg" width="60" height="60" /></a>
<p class="p"><strong>1) <a href="http://www.4chan.org/">4chan</a></strong><br/>Go ahead, scoff. But I will tell you this: no site in the past year has better personified the internet in all its complex contradictions than 4chan. Blisteringly violent yet irrepressibly creative, vociferously political yet erratic in agenda, 4chan was the multi-headed monster that got you off, got you pissed off, and maybe got you knocked out. When I <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-5738.cfm">interviewed moot</a> in February, I discovered a smart kid who had seen more by the age of 16 than someone who actually lived inside all six <em>Saw</em> movies. People tend to think of 4chan as pure id, but there are highly formalized rules (<a href="http://www.4chan.org/faq">written</a> and unwritten) within the community. Inside all the blustery fury of the /b/tards, there is more going on psychologically than we are equipped to understand yet.<br />
(<em>See also: <a href="http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com">Uncyclopedia</a>, <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/">Encyclopedia Dramatica</a>, and <a href="http://knowyourmeme.com/episodes">Know Your Meme</a>.</em>)</p>
</div>
<p>Special thanks to these exceptionally nice people for contributing ideas to this list: <a href="http://caro.tumblr.com/">Caroline McCarthy</a>, <a href="http://tomorrowmuseum.com/">Joanne McNeil</a>, <a href="http://www.doublex.com/users/melissa-maerz">Melissa Maerz</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/cklosterman">Chuck Klosterman</a>, <a href="http://saucy.tumblr.com/">Soraya Darabi</a>, <a href="http://honan.net">Mat Honan</a>, <a href="http://katiebakes.tumblr.com/">Katie Baker</a>, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/erin-carlson">Erin Carlson</a>, <a href="http://www.noahbrier.com/">Noah Brier</a>, <a href="http://kottke.org/">Jason Kottke</a>, <a href="http://crazyinternetbeatz.com/">Taylor Carik</a>, <a href="http://toomuchnick.com/">Nick Douglas</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/Lock">Lockhart Steele</a>, <a href="http://mthomps.com/">Matt Thompson</a>, <a href="http://anastasiafriscia.com/">Anastasia Friscia</a>, and <a href="http://www.kellaroot.com/">Kelly Reeves</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/fimoculous-30-best-blogs-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5QQ: Rex Sorgatz</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/5qq-rex-sorgatz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/5qq-rex-sorgatz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Sklar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 end of year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5QQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fimoculous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm Chuck Bass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megantereons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Sorgatz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=60229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rex Sorgatz is many things: Writer, editor, blogger, developer, consultant, authority on microcelebrity, wearer of exotic t-shirts, former web TV show Svengali, proud dog owner and surely one of the biggest consumers of media I&#8217;ve ever met (and don&#8217;t call him Shirley &#8212; though you can call him Fimoculous, online, if you&#8217;re referencing the blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/rex1.jpg" alt="rex sorgatz" title="rex sorgatz" width="280" height="280" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-61084" />Rex Sorgatz is many things: Writer, editor, <a href="http://fimoculous.com/">blogger</a>, developer, <a href="http://kindasortamedia.com/">consultant</a>,  authority on <a href="http://nymag.com/news/media/47958/">microcelebrity</a>, wearer of <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.03/snackculture.html#six">exotic t-shirts</a>, former <a href="http://news.tubefilter.tv/2008/11/19/rex-sorgatzs-im-just-sayin-aims-to-be-diggnation-for-girls/">web TV show Svengali</a>, proud <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fimoculous/tags/zuki/">dog owner</a> and surely one of the biggest consumers of media I&#8217;ve ever met (and don&#8217;t call him Shirley &mdash;  though you <em>can</em> call him <a href="http://fimoculous.com/">Fimoculous</a>, online, if you&#8217;re referencing the blog he&#8217;s run for nigh on a decade now or his <a href="http://twitter.com/fimoculous">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://fimoculous.tumblr.com/">Tumblr</a> or <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fimoculous/">Flickr</a>). He&#8217;s also part of the Mediaite team as our <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/our-site-designer-speaks-mediaite-from-the-inside-out/">designer/developer</a> and can frequently be spotted around our office, enough to have <a href="http://">stolen the Mayorship of Downtown Records from me on FourSquare</a>, but we&#8217;ll see how long that lasts. If there&#8217;s a word to describe Sorgatz it&#8217;s prolific, or maybe polymath &mdash; having spent a fair bit of time with him (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fimoculous/3722611754/">disclosure</a>!), I can attest to the breadth of his expertise about music, TV, film, books, media, new media,  and What The Kids Are Talking About (I am pretty sure he is a leading authority on <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/search.cfm?s=boxxy">Boxxy</a>). So it makes sense, then, that he should be the self-appointed curator of all those year-end lists that run through the very best, most interesting, or insert-quirky-descriptor-here lists that are the media staples come December of any given year. Sorgatz&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/year-review-2009.cfm">List of Lists</a>&#8221; every year is massive and meta, a great overview of the minutiae of the last 365 days as well as a document shedding light on how we collect, organize, prioritize and present information. There&#8217;s a lot going on under that spiky hairdo, so as we look back on 2009 he seemed like the perfect person to wrangle for our <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/5qq/">5QQ &#8211; Five Quick Questions</a>.<span id="more-60229"></span> </p>
<p><strong>1. How do you get your first news of the day?</strong></p>
<p>A media knowledge elixir is slowly filtrated into my skull by nanobots while I slumber.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m really into the <a href="http://www.bnonews.com/services/bno-news-iphone-application">BNO Breaking News iPhone app</a> lately. It breaks news faster than every source, and it delivers headlines in digestible Twitter morsels. Plus, it makes a CRAZY LOUD ALERT SOUND that wakes me up every morning, because naturally I sleep on my iPhone.</p>
<p>For everything else, I have 600 feeds in my RSS reader that eat away at my soul. (Knowledge isn&#8217;t power; it&#8217;s cancer.)</p>
<p><strong>2. Either, or (you gotta pick one!):</p>
<p>Tumblr or FourSquare?  </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible">Ansible!</a></p>
<p>But seriously: Isn&#8217;t it interesting that Tumblr and FourSquare are NYC&#8217;s major contributions to social software in the past couple years? I have a theory! They share this commonality: they&#8217;re both semi-closed networks. To wit: Though wildly successful, both platforms still somehow feel clubby and insidery. </p>
<p>In the long run, it will be interesting to see if this distinct (dare I say <em>New Yorky</em>?) quality is a feature or a bug.</p>
<p>(Before I lived in NYC, I had a name for social software like FourSquare&#8217;s predecessor, Dodgeball. I called it &#8220;NewYorkWare&#8221; because those apps seemed specifically made for the hyper-urban. Similarly, Tumblr seems made for the hyper-mediated.)</p>
<p><strong><em>Fringe </em>or<em> Gossip Girl</em>?  </strong></p>
<p>GG lost me this season. There are only so many ways to slip &#8220;I am Chuck Bass&#8221; into dialogue. Critics picked up on<em> Fringe</em> this year, but last was better.</p>
<p>The best show on TV right now is <em>Modern Family</em>. It&#8217;s sorta genius to mash up the crass family comedy from the late &#8217;80s (<em>Married With Children, Roseanne</em>) with the jittery faux-docudrama of the middle &#8217;00s (<em>Arrested Development, The Office</em>), and then in a twist, give it a heart.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/search.cfm?s=klosterman">Klosterman</a> or <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/search.cfm?s=heffernan">Heffernan</a>? </strong></p>
<p>I was at Chuck&#8217;s wedding this summer and it sorta made me cry. I hate that, so I&#8217;ll pick Heffernan.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s odd that you are making me choose between two columnists who currently don&#8217;t write a column!</p>
<p><em>(Ed. I like funny rhymes.)</em></p>
<p><strong><br />
<em>Mad Men</em> or <em>The Hills</em>? </strong></p>
<p>I have an essay in a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Reality-Matters-Writers-Clean-Watching/dp/006176664X/">reality TV collection</a> coming out in March that goes to bat for <em>The Hills</em>. People often say they hate <strong>The Hills</strong> because it&#8217;s fake, but I argue this is precisely what makes the show so interesting. This question &#8220;Is it fake?&#8221; is precisely the question we ask ourselves all day, whether while reading Wikipedia or trying to determine if an image has been Photoshopped. Interrogating truthiness, as Colbert called it, is what makes the act of watching <em>The Hills</em> so interesting: it embodies the idea of questioning facticity like nothing else in culture. </p>
<p>Interestingly, this also seems to be the primary dilemma of <em>Mad Men</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/o2/rex-and-city"><strong><a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/culture/rrrowl-beware-cougars-young-niece-cheetah?page=0">Cheetahs</a> or <a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/o2/rex-and-city">Tumblr Girls</a></a>?  </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megantereon">Megantereons</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
3. What&#8217;s the biggest story the media has missed this year?:</strong></p>
<p>1) The death of Michael Jackson.</p>
<p>2) Tiger Woods&#8217; mistresses.</p>
<p>3) Kanye v. Taylor.</p>
<p>Oh wait. Wrong question. Keep fuckin that chicken!<br />
<strong><br />
 4. Obligatory Twitter Question: Describe yourself in 140 characters or less (hash tag optional!)</strong></p>
<p>Narcissistic dilettante seeks narcissistic dilettantes for internet media foreplay.</p>
<p><strong>5. Are you nervous or excited about the future of journalism?  Why?</strong></p>
<p>If you have an office between SoHo and Flatiron, it&#8217;s <em>de rigeur</em> to say excited; anything above that, nervous.</p>
<p>I spend most of my day floating around between the two, so I&#8217;ll say pensive. </p>
<p>Briefly: There is more information available right now than there ever has been, and more people are involved in content generation than ever before. Despite the caterwauling you hear from the cranks, this is cause for celebration. However, a signal-to-noise problem persists, and &#8220;quality&#8221; is still the bugbear of the free content economy. </p>
<p>All in all, I feel less worried about waking up in the morning and not knowing something valuable than I did 15 years ago. So for me, the glass is half full of Jameson.<br />
 <strong><br />
Bonus question: How many lists do you have so far? </strong></p>
<p>Nearly 400, but I was hoping to close the year at 700. So I say to you internet taste makers and media list producers: get to work!<br />
<em><br />
Check out Rex&#8217;s year-end List of Lists <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/year-review-2009.cfm">here</a>, and <a href="http://fimoculous.com/">Fimoculous</a> for all sorts of other goodies. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/5qq-rex-sorgatz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC.com Purchases EveryBlock, Pushes Newspapers Closer to the Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbc-com-purchases-everyblock-pushes-newspapers-closer-to-the-brink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbc-com-purchases-everyblock-pushes-newspapers-closer-to-the-brink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Holovaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan D. Mutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EveryBlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fimoculous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflections of a Newsosaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Sorgatz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=14385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, MSNBC.com <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/17/msnbccom-acquires-hyperlocal-startup-everyblock/">announced its plans</a> to buy <strong>EveryBlock</strong>, an upstart young website that aggregates newspaper articles, blog posts, Flickr photos, and public records: so-called "hyper-local coverage" in fifteen cities.  Could this spell out yet more bad news for newspapers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-14535" title="msnbc logo" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/msnbc-logo.jpg" alt="msnbc logo" width="280" height="196" /></p>
<p>Yesterday, MSNBC.com <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/17/msnbccom-acquires-hyperlocal-startup-everyblock/">announced its plans</a> to buy <strong>EveryBlock</strong>, an upstart young website that aggregates newspaper articles, blog posts, Flickr photos, and public records like restaurant inspections and crime reports city block by city block to create so-called &#8220;hyper-local coverage&#8221; in fifteen cities. Since it was founded two years ago, the site had been running on a grant from the <a href="http://www.knightfoundation.org/">Knight Foundation</a>, which recently expired. EveryBlock&#8217;s founder, <strong>Adrian Holovaty</strong>, told <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/535508.php">journalism.co.uk</a> that in its current form, the site only does &#8220;five percent of what we want to do with it&#8221; and that it will &#8220;expand profoundly&#8221; with MSNBC.com&#8217;s backing.<span id="more-14385"></span></p>
<p>This could spell out yet more bad news for newspapers. Over at <a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/">Reflections of a Newsosaur</a>, newspaper veteran <strong>Alan D. Mutter</strong> asks, with some righteous indignation, &#8220;How could MSNBC.Com have scooped the newspaper industry by buying Everyblock.Com?&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-14391" title="everyblock" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/everyblock-283x247-custom.png" alt="everyblock" width="283" height="247" />EveryBlock&#8217;s blog and news aggregation are neat, but not quite revolutionary; it&#8217;s the wealth of civic information on the site really is unique. I speak from personal experience: discovering EveryBlock&#8217;s &#8220;Restaurant Inspections&#8221; feed a few weeks ago ruined a few of the restaurants in my neighborhood for me, once I discovered that they were rife with mice, spoiled food, and &#8220;flying insects.&#8221; With MSNBC.com&#8217;s deep pockets and newsroom behind it, the site, which in its current incarnation looks decidedly startuppy, could turn into a bigger destination for users and a ready source of in-house news stories.</p>
<p>But forget the editorial side: if the EveryBlock/MSNBC.com alliance really takes off, it could hurt local newspapers where it really hurts &#8212; their checkbooks.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/dan-macsai/popwise/microsoft-doomed-repeat-its-hyperlocal-past-everyblock">Fast Company</a>, online ad spending in the U.S. is currently flat, but online local-ad spending is projected to grow 5.4%. EveryBlock isn&#8217;t the only way to capture that flow, and it&#8217;s still unsteady enough that news outlets still have some time to play hyper-local catchup. But if they continue to stagnate, they&#8217;ll suffer the humiliation of being beaten at their own game by a website founded by a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft">software company</a> and a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBC">television network</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-3860.cfm"><strong>Related: Rex Sorgatz Interviews EveryBlock founder Adrian Holovaty [Fimoculous]</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbc-com-purchases-everyblock-pushes-newspapers-closer-to-the-brink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gossip Cop: Patrolling Celebrity</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gossip-cop-patrolling-celebrity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gossip-cop-patrolling-celebrity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rex Sorgatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egotastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fimoculous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip Cop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Tuna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Lewittes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perez Hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Sorgatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tara Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=7429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the launch of <a href="http://www.gossipcop.com/">Gossip Cop</a>. The premise is simple: investigate the accuracy of the daily anecdotes, the rampant rumors, and the cubicle grist known as celebrity gossip.  Think of it as TMZ meets Smoking Gun. Or maybe Perez Hilton meets Columbia Journalism Review. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a style="border: 0pt none;" href="http://www.gossipcop.com/"><img src="http://www.gossipcop.com/wp-content/themes/gossip/images/logo.png" border="0" alt="" hspace="5" vspace="0" width="240" height="271" align="right" /></a><em><span id=":2ak" dir="ltr">Rex Sorgatz designed Mediaite and <a href="http://www.gossipcop.com">Gossip Cop</a>, the new site co-founded by Mediaite publisher Dan Abrams and Gossip Cop editor <a href="http://www.gossipcop.com/about/">Michael Lewittes</a>. Here is his explanation of the site, which launches today.</span></em></p>
<p>Let me ask you, what kind of person do you think Scarlett Johansson is?</p>
<p>You have probably never met her, and I definitely have not, yet we both seemingly feel like we could describe her personality with reasonable accuracy.</p>
<p>This is peculiar.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not shocking to learn that humans enjoy making personality judgments based upon scant evidence. But with celebrities it seems exceptionally dubious, since we actually know literally <em>nothing</em> about them first-hand. Lohan, Aniston, Springsteen, Cruise &#8212; why do all these people seem to have well-formed personas? How much of it is real and how much is manufactured? What are the sources we use to scrape together these mysterious portraits?<span id="more-7429"></span></p>
<p>There are a few known mythological origins. Maybe that profile in <em>Rolling Stone</em> had some lasting influence, and perhaps those eight minutes on Leno left an impression. But these sources, mediated and filtered and manicured, seem exceptionally unreliable. So what else is there?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, we have their work. Scarlett gave a lasting impression in <em>Lost in Translation</em>, so perhaps we know a little more about her because of how she gobbles sushi with Bill Murray. But wait &#8212; she was <em>acting</em>. Can we really conclude anything about her personality from these flickering screen moments?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent an inordinate amount of time considering this question: <em>why do we think we know people who we&#8217;ll never actually know?</em></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my best guess: we trust gossip.</p>
<p>Before mass media, gossip was merely personal information shared about a mutual acquaintance. In other words, pre-modern gossip was the original conversational marketing: valued information shared by reputable sources.</p>
<p>With the onset of broadcasting, publishing, and eventually the internet, the intimacy of gossip bred with the entertainment industry, birthing the hybrid offspring known was celebrity gossip. Of all the animals in the media zoo, celebrity gossip emerged as the most chimerical creature. Every day, hundreds of weird little stories pop up on sites with names like <strong>Hollywood Tuna</strong> and <strong>Egotastic</strong> and <strong>Celebrity Puke</strong>. Sometimes they make outrageous claims (Amy Winehouse just ate a drunk baby!), and other times the narratives are ostentatiously mundane (Tara Reid just ate a taco!). Through these morsels of checkout lane anti-matter, we form lasting opinions about celebrities.</p>
<p>That finally brings us to today&#8217;s launch of <a href="http://www.gossipcop.com/"><strong>GossipCop.com</strong></a>, a site that I did the strategy/design/development on. The premise is simple: investigate the accuracy of the daily anecdotes, the rampant rumors, and the cubicle grist known as celebrity gossip. Think of it as TMZ meets Smoking Gun. Or maybe Perez Hilton meets Columbia Journalism Review. <em>Whatever</em> &#8212; the prevailing idea is that even seemingly unknowable information can be investigated in today&#8217;s info-rich economy.</p>
<p>My three favorite features on the site:</p>
<p>+ <strong>Truth Meter</strong>. Every post investigates a piece of celebrity gossip and provides a rating, from 0 to 10, based upon the likelihood of the story.</p>
<p>+ <strong>Paparazzi Patrol</strong>. Rather than churn out more celebrity video, Gossip Cop looks at the underside of the celebrity gossip business. By turning the camera back on the paparazzi, the site reveals the gossip creators for what they are. (This feature was originally dubbed &#8220;Papsmeared,&#8221; a name I really loved but which was ultimately dropped.)</p>
<p>+ <strong>Twit Happens</strong>. With its direct interaction and unfiltered access, Twitter could end up being the greatest invention in celebrity journalism since the camera. It is quickly become the ultimate device for determining how impressions are made, rumors are debunked, and celebrity battles are fought. This hand-picked list contains the best tweets of the day.</p>
<p>Truthfully, I&#8217;m not much of a celebrity news consumer. But I hope this site adds a new angle into the salacious, rumor-driven celebrity culture.</p>
<p>And maybe I can finally get to know Scarlett.</p>
<p><em>Rex Sorgatz is a writer, designer, and media consultant based in New York. His consulting agency, Kinda Sorta Media, launches new sites for media and commerce companies. He is a contributing editor at Wired and his work has appeared in New York and NPR. He blogs his internet life in real time at<em> </em></em><em><a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-6328.cfm">Fimoculous.com</a>, where this post was first published. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gossip-cop-patrolling-celebrity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

