1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Hannity And Malkin Slam Michelle Obama’s Campaign Against Childhood Obesity

video
» 87 comments

Some issues seem to transcend political debate. For example, take the Clinton administration’s efforts to curb underage smoking, just after the disasterous mid-term elections of 1994. Everyone can agree that kids shouldn’t smoke! Similarly, one would think that the epidemic of childhood obesity is a fight that everyone can get behind, right? Not so. As Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin last night attacked the efforts of First Lady Michelle Obama, in part because she used to sit on the board of a company that profited from junk food.

While Malkin and Hannity make some legitimate points in the following clip, they do appear to be missing the forest through the trees. For example, in the eyes of Malkin, the epidemic of childhood obesity appears to pale in comparison to the scourge of the “nanny state,” or as she puts it:

“We can laugh about it now, but it is a serious and dangerous issue. The amount of control they want to exercise on our lives.”

Um…I don’t think anyone will find anything funny about the following interview (nor childhood obesity.)

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • timzank

    Laugh now, but when social services shows up at your door because the camera caught you taking your kids to McDonalds more than the “allowed” times you won’t be laughing.

  • The Real Royal King

    Hannity and the Utterly Despicable Malkin. If Michelle Obama invented a cure for the common cold, they would be opposed to it and bash her for drying up the market for Mentholatum. They have rendered themselves silly and trite.

  • Snipzor

    Hey Timzank, you dropped your tin foil hat in the other thread. Oh, you’ve got extras? I guess you bring an extra everywhere you go then.

  • timzank

    Thanks snips, I never leave home without it.

    Once again, whether you hate Malkin or Hannity is immaterial, you have a government that is micro managing your lives and is in fact is controlling what and where you eat. Seems you guys like that, I don’t.

  • Snipzor

    Do you have any empirical evidence to support your tinfoil hat conspiracies? Or are you purely going off on an Alex Jones rant?

  • sarainitaly

    A third-grader at Brazos Elementary was given a week’s detention for possessing a Jolly Rancher.

    “School officials in Brazos County are defending the seemingly harsh sentence. The school’s principal and superintendent said they were simply complying with a state law that limits junk food in schools.”

    http://www.khou.com/news/Candy-Gets-Third-Grader-A-Weeks-Detention-93033319.html

    Other headlines:
    California county bans fast-food toys to stem child obesity

    Councilman Gioia Proposes Fast Food Ban Near Schools

    Should there be a ban on fast food commercials aimed at kids?

    Brooklyn Dem Felix Ortiz wants to ban use of salt in New York restaurants

    Is Feeding Your Kids Junk Food Child Abuse?

    No tin foil hat needed.

  • TylerDurden

    Michelle Obama is one of the most obese first ladies after Bill Clinton!

  • timzank

    What Sara said snips! She beat me to it. Thanks Sara!

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Do you have any empirical evidence to support your tinfoil hat conspiracies? Or are you purely going off on an Alex Jones rant?”

    Snip, man you need to keep up with current events!

    “Mayor Bloomberg, the mayor who declared war on tobacco, sugary drinks and trans fats, has identified a new public enemy — now he wants to protect New Yorkers from salt.

    Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley launches a campaign today to cut New Yorkers’ sodium intake by one-fifth over five years.

    “If we achieve our goal, we would talk about saving tens of thousands of lives,” Farley said, predicting that deaths from strokes and heart attacks will dramatically fall.

    The City Health Department is spearheading the National Salt Reduction Initiative, which will cajole food manufacturers to voluntarily cut sodium content 20 to 25 percent by 2014.
    Food-nanny Mayor Bloomberg and the City Health Department plan to reduce New Yorkers’ sodium intake with the National Salt Reduction Initiative.

    Food-nanny Mayor Bloomberg and the City Health Department plan to reduce New Yorkers’ sodium intake with the National Salt Reduction Initiative.

    Some 26 other cities, states and organizations, including the American Medical Association, back the campaign.”

  • The Real Royal King

    Sara N. Italy is right! Amerika has not enough little fatties running around. We ought not be worried about the fact that our military leaders believe it will be increasingly difficult to field a fit army or that our life expectancy will drop. Even our birthrate will drop. I mean, how many children has Limbaugh sired? I am not willing to deny or children the inalienable right to double meat burgers and supersized fries. That’s why I support Colonel Sanders and the Burger King in 2012.

  • MichelleF

    Do you have any empirical evidence to support your tinfoil hat conspiracies? Or are you purely going off on an Alex Jones rant?”

    County supervisors in California have proposed that toys included in fast-food restaurant meals for kids be banned, the Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.

    Officials in Silicon Valley are convinced that luring kids into eating foods with high sugar, sodium and fat by using toys will make them overweight and cause long term health problems.

    This proposal is believed to the first of this type, and would ban the inclusion of a toy in any kids meal with more than 485 calories, 600 mg of salt, or high amounts of sugar or fat. These guidelines would cause all McDonald’s happy meals — even those with apple sticks instead of French fries — to be served without a toy.

    Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/happy_meal_toys_could_be_banned_6Yabv8gCXkvga0ni4RMA0N#ixzz0np3JyxNA

  • Snipzor

    So essentially, all of those things are Obama’s fault, and it’s a prime example of government fascism. Obviously, you three strive to fail, not just fail in the literal sense, but beyond that. You’ve gone beyond stupid. You’ve gone full retard, nobody goes full retard.

    Tyler Durden especially, because that example is essentially campaign launches, which are only social initiatives. Which is obviously a phrase you’ve never heard of.

    But how dare they stop kids from being fat! How dare they! It’s fascism that government uses these initiatives to stop kids from being unable to get off the couch. How dare they!!!

  • MichelleF

    The libs are doing what they always do. We are against ILLEGAL immigration, so we are racists that hate those from other countries. We abhore abortion, so we are against woman’s rights. We don’t want the gov’t in EVERY aspect of out lives, stripping us of our god-given right to free agency, so we want kids to be fat and die. That’s schtick is getting tired. How about debating us on those issues instead of trying to make it about something other than it is. Oh I know, because if you actually debate the issues, you LOSE!

  • BowenIsland

    The Real Royal King says:

    “That’s why I support Colonel Sanders and the Burger King in 2012.”

    Don’t forget your oat cakes and watermelon TRRK , have to keep your bowel movements as fluid as your beliefs.

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:10 am

    So essentially, all of those things are Obama’s fault, and it’s a prime example of government fascism.”

    Snipy, show where anyone said it was BHO’s fault.

    I’ll wait!

    Your are such a BHO brown noser- can’t say much without bringing up Dingle Barry, cam ya?

  • TylerDurden

    Snip- take a reading comprehension course:

    “Mayor Bloomberg, the mayor who declared war on tobacco, sugary drinks and trans fats, has identified a new public enemy — now he wants to protect New Yorkers from salt.”

  • writer

    So checking for illegal immigrants is a government intrusion, but telling us what to eat isn’t.

  • Snipzor

    Were you whining about these measures against childhood obesity, wait hold on, the support of measures against childhood obesity (that’s more accurate) before Michelle Obama decided to make that her focus? Obviously not, enjoy the selective outrage.

    You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

  • Cecelia

    I commend Mrs. Obama for her good work. It’s certainly as important and as relevant as Mrs. Bush focus on literacy.

    “Is Feeding Your Kids Junk Food Child Abuse?”

    Here’s the kicker.

    It’s not out of the realm of imagination that at some day the food pyramid won’t just be good advice, it will be a govt mandate based upon egis of public money.

  • Snipzor

    “So checking for illegal immigrants is a government intrusion, but telling us what to eat isn’t?”

    One goes into law and directly gets in the way of life liberty and all that. Launching campaigns against stuff that will kill you faster, is hardly a bad thing. Would you be pissed off if they targeted cigarettes? Probably, if it was done during the Obama administration.

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor- You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.”

    We just provided you with the facts and you reply with opinions! LMAO

    Also, as the benighted libby you are, when confronted with the facts that destroy your opinion, you resort to name calling.

    You are so predictable.

    Tsk, tsk!

  • The Real Royal King

    In the end, isn’t the need for such action the product of poor parenting, and aren’t most of our nation’s problems the result of poor parenting? If all parents were as attentive and involved in their children’s lives as I believe Michelle to be, none of this would be necessary, would it?

  • TylerDurden

    If all parents were as attentive and involved in their children’s lives as I believe Michelle to be,”

    Michelle Obama is obese.

  • writer

    Snip, so millions of people entering illegally is a ‘healthy’ condition for the country?

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:21 am

    “So checking for illegal immigrants is a government intrusion, but telling us what to eat isn’t?”

    One goes into law and directly gets in the way of life liberty and all that. ”

    And that’s the point. One deals with breaking a current law, the other with unwanted and unnecessary govt. intrusion.

  • Snipzor

    “Snip, so millions of people entering illegally is a ‘healthy’ condition for the country?”

    Love the strawman argument, writer. I addressed cops checking people on vague stereotypes that was put into law, not illegal immigration. Nice try, but in the end, misrepresentation of opinions is still easy to call out.

  • gabbie99

    those of you who say the government should not be allowed control…sorry, but I want them to quit using my tax dollars to provide health care to people who are not at least encouraged and rewared to eat right and exercise. Education in those areas and making unhealthy crap that is marketed to kids more expensive than healthy food is not taking control…it is good for all. People don’t take personal responsibility for their unhealthy behavior. Screaming about taking away their freedom to eat crap and be lazy is just plain idiotic when we all end up paying all of the bills related to that behavior later.

  • writer

    Nice try, snip. But the law says there has to be a reason to stop people. Obama’s ‘being stopped on the way to get ice cream’ is a lie.

  • sarainitaly

    Michelle Obama is taking on a great cause, and I applaud her Get Fit efforts.

    That said, the responsibility lies with the PARENTS, not with the government. Give them an inch, they’ll take a mile. First they ban salt and Happy Meal toys, then what? Donut shops and pizza parlors? Then Starbuck’s drinks and Cheetos? Then ALL convenience foods?

    They punish the whole for the *crimes* of a few?

    Why should my niece be punished, who is healthy and thin, and gets a Happy Meal Toy maybe three times a year, be punished because your kid is overweight because you are a crap parent?

    Why should my meal be bland and boring without salt, when we treat ourselves to a night out once in a blue moon, because you are a fat a** who doesn’t eat healthy?

    MichelleF says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Spot on!

  • Snipzor

    “Nice try, snip. But the law says there has to be a reason to stop people”

    Reasonable suspicion is what it says, which can be interpreted by cops as anything. Cops can use excuses when they arrest some Hispanic young male for not having his papers, after which an investigation was provoked because he had “tattered clothing” or “awkward walking patterns” or whatever.

  • tws258

    Snipzor says:

    I see you have cleverly invoked the” Chicken Little” gambit. Well Played.

  • sarainitaly

    The Real Royal King says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:08 am
    I am not willing to deny or children the inalienable right to double meat burgers and supersized fries.

    And that there is the problem – parents.

  • MichelleF

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:19 am
    Were you whining about these measures against childhood obesity, wait hold on, the support of measures against childhood obesity (that’s more accurate) before Michelle Obama decided to make that her focus? Obviously not, enjoy the selective outrage.

    You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

    Those on the right are always against gov’t over-reach. Doesn’t matter who’s suggestion it is.

  • TylerDurden

    Sorry Snip- the American people are for this law- you and your libby friends are wrong again!

  • MichelleF

    If all parents were as attentive and involved in their children’s lives as I believe Michelle to be, none of this would be necessary, would it?

    Thanks King, I try!

  • Snipzor

    In that case Michelle, a quick question.

    Where was the outrage for Laura Bush’s pro-literacy campaigns?

  • MichelleF

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:48 am
    Sorry Snip- the American people are for this law- you and your libby friends are wrong again!

    Tyler,
    I think they missed the latest polls on that yesterday. Either that or they have their hands over their ears screaming, “I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!)

  • writer

    So what’s your solution to people entering the country illegally, snip? Do nothing?

  • MichelleF

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:49 am
    In that case Michelle, a quick question.

    Where was the outrage for Laura Bush’s pro-literacy campaigns?

    Snip,
    When the gov’t is requiring book reports, then come talk to me. That would be more akin to what they are doing with banning happy meals and such. If you can’t see the difference in teaching children to love to read and forcing them to eat certain foods the gov’t deems acceptable, then I can’t help you.

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:49 am

    In that case Michelle, a quick question.

    Where was the outrage for Laura Bush’s pro-literacy campaigns?”

    LMAO!

    Outrage from liberals who can’t read!

  • tws258

    Snipzor says: Where was the outrage for Laura Bush’s pro-literacy campaigns?

    Enabling people to read ,thereby offering opportunity vs. denying some people things (in this case food choices) because some people have no self control . You really don’t see the difference ?

  • TylerDurden

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:33 am

    Love the strawman argument”

    And here it is Snip-

    “Where was the outrage for Laura Bush’s pro-literacy campaigns?”

    LMAO!

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:26 am

    “Michelle Obama is obese.”

    Silly Bagger. Good thing we all know reality isn’t your guys strong point….

  • sarainitaly

    Snipzor says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:41 am

    Reasonable suspicion is what it says, which can be interpreted by cops as anything. Cops can use excuses when they arrest some Hispanic young male for not having his papers, after which an investigation was provoked because he had “tattered clothing” or “awkward walking patterns” or whatever.

    So, basically, you are subscribing to the *Cops acting stupidly* meme, before the law has even started?

    Don’t police operate under suspicions most of the time? They see a car swerving down the road – they have reasonable suspicion the driver is drunk. They see a guy lurking in a doorway, watching people come in and out, at 2am, they might have reasonable suspicion the guy is up to no good. They see a guy following a woman walking down the street at 3am, acting all shifty, looking over his shoulder, they might have reasonable suspicion he is going to attack her. They see a couple of hoodlums with sweatshirt hoods on, hands in their pockets, enter a 7/11 at 3am, they might have reasonable suspicion they plan to rob the place. They pull over a guy for a broken tail light, and he can’t produce any valid ID, which is against the law, they might have enough reasonable suspicion to check his legal status.

    “an investigation was provoked because he had “tattered clothing” or “awkward walking patterns” or whatever.” It sounds like you’re the one using the strawman argument.

  • writer

    We would never hear the left referring to Rush Limbaugh as fat. They are above it.

  • TylerDurden

    Jackie_Treehorn says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:26 am

    “Michelle Obama is obese.”

    Silly Bagger. Good thing we all know reality isn’t your guys strong point….”

    LOL

    She is huge- fat- like libs like ‘em!

    hahaha

  • Grammie

    “gabbie99 says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:35 am

    those of you who say the government should not be allowed control…sorry, but I want them to quit using my tax dollars to provide health care ……..Screaming about taking away their freedom to eat crap and be lazy is just plain idiotic when we all end up paying all of the bills related to that behavior later.”

    Well, Gabbie and anyone else who approves of these measures, that are much more than just “campaigns” and take the form of regulations laws, where do you draw the line which separates allowable/desirable control of personal behavior and/or parental control?

    Here’s one for you. Studies have shown that a large percentage of children and teens are sleep deprived. This is especially prevalent in two income and single parent households. I think this is a significant problem b/c as all parents know sleepy children are at a disadvantage in almost everything and especially in academic pursuits. What solutions via law and regulations would you be OK with? Random bedtime checks in the home? Questioning the children at school?

    BTW, good to see you again, Sara.

  • writer

    Dangerous ground, Grammie, talking about two parent households. Remember what happened to Dan Quayle when he said kids are better off being raised by two parents

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    “LOL

    She is huge- fat- like libs like ‘em!

    hahaha”

    Like all those big ole Texas, MIssissippi, and Alabama Mommas……

    Keep your hands off their cheeseburgers Obama! They’re proud of their 400lb 14 year olds…..

  • Grammie

    writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    Hey, I come from the days when ships were made of wood and men of iron, or so my Daddy always said. :)

  • writer

    Careful. There are minorities living in those states. You surely don’t mean them, too.

  • writer

    Wait a minute! Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama have large minority populations! Jackie, you’re a racist!

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    Wait a minute! Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama have large minority populations! Jackie, you’re a racist!

    Writer, you’re an idiot!

  • writer

    Why, Jackie? You didn’t specify. You just named the entire states. Did you mean everyone in those states, or just some, or what?

  • puck30

    I think it’s funny when Pawn Vannity & Malkin have the time to talk about this but they could care less about having the feds open the books.

    Or would the real reason be that they would find it hard to cover up why some on their own side voted agaisnt this, like McConnel & Alexander?

    No instead let’s talk about cheat dating websites on the radio show, much more important. I thought some folks in Congress where all for us getting the house in order?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GmCjUB00uM

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    “writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Why, Jackie? You didn’t specify. You just named the entire states. Did you mean everyone in those states, or just some, or what?”

    Well it’s not the liberal elitist states topping the fat charts every year……

  • writer

    The liberal elitist states also give the least to charity. I guess all those fat and happy southerners are in a better mood that the always bitter and angry liberals.

  • TylerDurden

    Jackie_Treehorn says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    Wait a minute! Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama have large minority populations! ”

    They are packed with your kind, Jackie!

    Big fat ones like Barry’s wife!

  • CJJ2

    Is there a reason the Left ignores the fact that local school districts already test for body-mass ratio, and school districts and states are fully equipped to address the issue?

    Do they really believe Americans think this is one of those areas where only the Federal Government has the means to act? National defense, interstate highways and…diets?

  • sarainitaly

    writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:12 pm
    Remember what happened to Dan Quayle when he said kids are better off being raised by two parents

    You bring up a very good point. How many obese children come from single parent or broken homes? And from low income homes?

    Call me crazy, but I am going to take a guess that not many obese children come from stay at home mom/dad at work households.

    Obesity is more common in African American, Hispanic American, and Native American children and adolescents, than among Caucasians of the same ages. – What would they think if they just banned these groups, and not white children? Would that be ok?

    All those who are supporting a nanny state – how many would support a move by the government to implement a ban on divorce when children are involved? Or a ban allowing mothers to work? If they determine that single moms raise the most obese children, will they support a ban on single mothers?

    I had to check – I was correct:

    “Studies have demonstrated that children in single-parent families are more likely to be overweight or obese than children in two-parent families and that the rise in women working outside the home coincides with the rise in childhood weight problems
    http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/child_obesity/

    So…. I guess they won’t mind laws that forbid single parent homes and working mothers?

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    The liberal elitist states also give the least to charity. I guess all those fat and happy southerners are in a better mood that the always bitter and angry liberals.

    Well good thing then that they’ll be dying out 30 years earlier than my kind huh?

  • TylerDurden

    Jackie- admit it! You are a BBW- big butt woman!

  • writer

    Not necessarily, Jackie. Constant anger shortens the life span, and the left is always angry, even when their guys hold the White House and congress. Check out the red-faced rantings of people like Keith Olbermann. I’m surprised he’s lived as long as he has.

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Jackie- admit it! You are a BBW- big butt woman!

    Why does noone ever get the movie reference? Are you seriously that frothy about Hollywood? Well at least you have that 24 movie coming out…..

  • TylerDurden

    Jackie_Treehorn – no one saw that movie- it was a bomb.

  • Jackie_Treehorn

    “writer says:
    May 13, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    Not necessarily, Jackie. Constant anger shortens the life span, and the left is always angry, even when their guys hold the White House and congress. Check out the red-faced rantings of people like Keith Olbermann. I’m surprised he’s lived as long as he has.”

    Being 400lbs and marching around DC like a lunatic about taxes and birth certificates until your blue in the face just makes our liberal dream of a socialist utopia come true faster.

  • TylerDurden

    Being 400lbs and marching around DC like a lunatic ”

    Get over your Michelle Obama fascination!

  • writer

    Maybe you’re onto something, Jackie. Ms. Obama probably got that obesity idea from seeing her behind in the mirror.

  • gabbie99

    Any ex-smokers here? Why did you quit?

  • TylerDurden

    gabbie99 says:
    May 13, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Any ex-smokers here? Why did you quit?”

    The cost.

  • writer

    Personal choice. Not the government’s choice.

  • CJJ2

    “Studies have demonstrated that children in single-parent families are more likely to be overweight or obese than children in two-parent families…”

    Ah, the elevation of the single-parent household to ‘normal, healthy’ status. The Left’s gift to America.

    The single most significant – and destructive — domestic development of the 20th century.

    “Destructive” only if you care about poverty, and education, and crime, and taxes, and children’s health

  • The Real Royal King

    The Left’s Gift. That is truly amusing. To get anywhere as a Republican candidate, office holder or pundit, it seems you have to be divorced, preferably multiple times. Gingrich*, Guiliani*, Limbaugh*, McCain, Raygun, Sanford, Thompson …. We could go on and on.

  • TylerDurden

    Or cheat multiple times: All Kennedys, Bill Clinton, John Edwards, etc.

  • sarainitaly

    Nice to see President Obama leading by example.

    Chicken wings, extra crispy, and french fries.

    Do you think he had a smoke afterwards?

    http://tinyurl.com/2vk3cyb

  • badr

    Isn’t it lovely how a moron like Maochelle managed to get on Treehouse’s board? Anyhow, as Hillbuzz notes, http://hillbuzz.org/2010/05/12/question-shouldnt-the-white-house-start-with-banning-its-own-deep-fryer/ Shouldn’t the White House start with banning its own Deep Fryer?

  • TylerDurden

    badr, that was MORE than obscene!

    Yuk!

  • The Real Royal King

    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    Or cheat multiple times: All Kennedys, Bill Clinton, John Edwards, etc.

    The topic was single parent families. You are off topic.

  • sarainitaly

    The Real Royal King says:
    May 13, 2010 at 3:28 pm
    TylerDurden says:
    May 13, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    The topic was single parent families. You are off topic.

    I believe all the people you listed are married. (Maybe not Rush.)

  • The Real Royal King

    Duh, Sara N. Italy! The point to anyone who reads English as his or her first language is that they all engaged in adulterous dalliances which created single parent households. I’m not a Republican and I have never been divorced, so I don’t understand all this step parent “stuff”. I understand, however that all of these men left their children when they left their wives.

  • The_Reasonable_Lib

    MichelleF says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Kind of like how during the Bush administration if you disagreed with any of their policies you were unamerican? Or ooohh, how everything Obama does is evil to Fox News?
    And debate the issues? Like when President Obama embarassed the ENTIRE REPUBLICAN SECTION OF THE HOUSE on national television? Or maybe the entire campaign where all the GOP did was try to demonize Obama and never talked about the issues while Obama stuck to them? Your tunnel vision astounds

  • annejaa

    I really don’t understand why people can’t do support to such activities ? Michelle is doing good job by this campaign.This is to aware us Americans to take care about our kids’ food.
    r4 card

  • RichS

    The_Reasonable_Lib says:

    May 13, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Kind of like how during the Bush administration if you disagreed with any of their policies you were unamerican? Or ooohh, how everything Obama does is evil to Fox News?
    And debate the issues? Like when President Obama embarassed the ENTIRE REPUBLICAN SECTION OF THE HOUSE on national television? Or maybe the entire campaign where all the GOP did was try to demonize Obama and never talked about the issues while Obama stuck to them? Your tunnel vision astounds

    What you typed might seem less like ravings and more like an arguement if you backed up your “points.”

  • RichS

    Speaking of violating the law, its against the law to smoke in Federal Buildings. Does President Obama, who smokes, always leave the White House to light up a cigarette?

  • MichelleF

    The_Reasonable_Lib says:
    May 13, 2010 at 6:38 pm
    MichelleF says:
    May 13, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Kind of like how during the Bush administration if you disagreed with any of their policies you were unamerican? Or ooohh, how everything Obama does is evil to Fox News?
    And debate the issues? Like when President Obama embarassed the ENTIRE REPUBLICAN SECTION OF THE HOUSE on national television? Or maybe the entire campaign where all the GOP did was try to demonize Obama and never talked about the issues while Obama stuck to them? Your tunnel vision astounds

    As does yours.

  • AmericanCowboy

    …‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›..Support “Legal Only” Immigration..‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…

    “Buycott” not Boycutt…Buycott Arizona. Visit the Great State of Arizona this year. I have planned a trip to Scottsdale for June. Scottsdale has some amazing resorts, great restaurants and shopping, a wild nightlife and some of the greatest golf courses on earth. They also have the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River. Let’s support the Great State by spending money there. Vote out politicians who don’t support legal immigration and want to boycott this state. Business owners buy Arizona products!!!!

  • TCinAZ

    Hannity and the Utterly Despicable Malkin. If Michelle Obama invented a cure for the common cold, they would be opposed to it and bash her for drying up the market for Mentholatum. They have rendered themselves silly and trite.
    >>>>>>>>

    Well how about we see Michelle Invent a cure for the common cold First, instead of her being appointed as a board member at some non-union “Big Pharma” multi-national conglomerate that has Already found the cure for it? How about that?

    Until then though, She should keep her big “Badunkadunk” that’s as Big as a Treehouse (Foods) The Hell out My Fridge, and My Nephew’s Fridge, and All my friends kids….since We’ve ALL been doing Just Fine without her HOPE or CHANGE in terms of Our Weight for Our Age, Height and so on TYVM, FAT @SS!

    Oh yeah, and while you’re at it, tell the O’s to stay out of our light sockets, wall sockets, toilets, garages and whatever the hell else they have in mind for us Too.

    Liberals. You guys are Long Range ****ing Fascists. Yoo-Hoo, CUT THAT OUT! Come on over and try it face up though. lol.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram