The only thing that Breibart is worried about is what Weiner photo to use as a screen saver.

True . The left has the union thugs and goons and true believers who don’t know when to stop . The followers of Soros would love to curry favor with the Spooky Dude by any means necessary . See Ayers, Bill …Dohrn , Bernardine …, Trumka , Richard,… the Unibomber … etc.

Breitbart has nothing to worry about…..liberals are nice caring people!!

“Career”

You mean falsely reporting things? This story has been a deviation from the norm for him, FoxNews will deify this attention whore now for finally reporting on something correctly, even as inane as this story is.

I remember Paul Begala saying his mama always told him to look at the source, and he was not believing Breitbart for all the trouble he had caused. Big portion of crow for this clown.

I wonder if BillO worries that Andrea Makris will come after him with a falafel.

Manufacturing fake threats against themselves and pretending to be dodging assassins’ bullets seems to be a favorite pasttime of right-wing journalists.

The only thing O’Reilly is under threat from is “loofah!” chants.

Sam M. said:
The only thing that Breibart is worried about is what Weiner photo to use as a screen saver.

Recycling your jokes already Sam? It wasn’t that funny the first time you posted this.

BarneyFranken said:
Recycling your jokes already Sam? It wasn’t that funny the first time you posted this.

For a rube like you, why not?

Media Matters, noting he could not name “a more grotesque organization in the history of media.”

Some sick folks to be sure.

BarneyFranken said:
Recycling your jokes already Sam? It wasn’t that funny the first time you posted this.

He’s as original as white paint.

Jaurez said:
He’s as original as white paint.

No one will ever question your IQ.

Oh boy, iq quips..zzzzzzz

By the way, media matters has scrubbed their website of all things weinergate.

go to their website and try to find something about it.- Its almost as if the story never happened!

http://mediamatters.org/search/index?qstring=weiner&x=0&y=0

searching “weiner” somehow brings up nothing between may 31st and june 7th. Hmm, thats odd isnt it?

But isnt media matters supposed to be so reputable, so honest, so unbiased?

Breitbart has to be more hated by the left than Beck by now. Maybe even hated more than Palin. If so, then Andrew should take precautions.

Jaurez said:
Oh boy, iq quips..zzzzzzz

It makes perfect sense coming from you. LMAO!!

BarneyFranken said:
By the way, media matters has scrubbed their website of all things weinergate.

go to their website and try to find something about it.- Its almost as if the story never happened!

http://mediamatters.org/search/index?qstring=weiner&x=0&y=0

searching “weiner” somehow brings up nothing between may 31st and june 7th. Hmm, thats odd isnt it?

But isnt media matters supposed to be so reputable, so honest, so unbiased?

Barn you are indeed a brain stem.

Garth, how many time you been banned? A dozen? More?

The Left hates Andrew Breitbart with a passion. They hated him when he broke the Acorn story. A short while later, they slandered him when tried to make him responsible for bugging a Senator’s office — and never apologized when these accusation proved to be bogus. And just last week they accused him of lying, doctoring photos, hacking into a Congressman’s computer accounts, and a bunch of other vile stuff — and he was innocent of every one of these charges. As now is absolutely clear to everybody.

And now that Breitbart has been vindicated time and time again, they hate him all the more — because he has made the American Left look foolish. And the American Left believes that it is their mission to make THEIR OPPONENTS LOOK FOOLISH, and there is nothing they dislike more than getting a taste of their own bitter medicine. They fear ridicule above everything else, even as that becomes their weapon of choice in all matters.

So, yes, Breitbart has reasons for concern. The liberal media will scrutinize his every move and jump on him on the basis of the least amount of evidence — or even on the basis of NO evidence as recent events have shown.

felixw said:
The Left hates Andrew Breitbart with a passion. They hated him when he broke the Acorn story. A short while later, they slandered him when tried to make him responsible for bugging a Senator’s office — and never apologized when these accusation proved to be bogus. And just last week they accused him of lying, doctoring photos, hacking into a Congressman’s computer accounts, and a bunch of other vile stuff — and he was innocent of every one of these charges. As now is absolutely clear to everybody.

And now that Breitbart has been vindicated time and time again, they hate him all the more — because he has made the American Left look foolish. And the American Left believes that it is their mission to make THEIR OPPONENTS LOOK FOOLISH, and there is nothing they dislike more than getting a taste of their own bitter medicine. They fear ridicule above everything else, even as that becomes their weapon of choice in all matters.

So, yes, Breitbart has reasons for concern. The liberal media will scrutinize his every move and jump on him on the basis of the least amount of evidence — or even on the basis of NO evidence as recent events have shown.

Same old pathetic rant that we have all hear a hundred times. Jesus,. you are a bore.

The most interesting part of this interview came in the last 5 seconds of the video which showed the “oh shit” look on breitbart’s face after Bill told him twice to be very careful.

Jaurez said:
Garth, how many time you been banned? A dozen? More?

More. How many time have you had a lobotomy?

Not sure he’s in that much danger, but he should be wary of those blindly sheeping it up to vile outlets like some of the ones mentioned who even use murder and the deaths of innoents to push hate, and vile political agendas.

Looks like moderation has the night off.

Bummer.

Two words, Andrea Makris.

MediaWhorse said:
Manufacturing fake threats against themselves and pretending to be dodging assassins’ bullets seems to be a favorite pasttime of right-wing journalists.

The only thing O’Reilly is under threat from is “loofah!” chants.

Sooooooo. I guess you forgot about Hillary dodging sniper fire when she got off of the plain?

Sam M. said:
Same old pathetic rant that we have all hear a hundred times. Jesus,. you are a bore.

Folks, be sympathetic to Sam. When Mediaite announced its new policy to get rid of obscene, irrelevant or abusive comments, that took away his entire repertoire in one day.

You know what has been a lot of fun?

Looking at some old Weinergate columns from last week.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-covers-rep-weiner-why-listen-to-character-assassin-andrew-breitbart/

Whoops.

Bill is referring to the very real thugs described in Coulter’s new book, Demonic. Liberals naturally group into thuggish groups because they can’t use logic.

They start out with selective facts, but soon degenerate in name calling. If that doesn’t work, the real thuggish behavior starts. At this point, the liberals feel they are victims and that they have the right o protest, attack, disrupt, etc.

Glackin said:
This is another chapter in the uber-right’s campaign.
It’s a combination of “Wag the Dog” (keep them away from the Ryan Fiasco.) and Nixonian “rat-f#cking.”
“Pay no attention to the corporations behind the curtain who are writing the laws.”

The comments are especially delicious arent they?

BarneyFranken said:
You know what has been a lot of fun?

Looking at some old Weinergate columns from last week.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-covers-rep-weiner-why-listen-to-character-assassin-andrew-breitbart/

Whoops.

Are you waiting for Mediaite to apologize to Andrew Breitbart? Keep on waiting. They still haven’t apologized for slandering him a year ago, when they falsely accused him of bugging a Senator’s office. No journalist in America has been smeared so often — and on the basis of little (and in many cases no) evidence. Mediaite has done Breitbart a tremendous disservice, and really ought to fess up.

dont forget this whopper of a lie:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/rep-weiners-spokesman-weve-retained-counsel-considering-civil-or-criminal-actions/

ganymede said:
Business must be very, very slow if the people at Mediaite have to create a story out of what was obviously a prank, and , of course, when you have Breitbart’s name attached to the story it all becomes even more suspicious. Weiner is a dangerous person for the rightwingers because he’s very bright and has dogged New York style determination about issues, and he’s usually on the side of the angels. Virtually everything Brietbart is involved with has an element of criminal intent wrapped around it. It’s a shame that Mediaite gets involved in such low level stuff.

Yes, for shame Mediaite! Weiner is on the side of the angels!! LMFAO

One can only hope Breitbart ends up underneath a NYC Garbage Truck.

Media Matters grotesque? Quite the inversion of reality…

Byron Williams shot police on the way to the Tides Foundation because of whom?

I certainly hope that Breitbart continues to live in good health but understand that many on the right are actively itching for a fight.

TangledThorns said:
e)
Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2

Breitbart has to be more hated by the left than Beck by now. Maybe even hated more than Palin.

If so, then Andrew should take precautions.

REALLYYY NOW….
Bettter check your self, is that a threat?
LMAO wanna be wise-guy/basement-Soros-lotion-boys always get LOLed

msblkwidow said:
I think Rep. Weiner is correct when he said that this is a distractor. I thank him for viewing it as such. But…I know that this issue must be addressed. If…if Andrew Breitbart is behind this so-called prank, then he should be sued…again.

Whoever is behind this awful prank, according to the young lady who was named, should pay dearly for being responsible for the harrassment this young lady and her family/friends have had to endure.

So I take it you still think whoever is responsible should “pay dearly?”

Because it doesn’t look like Weiner wants to pay any price at all.

tiredofbs said:
REALLYYY NOW….
Bettter check your self, is that a threat?
LMAO wanna be wise-guy/basement-Soros-lotion-boys always get LOLed

I may have missed the sarcasm here,,,Please delete above10:37 post

Remember when this was all just a hoax?

Look how dizzy the liberals got themselves trying to spin the truth:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/29/980400/-Breitbarts-

Hey Markos, how does crow taste?

Fokker News said:
This whole story has no legs and will shortly die.

tag that at May 30, 2011 at 3:04 pm

Holy Crap Fokker was impossibly wrong about this..lol!

All I know is that something has to be done with the thugs
that bought & paid for the American MSM -Soros et al

The JournOlisters The Anarchists, The EnviroLoones
60′s Radical Terrorists in Media & Politics and all their lil minions
too scared to say anything sitting back watchin this country go down the toilet.

Never thought I’d say this: Glenn Beck was/is 100% right.

MediaWhorse May 30, 2011 at 3:13 pm said:
Don’t you love it when those who scream loudest about the media and do nothing but criticize the media and journalists 24/7/365 — looking at you Breitbart — actually try their own hand at journalism?

You see what happens: Jumping the gun before any facts are known, printing rumor and speculation, and making themselves look like complete jackasses in the process.

Let this be a lesson to all you mainstream media types! This is what to expect if the Breitbarts of the world were in control. Unsubstantiated rumor and drivel all day, every day.

Congratulations conservatives, this is your media on Breitbart.

Yes, jumping the gun sure does make someone look like a complete jackass! This is pretty embarrassing.

BarneyFranken says:

Don’t see too much of the poster that was calling himself “itwasextortion” round these parts anymore. ;)

BFD said:
This story is pointless to me until we get some kind of proof from either side.
TBH if it is true I would be the first to call for Weiner’s resignation.

Not for the photo, he could have survived that.
For the lying.

Hey BFD- You havent called for Weiner’s resignation yet.

darladoon said:
“this weekend’s biggest story”?

really?

aside from breitbart’s face, and mediaite’s fledgling reputation, we now have CNN.

credibility down the tubes….

Credibility down the tubes indeed!

Michael Adam said:
One can only hope Breitbart ends up underneath a NYC Garbage Truck.

Such continued hate from the left.

I don’t want Weiner to resign. I want him to stay there and be a thorn in the side of Harry Reid and Nancy every single day.

I’ve even felt the odd twinge of sympathy for the little wiener. Honestly, I think he is one of the weird little men who’s entire life was a facade. I’m afraid for him at this point. Not by anyone else – but himself.

MediaWhorse said:
MediaWhorse says:
June 7, 2011 at 9:31 pm  (Quote)
3  21
Manufacturing fake threats against themselves and pretending to be dodging assassins’ bullets seems to be a favorite pasttime of right-wing journalists.

———————————————————–

“[Andrew Breitbart]…I want that bastard destroyed. Now.[...] when I say I want him destroyed I am not kidding. I want to see him penniless, homeless, begging on the street for money to buy food[...] he can die on the street so far as I’m concerned[...] let you and your rich ass Brentwood family suffer” – Tim Wise (May 31, 2011)

Keep in mind that Tim Wise is widely respected in academia and in the leftist world.

Wasn’t Breitbart just an errand boy for Schmucker and Obama the Mole?

Weiner (he should pronounce it the proper German way, “Vine-er”, from wine producers) is a threat to Schmucker, and weighed in for Israel against Obama the Mole’s “’67 borders” speech.

New York will lose one or more representatives in 2012 anyway; the Democratic leadership might as well give Breitbart the derogatory evidence and let him do the dirty work of outing Weiner.

Am I wrong?

BarneyFranken said:
Remember when this was all just a hoax?

Look how dizzy the liberals got themselves trying to spin the truth:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/29/980400/-Breitbarts-

Hey Markos, how does crow taste?

Markos doesn’t eat crow…he gobbles Weiner.

Weiner is completely wrong for lying to begin with about this whole fiasco. But Breightbart needs to remember one thing. “He who laughs last laughs hardest.”

Bretbart is a human fart.

The only person who would want to kill Not so Breitbart – is his mother.

Greg said:
Media Matters grotesque? Quite the inversion of reality…

Byron Williams shot police on the way to the Tides Foundation because of whom?

I certainly hope that Breitbart continues to live in good health but understand that many on the right are actively itching for a fight.

ok – so you have now posted this same smear, oh I don’t know – maybe 100 times. Is it out of your system yet?

BarneyFranken said:
BFD said:
This story is pointless to me until we get some kind of proof from either side.
TBH if it is true I would be the first to call for Weiner’s resignation.

Not for the photo, he could have survived that.
For the lying.

Hey BFD- You havent called for Weiner’s resignation yet.

Haha This is great :)

breitbart is basically 1 for 4 now, and he actually wants an apology?!

glenn113 said:
Weiner is completely wrong for lying to begin with about this whole fiasco. But Breightbart needs to remember one thing. “He who laughs last laughs hardest.”

I think you meant “He who laughs last, didn’t get the joke”

darladoon said:
breitbart is basically 1 for 4 now, and he actually wants an apology?!

Lets see, he’s

-Taken down ACORN
-Taken down (ex) congressman weiner
-Embarrassed Salon, Daily Kos, Media Matters, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and a whole host of others
-Exposed Journolist and shut it down
-Exposed the Pigford scam and outed the fraud
-Has got an X rated pic to use just in case Weiner boy wants to get frisky again

I’d say he’s batting 1.000!

darladoon said:
breitbart is basically 1 for 4 now, and he actually wants an apology?!

how’s the remedial math class coming along?

LoyalOpposition said:
Lets see, he’s

-Taken down ACORN
-Taken down (ex) congressman weiner
-Embarrassed Salon, Daily Kos, Media Matters, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and a whole host of others
-Exposed Journolist and shut it down
-Exposed the Pigford scam and outed the fraud
-Has got an X rated pic to use just in case Weiner boy wants to get frisky again

I’d say he’s batting 1.000!

You forgot debunking that crap about the n-word being shouted 15 times.That was huge.

500K4Sarah2Speak June 4, 2011 at 3:40 am said:
For those of you who think the authors of this fiasco are either credible or relaible, please read below.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/internet/mike-stack-weinergate-co-pilot-219073

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/leaked_emails_show_tip_to_breitbart_about_weiner_t.php

This is the caliber of creep that Breitbarts ahteful agenda inspires.

It is criminal that they were actively harrasing minors online, and it is utterly hypocritical that they should try to frame the congressman with the charge, when THEY are the only people to have acted MORE than innapropriately.

What “family values” do these deranged speed-freaks stand for?

Just wondering: What flavor of kool-aid did talkingpointsmemo serve you?

Wow- Breitbart did such a good job of framing Weiner, that even Weiner thought he was guilty!

LOL you guys are hilarious. Take a bow, Sarah2speak- you deserve it.

Rocky Reed May 28, 2011 at 8:18 pm said:
Breitbart and his right wing flying monkey cohorts don’t get the benefit of a doubt. They have been proven guilty of distortion several times over during their brief history of smear campaigns and misleadingly re-edited videos. Think Shirley Sherrod. Think ACORN. In short, Andrew Brietbart is a sleazy freaking liar.

Breitbart’s sole purpose of existence is to get rich by smearing the enemies of the Republican party and the special interests whom they serve. If Andrew Breitbart told me that it was raining outside I would open a window to verify it for myself. I don’t trust him any farther than I can throw Sarah Palin’s $150,000 wardrobe.

This reads like a liberal version of mad libs. (mad lib-erals, perhaps?)

Lets all play! I’ll start it over new:

(name of conservative you hate) and his (four word insult) don’t get the benefit of a doubt. They have been proven guilty of (project a liberal tactic onto target) several times over during their brief history of (something Media Matters does) and (something Jon Stewart does) Think (something conservative target is notorious for) Think (something target did that we need to discredit). In short, (conservative you hate) is a (three word insult).

(Conservative you hate)’s sole purpose of existence is to get rich by smearing the enemies of the Republican party and the special interests whom they serve. If (Conservative you hate) told me that it was raining outside I would open a window to verify it for myself. I don’t trust him any farther than I can throw (Conservative you hate)’s (something they are notorious for)

let-me-explainify... May 28, 2011 at 8:48 pm said:
TeaTard Baggers denying reality & defeninda KNOWN CHARLATAN.

(F)Right Wing Nut Jobs WHA-WHA-WHA-WHINING about verifiable FACTS & embracing RUMORS.

what else is new in The Land of the Lost?

Hehehehehehe!

Hmm. who was denying reality, and defending a known charlatan again?

This is so easy it almost isnt fair.

hwatttx May 28, 2011 at 9:28 pm said:
Breitbart is so full of shit he can barely breathe. To imagine for an instant the Weiner would be so naive with his understanding of twitter and social media , in general, that he would post a crotch shot is stupid.
What makes more sense, “dress like a pimp” would be the one to “find” the pic, or he took it?
Thank goodness there’s lots of oxygen on the good Earth, because a lot sure does get wasted around here defending stupidity.

Yes- Its horrible when someone defends stupidity! I certainly can’t defend your post, and now you can’t either.

Man, who knew busting hypocrites was such hard work!

I’ll leave you all with this:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/28/979547/-Brietbart-to-use-SEX-SMEAR-on-Rep-Anthony-Weiner-UPDATE:-BUSTED

This is like the cherry on top of the desert to read this- I especially enjoy the updates, which state “EPIC FAIL” and “BUSTED” on Breitbart- not on Weiner!

Unlike Media Matters, who scrubbed their site of all Weinergate mentions already, the KOS has decided to go down with the ship.

Hmm- a couple of paragrahps from the daily kos link above sounds familiar: Looks like “Rocky Reed” likes to plagiarize:

“But Andrew Breitbart and his cohorts don’t get that benefit of a doubt. They have been proven guilty several times over during their brief history of smear campaigns and misleadingly re-edited videos. Think Shirley Sherrod. Think ACORN. In short, Andrew Brietbart is a sleazy f&%^king liar.

Andrew Breitbart’s sole purpose of existence is to get rich by smearing the enemies of the Republican party and the special interests whom they serve. If Andrew Breitbart told me that it was raining outside I would open a window to verify it for myself. I don’t trust him any farther than I can throw Sarah Palin’s $150,000 wardrobe.”

LOL! This is like copying off of another kid’s test is school- only you are cheating off of the stupidest kid in class.

Not only is Rocky Reed an idiot now, but he proves he doesnt have a unique thought in his head.

If that doesn’t sum up liberal group think, I don’t know what does!

Despite the fact that Breitbart is repeatedly vindicated on the stories he initiates, the false accusations are all the weak minded haters can recall. Of course, the weak minded haters are the ones irrational enough to do harm to him regardless of the fact that he was right and justified.
It’s incredible that some still believe things like the ACORN and Sherrod stories were just somethings that Breitbart ginned up.
I’m not crazy about his delivery sometimes be he keeps being right in the end.

Fact: Dumb question because Breitbart has ripped liberals for some time.

Colorado_Conservative said:
Breitbart has nothing to worry about…..liberals are nice caring people!!

Fact: Muslims are a religon of peace too.

MediaWhorse said:
Manufacturing fake threats against themselves and pretending to be dodging assassins’ bullets seems to be a favorite pasttime of right-wing journalists.

The only thing O’Reilly is under threat from is “loofah!” chants.

Well, that and battery-powered personal appliances.

Your point is well-taken. We spent the bigger part of eight (8) very long years have the rightist media hawking fear to support W policies. It worked for individual rightists, both in and out of the media, to which witness a stiff walk brought about by too-frequently knocked-knees, but most Americans didn’t fall for it. I don’t think the rightist media can now separate itself from this theme.

Michael Adam said:
One can only hope Breitbart ends up underneath a NYC Garbage Truck.

Fact: Here’s one Bill O’Reilly you were talking about.

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Dumb question because Breitbart has ripped liberals for some time.

Yet, there doesn’t seem to be any sign of wear. What a paradox!

Just4thefax said:
Colorado_Conservative said:
Breitbart has nothing to worry about…..liberals are nice caring people!!

Fact: Muslims are a religon of peace too.

Yet, I thought libruls were atheists. Another paradox!

mmmmarilyn said:
The only person who would want to kill Not so Breitbart – is his mother.

Fact: Here is another lefty lunatic RRK this is a sign of wear.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Yet, I thought libruls were atheists. Another paradox!

Fact: Hey we all can’t be God’s creatures. Thus he made liberals.

BarneyFranken said:
Yes- Its horrible when someone defends stupidity! I certainly can’t defend your post, and now you can’t either.

Fact: Liberals have Forrest Gump syndrome stupid is as stupid does. That’s it.

People on THIS site have called for Andrew to be jailed to stop him. It’s not much of a streach to think that they will step it up to killing him to stop him… when they realize that jailing a jurno for exposing the tructh isn’t going to happen.

Just4thefax said:
*

mmmmarilyn said:
The only person who would want to kill Not so Breitbart – is his mother.

Fact: Here is another lefty lunatic RRK this is a sign of wear.

I would be the first to admit the can of Planters contains a mix.

tatboy said:
People on THIS site have called for Andrew to be jailed to stop him. It’s not much of a streach to think that they will step it up to killing him to stop him… when they realize that jailing a jurno for exposing the tructh isn’t going to happen.

That we are blessed with a First Amendment means we have to define “press” and all its modern extensions, and “religion” and “speech” in very broad terms. Bill-o, O’Beckerhead, O’Hannity, O’Van Susteren, Maddow, O’Donnell and Schultz, although not new people, but merely commentators, clearly enjoy First Amendment protections. If we extend those protections to this sorrow and sordid assemblage, as we do and should, we must also extend them to the sleazy and despicable Breitphart. We’re better as a nation for doing so.

“We” don’t have to extend First Amendment protection to anyone. The Bill of Rights was written to protect the people from government. At least get a clue.

The Baboon is saying the Weiner put the whole country at risk and now Billdo is wondering if HE as well as Breitfart ought to be worried about their life.

That’s some really bad meth they are snorting over there at Fux.

Given the calm and polite demeanor of our left winger’s posts, I can’t believe anyone on the left would ever threaten anyone. They are the kind and sensitive side, you know.

Dave Richards said:
The Bill of Rights was written to protect the people from government. At least get a clue.

And the nutters on the left. Just ask the AZ congresswoman

All celebrities are at risk these days (sadly). But so are innocent third parties who are dragged through the mud by media organizations.

felixw said:
and there is nothing they dislike more than getting a taste of their own bitter medicine. The

just like ann coulter says… mob mentality.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That we are blessed with a First Amendment means we have to define “press” and all its modern extensions, and “religion” and “speech” in very broad terms. Bill-o, O’Beckerhead, O’Hannity, O’Van Susteren, Maddow, O’Donnell and Schultz, although not new people, but merely commentators, clearly enjoy First Amendment protections. If we extend those protections to this sorrow and sordid assemblage, as we do and should, we must also extend them to the sleazy and despicable Breitphart. We’re better as a nation for doing so.

Yes we are. We must tolerate the Becks, Olbermanns, Dan Rathers, and Andrews to have what we have. It is a good thing

writer said:
Given the calm and polite demeanor of our left winger’s posts, I can’t believe anyone on the left would ever threaten anyone. They are the kind and sensitive side, you know.

Really funny post amidst a sea of distrubing ones.

I think there’s nuts on both sides, and I thought the same as O’Reilly here. I really hope Breitbart takes it seriously. There’s always an escalation to these nut jobs actions, and professionals are good at determining real risks versus vitriolic idiots.

I hope there’s a separate post about MSNBC’s anti-Breitbart obsession.

I turned to MSNBC last night and there was something about breaking Bill Clinton scandal news, and another show acted like the Weiner disclosures weren’t a big deal. I think Maddow was showing republican scandals as somehow exonerating Weinergate.

Obviously, I didn’t bother to return to MSNBC, but it seemed really bizarre. I’m fairly sure Maddow was still blaming everyone else for Weiner. Somehow either this huge and growing scandal stopped at around noon on MSNBC.

valkyrie101 said:
All celebrities are at risk these days (sadly). But so are innocent third parties who are dragged through the mud by media organizations.

Everyone is at risk every day. Life is risky.

Well… now we KNOW the left is willing to kill.

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/07/crossing-the-line-comic-hints-at-assassinating-palin-if-she-were-president/

So much for that whole civility thingy???

Pablo said:
Everyone is at risk every day. Life is risky.

Well, OK, but not that risky otherwise social security wouldn’t be in such bad shape.

Pablo said:
Everyone is at risk every day. Life is risky.

If a media person acts irresponsibly and innocent third parties end up targeted or in the line of fire, how is that any different than what poor Bill or Glenn (or Britebart the moonie) have to go through? Glenn gets on his high horse about some organization he does not like and they become actual targets for psychos. Britebart plays fast and loose with the facts to promote himself and he does not care what innocent people he hurts. Of course he feels like a target.

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Hey we all can’t be God’s creatures. Thus he made liberals.

Fact: Liberals laugh at themselves too.

Question: What is the difference between Carville and a catfish?
Answer: One’s a scum sucking bottom dweller and ones a fish.

Question: What’s the difference between Carville and a bald monkey?
Answer: A sports jacket.

Question: Why can’t liberals find facts?
Answer: They aren’t looking for any.

Question: How do liberals brain cells die?
Answer: Lonely.

Question: How do you confuse a liberal?
Answer: You don’t, they are born that way

Question: Did you hear about the new liberal agenda.
Answer: They got two hands in your front pocket and two in you back pockets.

Question: How much does a Liberal cost?
Answer: Nothing, Liberals have no values.

Some dummy is quoting Ann Coulter- the freakin ugliest woman on earth- inside and out- she lied about her address In Palm Beach and voted in the wrong district- on purpose- she needs to be deported with all the other loser righties.