<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; McKinsey &amp; Co</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/mckinsey-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McKinsey Visits Vogue, Introduces Anna Wintour to &#8216;The Web&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/mckinsey-visits-vogue-introduces-anna-wintour-to-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/mckinsey-visits-vogue-introduces-anna-wintour-to-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glynnis MacNicol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKinsey & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=14671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Great McKinsey-Condé Nast consultation <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/cafeteria-eating-destroys-the-myth-of-conde-nast/">continues</a>.  This week finds the intrepid consultants making a visit to <strong>Anna Wintour</strong>'s office.  And what they've apparently gleaned thus far is that <em>Vogue</em> is a great representation of everything that is wrong at Condé.  Also, <strong>Anna Wintour</strong> may or may not have known about "the Web" before now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-14707" title="anna-wintour-62508-12" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/anna-wintour-62508-12.jpg" alt="anna-wintour-62508-12" width="167" height="260" />The Great McKinsey-Condé Nast consultation <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/cafeteria-eating-destroys-the-myth-of-conde-nast/">continues</a>.  This week finds the intrepid consultants making a visit to <strong>Anna Wintour</strong>&#8216;s office.  And the what they&#8217;ve apparently gleaned is that <em>Vogue</em> is a great representation of everything that is wrong at Condé.  This <a href=" http://www.observer.com/2009/media/vogue-traveler-get-thorough-exams-courtesy-mckinsey">from today&#8217;s</a> <em>New York Observer</em>:<span id="more-14671"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>If McKinsey and Mr. Townsend can figure out how to maintain the majesty of a brand like Vogue, while also reining in editorial costs (photo shoots, models, hair and makeup, clothing allowances for Anna, and so on), then they’ll feel they can effectively accomplish that for other brands, a source said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation: If McKinsey can figure out how to make <em>Vogue</em> more profitable and relevant in the brave new media world, they can do anything!  Actually, they are apparently looking at both <em>Vogue</em> and <em>Condé Nast Traveler</em> as examples of how to deal with the whole company.  And not only because of their &#8220;magesty&#8221; &#8212; both magazines have &#8220;unusual Web strategy.&#8221;  And finally we arrive at the crux of the problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>Vogue is represented online by style.com and Traveler by concierge.com., rather than by their own brand names. Several Condé Nast insiders have told The Observer in recent weeks that Anna Wintour is beginning to the “get the Web,” and perhaps the McKinsey trip helped prompt a sudden awakening.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps the question really is, does a magazine, or its legendary editor deserve to survive, if it can be said of them in the summer of 2009 that they are &#8220;beginning to the get the Web”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/mckinsey-visits-vogue-introduces-anna-wintour-to-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast Admits Defeat, Realigning</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/conde-nast-faces-reality-realigning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/conde-nast-faces-reality-realigning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glynnis MacNicol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Townsend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graydon Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKinsey & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=4067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the reality has finally caught up to Conde Nast.  A tipster passed on this email, which was just sent out to all Conde Employees informing them that the company has been forced to rethink "the way we do business in many instances and incorporate efficiencies in every step of our process."  Short version: tighten your Gucci belts kids and put on your walking shoes, no more Town Cars in your future!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4073" title="vogue1" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/vogue1-150x198.jpg" alt="vogue1" width="150" height="198" />Looks like the reality has finally caught up to Conde Nast.  A tipster passed on this email, which was just sent out to all Conde Employees informing them that the company has been forced to rethink &#8220;the way we do business in many instances and incorporate efficiencies in every step of our process.&#8221;  Short version: tighten your Gucci belts kids and put on your walking shoes, no more Town Cars in your future!<span id="more-4067"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>From: Townsend, Chuck<br />
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 4:41 PM<br />
To: Conde Nast Publications &#8211; Employees Only<br />
Subject: Important Announcement</p>
<p>The US economy has contracted at a rate not seen in 80 years, forcing companies across America to adjust to the reality of this major economic setback. Our company and our brands have weathered this storm. However, we are not immune to the effects of the substantial revenue losses resulting from the deep and prolonged recession. Consequently, we must realign Condé Nast to be a successful business in an emerging economy that is now predicted to be painfully slow in recovering.</p>
<p>This is a considerable and complicated task, forcing us to rethink the way we do business in many instances and incorporate efficiencies in every step of our process. Beginning this week, I am dedicating myself and a team of my colleagues to this project. We will work with consultants, including McKinsey &amp; Company, to develop new perspectives on optimizing our approach to business, growing revenues, and enhancing our brand assets. All areas of Condé Nast will be included in the study.</p>
<p>There is no doubt in my mind that the strength of our brands and people will provide us with the opportunity to participate in America’s economic recovery. Ensuring our financial health is paramount to our ability to be part of that process.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/conde-nast-faces-reality-realigning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

