Daily Show Misses Mark With CNN “Leave It There” Critique
We’ve detailed times when Jon Stewart and The Daily Show have been biting and brutally accurate in their media criticism and political satire.
But in a lengthy critique of CNN yesterday, The Daily Show fell back on a tactic of choppy editing and a somewhat disingenuous premise.
It began with a focus on the surprising CNN Saturday Night Live fact check, which we wrote about last week. “You got together, did some research, and put together a report on an SNL sketch,” said Stewart. “While you were doing your research did you also find that sharks live in water and don’t deliver candy-grams, that there’s no African American equivalent of Mr. Rodgers, and that the majority of boxes don’t have dicks in them, were you able to find that out?”
Good point, and funny as usual. After playing a clip of Sen. Jon Kyl saying something to John King on a State of the Union appearance that turned out to be false, Stewart focused on King who cut the interview off before calling him out:
You’re out of time on this day? Your show is four f–king hours long!…How about if Fred Armisen learned a Jon Kyl impression, would they cover it then?
But the big takeaway was a montage of clips of CNN anchors saying some form of the phrase “we’ll have to leave it there,” which served to make Stewart’s point about CNN’s refusal to call out anyone the way they did with the SNL fact check. The criticism of the fact check makes sense, and all cable news outlets could be questioned for not fact checking or calling out their guests often enough.
And that’s the point – this is the same argument that can be made with every cable news network. Instead of broadening it, Stewart (and his editors) have put together a series of out of context clips that somhow prove a point. Instead, as we’ve mentioned in the past, the mischaracterizations and selective editing prove nothing here. “We’ll have to leave it there,” or something like it, is a phrase all anchors and hosts will say to end an interview. Is every host supposed to let their guest talk as long as they want? There are segments, and they have to end. Stewart has to do the same thing with his interviews that look like they could run a bit long.
A criticism of the SNL fact check could be it felt like a Daily Show segment. In the same way Stewart was able to put together his segment last night based on days, if not weeks, of CNN clips and research by writers and producers, so did CNN here. There’s a major difference between an anchor calling out the guest for an incorrect statement while the interview is taking place and doing a fact check later. Maybe all news networks should essentially serve as ombudsmen of themselves and their guests, but no one does. It’s disingenuous to tie the ridiculous SNL fact check to some premise that CNN let’s their guests say whatever they want, until the CNN host is ready to “leave it there” unchecked.
Here’s the Daily Show segment:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| CNN Leaves It There | ||||
|
||||
—–
» Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter
14 comments
Wait. Now you’re fact checking The Daily Show? This was supposed to be funny, and I think it was. Does he always have to be making a serious point?
I was just going to say that. haha Fact checking the fact checking of the fact checking of comedy skits….
Stewart’s stuff is usually left leaning but it is funny. and while he is poking fun, and editing, it is comedy, and there is some truth to it. they do have 24/7 and i get so tired of these 2 minutes interviews. they need to get in more deep discussions, and the journalists do let a LOT of facts slide, on both sides, because they don’t know the truth. Case in point, George Stephanapolous on Hannity the other night, on Jennings.
Usually I’d agree, but this whole bit really was more of a critique than it was comedy. The daily show was clearly trying to make a point with the sketch, so I think it’s fair for mediaite to point out where they think it went wrong.
I agree with the idea in the skit that there should be less panel shows, but mediaite is correct that that isn’t just CNN.
I agree it was funny, but I think Daily Show is at the point now where it should be accurate.
It’s something we’ve written about here before:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/whats-more-important-for-daily-show-to-be-funny-or-accurate/
The Daily Show doesn’t always have to be making a serious point (SNL rarely is), but in this case he was trying to.
Steve I understand your point. But because each show on CNN is virtually autonomous they do cut interviews short and ask only the who/what/why questions. Stewart makes a good point that CNN’s time could broaden a lot of discussions but because of commercials; 1hr of news is actually only about 43 or 44 minutes of actual programing. They aim for quantity not quality with their interviews hence the 5 packages and 4 interviews in a one hour slot. You can not possibly explain any complex subject with sporadic 4min interviews. We are becoming a country that knows a lot of BS but very little true knowledge of anything. American’s know Iran has an enrichment plant in Qom…but not the circumstances and options around it.(Sunday shows excluded). American’s know Ensign slept with a staffer’s wife… yet rarely is the lobbying ethics really explained so people understand the real corruption. (NY TImes did a great piece on this if anybody cares… PDF’d many documents and made available on its site) We always focus on the easily explainable and watered down part of the story. Due to character limitations… I’ll have to leave it there.
I think that Steve’s point is a good one–if we’re going to fact-check other comedy shows, why not Stewart? The other issue is that as people increasingly get their information and news from The Daily Show and Colbert Report, it’s important that someone is there to tell people what is actually going on. CNN SHOULD fact-check these items so that people don’t get the wrong impressions, but Stewart has such a valid point. Why aren’t the guests being questioned more or fact-checked for their comments. It should be a part of the broadcast.
I guess. I think it’s scary that people get their news from The Daily Show and Colbert Report. I am a HUGE fan of both shows but I don’t want to hold them to the same journalistic standards as a real news show. Sometimes satire needs to stretch the truth for the sake of comedy.
It’s worth fact checking them, I suppose, for the sake of people who take them too seriously.
If we were to fact check Stewart’s show it would lose all sense of comedy. He does call himself a comedy show, and he does do real interviews, and some great ones at that. he also deals with a lot of news topics…but if you are going to fact check this one, we need to go back and fact check aaaaaaaaaallllll the ones he has done against FOX, and conservatives. He does this kind of thing all the time. He did it a lot to support Obama and knock Repubs.
So – do we fact check every episode of Stewart, or just let it be what it is – comedy. Granted, he has influence with some voters, and he was voted as the most trusted man in news, in an online poll… That should tell you something about Obama supporters. haha
It’s hard because I like Jon Stewart, I have even met him, and I had to fight hard to not get mad at him sometimes during the primary and election. But – he is what he is. A comedian. It’s up to the viewers to decipher fact from fiction. Unfortunately many don’t, but like I said, if you are going to start fact checking Stewart you are going to have to do it every night because he does this kind of stuff all the time.
Basically – nothing Stewart does is accurate, except his interviews.
Whoever wrote this piece clearly never watches CNN. The anchors ask questions that are designed to elicit already known talking points. There is no fact checking other than to present the other POV. This just confuses the issue and leads to a situation where most Americans believe whatever ridiculous fact they last heard.
Good for Jon Stewart because guys like Steve Krakauer have lost their ability to think critically and no one else would have called out CNN for lacking an iota of journalistic integrity.
I miss the old days, when The Daily Show did stories about big-headed kids who couldn’t fit into their football helmets.
Oh well…
Slow up on the fact checking of Stewart – I think the entire purpose of his bit was to get people to think. CNN fact checks SNL but let’s their guest run wild. Sure there are cases where they might challenge but for the most part its 24/7 of point counter point.
The other dig “…we are out of time” – “you are on the air for 24 hours a day” – that is one of the greatest points that needed to be made – if they are a news outlet then they should examine the news not just get both opposite sides spitting on each other.
John Stewart was making the point that it was absurd for CNN, a news outlet, to fact check a comedy sketch. He then drove the point home by showing slips of them not fact checking real news stories. So, mediaite then wants to fact check the Daily Show? Do you really not see the irony here?
Sorry Steve, I think this piece is what’s missing the mark. First of all, you seem to miss the massive point that Stewart and company clearly have higher expectations for CNN, a cable news network that often positions itself as being above the fray of its competition.
As for the editing, yes, we all know the show does it, but I don’t see how it misconstrued the overall point. In this case, obviously “we’ll leave it there” was used for comedic effect. Not every instance the phrase is uttered is going to involve some sort of controversy. I’m assuming Stewart expects his audience is smart enough to know that. However, he is totally on point in that many of these segments are cut off right after someone makes a ridiculous/blatantly untrue statement.
You make a good point regarding the live interview vs. fact-check, but Stewart addressed this as well, noting that no subsequent fact-checks were made. I watch a lot of CNN and Stewart’s critique was SPOT ON.
“The Daily Show doesn’t always have to be making a serious point (SNL rarely is), but in this case he was trying to.”
************
You’re correct: John Stewart and The Daily Show were trying to make a serious point.
They did so brilliantly.
- » Jon Stewart's Epic Parody Of Glenn Beck
- » Another CNN Anchor Fails At Celebrity Jeopardy
- » CNN Reports: Protesters Shout Racial And Gay Slurs At Lewis And Frank (Update)
- » David Shuster On Media Bias, Drudge, Andrew Breitbart, And James O'Keefe
- » FAMU Sex Tape Link - Real Or Hoax?
CNN Reports: Protesters Shout Racial And Gay Slurs At Lewis And Frank (Update)

"Rising tensions on Capitol Hill" is a cliche in cable news, but it may never have been apt than today. With the House currently negotiating a controversial vote on a health care reform, protesters have gathered to voice their opposition to the bill. CNN's Capitol Hill reporter Dana Bash reports today of personally witnessing epithets being used towards John Lewis (D-GA) and Barney Frank (D-MA) by protesters that were identified earlier as "Tea Party people."
Obama’s Final Push On Health Care To Democratic Caucus On Capitol Hill
President Barack Obama spoke in the conference hall of the Capitol today about the health care reform bill which is coming close to meeting enough votes to pass in the House of Representatives, which earlier today decided not use the "deem and pass" strategy to railroad the bill through Congress. "I know this is a tough vote for some of you," said our president, adding "Don't do it for Nancy Pelosi, or Harry Reid, or me. Do It for the American People." Pay attention folks, this speech is definitely one for the history books.
More TV headlines:
»David Shuster Defends Brett Baier Interview, Talks Twitter Absence
»Democrats Announce They Won’t Use “Deem And Pass” »10
»Rahm Emanuel On 60 Minutes: “Fringe Group Has Taken Control” Of GOP »69
»Rep. John Boehner: “This Health Care Bill Will Ruin Our Country” »3
»Jon Voight At Tea Party Rally: “Founders Were Envisioning A Very Small Government” »7
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives
| Dan Abrams, Founder
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS





















