I know! It’s hard for you to tolerate all people, and include Beck in that group, isn’t it?

m says:
December 1, 2009 at 11:06 am

Wow… hoping that someone gets violent and hurts other people, so you can attack Glenn Beck. Congrats! You’ve reached a new low!

Beck fears this himself, he knows this. He knows what he’s doing. This is why he instructs his own audience not to get violent.

I do not think Glen Beck, is in any way a time bomb. What he is doing it getting us ready for that big time bomb that is about to go off in Congress. Do those people really believe that we are going to give in to them on the most horrible Health bill ever put on paper. That is 2074 sheets of paper. No one in their right mind would believe that it will not cost us, trillions of dollars, less health care, no choice in our OWN health care and most of all that this government could possibly run this! We are now learning a bit about the secretary of Health by Not being able to get a simple Flu shot.

That’s all I have to say.

Actually, I’m not a fan of Beck’s. Too much “drama” on his show for my likings.

The difference is, just because I don’t like his program, doesn’t mean I hate the man, or will disrespect people who watch it. That’s part of that whole, “tolerance for all people” thing, we’re supposed to have. You should give it a try!

So, wrong on all counts… but thanks for playing!

Larry’s snide remark was SOUR GRAPES in 1992 just like Bill what’s-his-name’s remark is about Glenn Beck. I read some of Bill’s articles calling for the return of the fairness doctrine. The man is just jealous that nobody much cares what he as to say. I bet he’s hoping to set himself up as a liberal darling by bashing Beck.

My last word on Press is if you don’t like Beck or anyone else on TV, you can ignore them. You can’t do that to obama and Congress, can you!

Have fun with that.

Great comment… stay classy.

*rolls eyes*

m says:
November 30, 2009 at 3:44 am

GOODWIN’S LAW! AGAIN!

m says:
November 30, 2009 at 8:16 am

So you approve of just launching into a tirade of name calling, and expecting that to make some sort of educated point.

What am I thinking? OF COURSE you do… just read your comments above! Man, you guys are seriously becoming unhinged. You’re all filled with so much hate… hate for people who don’t agree with you… whether it’s other Americans, politicians, or otherwise, you just hate hate hate. And the rhetoric is getting worse. You’re losing you’re grip on reality… and if your comment, and the comments from the other lunatics around here is any indication of how you think as a group… YOU’RE the people that everyone should be afraid of!

Beck: -999999999999999999999999999999999999999
Obama: 99999999999999999999999999999999999999

You can mock him, call him an idiot, call him any name in the book but you can not deny the score:

Beck: 3
Obama: 0

“Hide the decline” — it will break through the media stone walling today.

Man, using Glenn Beck’s rhetorical style against himself is a lot of fun. I can understand why he does why he does. It’s so incredibly easy. Beck literally is an internet forum troll with a TV show.

FoxNews.com misleads on FY09 spending to attack Obama as “Spender in Chief”
November 25, 2009 9:13 am ET
A graphic posted on FoxNews.com suggested that President Obama is responsible for all of the $3.5 trillion in federal outlays for Fiscal Year 2009. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has stated that “much” of the 2009 increase in spending “results from legislation enacted in calendar year 2008 in response to turmoil in the housing and financial markets-in particular, $133 billion for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and $291 billion for the estimated costs of placing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship.”

Still think fox has anything to do with news? If you do, you’re a moron which is what you’d have to be to watch fox.

“Progressives have built up this wall of separation between church and state, and it’s nonsense”
November 25, 2009 5:49 pm

Now, which one of you mensa members will be able to explain why that statement by Beck is completely ignorant? What a dumb ass! As I posted earlier today, I’m living for the day when that nut job comes on the air, puts a gun is his mouth and pulls the trigger. Perhaps some of you NRA loonies could join him. Or maybe you should all go on a hunting trip with the Dick and the Daughter!

And how exactly is MSNBC not an “activist organization?” I’m wondering what you think the equivalency is…

m says:
November 29, 2009 at 6:36 pm

Goodwin’s Law.

____

Funny… KO makes the comment that he told the President of the United States to “shut the hell up,” on his program, only because he couldn’t say “F**k,” and nary a peep from the left about how “offensive” and “insane” he is. A multitude of stories about KO getting kicked out of every place he’s ever worked for… reducing fellow reporters to tears… and receiving a life-time ban from ESPN (not even for reunions)… and yet, he is the poster child of “good journalism.” Yeah… perhaps if you knew how to criticize one of your own (ask Rachel Sklar what happens when you write something even a little negative about Olbermann), your constant wailing against Beck would have some merit. Until then, it’s just wishful thinking from the left.

(PS- I wonder if David Schuster’s comment about Chelsea Clinton got this much press. Somehow, methinks not…)

The cablers have hardly discussed it this weekend, the broadcasters are too busy gushing over their time at the state dinner (see tweets by Katie and Brian) and next week we will have Afghan policy and Obama addressing the nation so the media will find another excuse to spike this story. But then….Copenhagen. Will mediaite ever address it? Evaluate it? Report on it? Or will you spike it????

Is Dan a newsman or not?

YOU CAN’T STOP THE TRUTH !

Climate change data dumped

Jonathan Leake [sic], Environment Editor

November 29, 2009

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

This story will and should blow out the upcoming Copenhagen climate change conference.

I’m certain FNC will have a field day next week with climategate as well, and will laugh heartily at the media for ignoring the story completely, despite it being all over the internet and in foreign papers as well. The US media is ignoring it, except for a few words here and there, in order to protect the One’s upcoming trip to Copenhagen.