Barren, old, repetitive, jingoistic, dogmatic losers.

No need to thank me.

Matthews,
a dose of subtlety might do you and your cause some good…

Skippy said:
Barren, old, repetitive, jingoistic, dogmatic losers. No need to thank me.

you’re giving CM a run for his money…

Well King Obama is certainly free of flaws .

Get a grip , Chris . Good Lord ,man .

no Herman Cain Chris?
hmmmm…
personal gossip Chris?!
putting together a heavy hitter guest list for you show Chris…

The GOP needs to find a inexperienced two year Senator and former community organizer if they expect to win in 2012.

Matthews may have one of those windmill powered computers that can’t quite pick up the Internet to get the news .

You’ve been Baracked , Chris .

If gas prices continue at $4.00 per gallon, anyone will be able to beat Obama. He needs to start saying “DRILL BABY DRILL”.

Gingrich had three wives, four tax leans is totally against the Ryan budget and supports the individual mandate.

John Huntsman is a rino who worked Obama, supported cap n trade and is considered a liberal by the far right.

Trump is a joke.

Ton Paul is crazy.

Mitch Daniels has wife problems.

Romney has a flip-flop problem.

Pawlenty is boring.

Palin is a quitter.

Yes, this is a weak field.

Obama has been on Judicial Watch’s Top Ten List of Most Corrupt Politicians since coming to Washington .

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2010/dec/judicial-watch-announces-list-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2010

I agree that at least on the surface that the Republican field is very weak. Or appears to be.

But I’m interested right now in a bit of a technocrat in the White House. Someone with hands on experience in making budgets and dealing with the real problem of our our debt and deficits and getting government to both work and live within its means. Governors have that knowledge.

That’s not very sexy though and Matthews is more interested in the superficial aspects of the Presidency. Style, speech making, looks. Those are not unimportant issues since the President is also Head of State and must use the bully pulpit on occasion. How he or she looks, how they come across in the age of television is – whether we like it or not – important.

But there has to be more than glitz and glammer. I think President Obama has failed miserably in this aspect. He doesn’t know how to put a budget together, he doesn’t know how to compromise, he doesn’t know how to work with the other side. He consistently mischaracterizes the opposing view and is incapable of arguing against a real view. It’s all strawman arguments.

Looks are nice on a date. But for a long term relationship you need more.

Chris Matthews loves Obama the stylist, the charisma, the looks. But style without substance isn’t what we need right now.

Be nice if Matthews was able to get beyond the, let’s say, skin (pun intended). But apparently he can’t.

The GOP candidates are a sad-sack group of misfits.

At this rate Senator David ‘the Diaper Crapper’ Vitter may join in His moral problems would not be noticed.

OK, then.

Idiot gNOpigs, NAME your potential candidates.

George Will just wrote off the rabble-rousers.

And oh, please please please say H Cain.

possibly said:
Gingrich had three wives, four tax leans is totally against the Ryan budget and supports the individual mandate.

John Huntsman is a rino who worked Obama, supported cap n trade and is considered a liberal by the far right.

Trump is a joke.

Ton Paul is crazy.

Mitch Daniels has wife problems.

Romney has a flip-flop problem.

Pawlenty is boring.

Palin is a quitter.

Yes, this is a weak field.

But none of them has 10% unemployment, outrageous gas and food prices, and worthless counterfeit currency all tattooed to their butts. America will elect a broken toilet seat over Hussein, the incompetent “Marxist-In-Chief.”

Tingles has such a slobbering love affair going on with our incompetent community organizer he is unable to see how vulnerable he is!!

Oh Tweety – drop the Mitch Daniels thing. It’s no more valid to criticize Daniels for that than it is to criticize Barack Obama for things the father he never knew did or said (ahem….Newt).

But I’ll say this – none of these potential candidates have the Osama bin Laden killing record that Obama does. That’s gonna hurt them.

Davo said:
But none of them has 10% unemployment, outrageous gas and food prices, and worthless counterfeit currency all tattooed to their butts. America will elect a broken toilet seat over Hussein, the incompetent “Marxist-In-Chief.”

You’re clueless.

Food and oil DOWN since 2008 when crude peaked at $147/bbl and the dollar is STRONGER since then.

UE is dropping and will be less than Bush’s 8% by 2012.

Rgentum said:
Oh Tweety – drop the Mitch Daniels thing. It’s no more valid to criticize Daniels for that than it is to criticize Barack Obama for things the father he never knew did or said (ahem….Newt). But I’ll say this – none of these potential candidates have the Osama bin Laden killing record that Obama does. That’s gonna hurt them.

Yes, but if we continue to struggle economically the voter might ask: “If you can get Bin Laden why can’t you help me get a job or help me with my gas and other bills? Just what are you focusing on?”

It’s sort of the problem that Bush Sr. faced after the success of the Persian Gulf War. Voters said, “Fine, but what about here?”

Nov 2012 was a wake-up call to the “Corrupt B-tards” of the lamestream socialist media. They realized then that the American voters were no longer swallowing their lies, distortions, fact-hiding, half-truths and shameless proselytizing for them to idolize the lunatic-left Messiah and his (and their) near endless misrepresentations about his beliefs and positions.

Never forget that “You Lie!” hussein is nothing more than an artificial creation of the lunatic-left socialist media with no more substance or depth than a Daffy Duck cartoon. Wherever there are no mirrors, no cameras and especially no teleprompters (heavy drug use significantly impairs short-term memory), hussein vanishes.

So to make sure that the voters don’t stray off the lunatic plantation in 2012, they will redouble their assault on the truth, the facts and – most of all – reality, to fool the voters back to the brain-washed days of the 2008 campaign when they had them convinced that “hopey-changey” bs would save us all. (Reality: “hope-changey” is actually the lunatic-left “Road-to-Hell”.)

The lunatic-left socialist media has no choice but to continue to try to prop-up their shallow, profane, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, Marxist, drug-addicted, smug, elitist, narcissistic, pompous, flip-flopping, racist, anti-Semitic gas-bag who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes, who hijacked the nomination with fewer votes than Hillary received, and who stole the election with extensive ACORN fraud.

They have nothing else to offer.

“Norah O’Donnell suggested President Obama is very vulnerable, yet all seemed to agree that no Republican candidate right now is getting enough people excited.”

What a short memory this put and his pals have. The “out of power” party challenging an incumbent President NEVER has a front-runner selected this early.

Remember at this point leading up to the 2008 Presidential election and who was in it???
CandidatesMain article: Democratic Party (United States) presidential candidates, 2008
Barack Obama, U.S. Senator from Illinois
Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator from New York
John Edwards, former U.S. Senator from North Carolina
Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico
Dennis Kucinich, U.S. Representative from Ohio
Joe Biden, U.S. Senator from Delaware
Mike Gravel, former U.S. Senator from Alaska
Christopher Dodd, U.S. Senator from Connecticut
Tom Vilsack, former Governor of Iowa
Evan Bayh, former Governor and U.S. Senator from Indiana

All of your pontificating means nothing, it’s still too early and as I’ve noted before, unless you’re a crack addict or a welfare recipient there really is no basis to vote for Chicago Jesus again.

TeaPartyPatriot said:

blah blah blah blah blah

You may want to stop spamming your BS.

SteveMG said:
Yes, but if we continue to struggle economically the voter might ask: “If you can get Bin Laden why can’t you help me get a job or help me with my gas and other bills? Just what are you focusing on?” It’s sort of the problem that Bush Sr. faced after the success of the Persian Gulf War. Voters said, “Fine, but what about here?”

Yeah, as soon as Obama made the announcement, I thought of Bush 1. But this is a little different in that bin Laden was OUR enemy, we were not defending an ally/foreign interest. And, strategically, this takes away a huge talking point from Republicans, in that they can no longer burnish their own national security credentials and bash Obama’s. That was not the case in Bush 1′s re-election bid. Finally there’s the fact that Bush 1 was severely harmed by Ross Perot, and again, this is unlikely to be a factor that will hurt Obama – any third party candidate will probably peel away Republican votes.

Anyway, of course, you’re right, all things being equal, the economy will still be the biggest challenge Obama faces in his re-election bid.

SteveMG said:
I agree that at least on the surface that the Republican field is very weak. Or appears to be.

But I’m interested right now in a bit of a technocrat in the White House. Someone with hands on experience in making budgets and dealing with the real problem of our our debt and deficits and getting government to both work and live within its means. Governors have that knowledge.

That’s not very sexy though and Matthews is more interested in the superficial aspects of the Presidency. Style, speech making, looks. Those are not unimportant issues since the President is also Head of State and must use the bully pulpit on occasion. How he or she looks, how they come across in the age of television is – whether we like it or not – important.

But there has to be more than glitz and glammer. I think President Obama has failed miserably in this aspect. He doesn’t know how to put a budget together, he doesn’t know how to compromise, he doesn’t know how to work with the other side. He consistently mischaracterizes the opposing view and is incapable of arguing against a real view. It’s all strawman arguments.

Looks are nice on a date. But for a long term relationship you need more.

Chris Matthews loves Obama the stylist, the charisma, the looks. But style without substance isn’t what we need right now.

Be nice if Matthews was able to get beyond the, let’s say, skin (pun intended). But apparently he can’t.

SteveMG…You SEEM to be a regular guy….apologize…and you can stay.

Rgentum said:
Anyway, of course, you’re right, all things being equal, the economy will still be the biggest challenge Obama faces in his re-election bid.

And unless he’s able to hire about 10 million more people on the government payroll, unemployment will be the same or worse than it is now (about 20% in the real world)….

Epic Fail…

Liberals love candidates with no experience(Obama), candidates who screw over their wife and kill secretaries(Ted Kennedy) and candidates who were crushed in their election bid for president(Carter, Mondale and Dukakis).

timzank said:
“Norah O’Donnell suggested President Obama is very vulnerable, yet all seemed to agree that no Republican candidate right now is getting enough people excited.”

What a short memory this put and his pals have. The “out of power” party challenging an incumbent President NEVER has a front-runner selected this early.

Because you idiot wingnutz STARTED your BS right after the Nov 2008 elections. In fact, you birfher racist have continued to the present day trying to hinder President Obama every step of the way.

SORE gNOpig LOSERS! YOU WILL LOSE AGAIN!

Chrissy is a flawed journalist.

possibly said:
Gingrich had three wives, four tax leans is totally against the Ryan budget and supports the individual mandate.

John Huntsman is a rino who worked Obama, supported cap n trade and is considered a liberal by the far right.

Trump is a joke.

Ton Paul is crazy.

Mitch Daniels has wife problems.

Romney has a flip-flop problem.

Pawlenty is boring.

Palin is a quitter.

Yes, this is a weak field.

Well, Shit! End of story!
Ol possi’ has it all figured out for us, he does!

MSNBC doesn’t practice journalism….it merely practices smugness.

Chris Matthews doesn’t seem aware of this, but Republicans will be running next year on bringing a fiscal prudence and accountability to Washington, D.C. They ran on that same platform last November, and had the largest gain in seats in modern times. Next year will be more of the same.

But Matthews, and his fellow travelers in the mainstream, prefer all the embarrassing specifics relating to the disastrous Obama administration. They don’t even try to defend OBAMA’S BORROWING ANOTHER $4 BILLION EVERY DAY — THAT’S RIGHT EVERY DAY. Chris thinks if he acts smug enough, that is sufficient to counter the huge list of glaring flaws with the current administration — yet Matthews is never brave enough to try to counter these substantive criticisms. That mixture of self-righteousness and intellectual cowardice is now the trademark of MSNBC in general and Chris Matthews in particular.

Rgentum said:
Oh Tweety – drop the Mitch Daniels thing. It’s no more valid to criticize Daniels for that than it is to criticize Barack Obama for things the father he never knew did or said (ahem….Newt).

But I’ll say this – none of these potential candidates have the Osama bin Laden killing record that Obama does. That’s gonna hurt them.

Mitch Daniels is the only one who gives me concern. His wife issue may help rather than hurt since most people will be sympathetic to his forgiving nature. He’s also the only sane one in the bunch …. which could work against him with the right. He concerns me most because the independents may like him.

” And, strategically, this takes away a huge talking point from Republicans, in that they can no longer burnish their own national security credentials and bash Obama’s”

Agreed. It inoculates Obama against the “weak on defense” charge. Republicans simply can’t raise it. Although based on the current field I’m not sure any of the potential candidates can raise the issue anyway. None of them have much FP experience or cache to use.

It also symbolizes – rightly or not – to the American people that the war against terror or the threat from Islamic terror is coming to an end. Or that an end exists. That we can rest a bit, that they’re in retreat and that we can re-focus here.

Big win for the President politically, no doubt.

Skippy said:
You may want to stop spamming your BS.

Yep. As soon as I see the words “lame stream media” I check out.

felixw said:

Republicans will be running next year on bringing a fiscal prudence and accountability to Washington, D.C.

That mixture of self-righteousness and intellectual cowardice

OK. We hear you Felix. That is a winning formula.

felixw said:
MSNBC doesn’t practice journalism….it merely practices smugness. Chris Matthews doesn’t seem aware of this, but Republicans will be running next year on bringing a fiscal prudence and accountability to Washington, D.C. They ran on that same platform last November, and had the largest gain in seats in modern times. Next year will be more of the same. But Matthews, and his fellow travelers in the mainstream, prefer all the embarrassing specifics relating to the disastrous Obama administration. They don’t even try to defend OBAMA’S BORROWING ANOTHER $4 BILLION EVERY DAY — THAT’S RIGHT EVERY DAY. Chris thinks if he acts smug enough, that is sufficient to counter the huge list of glaring flaws with the current administration — yet Matthews is never brave enough to try to counter these substantive criticisms. That mixture of self-righteousness and intellectual cowardice is now the trademark of MSNBC in general and Chris Matthews in particular.

That’s the beauty of it, they are going to try the same tack as last time “you are racist if you don’t vote for handsome black guy” but a majority of people are actually suffering economically on some level (except the food stampers of course) and working people still slightly outnumber the “disciple leeches” on the government dole….

He’s got 3/4 of the economy wrecked, but not enough time to finish it off I hope.

Alice67 said:
Yep. As soon as I see the words “lame stream media” I check out.

It is not single words.

Those are full rants. Word by word.

He must be paid by post.

SteveMG said:
It also symbolizes – rightly or not – to the American people that the war against terror or the threat from Islamic terror is coming to an end. Or that an end exists. That we can rest a bit, that they’re in retreat and that we can re-focus here.
Big win for the President politically, no doubt.

Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

The group on this Matthews panel are the same folks who said about Bill Clinton’s extra curricular activities, nothing to see here folks. Just a little oral sex in the WH. Keep moving on. These are the same folks who were shocked to find out about their guy John Edwards. That’s just some basic double standard stuff. What I really don’t understand is how/why these same folks discard the resumes of the candidates on the republican side, and never once mention that Obama resume was tissue paper thin. With a thanks to timzank for the list of dem candidates, I see that all of them had many more accomplishments than Obama did. I don’t recall Fox news getting snarky about the weakness’ of each of these folks. Matthews is really a tool.

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

Perhaps. But a future attack will have to be directly connected to a specific policy failure by Obama. Republicans simply can’t say he’s to blame. They need to connect the dots, so to speak.

The capture/death of Bin Laden gives him some protection from a blanket charge of weakness.

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

You anti and un AMERICAN POS.

You actually WISH for the death of MORE AMERICANS, VICTIMS TO TERRORISM just so you imbecile gNOpigs get another chance at the White House.

What sorry POS you are. F-U IN THE A SS WITH OBL WRINKLED DI CK.

woburn828 said:
With a thanks to timzank for the list of dem candidates, I see that all of them had many more accomplishments than Obama did. I don’t recall Fox news getting snarky about the weakness’ of each of these folks. Matthews is really a tool.

Everybody on the Dem list back then had more experience, they just didn’t have the most important attribute: Black skin. That’s what sealed it for the Chicago Jesus, it wasn’t brains or talent or experience (obvious now)

Well,aint this unbelievable….you put five liberals together and ask them to evaluate Republicans and they have nothing good to say about any of them…….one would never guess that would happen.

BREAKING NEWS!!! : Progressives moan and kibbitz about how much they hate everyone who isn’t like them, film at 11.

Skippy said:
You anti and un AMERICAN POS. You actually WISH for the death of MORE AMERICANS, VICTIMS TO TERRORISM just so you imbecile gNOpigs get another chance at the White House. What sorry POS you are. F-U IN THE A SS WITH OBL WRINKLED DI CK.

I don’t wish for that at all, you are making things up. I am pointing out that every day there plots being broken up and there is a long time until the next election. If you think all the bad guys went home just cuz UBL is dead you are more naive than most democrats, and that’s naive.

timzank said:
I don’t wish for that at all, you are making things up. I am pointing out that every day there plots being broken up and there is a long time until the next election. If you think all the bad guys went home just cuz UBL is dead you are more naive than most democrats, and that’s naive.

Your comment below, you mucking foron.

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

timzank said:
I don’t wish for that at all, you are making things up. I am pointing out that every day there plots being broken up and there is a long time until the next election. If you think all the bad guys went home just cuz UBL is dead you are more naive than most democrats, and that’s naive.

Everyone – well, every fair minded person – here understood that you were just throwing out a scenario. We all do it.

If I say “If unemployment rises to 10% then x will happen” it doesn’t mean I want unemployment to rise; it just means what I think will happen if it does.

Or if I say “If Iraq blows up again, then X will happen” that doesn’t mean I want it to.

The adults here understand the concept.

Rusty Shackelford said:
Well,aint this unbelievable….you put five liberals together and ask them to evaluate Republicans and they have nothing good to say about any of them…….one would never guess that would happen.

I admit that Chris Christie would be a tough candidate.

He is tough and can think on his feet among his rivals (which he said Sarah Palin could NOT do). Christie is engaged in problem solving and does not have GOP Foot-in-Mouth disease.

It is quite amusing(although not unusual to me) to note that the name “Ron Paul” was not mentioned during this segment.

The fact that Ron Paul(who has officially declared his intentions) was not even mentioned(not even once) here, gives me the satisfaction I need. It seems to affirm the fear that Liberals have, knowing Ron Paul is a huge threat to Obama’s re-election in 2012; instead Chris Matthews and his panel chose not to give Ron Paul any significant media coverage, in order not to shed more light on the huge threat. They chose to address all the marital imperfections of the other Republican candidates, perhaps realizing the fact that Ron Paul has been married to the same woman for 54 years(5 years before Barack Obama was even born). Apart from the fact that Paul has been married to Carol Wells since 1957, his political views over the decades have been more consistent than any other politician or member of both houses of Congress. Human are not perfect, but no other living politician in the United States is more aligned to the US constitution and Bill of Rights than Ron Paul.

America is at a very critical period in the history of the beloved Republic, and the “ordinary citizens”(silent majority) seem to realize this fact. If Obama could do this much damage to the Republic when he had to worry about re-election, then one can only imagine how much damage he can and will do, with 4 more years in office and nothing whatsoever to loose.

We shall see what happens in the Presidential elections this time; if there was ever a time that one had to vote with their conscience, I think now is that time.

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

What happens in the next “big boom on Obambi’s watch”?

How many AMERICANS YOU WANT DEAD?

Keep it up, you POS.

Skippy said:
You anti and un AMERICAN POS. .

Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

What the f___ is wrong with you? How can you call yourself an American? What decent human being would wish – actually gleefully anticipate – a terrorist attack? I have said on this site, partly in bitter jest, partly out of frustration, that there is a right-wing support for terrorism and al Qaeda, but comments like yours make me think that it’s true.

When al Qaeda attacked US, 90% of Americans rallied behind George Bush. Yes, there were outliers, and there always will be. They were wrong. By contrast, many, many, many conservatives are visibly upset – even dejected – that Obama got Osama. Andrew Napolitano said (untruthfully) that the killing of Osama was illegal. Many Republican presidential hopefuls could not even bring themselves to say Obama’s name when talking about the credit due for OBL’s demise. It’s absurd, it’s sick, and it’s wrong.

You wonder why people question whether there is some racism behind the criticism of Obama. It’s because it’s hard to conceive of any other reason for dismissing or criticizing his leadership skills or his guts in this case. Killing OBL was an unquestionably good thing for the US. People would be grateful if Bush did it (OK – Michael Moore would not be, but give the guy credit for being a consistently nutty left-winger), just as people, including myself, were grateful and happy when al Zarqawi was killed. There is no logical explanation for the anger and resentment displayed by the right toward this President. It’s not a “legitimate criticism” of him, it is an absolute inability to tolerate his presence in the White House. And so it begs the question, why so angry? Why so unaccepting? He’s lowered taxes, he’s had an aggressive foreign policy – he’s a very moderate, centrist President. So what’s the problem? There aren’t many explanations left.

Davo said:
Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

F U too Davo.

I wan to see how many of you stupid ANTI AMERICANS CONTEMPLATE a TERRORIST ATTACK to KILL AMERICANS and hurt President Obama’s presidency.

How many more dead AMERICANS you want Davo?

Davo said:
Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

Who provided weapons to enemies like Iran, Saddam Hussein, and the Mujahideen?

Why, it was that anti-American POS Ronald Reagan!

SteveMG said:
Everyone – well, every fair minded person – here understood that you were just throwing out a scenario. We all do it. If I say “If unemployment rises to 10% then x will happen” it doesn’t mean I want unemployment to rise; it just means what I think will happen if it does. Or if I say “If Iraq blows up again, then X will happen” that doesn’t mean I want it to. The adults here understand the concept.

I’m an adult and I don’t see it that way. “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still.” sounds like a football coach giving the losing team a locker room pep talk at halftime, telling them there’s plenty of time to score another touch down. Until = when. Plenty of time = words of encouragement. It’s depraved. It’s a far cry from “Eighteen months is a long time and another terrorist attack would effectively erase any political benefit Obama received from the strike that took out OBL.” One is an observation, the other is a sick wish.

Rgentum said:
I’m an adult and I don’t see it that way. “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still.” sounds like a football coach giving the losing team a locker room pep talk at halftime, telling them there’s plenty of time to score another touch down. Until = when. Plenty of time = words of encouragement. It’s depraved. It’s a far cry from “Eighteen months is a long time and another terrorist attack would effectively erase any political benefit Obama received from the strike that took out OBL.” One is an observation, the other is a sick wish.

And he emphatically stated in his next post that he was throwing out a imaginary situation of what might happen and not that he wanted an attack.

People accused him of wanting one. He clearly stated that he didn’t. What more does he have to do?

Rgentum said:
What the f___ is wrong with you? How can you call yourself an American? What decent human being would wish – actually gleefully anticipate – a terrorist attack? I have said on this site, partly in bitter jest, partly out of frustration, that there is a right-wing support for terrorism and al Qaeda, but comments like yours make me think that it’s true. When al Qaeda attacked US, 90% of Americans rallied behind George Bush. Yes, there were outliers, and there always will be. They were wrong. By contrast, many, many, many conservatives are visibly upset – even dejected – that Obama got Osama. Andrew Napolitano said (untruthfully) that the killing of Osama was illegal. Many Republican presidential hopefuls could not even bring themselves to say Obama’s name when talking about the credit due for OBL’s demise. It’s absurd, it’s sick, and it’s wrong. You wonder why people question whether there is some racism behind the criticism of Obama. It’s because it’s hard to conceive of any other reason for dismissing or criticizing his leadership skills or his guts in this case. Killing OBL was an unquestionably good thing for the US. People would be grateful if Bush did it (OK – Michael Moore would not be, but give the guy credit for being a consistently nutty left-winger), just as people, including myself, were grateful and happy when al Zarqawi was killed. There is no logical explanation for the anger and resentment displayed by the right toward this President. It’s not a “legitimate criticism” of him, it is an absolute inability to tolerate his presence in the White House. And so it begs the question, why so angry? Why so unaccepting? He’s lowered taxes, he’s had an aggressive foreign policy – he’s a very moderate, centrist President. So what’s the problem? There aren’t many explanations left.

You don’t read very well do you? Obviously a product of public schools.

SteveMG said:
And he emphatically stated in his next post that he was throwing out a imaginary situation of what might happen and not that he wanted an attack.

People accused him of wanting one. He clearly stated that he didn’t. What more does he have to do?

FU Steve.

LET HIM SPEAK. Unless you have your dick in his mouth.

Rgentum said:
I’m an adult and I don’t see it that way. “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still.” sounds like a football coach giving the losing team a locker room pep talk at halftime, telling them there’s plenty of time to score another touch down. Until = when. Plenty of time = words of encouragement. It’s depraved. It’s a far cry from “Eighteen months is a long time and another terrorist attack would effectively erase any political benefit Obama received from the strike that took out OBL.” One is an observation, the other is a sick wish.

I can’t help the fact you have interpretive deficiencies, that is all on you.

Kindly point out where I said “I wish or I want”. Oh, you can’t. Why are facts such a struggle for you guys? Emotion is wonderful thing but it doesn’t actually win arguments.

Skippy said:
FU Steve. LET HIM SPEAK. Unless you have your dick in his mouth.

You have interpretation and emotion problems as well I see.

timzank said:
You don’t read very well do you? Obviously a product of public schools.

It is quite clear what you said, AS HOLE

Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

You want DEAD AMERICANS to fade President Obama’s ratings.

timzank said:
You have interpretation and emotion problems as well I see.

No.

If you have the balls you don’t need your girlfriend to come and defend your bull sht.

Carry on, ignorant ANTI AMERICAN TERRORIST WANNA BE.

SteveMG said:
And he emphatically stated in his next post that he was throwing out a imaginary situation of what might happen and not that he wanted an attack. People accused him of wanting one. He clearly stated that he didn’t. What more does he have to do?

Either he meant it when he said “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still,” or he meant it when he said he didn’t wish for another attack. One of those statements is sincere, one is not. Based on the rest of his comments in this thread, it seems pretty clear to me he was sincerely wishing for another attack.

Skippy said:
FU Steve. LET HIM SPEAK. Unless you have your dick in his mouth.

Excuse me, I was responding to a question from another person.

Are you working for Karl Rove? You must be because you are doing more harm to the liberal and Democrat viewpoint than anyone here. You are rude and boorish and ugly and are incapable of responding without using juvenile language.

All of that is simply hurting whatever cause you are promoting.

Skippy said:
FU Steve. LET HIM SPEAK. Unless you have your dick in his mouth.

Dude. Calm down. Seriously. No one here is going to take away your birthday.

Rgentum said:
Either he meant it when he said “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still,” or he meant it when he said he didn’t wish for another attack. One of those statements is sincere, one is not. Based on the rest of his comments in this thread, it seems pretty clear to me he was sincerely wishing for another attack.

Again, he stated that he didn’t want an attack to occur.

Seriously: What more does he need to do to satisfy you? What do you want him to say?

SteveMG said:
Excuse me, I was responding to a question from another person.

Are you working for Karl Rove? You must be because you are doing more harm to the liberal and Democrat viewpoint than anyone here. You are rude and boorish and ugly and are incapable of responding without using juvenile language.

All of that is simply hurting whatever cause you are promoting.

F-U STEVE.

You are defending the same ANTI AMERICAN POS, whether you address some one else or me.

Skippy said:
It is quite clear what you said, AS HOLE You want DEAD AMERICANS to fade President Obama’s ratings.

Soooo…

You don’t think we’ll ever be attacked again.
You don’t think 19 months is plenty of time for another Muslim attack.
You think the ratings bump Obama got will last indefinetely.
You think his “bump” would not disappear should something “blow up”.

Got it.

You are a true disciple, I’ll give you that.

Chris Matthews Wonders Just How Bad Is GOP’s Field Of Flawed Presidential Candidates?

Not Nearly As Flawed As The Scam You And Your Panel Of Left Wing Douchebag Obama Sycophants Are About To Perpetrate On The American People…Chris.

The president himself must be hauled before Congress, God ( not allah ) and the ” real ” American people to answer for the devastating effects this continued barrage of lies and disinformation that his ‘ EPIC ‘ going on 4 year now quid pro quo ( illegal ) arrangement with his co conspirators has and continues to have on America.

Enough is enough of this crook in our White House.

SteveMG said:
What more does he have to do?

The crazies won’t be happy until timzank disappears down a cyber hole, then they watch and wait until they can make an issue out of another nothing. They are entertaining at times, just thinking about what kind of gears are spinning in their little heads otherwise they’re quite pathetic.

SteveMG said:
Again, he stated that he didn’t want an attack to occur. Seriously: What more does he need to do to satisfy you? What do you want him to say?

Nothing; like I said, his other statements show his contempt for those of us who were affected by Sept 11 and its aftermath and find the idea of wishing for another terrorist attack abhorrent. There’s really nothing more for him TO say (well, nothing that would convince me that he doesn’t secretly wish for another attack because it will translate into some partisan talking point).

Skippy said:
F-U STEVE. You are defending the same ANTI AMERICAN POS, whether you address some one else or me.

Get some help. Really.

Have a good day.

My show is absolutely non-partisan.

Chris “I have an obama shaped tingle running up my leg and into my netther regions” Matthews.

TeaPartyPatriot said:
“Corrupt B-tards”, “lamestream socialist media”, “swallowing their lies, distortions, fact-hiding, half-truths and shameless proselytizing”, “lunatic-left Messiah”, “You Lie!” hussein”, “lunatic-left socialist media”, “teleprompters”, “lunatic plantation”, “assault on the truth”, ” the facts and reality fool the voters”, “brain-washed days of the 2008 campaign”, “hopey-changey”, “lunatic-left “Road-to-Hell”, “lunatic-left socialist media”, “shallow, profane, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, Marxist, drug-addicted, smug, elitist, narcissistic, pompous, flip-flopping, racist, anti-Semitic gas-bag”, “mentally deficient from extensive drug use”, “stole the election”, “ACORN fraud”.

Do you still use the term “da bomb?”
How about catching up with the times and drop all the worn out catch phrases.
In all that babble, there is no point, just a litany of insults.

Skippy said:
F-U STEVE. You are defending the same ANTI AMERICAN POS, whether you address some one else or me.

OK, Skippy, I’m going to either recommend that you start or stop drinking heavily. People can disagree with you and not be your enemy. Steve apparently doesn’t support Obama. Frankly, there are legitimate debates over whether his policies are good or bad. That doesn’t make him a bad person. Really. I know lots of conservatives who are decent people, as hard as it is for me to admit.

timzank said:
timzank says:
May 15, 2011 at 4:07 pm

You just had to go and bang the cage. Who’s going to clean up the mess?

timzank said:
Soooo…

You don’t think we’ll ever be attacked again.
You don’t think 19 months is plenty of time for another Muslim attack.
You think the ratings bump Obama got will last indefinetely.
You think his “bump” would not disappear should something “blow up”.

Got it.

You are a true disciple, I’ll give you that.

Keep digging, you ANTI AMERICAN POS.

You clearly stated your desire for ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK, KILLING AMERICANS IN ORDER TO HURT PRESIDENT OBAMA.

You POS could not complain about anything else. But YOU WISHED FOR MORE DEAD AMERICANS.

You are F-ING disgrace.

Rgentum said:
Nothing; like I said, his other statements show his contempt for those of us who were affected by Sept 11 and its aftermath and find the idea of wishing for another terrorist attack abhorrent. There’s really nothing more for him TO say (well, nothing that would convince me that he doesn’t secretly wish for another attack because it will translate into some partisan talking point).

Heh, judging by your emotionally stunted comments, your lack of comprehension skills, and the level of vulgarity in your comments, my guess is you were probably about 8 years old on Sept 11 2001.

Maybe if you yell louder and use fouler language more people will respect your opinion, that seems to be your plan.

Tim says:

You think the ratings bump Obama got will last indefinetely.

Well, it’s pretty much gone as it is according to the most recent polls.

SteveMG said:
Get some help. Really.

Have a good day.

F U STEVE.

Go defend the as holes wishing more AMERICANS dead due to terrorism far, far, far away.

Phuck you very much.

SteveMG said:
Again, he stated that he didn’t want an attack to occur. Seriously: What more does he need to do to satisfy you? What do you want him to say?

Steve, if some time during the 2004 elections, while Bush and Cheney were touting their national security credentials, if someone – say Chris Matthews – had said “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Bushie’s watch still. The ratings bump from nabbing Saddam will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up,” you would rightly be mortified. As would I (Chris Matthews is not a great example since I think he’s deteriorated into a blatantly partisan hack anyway) – as would any decent human being. It’s simply gruesome to talk about another terrorist attack as if it would be a GOOD thing.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Tim says:

You think the ratings bump Obama got will last indefinetely.

Well, it’s pretty much gone as it is according to the most recent polls.

How about that, eating Big Macs from my Window?

You also wish for another TERRORIST ATTACK in order to sink Obama’s poll numbers?

I wouldn’t put that above you.

Skippy said:
F U too Davo.

I wan to see how many of you stupid ANTI AMERICANS CONTEMPLATE a TERRORIST ATTACK to KILL AMERICANS and hurt President Obama’s presidency.

How many more dead AMERICANS you want Davo?

If anything it’s you uber-Progressive ilk who want Americans dead. Did somebody vote the “wrong” way? OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! Willing to kill anyone who “stands in the way of Social Justice”. As Bill Ayers said, “25 Million Americans need to die.”

Skippy said:
Keep digging, you ANTI AMERICAN POS. You clearly stated your desire for ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK, KILLING AMERICANS IN ORDER TO HURT PRESIDENT OBAMA. You POS could not complain about anything else. But YOU WISHED FOR MORE DEAD AMERICANS. You are F-ING disgrace.

Next time use more caps,people always believe more caps.

Rgentum, Were you saying it’s gruesome to talk of another terrorist attack when DEM pollster Mark Penn said that Obama needed his own 9/11?

Davo said:
Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

My dad fought in the CBI in WWII, was a democrat all his life. My Uncles and cousins, all served, all democrats. That’s really not marvelous when you call veterans anti-American. There are Democrats and Republicans defending this country. This country is about choices. To call someone Anti-American because their choice is different from yours is…..well… Anti-American.

Rgentum said:
Steve, if some time during the 2004 elections, while Bush and Cheney were touting their national security credentials, if someone – say Chris Matthews – had said “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Bushie’s watch still. The ratings bump from nabbing Saddam will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up,” you would rightly be mortified. As would I (Chris Matthews is not a great example since I think he’s deteriorated into a blatantly partisan hack anyway) – as would any decent human being. It’s simply gruesome to talk about another terrorist attack as if it would be a GOOD thing.

They actually said that kind of stuff all the time, where were you? Oh that’s right, you were a pre-teen back then.

Skippy, you’re an idiot who is embarrasing yourself. ANYONE who wished a terrorist attack on us is a moron. I don’t care if they are right, left or center. Now take your meds and lay down for a bit.

Rgentum said:
Steve, if some time during the 2004 elections, while Bush and Cheney were touting their national security credentials, if someone – say Chris Matthews – had said “Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Bushie’s watch still. The ratings bump from nabbing Saddam will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up,” you would rightly be mortified. As would I (Chris Matthews is not a great example since I think he’s deteriorated into a blatantly partisan hack anyway) – as would any decent human being. It’s simply gruesome to talk about another terrorist attack as if it would be a GOOD thing.

And if they later stated that they didn’t want an attack or a “blow up” to occur I’d accept their clarification. Why are you leaving this latter part out?

I have posted a number of times on sites where my words and phrases were not what I wanted to fully say. The words got mangled, the ideas got mixed up. Haven’t you?

The man (or lady) said that they didn’t want an attack to occur. You reject that explicit statement. I accept it.

We’re now going in circles. Either one accepts his/her statement or one doesn’t.

Time to move on, I think.

So some wingnut shit complained again but they are given a pass.

Skippy said:
F U too Davo.

I wan to see how many of you stupid ANTI AMERICANS CONTEMPLATE a TERRORIST ATTACK to KILL AMERICANS and hurt President Obama’s presidency.

How many more dead AMERICANS you want Davo?

As has been brought to your attention but ignored for partisan reasons, Tim never insinuated anything of the sort. That’s just #3 of the 10 Commandments in the Democrat Playbook:

“3. Whatever illegal and unethical thing Democrats are about to be exposed for doing, or are planning to do, instantly rush out and accuse Republicans of that exact infraction. Remember the 3 D’s. Distraction, diversion, and deception are our most powerful weapons.”

Nevertheless, I can’t help but notice the aversion Liberals have being identified as un-American, or anti-American. But in consideration of the fact that truth knows no agenda, here is the truth Liberals would rather not address.

1. America was founded as the ‘land of the free’ and our Constitution established the nobility of the individual above the government or the masses. The government exists “at the consent of the governed,” unlike oppressive regimes that exist to the opposite. Liberals tirelessly work to reverse that value system, putting the government and the “greater good” (as they alone see it) above the individual rights to life, liberty, and ownership of property our American system guarantees.

2. In every instance where the question arises, Liberals never miss an opportunity to ‘blame America first,’ the very essence of being “anti-American.” Liberals never miss an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her, promoting the notion that those enemies are somehow “victims” of America. Treason as defined in the Constitution is “giving aid and comfort to our enemy,” and there can be no denying the guilt of the anti-American Liberals in constantly committing this crime.

For anyone interested, I’ve saved a list of quotes where it’s impossible to distinguish the Democrat politicians from Al Qaida leaders as to who made the quotes. Very “anti-American” to the core.

3. Avowed anti-Americans always gravitate to the Democrat Party for association. The Socialist Party, the Communist Party, Muslims, Marxists, and illegal immigrants find sanctuary with anti-American Democrats, as they all have the same agenda……………destroy America as it was founded and replace the American value system with a foreign style oppressive system. Democrats give aid and comfort to Muslims who work to advance the fascist Sharia law into the incompatible American system of individual liberty and human rights. And third world tyrannical dictators always are friendly with Democrats who support their efforts without hesitation.

The problem with most of you DIMS here, is that you prefer to work in the cover of darkness than to step up into the light and proudly wear your anti-Americanism like a badge. Go ahead, you’re not fooling anyone………….except maybe yourself if you consider the above list somehow “patriotic.” But I suspect most of you know who what you are…….you just don’t like discussing it openly.

Drop the nonsense of being patriotic, Dims. Just be who you are.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Skippy, you’re an idiot who is embarrasing yourself. ANYONE who wished a terrorist attack on us is a moron. I don’t care if they are right, left or center. Now take your meds and lay down for a bit.

Your pal TIMZANK just did.

You want his words, ask him and watch him try to wiggle out of it.

Davo said:

NOTHING.

That is what you said Davo.

F U too Davo for coming to defend the POS TIMZANK wishing another terrorist attack on America.

Skippy said:
NOTHING.

That is what you said Davo.

F U too Davo for coming to defend the POS TIMZANK wishing another terrorist attack on America.

Oh, I think I said quite a lot. As a Dim, however, “Nothing” is what you have on your side to respond with.

Davo said:
Oh, I think I said quite a lot. As a Dim, however, “Nothing” is what you have on your side to respond with.

You copy / pasted disjointed quotes to come to defend the sick POS TIMZANK who just wished another terrorist attack to hinder President Obama.

And, my, oh, my, what a waste of time.

TimZ and Davo are Patriots, skippylongsucker. You? Not so much.

longsucker, how many people are you officially stalking now? 15? 20?

Jaurez said:
TimZ and Davo are Patriots, skippylongsucker. You? Not so much.

You think giving blow and hand jobs to horses is patriotic.

That is just sick. Get help Jeffy.

Jaurez said:
longsucker, how many people are you officially stalking now? 15? 20?

Your paranoia is paying off, Jeffy?

timzank said:
Next time use more caps,people always believe more caps.

I find it’s usually the degenerate libs who are pissed off about having the worse or missing altogether teeth who insist upon employing ( another thing missing from their miserable lives ) the most CAPS.

Apparently Skippy is the ‘ Poster Child ‘ of this living under the overpass crowd.

He is a special case though, as he still has All of his own teeth. He keeps them in a jar tucked away for safe keeping in his stolen shopping cart.

I’ve been posting on this site since the first day. It started out as a slanted (liberal) site but the commenting & banter with the authors was pretty good. Now when I see a thread that has already gone past a couple of pages of comments (50) I know not to bother because it’ll be the same 3 or 4 yahoos that change their screen names daily and just hijack the thread. It just devolves into nonsense, no real points made or ideas discussed, just FU etc etc etc…

It does prove the incontrovertible theory true though that the left is devoid of reason. We could say the sky was blue on a clear day and they’d call me right wing nazi homophobe racist. It’s just what they do, and I still blame a lot of it on public edumacations!!

longsucker, not even rgentum agrees w/you. ROFL!

longsucker, don’t you copy and paste peoples comments and save them on your stalker site? Yea, I’m the sick one…LOL!

Jaurez said:
longsucker, not even rgentum agrees w/you. ROFL!

Mark Koldys does not let you post in his crapper.

ROFLMAO!

By the way, are you going to support Ron Paul?

Fine political dark horse milker that you are…

Jaurez said:
longsucker, don’t you copy and paste peoples comments and save them on your stalker site? Yea, I’m the sick one…LOL!

I have a site?

When did you star hallucinating this, Jeffy?

Davo said:
Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

QUIT TALKING TO THESE IDIOTS!

Skippy and Alice67…etc!!

Skippy said:
Mark Koldys does not let you post

No proof? Shocker! Maybe I’m him? ;)

timzank said:
I’ve been posting on this site since the first day. It started out as a slanted (liberal) site but the commenting & banter with the authors was pretty good. Now when I see a thread that has already gone past a couple of pages of comments (50) I know not to bother because it’ll be the same 3 or 4 yahoos that change their screen names daily and just hijack the thread. It just devolves into nonsense, no real points made or ideas discussed, just FU etc etc etc…

It does prove the incontrovertible theory true though that the left is devoid of reason. We could say the sky was blue on a clear day and they’d call me right wing nazi homophobe racist. It’s just what they do, and I still blame a lot of it on public edumacations!!

No. You stupid shit.

You wished for MORE TERRORIST ATTACKS, MORE DEAD AMERICANS to hinder President Obama.

That is how f ing ignorant, misguided you are.

What’s truly most disturbing, heartbreaking really, is that people like skippy, rgentum etc actually once in a while “accidentally” reproduce (If the free rubbers break, the free pills run out,or the free abortion clinic closes) and their spawn is then subject to their twisted train of thought.

Jaurez said:
No proof? Shocker! Maybe I’m him? ;)

You are not Marky, but I have seen your post scrubbed you moron.

Please tell Karen to change the bed sheets tonight.

longsucker, not even rgentum agrees w/you. ROFLMAO!

Skippy said:
No. You stupid shit. You wished for MORE TERRORIST ATTACKS, MORE DEAD AMERICANS to hinder President Obama. That is how f ing ignorant, misguided you are.

You should put it 10 times in all caps, then EVERYONE will believe you, right?

Paul G said:
QUIT TALKING TO THESE IDIOTS!

They are getting paid by the posts….I don’t know about Alice? but Skippy….

Paul G said:
QUIT TALKING TO THESE IDIOTS!

Well, to be fair, they always start the war first, then side with the enemy.

timzank said:
What’s truly most disturbing, heartbreaking really, is that people like skippy, rgentum etc actually once in a while “accidentally” reproduce (If the free rubbers break, the free pills run out,or the free abortion clinic closes) and their spawn is then subject to their twisted train of thought.

Timmeh, you ignorant sht.

Do you believe President Obama and his administration are working to keep America safe or like you, in your terrorist dreams, they won’t be able to stop another terrorist attack.

Are you an American or anti-American as hole, Timmeh?

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&biw=1144&bih=611&q=www.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fjohndollarfullofcrap%2Fcomments%2F9lz2e+&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=69b1da9d4f1d0d24

longsucker is so heavily medicated he doesn’t remember posting the link to his stalker site last week just before he was banned for the 30th time.

Paul G said:
They are getting paid by the posts….I don’t know about Alice? but Skippy….

skippylongsucker doesn’t make a penny for posting. Who would pay him to post the crap he does? LOL!

Jaurez said:
skippylongsucker doesn’t make a penny for posting. Who would pay him to post the crap he does? LOL!

You’d be surprised.

Paul G said:
You’d be surprised.

Not really but…..

timzank said:
You should put it 10 times in all caps, then EVERYONE will believe you, right?

I can go and quote your post like this:

timzank said:
Until the next plot actually works. Plenty of time for a big “boom” on Obambi’s watch still. The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly, especially quickley when something blows up.

Then you can tell us again you were NOT wishing for another terrorist attack.
Try it.

Jaurez said:
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&biw=1144&bih=611&q=www.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fjohndollarfullofcrap%2Fcomments%2F9lz2e+&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=69b1da9d4f1d0d24

longsucker is so heavily medicated he doesn’t remember posting the link to his stalker site last week just before he was banned for the 30th time.

Gee, Jeffy.

For some idiot who don’t want to expose himself you are doing a marvelous job for me.

You might as well post your whole horse milking operation phone number.

Is Karen around?

“The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly”

Already has. ;)

Skippy said:
I can go and quote your post like this:

Then you can tell us again you were NOT wishing for another terrorist attack.
Try it.

Point out the part that supports your accusation. Where was Tim “WISHING” for a terror attack.

On the other side of history, we find people demanding American flags NOT be flown for fear of offending someone…………………….RIGHT AFTER 9/11 ! ! I’ll be Skippy here will say those were “Right-Wingers” The rest of the world knows who they were………………..moonbat DIMS.

Skippy said:
I have a site?

When did you star hallucinating this, Jeffy?

First you say you don’t have a site then you admit it? Wow, you’re f’ed up, dude.

Jaurez said:
“The ratings bump from snuffing UBL will fade pretty damn quickly”

Already has. ;)

I see Jeffy, the moron who shts himself thinking of BIG BAD BLACK MUSLIMS WITH 3 METER LONG MACHETES at his door could be happy.

Oh, wait. Jeffy is going by Jaurez now. So he is thinking of Mexicans.

BIG BAD BLACK MEXICANS WITH 3 METER LONG MACHETES AT YOUR DOOR, JEFFY!

Davo said:
Point out the part that supports your accusation. Where was Tim “WISHING” for a terror attack.

Jaurez said:
First you say you don’t have a site then you admit it? Wow, you’re f’ed up, dude.

QUIT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

John Williams, over at Shadow Stats, compiles economic data for inflation and unemployment the way it used to be calculated pre-1990. Based on that data, the CPI inflation rate is over 10%, and the unemployment rate is over 15% (see charts). The Misery Index is the sum of the current inflation rate and the unemployment rate. If it were to be calculated using the older methods, the Index would now be over 25, a record high. It surpasses the old index high of 21.98, which occurred in June 1980, when Jimmy Carter was president. Most believe the height of the Index along with the Iranian hostage crisis is what caused Carter to lose his re-election bid.

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/05/shadow-stat-misery-index-highest-on.html

Davo said:
Point out the part that supports your accusation. Where was Tim “WISHING” for a terror attack.

AGAIN?

No. Not for you dum shit. Why waste precious keystrokes.

“And Marky you are going down with them, you as$hole, you co*k sucker, you putrid disease carrying turd.”

by glennbovinekoldy’s/skippy

Wow, more evidence. ;)

Jaurez said:
First you say you don’t have a site then you admit it? Wow, you’re f’ed up, dude.

Prove I have a site, you imbecile.

I have outed your get Mount Royal King juice site several times.

Just how stupid is Karen to let herself be dragged into your illness, Jeffy?

She has to be your sister or your mom. Or a mare. There is no other explanation.

Jaurez said:
“And Marky you are going down with them, you as$hole, you co*k sucker, you putrid disease carrying turd.”

by glennbovinekoldy’s/skippy

Wow, more evidence. ;)

Not exactly Pulitzer prize material, Jeffy.

But I bet Mark Koldys will appreciate you are quoting his best qualities.

Skippy said:
It is not single words.

Those are full rants. Word by word.

He must be paid by post.

Well at least he said MSM about five words into the post so I stopped right there. He now goes on my list of those I just vote down and move on without reading. They get the vote down simply by making me have to scroll by their posts.

I know it’s always fun to respond with a funny repy…OR FACTS….BUT THEY DON’T CARE!! Let them talk to themselves…..I’m still out on MarkMG tho…

Alice67 said:
Well at least he said MSM about five words into the post so I stopped right there. He now goes on my list of those I just vote down and move on without reading. They get the vote down simply by making me have to scroll by their posts.

CAUTION: BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THESE EX-BIRTHERS, THEY ARE ARMED AND IGNORANT…

Dem4Ever, The Lantern of Truth, juan, Arkansas Steve, murf, Jaurez
WCinWI, Barack Must Go, NOBAMA, Colorado_Conservative, gordonbloyershow
TeaPartyPatriot, notsofast, Severian, Dronetek, TfT, mitchflorida, skoorbekim
mdanielson, Harry Flashman, OxyCon and NORBIT

ADD STEVE MG, TIMZANK and DEVO

longsucker, we already knew you post as bfdummie. no need to out yourself.

bfdummie/skippylongsucker are the same loser.

Jaurez said:
longsucker, we already knew you post as bfdummie. no need to out yourself.

Jeff, your stupid paranoia is quite boring.

How about we discuss something more substantial. You know, those 75 grand you owe me on the bet.

Jaurez said:
bfdummie/skippylongsucker are the same loser.

Would you like to see Karen’s pic again?

Better not. She is quite sensitive about her appearance.

longsucker, are you so hammered you forgot to change account names? ROFL!

You think i’m “jeff” and I’M the paranoid one? ROFL!

cue another one of haggy’s sockpuppets…

Jaurez said:
longsucker, are you so hammered you forgot to change account names? ROFL!

Unlike you, Jeffy. I am not paranoid. I do not have different accounts to respond to myself.

Any intelligent person would have surmised by now, you Jeffy, made a lot of enemies during your trolling at Think Progress and other sites.

I do not know them. But they know you. Some of them in California, Oregon and Nevada. You know that.

What I am saying is, I didn’t incite them against you. You did Jeffy. Only you Jeff Merrill.
But of course, you being the mindless paranoid idiot that you are, you believe the whole world is patsy.

You remember how everyone mocked you with your “patsy” paranoia at Think Progress?

LOL!

Hmmmmm…I notice a little break in the lefty comments. Guess the library is getting ready to close.

Skippy said:
Unlike you, Jeffy. I am not paranoid. I do not have different accounts to respond to myself. Any intelligent person would have surmised by now, you Jeffy, made a lot of enemies during your trolling at Think Progress and other sites. I do not know them. But they know you. Some of them in California, Oregon and Nevada. You know that. What I am saying is, I didn’t incite them against you. You did Jeffy. Only you Jeff Merrill.But of course, you being the mindless paranoid idiot that you are, you believe the whole world is patsy. You remember how everyone mocked you with your “patsy” paranoia at Think Progress? LOL!

You posted as Garth for a long time…

timzank said:
You posted as Garth for a long time…

You must be snorting that sht Jeffy wipes off his horses.

Jaurez said:
bfdummie/skippylongsucker are the same loser.

He doesn’t seem to be doing any better as “Skippy’” huh? Same lame attempts to claim the high ground without bothering with truth, logic, or substance.

Keep posting, Skippy……………you’re displaying the void known as “Liberalism” and increasing the landslide win for ABO (Anybody But Obama) next year.

timzank said:
You posted as Garth for a long time…

I think you meant he posted as Color Me Badd (Tee Hee).

Davo said:
He doesn’t seem to be doing any better as “Skippy’” huh? Same lame attempts to claim the high ground without bothering with truth, logic, or substance.

Keep posting, Skippy……………you’re displaying the void known as “Liberalism” and increasing the landslide win for ABO (Anybody But Obama) next year.

I am not wasting my time with you teabagged, racist birfhers. I have no hopes of shining a little light on your empty souls.

I do enjoy walking every now and then over your simplistic, ignorant, backward, buyble thumping jingoism.
It is the easiest think to do. Like watching a train wreck in slow motion.

BTW, Mitch’s wife has nothing to do with Mitch’s capabilities as a governor or future President. No need to pry into their personal lives unless they did something illegal.

Personally I couldnt care less what four liberal Obama lovers think about Republican candidates. All I do care about in this video is how smoking hot Norah O’Donnell is. It is just too bad she’s a wack-job.

Skippy said:
CAUTION: BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THESE EX-BIRTHERS, THEY ARE ARMED AND IGNORANT…

Dem4Ever, The Lantern of Truth, juan, Arkansas Steve, murf, Jaurez
WCinWI, Barack Must Go, NOBAMA, Colorado_Conservative, gordonbloyershow
TeaPartyPatriot, notsofast, Severian, Dronetek, TfT, mitchflorida, skoorbekim
mdanielson, Harry Flashman, OxyCon and NORBIT

ADD STEVE MG, TIMZANK and DEVO

————

#
#
BFD: Widow Tormenter BFD: Widow Tormenter says:
May 15, 2011 at 4:23 pm BFD: Widow Tormenter(Quote)
Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

CAUTION: BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THESE EX-BIRTHERS, THEY ARE ARMED AND IGNORANT…

Dem4Ever, The Lantern of Truth, juan, Arkansas Steve, murf, Jaurez/WCinWI, Barack Must Go, NOBAMA, Colorado_Conservative, gordonbloyershow
TeaPartyPatriot, notsofast, Severian, Dronetek, TfT, mitchflorida, skoorbekim
mdanielson, Harry Flashman, OxyCon and NORBIT

——–

Same loser.

timzank said:
Hmmmmm…I notice a little break in the lefty comments. Guess the library is getting ready to close.

Of course II can’t tell you what to do…BUT CAN YOU JUST QUIT IT? HE’S A MORON

Gasket said:
No need to pry into their personal lives unless they did something illegal.

I think that should go for children, parents, siblings too. Leave them all alone.

Does Chris ever wander away before the show ?

Funny, the drooler thinks romneycare is bad but thinks obamacare is good even though they are identical. LOL!

Skippy said:
I am not wasting my time with you teabagged, racist birfhers. I have no hopes of shining a little light on your empty souls. I do enjoy walking every now and then over your simplistic, ignorant, backward, buyble thumping jingoism.It is the easiest think to do. Like watching a train wreck in slow motion.

See, the more you drink Garth the worse your typing gets….

timzank said:
See, the more you drink Garth the worse your typing gets….

He already has enough egg on his face don’t rub it in. ;)

Oh no- it looks like a white person may oppose BHO in 2012.

How racist!

Jaurez said:
Funny, the drooler thinks romneycare is bad but thinks obamacare is good even though they are identical. LOL!

What’s funny are your comprehension skills, or should I say lack there of.

Nacho said:
Nacho says:
May 15, 2011 at 6:32 pm Nacho(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

You really can get off your knees, son, Barry knows when he has been licked.

Skippy said:
Not exactly Pulitzer prize material, Jeffy.

But I bet Mark Koldys will appreciate you are quoting his best qualities.

Hey monkey face, what animal did Barry evolve from?

Gasket said:
BTW, Mitch’s wife has nothing to do with Mitch’s capabilities as a governor or future President.

I’m mostly afraid of him simply because I like him and if a lefty like me likes him so might independents. Hopefully the wing-nuts will reject him and eliminate him during the primary. Actually my greater hope is that he doesn’t run.

Skippy, Garth?dirk/Ted/Sam M,Rectum and Fokker: the best minds that libs can proffer!

LOL

Their collective IQ’s are about 1.

I think a big tire fell on their trailer, too!

notsofast said:
Skippy, Garth?dirk/Ted/Sam M,Rectum and Fokker: the best minds that libs can proffer!

LOL

Their collective IQ’s are about 1.

I think a big tire fell on their trailer, too!

First a tornado…now a flood.

Paul G said:
First a tornado…now a flood.

How much can a cubicle stand?

Nacho said:
What’s funny are your comprehension skills, or should I say lack there of.

Really? Care to elaborate, “nacho?” Be specific, too.

SteveMG said:
Perhaps. But a future attack will have to be directly connected to a specific policy failure by Obama. Republicans simply can’t say he’s to blame. They need to connect the dots, so to speak.

The capture/death of Bin Laden gives him some protection from a blanket charge of weakness.

However, his foray into Libya should be the end of him. He’s more neocon than Palin.

notsofast said:
Skippy, Garth?dirk/Ted/Sam M,Rectum and Fokker: the best minds that libs can proffer!

All the same loser, ironically.

Jeff, has animal welfare taken your horsies away from you, again? You seem to be at a loss for anyting to do.

Jaurez said:
Really? Care to elaborate, “nacho?” Be specific, too.

why ‘elaborate’?…facts mean nothing to these guys.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Jeff, has animal welfare taken your horsies away from you, again? You seem to be at a loss for anyting to do.

I can see you’re busy as hell, too. LOL!

C’mon, “nacho.” Back your spew.

Jaurez said:
Really? Care to elaborate, “nacho?” Be specific, too.

The discussion was not about what Mathews likes or dislikes, it was viewed from the position of the Republican primary voters.

Jaurez said:
Funny, the drooler thinks romneycare is bad but thinks obamacare is good even though they are identical. LOL!

“the drooler” was pointing out that they are in fact similar and that could be Romney’s #1 flaw to conservative voters.

Dipshit.

Everybody is flawed, right?

But the Republican flaws are public, right?

The Republicans have nothing to hide. Their warts are out there. A very clever mole who has hidden nearly everything about his life says, “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” That’s doubly true of subversives. Mr. Obama, author of the aphorism just quoted, clearly (or opaquely) has nearly an entire life to hide.

I have no reason to suspect that anybody in the Republican field has fraudulently claimed to have a black Luo tribesman as his father in order to make a racist appeal for votes and falsely defame his opponents and critics as racists.

I have no reason to suspect that any Republican candidate would or could incite mutiny or insubordination by creating a false impression of constitutional ineligibility at birth, then abuse the office to which he pretends to obstruct justice by preventing the subpoena of an original birth certificate that creates a presumption of eligibility at birth, which would have prevented the insubordination had it been disclosed as requested.

I have no reason to suspect that any Republican candidate became a foreign citizen, became constitutionally ineligible to the Office of President thereby, and (apparently concluding it DID make him ineligible) employed crooked, corrupt and seditious schemes to have foreign interests conceal the alien citizenship, for which those interests are being vastly enriched at U.S. expense.

I have no reason to think that any Republican candidate’s upbringing and life experiences caused the candidate to become a Comintern agent at an early age.

I have no reason to doubt any Republican candidate’s U.S. citizenship.

I have no reason to doubt any Republican candidate’s allegiance to the United States of America.

I have no reason to think that the actual birth parents of any Republican candidate are secret and genetically unverifiable.

have no reason to suspect that any Republican candidate has taken any oath of office with any reservation, fraudulently or in bad faith, intending the very opposite of the words spoken

For all we know, Obama has done all of these.

Investigate Obama. Expose his past. Impeach him.

ABBO for President. AnyBody But Obama.

The Lantern of Truth said:
Obama has been on Judicial Watch’s Top Ten List of Most Corrupt Politicians since coming to Washington .

Judicial Watch is an incompetent bunch of thumb-fingered and toothless attack dogs with zero credibility with anyone but flaming wingnuts. It’s not exactly an honor to be on their list (their rage is about as targeted as a spray of spittle), but it’s certainly no dishonor.

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Nov 2012 was a wake-up call to the “Corrupt B-tards” of the lamestream socialist media. They realized then that the American voters were no longer . . .

I think you’re unclear on the concept. Mediaite doesn’t pay (even 3 cents a word) for crappy fiction in its discussion groups. And even if you keep posting this tripe in every discussion thread you stalk, they’re still not going to pay you.

Give it a rest.

timzank said:
Everybody on the Dem list back then had more experience, they just didn’t have the most important attribute: Black skin. That’s what sealed it for the Chicago Jesus, it wasn’t brains or talent or experience (obvious now)

And Obama’s lack of brains, talent, and experience was the winning factor that handed him the White House, besting highly experienced senators, governors, a war hero, and a moose lady from Ultima Thule.

Yeah, that works for me.

LOGICandREASON said:
It is quite amusing(although not unusual to me) to note that the name “Ron Paul” was not mentioned during this segment. The fact that Ron Paul(who has officially declared his intentions) was not even mentioned(not even once) here, gives me the satisfaction I need. It seems to affirm the fear that Liberals have, knowing Ron Paul is a huge threat to Obama’s re-election in 2012; instead Chris Matthews and his panel chose not to give Ron Paul any significant media coverage, in order not to shed more light on the huge threat. They chose to address all the marital imperfections of the other Republican candidates, perhaps realizing the fact that Ron Paul has been married to the same woman for 54 years(5 years before Barack Obama was even born). Apart from the fact that Paul has been married to Carol Wells since 1957, his political views over the decades have been more consistent than any other politician or member of both houses of Congress. Human are not perfect, but no other living politician in the United States is more aligned to the US constitution and Bill of Rights than Ron Paul. America is at a very critical period in the history of the beloved Republic, and the “ordinary citizens”(silent majority) seem to realize this fact. If Obama could do this much damage to the Republic when he had to worry about re-election, then one can only imagine how much damage he can and will do, with 4 more years in office and nothing whatsoever to loose. We shall see what happens in the Presidential elections this time; if there was ever a time that one had to vote with their conscience, I think now is that time.

It’s much simpler than that. No one believes Paul has a ghost of a chance. No one. It ain’t fear, it’s dismissal.

Could they be wrong? Sure, I suppose. Paul may be principled and consistent, but his views are not congruent with the people’s. His candidacy is doomed.

Davo said:
Now, that’s marvelous………………an anti-American Democrat calling someone “un-Aemrican.” Since WWII, Democrats have NEVER missed an opportunity to stand with America’s enemies against her.

“Excuse me, is there a tiny squeaking noise in here? It’s tinny, and shrill, and doesn’t seem to be saying anything, but it’s rather irritating.”

mediadoubt said:
And Obama’s lack of brains, talent, and experience was the winning factor that handed him the White House, besting highly experienced senators, governors, a war hero, and a moose lady from Ultima Thule.

Yeah, that works for me.

Actually it was the American electoate just coming off the perfect storm that effectively drowned the Republican party as a whole. coupled with their lack of experience regarding just who and what Barack Hussein Obama ll was, is and will forever be.

The second time around is much different. Even a left wing smart ass such as yourself has to admit that ( not out loud or anything ), just to yourself is good enough for me.

mediadoubt said:
“Excuse me, is there a tiny squeaking noise in here? It’s tinny, and shrill, and doesn’t seem to be saying anything, but it’s rather irritating.”

Let me guess…your husband’s out of town on a business trip again. You’ve had one to many glasses of your box o whine, so now your a mean girl immpersonator making the rounds.

It’s just not you…seriously. Get back under the bed and back to biting our ankles as we walk by little girl.

Your just embarrassing yourself now, in front of all the other girls. Now git….

This is just tooooooooooo funny. Matthews thinks the republican candidates have flaws, LOL. Every republican is a genius compared to Obama. Obama is the guy with the $4.00 a gallon gas baggage. He has the trillion dollar debt baggage. Obama is the guy that has a list of lies as long as a gorilla’s arm baggage.

Libs are soooooooooooooo blind about Obama they can’t see that he couldn’t beat a one armed blind monkey in the next election.

possibly said:
Gingrich had three wives, four tax leans is totally against the Ryan budget and supports the individual mandate.

John Huntsman is a rino who worked Obama, supported cap n trade and is considered a liberal by the far right.

Trump is a joke.

Ton Paul is crazy.

Mitch Daniels has wife problems.

Romney has a flip-flop problem.

Pawlenty is boring.

Palin is a quitter.

Yes, this is a weak field.

Let’s look at the field of the 2008 dems…

Obama – Zero experience in management, attended racist church services, started his political career in a domestic terrorist home.
Clinton – carpetbagger senator, serious husband problems.
Edwards – slime ball attorney, lost prior election with John Kerry, weasel.
Biden – Complete buffoon.
Dood – Shady real estate dealings
Gravel – who?
Kucinich – to the left of karl marx…advantage hot wife.
Richardson – decent candidate that reminds me of Daniels…lacks the charisma.

Hey Chrissy ‘Tingles & Thrills’ Matthews, you should be worrying about how bad your show is along with the other prime time lineup on LSDnbc. It don’t get any ‘badder’ than your silly last place cable NONnews network. Maybe Comcast has plans on hiring adults to take over and bring PMSnbc up out of the depths of the Atlantic ocean.

rubberneck said:
Let’s look at the field of the 2008 dems…

Obama – Zero experience in management, attended racist church services, started his political career in a domestic terrorist home.
Clinton – carpetbagger senator, serious husband problems.
Edwards – slime ball attorney, lost prior election with John Kerry, weasel.
Biden – Complete buffoon.
Dood – Shady real estate dealings
Gravel – who?
Kucinich – to the left of karl marx…advantage hot wife.
Richardson – decent candidate that reminds me of Daniels…lacks the charisma.

People did look at them. That’s all old news, where were you?

Welcome to 2011…

So far the “Anybody is better than…” doesn’t cut it. GWB proved that in 2004 and even most Republicans have thrown him under the bus and will most likely go down as the worst Pres ever and that was clear before 2004. If you’re going to unseat a Pres, you better have something better to offer. Who ever the opposing candidates will be, they won’t have four years of POTUS under their belt like Obama has. There is your experience.

Obama hasn’t fvcked things up so much that a “shoe” could take his place and so far, that’s the best thing the Republicans have offered up.

Nacho said:
People did look at them. That’s all old news, where were you?

Welcome to 2011…

So far the “Anybody is better than…” doesn’t cut it. GWB proved that in 2004 and even most Republicans have thrown him under the bus and will most likely go down as the worst Pres ever and that was clear before 2004. If you’re going to unseat a Pres, you better have something better to offer. Who ever the opposing candidates will be, they won’t have four years of POTUS under their belt like Obama has. There is your experience.

Obama hasn’t fvcked things up so much that a “shoe” could take his place and so far, that’s the best thing the Republicans have offered up.

He’s sitting at 9% unemployment. The election will be a referendum on the economy and Obama. The republicans can easily unseat him with a decent candidate. My money is on Daniels.

rubberneck said:
He’s sitting at 9% unemployment. The election will be a referendum on the economy and Obama. The republicans can easily unseat him with a decent candidate. My money is on Daniels.

That’s wishful thinking. 9% actually equals closer to 18% and even those don’t trust some republican can step in and make things better if they don’t offer up and real solutions. The way the republicans are leaning towards crazy, there isn’t one candidate out there that will be selected that will offer real solutions that the majority of the public can get behind.

Like I said, there was no way that Bush should have been reelected, but it seems people just go with what the think will work. The sitting President gets the benefit of doubt and think he just needs more time to work it out.

Nacho said:

Like I said, there was no way that Bush should have been reelected, but it seems people just go with what the think will work. The sitting President gets the benefit of doubt and think he just needs more time to work it out.

Tell that to Jimmy Carter, George Bush Sr., and Gerald Ford.

eingriff said:
Everybody is flawed, right?

I have no reason to suspect . . .

. . . etc., etc., etc. . . .

I have no reason to think you are able to butter a piece of bread without cutting one of your thumbs off. For all we know, you’re down to eight fingers.

Barack Must Go said:
Actually it was the American electoate just coming off the perfect storm that effectively drowned the Republican party as a whole. coupled with their lack of experience regarding just who and what Barack Hussein Obama ll was, is and will forever be.

The second time around is much different. Even a left wing smart ass such as yourself has to admit that ( not out loud or anything ), just to yourself is good enough for me.

Of course it’s different this time around. Instead of a doddering old fart who changed his convictions more frequently than his tie, the ‘Licans will offer whoever emerges from a pack of loons, sleazoids, naifs, and narcolepts.

It’ll definitely be different.

Barack Must Go said:
Let me guess…your husband’s out of town on a business trip again. You’ve had one to many glasses of your box o whine, so now your a mean girl immpersonator making the rounds.

It’s just not you…seriously. Get back under the bed and back to biting our ankles as we walk by little girl.

Your just embarrassing yourself now, in front of all the other girls. Now git….

Uhhh, yeah . . . sure.

Being a good Republican, Chris is worried to death about this.

mediadoubt said:
Of course it’s different this time around. Instead of a doddering old fart who changed his convictions more frequently than his tie, the ‘Licans will offer whoever emerges from a pack of loons, sleazoids, naifs, and narcolepts.

It’ll definitely be different.

Look sport, Obama’s own Mao enthusiast spokeswoman, Anita Dunn ( Dumb ), admitted for ALL THE WORLD TO HEAR how they purposely kept their Harvard educated, post modern, community agitating, con artist, fraud of a candidate away from the press and any and all questions concerning his questionable past, present and at least for another 18 months future.

This wholely un – American practice, lying directly to the faces of the ” real ” American people and you mutt libs on a daily basis by this fraud ( Obama ) has not only proven to be counter to everything America has stood for over the past 230 years, it threatens our very lives and the future existence of our country.

You and your petty, loser, America hating ilk obviously have nothing to lose, and your jealousy makes you wish for the day America is destroyed……so a douche like YOU can really show me .

Well that day is never, ever going to come in America. Not in a million years, so sit down & shut the f**k up….or Move to Canada or France.

Barack Must Go said:
Look sport, Obama’s own Mao enthusiast spokeswoman, Anita Dunn ( Dumb ), admitted for ALL THE WORLD TO HEAR how they purposely kept their Harvard educated, post modern, community agitating, con artist, fraud of a candidate away from the press and any and all questions concerning his questionable past, present and at least for another 18 months future.

This wholely un – American practice, lying directly to the faces of the ” real ” American people and you mutt libs on a daily basis by this fraud ( Obama ) has not only proven to be counter to everything America has stood for over the past 230 years, it threatens our very lives and the future existence of our country.

You and your petty, loser, America hating ilk obviously have nothing to lose, and your jealousy makes you wish for the day America is destroyed……so a douche like YOU can really show me .

Well that day is never, ever going to come in America. Not in a million years, so sit down & shut the f**k up….or Move to Canada or France.

I’m looking for the perfect response to your latest dribblings. Something that strikes the same thoughtful tone, demonstrates an equal command of the facts, lays out the issues with admirable clarity, and is irresistible to perspicacious readers. I think I’ve got it:

“Yo mama!”

That should about cover it.

mediadoubt said:
I’m looking for the perfect response to your latest dribblings. Something that strikes the same thoughtful tone, demonstrates an equal command of the facts, lays out the issues with admirable clarity, and is irresistible to perspicacious readers. I think I’ve got it:

“Yo mama!”

That should about cover it.

More than…..

How, Why, is Mitch Daniels re-marriage in any way a negative? They recommitted to one another. Again, how is this a disadvantage to anyone who isn’t ruled by a soap opera or reality tv mindset (though I concede there are a lot of superficial people in the electorate)?

We have seen what a clueless, voting present community organizer has done as potus and it’s not pretty.
Obama-One and done.

It’s still too early for the Republican party to worry about picking a candidate for the 2012 election. However the Democratic party doesn’t really have a choice in who will run for president in their party. I would rather wait and see who emerges from the Republican party before I make my decision. Someone may emerge that completely surprises everyone including the present front runners. I think the ideal candidate will have military and business experience and be a true leader with no ties to any benefactor other than the American people. The Democratic party is stuck with 1 candidate that has not improved our standard of living or the country as a whole during his presidency. The transparency that was promised was never produced and many promises were never kept.

Going green has to be done gradually over many years. You cannot expect people to run out and buy expensive electric cars they cannot afford. The poor and middle class consume the most fuel and will be hurt the most. Air Force 1 consumes over 1,000 gallons an hour of high priced jet fuel. Maybe the president should have electric motors on AF 1, see how that works out.

It’s highly likely the Republican candidate for 2012 is not even in this group. It’s really a long time from now, if that candidate comes from a ground swell.

What we need is a non-political type with a proven track record. With our political system so polarized and dysfunctional we need a nation builder that everyone can trust.

We need David Petraeus.

Obama too recognizes that he would be a very formidable candidate. He has nominated him to be the new Director of the CIA. A brilliant stroke, that ties him up in the critical 2012 campaign year and also smears him with CIA dirt.