<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; Harry Reid Pccc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/harry-reid-pccc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:45:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid Fires Back at Critical Public Option Ad</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/harry-reid-fires-back-at-critical-public-option-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/harry-reid-fires-back-at-critical-public-option-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid Pccc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Ad Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Change Campaign Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid Public Plan Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid Threatened]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Christopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=37370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/harry-reids-toughness-que_n_325349.html">previewed an ad, earlier this week,</a> that euphemistically asked whether Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) has the "toughness" to get a public health insurance option passed.  Mediaite has been trying for several days to get a statement from Senator Reid's office, and we finally have it.  They must have needed the time so they could make it extra-tough.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/harry-reids-toughness-que_n_325349.html">previewed an ad, earlier this week,</a> that euphemistically asked whether Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) has the &#8220;toughness&#8221; to get a public health insurance option passed.  Mediaite has been trying for several days to get a statement from Senator Reid&#8217;s office, and we finally have it.  They must have needed the time so they could make it extra-tough.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re just in the nick of time, too.  The ad, produced by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, begins airing in Nevada today.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cgj0FbPxSiY&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cgj0FbPxSiY&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Reid&#8217;s office sent us the following statement late yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reid’s position on the public option hasn’t changed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Kaplow! I think the impact of that thing just fused several of my vertabrae!</p>
<p>In case you don&#8217;t know Reid&#8217;s position on the public option, here&#8217;s their only-slightly-less-terse <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/harry-reids-toughness-que_n_325349.html">statement to HuffPo</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Senator Reid has always been a strong supporter of the public option and he will continue to work with the White House and the relevant committees to pass the strongest bill possible.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, the ad doesn&#8217;t question Reid&#8217;s position on the public option at all, but rather, his ability to get it done.</p>
<p>On its face, Reid&#8217;s posture seems to mirror <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/white-house-public-option-or-better/">that of the White House</a>. The key difference is that Reid&#8217;s promise to pass &#8220;the strongest bill possible&#8221; leaves open the idea of passing something just to get it passed. The <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/white-house-public-option-or-better/">White House has said</a> that the President will not sign a law that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;provide choice and competition,&#8221; and is not interested in signing something just to get a bill passed.</p>
<p>At this point, what Reid or the White House have to say is irrelevant.  What is at issue is whether Reid and the White House are listening.  The American people <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2009/8/26/131840/361">want the public option</a>, and they know that the President, Reid, and the <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/63165-pelosi-seeks-centrist-support-for-liberal-public-option-plan">vast majority of congressional Democrats</a> support it. If they fail to get it passed, they will have proven the uselessness of a Democratic majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/harry-reid-fires-back-at-critical-public-option-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

