ITunes:http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/obama-for-the-world/id382415281

Amazon:http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=obama+for+the+world+david+king&ih=38_2_0_1_1_0_0_0_0_1.10_677&fsc=-1&x=17&y=18

ITunes:http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/obama-for-the-world/id382415281

Amazon:http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=obama+for+the+world+david+king&ih=38_2_0_1_1_0_0_0_0_1.10_677&fsc=-1&x=17&y=18

ITunes:http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/obama-for-the-world/id382415281

Amazon:http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=obama+for+the+world+david+king&ih=38_2_0_1_1_0_0_0_0_1.10_677&fsc=-1&x=17&y=18

felixw said:
Valkyrie, why don’t you make some anti-Semitic remarks against reporters at the New York Times, since the paper is owned by the Sulzberger family? I guess it’s all a question of how much slime do you want to dish out. I gave up trying to have a dialogue with you long ago. So I will just call you out for what your are — a bigot.

The Sulzberger family do not say things like this:

“Judaism committed a historical sin in front of Jesus, so Jewish people experienced the Holocaust under Hitler.”

“One reason you like darker people is that throughout history, perhaps the race that killed more people is the white race, not the other way. It’s not reasoning, it is a fact. When you go to spirit world there are not many white people in heaven.”

“As the Lord of the Second Advent I am the owner of this world of death… therefore, the world must follow Rev. Moon. There is no other solution, no other direction or choice…”

“When you work hard, Congressmen and Senators must be controlled by you.”

“The Religious Leaders that attend Father will have more and more influence over other religious leaders and soon they will influence political leaders as well…”

“The significance and meaning of Father’s last world tour was in his gathering of the heads of state and teaching them. In other words, he rose above them and declared kingship.”

“The time is coming that we have to abolish the concept of separation between church and state. We need a political party centered upon religious ideology…This democratic period in human history is passing away. Soon the heavenly sovereignty will be established to lead the world.”

“This is the time when I can carry out a revolution. I can exercise my authority according to my wish. In the future 70, 80 or even 90% of the world we know today will disappear. What can I do with an offspring of enemy.”

“If Catholic priests and nuns remain single, they will all end up in hell… The Unification Church blesses the bride and the bridegroom so they will not perish.”

“They may be proud to call themselves Catholic, Protestant and so forth, but they have nothing to be proud of. God is even rejected in the true sense by Christians, so how can God visit the Christian churches and expect something?”

“Homosexuals: … They have no rights. There should be a law to prohibit this. … But homosexuals and lesbians are lower than animals.”

“America declined because it rejected Reverend Moon. …Once the Messiah sits upon that throne, the Kingdom of Heaven on earth will come about through the unification and perfection of the family, world and cosmos…”

“Where is the root of the problem of divorce? It is in the woman.”

“Alcohol, smoking and evil social behavior are also satanic weapons to destroy the human race. Once we understand this clearly we cannot touch those kinds of satanic weapons. We have to destroy them.”

“Weapon factories must be placed under the supervision of the religious spheres…”

“All the irrelevant books in the world should be burned away. I cannot tolerate books that belong under the leftist ideology. Do you understand?”

—Direct quotes of Reverend Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Washington Times, and Andrew Breitbart’s long time employer and benefactor. And you have to assume that Breitbart was savy enough to google Moon. Thus, he chose to support Moon’s agenda inspite of Moon’s stated goal to take over the world.

I gave up trying to have a dialogue with you long ago. So I will just call you out for what your are — a bigot.

valkyrie101 said:
It just stinks up the place.

Exactly.

felixw said:
Valkyrie, your tired slander is getting old. Breitbart is not a Moonie, and you know that. But you continue to post the same lie over and over again. If the owner of a newspaper is Jewish, are all the writers Jewish? If the owner of a newspaper is Christian are all the reporters automatically Christian? If the owner of a newspaper belongs to the Rotary Club, does the Rotary Club “own” all the reporters? Of course not, and you know that. But it doesn’t stop you from spreading lies. The bigotry and duplicity you show in your posts is almost beyond belief. Do us all a favor and drop this garbage. It just stinks up the place.

What does it take to be a Moonie? Membership in the Unification Church? Nope. You have to be part of Moon’s agenda to become a Moonie, and Breitbart has done that. Moon has him under his magical power. Like Falwell, who took the money, hugged Moon, and became his follower. And as I mentioned, that Moon money is as dirty as it gets. Another guy who cozied right up to Moon, besides Bush 41, Dole, Graham, Rangel and many others, was Dick Cheney. Moon has been working behind the scenes seeking to control our government. And he brags that he does that. Amazing he has gotten away with it without reproach. Wright is nobody compared to Moon.

The bigotry and duplicity you show in your posts is almost beyond belief. Do us all a favor and drop this garbage. It just stinks up the place.

As they should.

Andrew Breibart , a well honed hack for Moonie Conservatives all over the world…..shameful.

How can the Republicans and Tea Partiers support Rev Moon?

Catoi said:
The implication: Moon is to Breitbart as Rev. Wright is to Obama. Not even remotely true.1. Moon is NOT “Breitbart’s long time employer and benefactor.” Breitbart has penned a few dozen editorials for the Washington Times over the past couple of years (as a freelancer, not an employee) — just as he has written pieces for other publications. I highly doubt he has ever met Moon, who has no direct role at the Washington Times (other than contributing to its budget). 2. According to Barack Obama himself, he knew Rev. Wright personally for more than 20 years. He spent most Sundays in Wright’s church, listening to his sermons. Wright officiated at Obama’s wedding. Obama took the title of his first book from a Wright sermon. Obama said, “I can no more disown him [Wright] than I can my white grandmother….” — the woman who raised him, for crying out loud. (Of course, Obama threw Wright under the bus mere weeks later, like he did with Sherrod once it looked like she could be inconvenient, but that’s grist for another mill.) Comparing Moon’s influence on Breitbart to Wright’s influence on Obama is absurd. You might as well cite the U.S. Treasurer’s pull, since her name is on the cash in Breitbart’s wallet. Now, if Breitbart was wedded at one of Moon’s mass ceremonies, you might have a point. But where’s the evidence of that?

Breitbart was well paid by the Moonies to write articles to support their newspaper which Moon states is his way of influcencing people further to his designs on world conquest as the messiah of mankind. And Moon has made so many public statements even more racist, homophobic, anti-Christian, than Wright that there is no comparison. Two minutes on google makes that clear. Tell me, would you work for a man who claims to be the “messiah” and who obviously is a racist? Yet there is Breitbart, promoting Moon’s agenda. And whereas Obama sat and listened with many other black congregants his age, wincing at Wright’s incendiary comments when they occasionally appeared, Breitbart signed on to be a Moon spokesperson. Moon used Breitbart to promote his agenda. But did that bother Breitbart? And as for Breitbart never meeting Moon, not so. Breitbart attended more than one of Reverend Moon’s speeches, together with dozens of Republican (and some Democratic) congressmen, including Newt Gingrich, for example. Moreover, given that Moon has invested over two billion dollars in furtherance of the conservative agenda, Breitbart and other conservatives are covered in Moon’s dirty money that mostly came from Japan from people who were defrauded of their life savings by being told if they gave up their money they could buy a better place in heaven for their ancestors. That is too sick. And Breitbart took the money.

valkyrie101 said:
—Direct quotes of Reverend Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Washington Times, and Andrew Breitbart’s long time employer and benefactor.

The implication: Moon is to Breitbart as Rev. Wright is to Obama. Not even remotely true.
1. Moon is NOT “Breitbart’s long time employer and benefactor.” Breitbart has penned a few dozen editorials for the Washington Times over the past couple of years (as a freelancer, not an employee) — just as he has written pieces for other publications. I highly doubt he has ever met Moon, who has no direct role at the Washington Times (other than contributing to its budget).

2. According to Barack Obama himself, he knew Rev. Wright personally for more than 20 years. He spent most Sundays in Wright’s church, listening to his sermons. Wright officiated at Obama’s wedding. Obama took the title of his first book from a Wright sermon. Obama said, “I can no more disown him [Wright] than I can my white grandmother….” — the woman who raised him, for crying out loud. (Of course, Obama threw Wright under the bus mere weeks later, like he did with Sherrod once it looked like she could be inconvenient, but that’s grist for another mill.)

Comparing Moon’s influence on Breitbart to Wright’s influence on Obama is absurd. You might as well cite the U.S. Treasurer’s pull, since her name is on the cash in Breitbart’s wallet. Now, if Breitbart was wedded at one of Moon’s mass ceremonies, you might have a point. But where’s the evidence of that?

kit9 said:
‘ Matthews emphasizes the fact that the Breitbart tape was, in fact, incomplete, and even plays the Breitbart version of the tape to make the point that it was so’

I am literally floored at how badly, not one, but two, Mediaite reporters mischaracterized this. First, you continue to make a claim that Matthews never made-that the tape wasn’t edited at all. But, worse, you claim Matthews is saying something he clearly is not-’Matthews emphasizes the fact that the Breitbart tape was, in fact, incomplete’. He does no such thing! What he emphasizes in the second segment is the part of the clip at the beginning where Breibart says she did this while working for the Feds. THAT’S what he’s emphasizing-along with his original point of contention with idiot Dean-that Breitbart’s original clip had always included the redemption bit of her speech. It’s amazing that Mediaite would so completely bungle and lie about what someone said in a segment focusing on alleged bungling and lying.

‘At the end of the segment, Matthews acknowledges the errors in the first take’

NO HE DOESN’T. He doesn’t acknowledge any errors nor did he make any. He simply made the points more clearly that he made in the first airing. Jesus, do you think that people won’t actually watch the clips and just take your word for it?

I agree. This is just amazingly slipshod and misleading work on Mediaite’s part. It’s almost as if you’re doing it deliberately. As Chris Wallace said the other day, “I know facts are inconvenient things, but let’s try to deal with the facts.”

Dan Abrams and Rachel Sklar, if you care about your reputations, you need to step in NOW and fix this. Your people need remedial reporting lessons and adult supervision.

writer said:
valk, the tea party is more of a loose amalgamation of like-thinking people than a national organization. And could you list some of the ‘racists’ they’ve invited to speak? (I know. Some far lefties include Sarah Palin in that list. But the far left doesn’t count. They call everyone racists.) As far as I know, there was one guy calling himself a tea party leader who was making questionable remarks, and he was thrown out. Plus, the tea party has only existed for a short time. The NAACP has a history of inviting people whom the general public considers racists to be guest speakers, and the NAACP receives them warmly. The difference is, the media bends over backwards to find racists in the tea party. They also bend over backwards to ignore them in the NAACP.

…yes, bending over backwards to ignore racists is catching.

In your moral equivocation, you’re going to call Breitbart a Moonie? That’s the justification for an admittedly failed stimulus, a disastrous foreign policy, a nonexistent budget, an oil spill due to government negligence and BP bribes, an unpopular healthcare bill, an unpopular immigration policy and bankrupt entitlement programs?

writer said:
valk, when Dan Rather muffed a story about Bush’s guard service, did that make Bush a hero in your eyes? In this case, Breitbart muffed a story. And that’s all it means. And no matter what Breitbart’s agenda was, it doesn’t change the fact that the NAACP has a long history of inviting racists to speak. And if Rev. Moon shovels millions to whomever, it still doesn’t change the fact that the NAACP invites racists to speak. Just FYI, but it was jailhouse snitch, a convicted criminal, who gave the cops the info that brought down the Manson family. Using your logic, because a criminal provided the info, the info must have been false. Real life doesn’t work that way. Breitbart could be Satan himself. It still doesn’t mean the NAACP isn’t racist.

You say the NAACP is racist for having some racists speak, but you do not take the same position when it comes to tar and feathering the entire tea party in that way because some racists have emerged as speakers sponsored by that organization. In fact you strongly disagree with the notion that the tea party is itself racist. Why is that?

writer said:
valk, pointing out Moon’s influence only proves what independents have long been saying. Both parties are corrupt. Pointing out which one is more corrupt than the other on any given day is little comfort. The thing is, it’s not mutually exclusive. Breitbart showing a video out of context was wrong. It’s also wrong when the NAACP invites avowed racists such as Louis Farrakhan as speakers, and applaud their racist rhetoric. The left has been dancing with joy, as if Breitbart showing an out of context video completely destroys any notion that the NAACP is rife with racist elements. All it proves is that Breitbart showed a video out of context.

Yes, both parties are corrupt. But in this case we are talking about Sherrod and Brightbart, and the fact that Breitbart is a Moon follower, is highly relevent, since Moon is an outspoken racist, anti-semite, and, tellingly, a conservative who employed Breitbart for many years. As for the NAACP inviting Farakhan to speak, etc., I would agree that is nonsense. Yet Breitbart’s long time employer and benefactor, Reverend Moon, gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Farakhan’s organization as the co-sponsor of Farakhan’s million family march in Washington a few years ago. The NAACP may have allowed him to speak, but Moon paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide a national platform for Farrakhan to speak from. The Washington Times, therefore, which Moon uses to promote his agenda, and his influence, as the “messiah of mankind”, and which helped promote Farakhan’s million family march, is equally, if not more “racist” according to your way of thinking.

MichelleF said:
That might have something to do with the topic of this thread… I suppose that’s one way to spin it.

Actually, it started with you posting a “quote” from Sherrod’s husband and mentioning how much fun the Sherrod v. Breitbart lawsuit will be. And since Andrew “the Moonie” Breitbart is one of Moon’s followers, I thought it was relevent as a response to what you said, and, of course, also germaine to the thread, unlike your predictable Obama diatribes. But I do admire you for your tenacious defense of the right, which is a tough sell these days, for sure.:-)

I suppose that’s one way to spin it.

Because it’s not a story of redemption, as the left is furiously trying to spin it. Sherrod’s “come to Jesus” moment explained that some whites maybe deserve help, but blacks always come first. She gets into wealth redistribution. Her Pigford lawsuit was an embarrassing case of misdirected government funds, if not outright fraud. Her husband has made some even more over the top racist comments. Discovery is going to be a bitch for these two when their suit against Breitbart comes to trial, if it ever does.

An excerpt is not an “edit.” Her words were not “taken out of context,” and good luck using that in a defamation suit. Those were her own shocking, ugly words. Helping the white farmer still meant “taking him to his own kind.”

Breitbart included the end where she said it was not so much about black v. white… though “it still kind of was.” It was about helping people, etc. She still admitted that she used to discriminate based on racial preference while she worked at an NP that was under the USDA. Her comments about blacks taking government jobs, because they can’t get fired and her husband talking about white devils and uncle toms is horribly racist and offensive.

She can’t keep her mouth shut. She should have just taken her job. That’s another thing… where’s the damages? But she has made a living using our legal system for race hustling lawsuits. She really can’t help it. Breitbart has no need to comment; you don’t interrupt your opponent when they are gloriously self-destructing.

MichelleF said:
Well, I’m busy, so I’ll let you do your won Soros research, there’s plenty out there. I do find it odd that you are more concerned about who breitbart hangs with than who Obama does.

That might have something to do with the topic of this thread…

MichelleF said:
Well Val, you guys have George Soros running your side, so you don’t have any room to talk, now do you?

I guess I will wait to read your posting of sordid Soros quotes, in any way comparable to Moon’s, so that comparison can be made. In the mean time, what we know for sure is that Moon brags about controlling our nation’s politicians, and “journalists” like Andrew Breitbart, to do his bidding as the messiah and king of the world.