Comments on: Bill O’Reilly Expresses Serious Interest in Pres. Obama’s Stones

By: Jelperman

Jelperman — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:28:44 +0000

Stones? No wonder the right-wingers call themselves TEA-BAGGERS!

By: Magister

Magister — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:28:33 +0000

The headline seems a bit misleading. I clicked the clip and all I saw was O’Reilly asking a question by using a colloquialism and not some kind of deep meditation on the size of Obama’s “colloquials”.

By: Pam1151

Pam1151 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:46:38 +0000

@JimW I think you are right about this site being everything Fox News. What is the deal here?? By the way Jim I do watch MSNBC and will gladly make note if the three you mentioned adopt that phrase for conservative men. I certainly wouldn’t want you to miss out on that. ;o)

Now back to my football game!!

By: m

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:42:30 +0000

It’s family values to refer to someone’s testicles.

By: ChuckfromTacoma

ChuckfromTacoma — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:01:57 +0000

When I first started reading this post, it brought to mind how the vet offered little fake balls for my dogs when I had the neutered last year. So now I wonder, Does he have the stones and are they real?
I wonder if he got fake ones installed when she had him neutered?
Off to the Seahawks game. Have a great day.

By: JimW

JimW — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:58:57 +0000

I think the “writers” on this site are way too occupied with everything Fox News. The minute Bill O’Reilly used the word “stones” in reference to Barack Obama, I thought, wow, another Mediaite Moment. Now, I don’t watch MSNBC, but I’ll wager my IRA that nary a minute goes by before Olbermann, Matthews, or Maddow uses the phrase “tea-bagger” referring to the scrotal sacs of conservative men.