<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediaite &#187; Sarah Palin mustache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tag/sarah-palin-mustache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last Year&#8217;s Sarah Palin Newsweek Cover Controversy? Not Sexy Enough!</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-other-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-other-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Walters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Meacham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin facial hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin unwanted facial hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runner's World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin mustache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Runner's World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SarahPalinUSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Christopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Did Sarah Palin Think Would Happen When She Posed In Spandex?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who Wears Short Shorts?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=47543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is currently involved in a <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/newsweek-cover-races-to-the-bottom-with-old-photo-of-palin/">heated back-and-forth</a> with <a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/11/17/official-statement-on-newsweek-s-sarah-palin-cover.aspx">Newsweek magazine</a> (while Runner's World <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/runners-world-distances-from-newsweek-palin-photo/">ducks for cover</a>) over their use of a sexy cover photo of her on their most recent issue. This whole thing sounded weirdly familiar to me. Newsweek magazine accused of <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/palin-newsweek-cover-sexist-country-needs-to-exercise-more/">sexist cover photo</a>, headline <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/newsweek-cover-races-to-the-bottom-with-old-photo-of-palin/">calling her a problem</a>? Sure enough, it looks like this is an <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/162396">annual event for Newsweek.</a> There are a few key differences, though. 

Back in October of 2008, <em>Newsweek</em> took fire from Palin supporters for a cover photo that was NOT sexy <em>enough</em>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-47556" title="palin_newsweek_cover" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/palin_newsweek_cover.jpg" alt="palin_newsweek_cover" width="200" height="269" />Sarah Palin is currently involved in a <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/newsweek-cover-races-to-the-bottom-with-old-photo-of-palin/">heated back-and-forth</a> with <a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/11/17/official-statement-on-newsweek-s-sarah-palin-cover.aspx">Newsweek magazine</a> (while Runner&#8217;s World <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/runners-world-distances-from-newsweek-palin-photo/">ducks for cover</a>) over their use of a sexy cover photo of her on their most recent issue. This whole thing sounded weirdly familiar to me. <em>Newsweek</em> magazine accused of <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/palin-newsweek-cover-sexist-country-needs-to-exercise-more/">sexist cover photo</a>, headline <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/newsweek-cover-races-to-the-bottom-with-old-photo-of-palin/">calling her a problem</a>? Sure enough, it looks like this is an <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/162396">annual event for Newsweek.</a> There are a few key differences, though.<span id="more-47543"></span></p>
<p>Way back in October of 2008, <em>Newsweek</em> took fire from Palin supporters for a cover photo that was not sexy <em>enough</em>. In a <a href="http://jezebel.com/5060704/the-sarah-palin-non+photoshop-chop-fox-news-wants-to-alter-your-reality">segment on Fox News</a>, a Republican media consultant picked the extreme closeup apart, pointing out wrinkles, pores, and unwanted facial hair.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yStRlkHyFrE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yStRlkHyFrE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>While Jezebel, among others, <a href="http://jezebel.com/5060704/the-sarah-palin-non+photoshop-chop-fox-news-wants-to-alter-your-reality">pointed out the falseness</a> of the assertion that Obama magazine covers were retouched to make him look flawless, the title of the cover story was a dead giveaway: <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/162396">The Palin Problem</a>. It doesn&#8217;t seem likely that they picked the photo for its artistic merit.</p>
<p>The biggest difference then, though, was that Palin herself wasn&#8217;t doing the complaining. The McCain campaign staff that she so <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29611.html">thoroughly derides now</a> apparently kept her from lashing out then, and wisely so. Getting worked up over a magazine cover, especially ones as relatively innocuous as these, doesn&#8217;t bespeak the toughness demanded of a leader.</p>
<p>Plus, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/runners-world-distances-from-newsweek-palin-photo/"><strong>Rachel Sklar</strong> has a point</a>. When she posed for the sexy Runner&#8217;s World spread, she and the magazine had to know they were going to sell to a wider audience than just jogging enthusiasts. This doesn&#8217;t make Palin fair game, but it raises the bar for what she gets to call &#8220;sexist.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for <em>Newsweek</em>, their respective points might have been better served in each case by using less controversial cover photos, but would have arguably been seen by far fewer people. Maybe, in the future, they should stick with (real) pictures of Palin holding guns. Everyone seems to like those.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-47559" title="Palintology" src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Palintology.jpg" alt="Palintology" width="250" height="342" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-other-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

