<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; In Touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/in-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker Finds That OK! And Star Are Most Lie-Filled Tabloids</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gawker-finds-that-ok-and-star-are-most-lie-filled-tabloids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gawker-finds-that-ok-and-star-are-most-lie-filled-tabloids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Busis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life & Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OK!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OK! magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=176322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that the information contained in the magazines sold near supermarket checkout lines is generally unsubstantiated at best and flat-out false at worse. But which tabloids are the most dishonest?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/gawker-finds-that-ok-and-star-are-most-lie-filled-tabloids/attachment/tabs_frontimage/" rel="attachment wp-att-176341"><img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/tabs_frontimage-300x223.jpg" alt="" title="tabs_frontimage" width="300" height="223" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-176341" /></a>Everyone knows that the information contained in the magazines sold near supermarket checkout lines is generally unsubstantiated at best and flat-out false at worse. But which tabloids are the most dishonest?</p>
<p>Taking a page from the playbook of Mediaite&#8217;s sister site <a href="http://www.gossipcop.com" target="_blank">Gossip Cop</a>, Gawker&#8217;s <strong>Maureen O&#8217;Connor</strong>—along with an army of interns—<a href="http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most?skyline=true&#038;s=i" target="_blank">scrutinized almost two years&#8217; worth of issues</a> from five leading tabloids, including <em>Us Weekly</em>, <em>Star</em>, <em>Life &#038; Style</em>, <em>In Touch</em>, and <em>OK!</em>, to find out which mag lied the most. (The nation&#8217;s most trusted celebrity magazine, <em>People</em>, was left out of the investigation because, as O&#8217;Connor writes, it &#8220;publishes so few unconfirmed rumors—and instead relies on scoops that have been spoon-fed by publicists.&#8221;)<br />
<span id="more-176322"></span></p>
<p>The result? <em>OK!</em> and <em>Star</em> have the worst records. Less than 10 percent of the stories advertised on both magazines&#8217; covers turn out to be true, and less than 15 percent of each magazines&#8217; overall stories are accurate. <em>US Weekly</em> came out on top in Gawker&#8217;s study—but even there, the website found that 65 percent of cover stories and 41 percent of stories overall are lies. Unsurprisingly, O&#8217;Connor also found that most of the lies are somehow tied to a <a href="http://gawker.com/5638479/a-thousand-little-brangelina-cover-lies" target="_blank">five-year-old scandal</a> involving <strong>Jennifer Aniston</strong>, <strong>Brad Pitt</strong>, and <strong>Angelina Jolie</strong>. </p>
<p>Read the full post (complete with fancy chart) at <a href="http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most?skyline=true&#038;s=i" target="_blank">Gawker</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/gawker-finds-that-ok-and-star-are-most-lie-filled-tabloids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Attempt To Reclaim Ratings Gold? Covers MJ &#8220;Body Double&#8221; Story</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnn-relives-golden-era-of-yester-month-covers-michael-jackson-body-double-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnn-relives-golden-era-of-yester-month-covers-michael-jackson-body-double-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Double]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Lemon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson Body Double]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Is It]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Is It Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom O'Neill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=38703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets say that you are in charge of CNN. Not only are ratings dismal, but the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-talks-about-the-big-story-of-the-day-fox-news/">biggest story in cable news </a> focuses on your competitor, and covering <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnns-david-gergen-the-white-house-battle-with-fox-news-is-helping-fncs-ratings/"> the story drives viewers towards them</a>. What do you do? How about go back to <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-gets-its-groove-back-with-michael-jackson-coverage/">the story that served you so well during the summer months</a> -- you know, resurrect the <strong>Michael Jackson</strong> story. Brilliant!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-38713" title="cnn_jackson" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cnn_jackson.jpg" alt="cnn_jackson" width="492" height="316" />Lets say that you are in charge of CNN. Not only are ratings dismal, but the <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-talks-about-the-big-story-of-the-day-fox-news/">biggest story in cable news</a> focuses on your competitor, and covering <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnns-david-gergen-the-white-house-battle-with-fox-news-is-helping-fncs-ratings/"> the story drives viewers towards them</a>. Oh, and the balloon boy thing <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/wolf-blitzer-tries-his-best-to-lose-cnns-balloon-boy-scoop/">didn&#8217;t work out too well</a>. What do you do? How about go back to <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-gets-its-groove-back-with-michael-jackson-coverage/">the story that served you so well during the summer months</a> &#8212; you know, resurrect the <strong>Michael Jackson</strong> story. Brilliant!<span id="more-38703"></span></p>
<p>Yesterday CNN host <strong>Don Lemon</strong> had on <strong>Tom O&#8217;Neill</strong>, Senior Editor of <em>In Touch,</em> to discuss rumors that the soon-to-be-released Jackson documentary &#8220;This Is It&#8221; is not as legitimate has it claims. Specifically, that a body double was used in the film.</p>
<p>When Lemon said of the controversy, &#8220;and like everything else Jackson touches (this film) probably will turn into solid gold,&#8221; one got the sense that he may has well have been talking about CNN&#8217;s ratings.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7sbQnKe79us&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7sbQnKe79us&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnn-relives-golden-era-of-yester-month-covers-michael-jackson-body-double-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

