You don’t go to the science museum and get handed a pamphlet on electricity. You go to the science museum, and you put your hand on a metal ball, and your hair sticks up straight…and you know science.

Wait, so this is like an Ed Show from 2 days ago talking about an O’Reilly show from 3 days ago?

Stop feeding us old news, Mediaite. I’m sure there are plenty of people who will say something stupid today. Just be patient.

Hey Torchy . Don’t say ” off the rails ” if you want to Win The Future with high speed trains that very few will use .

As a thank-you to its most famous customer, Amtrak is renaming the train station in Wilmington, Del., after stimulus “sheriff” Vice President Joseph R. Biden — after the project received $20 million in stimulus money and came in $5.7 million over the initial announced budget.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/19/amtrak-ceo-ditches-broken-train-to-travel-by-car-to-ribbon-cutting-of-wilmingtons-joe-biden-station/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/17/stimulus-funded-train-station-be-named-biden/

MSNBC is really switching it up. One day they talk about Beck, the next it’s O’Reilly. The next day they might cover O’Reilly, then Beck.

“Schultz claimed whenever Coulter is on television you can be sure there is “misinformation,”

You could say the same about Schultz. The guy cant get on TV without lying or spinning left wing politcal propaganda. Take a look for yourself:

http://newsbusters.org/people/ed-schultz

MSLSD in not a news network, it is a network about Fox News.

BFD said:
I’m sure there are plenty of people who will say something stupid today. Just be patient.

But of course. I can’t wait to hear today’s gaffe.

Don’t what Ed says, don’t care what Anne says, ..nothing to see here folks, keep moving.

Ed let’s just say jounalistic integrity and you show have nothing in common.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPvmOD3H-2U

How hard do you laugh when this Lardass, Mr ED the Talking HORSES ASS
questions someones (anyones) intelligence?
Just a thought! Check Coulter’s Book Sales against yours EDDIE!
Check O’Reilly’s Viewers and Book Sales against yours EDDIE!
Try pushing yourself away from the table EDDIE.
Go beat up a wife or former Wife, EDDIE!!

I couldn’t bare to watch the segment, did Sgt. Schultz actually point to anything that Ann said that was incorrect?

What is it about Republicans that they give endless money to airheads like Ann Coulter? She has has nothing but contempt for everyone – including R’s- or didn’t anyone else notice?

She doesn’t even write books anymore- she just compiles someone else’s words and R’s buy the thing like it’s a second bible.

Interesting thing is, I watched the O’Reilly segment in question. Coulter’s “source” was The New York Times. She was quoting directly from the Times in r/e the radiation theory.

That, you liberal morons, was the irony of it, she was using your paper of record for the material.

timzank said:
That, you liberal morons, was the irony of it, she was using your paper of record for the material.

Well since you neo-con nitwits think that the NY Times is full of hooey, then you should think that Ann Coulter is wrong anyway due to her source, correct? I mean, you guys only agree with the source if it’s the Drudge Report, or Newsmax, right?

Coulter never made the statements attributed to her. She was quoting other people. What is wrong with Shultz’s comprehension?

Hawk, it’s pretty funny that you libs aren’t smart enough to realize that Coulter was mocking you that whole segment.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Hawk, it’s pretty funny that you libs aren’t smart enough to realize that Coulter was mocking you that whole segment.

Mocking me? First off, I have no problem with Ann Coulter. I think she does what she needs to do to get her face out there. She goes on FOX and says what she’s told to say. Nuclear good, radiation good, nuclear power good, coal good, smog good….. regulation and safety measures bad.
I still love it how you guys use the word “libs” like it’s a bad word.
Still think the world was created in 6 days just 6,000 years ago?
Where does the moon come from?
Is the end near?
Still don’t know how to use the (quote) feature on these threads?

Wow, great comeback Hawk!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Wow, great comeback Hawk!

Thank you. Much appreciated.

Uh, Ann …. radiation is helpful to some cancer patients because radiation KILLS cells. The goal is to use radiation in a controlled manner such that the targeted malignant cells are the ones primarily impacted with minimal collateral damage.

Of course, Ann no doubt believes that since water is good for you, people should not pay attention to tsunami warnings either.

Elrod said:
What is it about Republicans that they give endless money to airheads like Ann Coulter? She has has nothing but contempt for everyone – including R’s- or didn’t anyone else notice? She doesn’t even write books anymore- she just compiles someone else’s words and R’s buy the thing like it’s a second bible.

The right wing “intellectuals” will buy anything that their leaders (Beck, Coulter, etc. – except Limbaugh who’s too lazy to hire a ghost writer) buy. Rather than read a real book, they read this crap.

labman57 said:
Uh, Ann …. radiation is helpful to some cancer patients because radiation KILLS cells. The goal is to use radiation in a controlled manner such that the targeted malignant cells are the ones primarily impacted with minimal collateral damage. Of course, Ann no doubt believes that since water is good for you, people should not pay attention to tsunami warnings either.

She was quoting reports from The New York Times, tell it to them.

Thelonious Funk said:
You don’t go to the science museum and get handed a pamphlet on electricity. You go to the science museum, and you put your hand on a metal ball, and your hair sticks up straight…and you know science.

Reminds me of a famous quote:

“There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” ~ Will Rogers

Does anybody else find it hysterical when Coulter makes fun of the lefties using their own ammo and they’re too stupid to even get the joke?

Ed, the talking horse’s ass, Schultz is so full of it.

Heyyyyyy, Schultz, what’s that old story about the POT & Kettle??

Schultz telling anyone about science, LOL. Coulter wrote an extensive column using back-up from science. Sgt. Ed should learn to read.
Coulter didn’t give her “theory” she cited science. She is right and O’Reilly just shoots off his mouth before he lets others complete a sentence. In this case he had NO IDEA what Coulter was talking about.

I’m no fan of Schultz, who becomes part of the news too often, but he’s spot on in this case. Coulter is a crafty lunatic, crazy like a fox, who says incredibly absurd things in order to get noticed. I think that she inspired Beck in that sense. Beck had to be listening to Coultergeist in the early 2,000′s and realized, wow, if she can say stupid and bat-shit crazy things like that and get noticed, then that must be the way to get noticed by my target audience: gullible and ignorant conservative bumpkins. (God knows, there are millions and millions of them in the United States. Just look at the numbers who watch Fox and wrongly believe that they’re watching a news channel.)

GlennBeckReview said:
I’m no fan of Schultz, who becomes part of the news too often, but he’s spot on in this case. Coulter is a crafty lunatic, crazy like a fox, who says incredibly absurd things in order to get noticed. I think that she inspired Beck in that sense. Beck had to be listening to Coultergeist in the early 2,000’s and realized, wow, if she can say stupid and bat-shit crazy things like that and get noticed, then that must be the way to get noticed by my target audience: gullible and ignorant conservative bumpkins. (God knows, there are millions and millions of them in the United States. Just look at the numbers who watch Fox and wrongly believe that they’re watching a news channel.)

lol

GlennBeckReview said:
I’m no fan of Schultz, who becomes part of the news too often, but he’s spot on in this case. Coulter is a crafty lunatic, crazy like a fox, who says incredibly absurd things in order to get noticed. I think that she inspired Beck in that sense. Beck had to be listening to Coultergeist in the early 2,000’s and realized, wow, if she can say stupid and bat-shit crazy things like that and get noticed, then that must be the way to get noticed by my target audience: gullible and ignorant conservative bumpkins. (God knows, there are millions and millions of them in the United States. Just look at the numbers who watch Fox and wrongly believe that they’re watching a news channel.)

Well hell, BOMB!
Why didn’t you say something earlier?
Could have saved all of us a lot of time!

It’s not up to GBR to save you from your own idiotic beliefs. It’s pretty clear that when a bag of hammers has to lecture a box of rocks the outcome of the debate is usually a moot point. You figure it out.

Tedderman said:
It’s not up to GBR to save you from your own idiotic beliefs. It’s pretty clear that when a bag of hammers has to lecture a box of rocks the outcome of the debate is usually a moot point. You figure it out.

And there ya go!! Right there!!
Another Genius! Ol’Tedderman is……….

Thank you, at least you’re still able to recognize genius when you see it.

Hey!! GlennBeckeview is out! Was your sentence commuted or are you now at a facility with limited internet priveledges?

timzank said:
Hey!! GlennBeckeview is out! Was your sentence commuted or are you now at a facility with limited internet priveledges?

You can’t disprove anything he said so you resort to personal attacks. Do you work for Fox?

Who are they trying to appeal to wasting time complaining about their competitors when they themselves strive on sensationalism? Who does this playground mentality appeal to?

Maybe a good dose of radiation will shrink her adams apple!

“Schultz claimed whenever Coulter is on television you can be sure there is “misinformation,”
Ann Coulter off T.V., Ann Coulter on T.V., “misinformation,”…. smile :-)

writer said:
MSNBC is really switching it up. One day they talk about Beck, the next it’s O’Reilly. The next day they might cover O’Reilly, then Beck.

.
That’s why in these unsettling and uncertain times I turn to Mediaite.

It is so comforting to know with certainty I can always count on them to cover every loony thing every MSNBC clown says about FOX.

I know that O’Reilly went to Harvard. And Ann Coulter graduated cum laude from Cornell, where she founded The Cornell Review before getting her law degree at the University of Michigan, where she edited the law review. Then she clerked for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Now what branch of science did Ed study at Minnesota State University Moorhead on a sport scholarship?

Hey there, I find an amazing web,please click the web ,you can find big pleasantly surprised
╭⌒╮WELCOME http://www.fullmalls.com/
—– ~ ¤ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮
╭⌒╭⌒╮╭⌒╮～╭⌒╮ HANDBAG 35$
,））））,”）~~ ,”~）
╱◥█◣ ╱◥█◣ SHOES 35$
｜田｜田｜｜田｜田｜ CLOTH 15$
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬ 2011 NEW

Matt Schneider:

“Ann Coulter recently made some headlines telling Bill O’Reilly that despite conventional wisdom, exposure to radiation could actually be good for someone’s health.”

Hmph. “Exposure to radiation”? Really? With no adjectives whatsoever? A person is “exposed to radiation” picking up a lead pencil. Conventional wisdom indeed.

This sentence reads remarkably like “media hysteria” which “for the past 20 years” has tried “to convince Americans that radiation at any dose is bad.”

The truth drives Ed and his followers crazy!

Does this fatass ever shut up? Not sure why anyone would watch this clown in the first place. He is as phony as a $3 bill. He relys on half-truths most of the time.

thanks http://www.raybanstoreuk.com/

“Watch the clip from MSNBC below:”

No Thanks….watching anything Big Ed says is a waste of time.

Does anyone know how Schult’s book sales are? Or what he gets paid to speak anywhere? Just wondering.

Remember back in grammer school, that science project where we make the bottle of soda erupt like a volcano? Thats the extent of my knowledge in the science field. But I was thinking about going to NASA and lecturing them on how to get a satelitte to Mars. Anyone want to join me?

For MSNBC it is obligatory to TAKE DOWN Coulter. Never mind what is actually saying.

Ed Schultz is ignorance incarnate.  Ed’s Dad had to be a union member or union official.  Maybe Ed got hit on the head too much when he was playing football.