<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; Representative Earl Blumenauer teabag remarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/representative-earl-blumenauer-teabag-remarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did President Obama Call Tea Partiers &#8220;Teabag Anti-Government People?&#8221; (UPDATE)</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-president-obama-call-tea-partiers-teabag-anti-government-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-president-obama-call-tea-partiers-teabag-anti-government-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Quigley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama Teabag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Blumenauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT Prescriptions Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescriptions Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Earl Blumenauer teabag remarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teabag anti-government people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=44098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of his yearend push to pass sweeping health reform legislation, the last thing <strong>President Obama</strong> needs is another dustup with the tea party set. Is it possible that he referred to them as "teabag" people in discussions with House Democrats? <strong> Update: a Democratic Representative's office responds. </strong>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/obama-300x200.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-44105" title="obama-300x200" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/obama-300x200.jpg" alt="obama-300x200" width="300" height="200" /></a>In the midst of his yearend push to pass sweeping health reform legislation, the last thing <strong>President Obama</strong> needs is another dustup with the tea party set. Is it possible that he referred to them as &#8220;teabag&#8221; people in discussions with House Democrats?</p>
<p><strong>Update: a Democratic Representative&#8217;s office responds &#8212; see end of post.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-44098"></span></p>
<p>From the <em><a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/07/lawmakers-detail-obamas-pitch/">New York Times&#8217;</a></em><a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/07/lawmakers-detail-obamas-pitch/"> Prescriptions Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Obama, during his private pep talk to Democrats, recognized Mr. Owens election and then posed a question to the other lawmakers. According to Representative Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, who supports the health care bill, the president asked, “<strong>Does anybody think that the teabag, anti-government people are going to support them if they bring down health care?</strong> All it will do is confuse and dispirit” Democratic voters “and it will encourage the extremists.” (<em>emphasis added</em>)</p></blockquote>
<p>The quote should be taken with a few large grains of salt before one draws any conclusions about President Obama: it is, after all, &#8220;according to Representative Earl Blumenauer,&#8221; and could be a paraphrase rather than a direct quote.</p>
<p>Still, the quote&#8217;s emergence is a sign of the powerful information-sifting capabilities of the social web: even though the offending word &#8220;teabag&#8221; appeared two thirds of the way into a wonky post on a fairly obscure <em>NYT</em> blog, it&#8217;s already starting to bubble up on social aggregator sites like Digg and Reddit. This, in turn, highlights the dark side of these sites, which sometimes tend towards sensationalism and a herd mentality: a Digg headline <a href="http://digg.com/politics/Obama_uses_the_word_teabagger_to_describe_opposition">falsely claims</a> that &#8220;Obama uses the word &#8216;teabagger&#8217; to describe the opposition.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><strong>It’s possible that an older fellow like Earl Blumenauer could naively use the phrase ‘teabag’ without realizing its explosive connotations — which is why the question of who said what and who paraphrased what is so crucial. </strong></span></span></em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a question worth asking whether the <em>New York Times</em> deliberately buried the lede on this one, out of genteelness or whatever other motivation. By now, anyone who has been seriously following the tea party movement should know that a lot of people out there are greatly offended by the phrases &#8220;teabag&#8221; and &#8220;teabagger,&#8221; given their sexual connotations (cf. <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagger">Urban Dictionary</a>).</p>
<p>Yes, Obama&#8217;s healthcare pitch to lawmakers is important to the public debate, but in today&#8217;s political climate, the possibility that Obama used the word &#8220;teabag&#8221; in conversation with Democratic lawmakers is a story of its own, not a noted-in-the-third-paragraph-with-no-followup story. At the same time, it&#8217;s possible that an older fellow like Earl Blumenauer could naively use the phrase &#8216;teabag&#8217; without realizing its explosive connotations &#8212; which is why the question of who said what and who paraphrased what is so crucial.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Representative Blumenauer&#8217;s communications director tells Mediaite that Blumenauer was paraphrasing.<strong> </strong>&#8220;Congressman Blumenauer was simply summarizing in his own words the President&#8217;s remarks following the caucus meeting,&#8221; she said in an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/did-president-obama-call-tea-partiers-teabag-anti-government-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

