John proves he’s not against sludge “as such”… He aims to convince folks the waste the right wallows in was produced by another and coordinate the pushbrooms toward Obama.

Looks like government trolls like yourself won’t be able to claim that he’s “surging” and taking someone else out of the race in SC

He’s fundamentally wrong about this, but he’s still less of a partisan hack than the rest of them.

He is surging. There is no doubt he will win. I got this information from the top… the top agent on the case.

What a joke.Anyone who has brains can see it is the Republican backwards party that is dividing this country.People are smarter than they are that is why President Obama will win a second term.Republican side had their chance and did screw up America for 8 years.Their brainwashing only effects a small few anymore.

Really?  Not Obama saying, “we won”?  Not leftists crying racism at every chance they get?  What about when the Dems had the presidency and both houses for two years?  Dont forget that the Dems had both houses for four years.  Please tell me that you aren’t really THAT stupid?

Including Obama, Harry Reid, Palosi……..

My fist disagrees with your fist. If only I was Tony_the_Paper.

You’re feeding right into the problem…

Wrong about what specifically?

Well Mr Huntsman you can’t be surprised that if you roll around in the GOP primary sewer that you will get crap all over you.

Please don’t feed the trolls.
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Trolls&hl=en&biw=1280&bih=855&gbv=2&tbm=isch&tbnid=I3qG4LIEhcKTXM:&imgrefurl=http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/articles/18-types-of-internet-trolls&docid=dIdvD12m77GonM&imgurl=http://legacy-cdn.smosh.com/smosh-pit/112010/no-troll-feeding.jpg&w=500&h=500&ei=TXwUT9a8PK7F0AHysKDRCg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=516&vpy=305&dur=188&hovh=225&hovw=225&tx=104&ty=96&sig=102465327675433855352&page=5&tbnh=162&tbnw=165&start=114&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:20,s:114

Hunstman has the chutzpah to accuse this president of divisiveness. 

The president who reached across the party aisle and appointed him over eminently qualified Democrats to represent us in China. The president who appointed Robert Gates, LaHood and other Republicans to his cabinet. The president he shafted by leaving his sensitive post early, after spending the last 5 months in Beijing putting together a campaign organization by stealth instead of doing his job.

What a disloyal putz. This my friends, is the result of bipartisanship the Republican way.

Memo to Mr. Huntsman: Does the following ring a bell: Muslim, Marxist, Communist, Socialist, born in Kenya, dictator, Fascist, etc., ring a bell?

He say’s he is “putting all his weight behind former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney”…whoa.

There’s an ounce and half to push the Governor over the top…

It’s called “cover”. Pick a lightweight from the opposition and bring him in for political cover…you can try to call yourself “bi-partisan”–didn’t work–won’t matter–they are both–DONE.

Correct. Huntsman and Romney are both done.

That would be fine with me…the pendulum swings the other way big time eventually.

That the administration has been the prime source of the toxicity. Obama has bent over backwards to play nice with people who said that it was their number one mission to defeat him. People who said from day one that they hoped he’d “fail.” The notion that this president (the guy who reached across the aisle and appointed him ambassador, no less) has been responsible for the political divisiveness is so patently absurd and so at odds with the facts, it’s laughable on its face.

Subject: Divisiveness

“Mitt Romney criticized me while he was out raising money…for serving my country in China. Yes, under a Democrat, like my two sons are doing in the United States Navy. They’re not asking what political affiliation the President is… I will always put my country first, and I think that’s important.”

“This nation is divided, David, because of attitudes like that.”

John Huntsman

Bang! Liked it so much I copied and pasted elsewhere. Check is in the post.

Huntsman was all over the “Bain” issue, until he figured out that he and his father would be wasting their money pushing his campaign. Now, he’s “for” Romney??? What a joke!

I still suspect that he’s going to “do a Romney” and figures that Romney will NOT beat Obama (a reasonable assumption), so he (Huntsman) will spend the next FIVE years putting together a structure and a team for his run for the presidency in 2016.

Smarmy little man.

Oh good God….  That happens to each party in every primary.  Do you not recall Clinton and Obama battling?  Just stop with the dishonest rants.

Not a reasonable assumption at all.  More like a wish on your part.

Lol!

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29581.html

Hmmmm, seems this ‘lightweight’ was also chosen by former POTUS REAGAN, and both H.&HW. Bush……..!!!!!! 

They did not “choose” him to be president now–did they? Neither have the primary voters….we don’t need another puff and fluff after this last one.

Hardly…I do NOT support Huntsman- he’s the candidate of “Morning Joe.”

Sayonara!
That’s Japanese for “Good-bye”!

Here’s an REO Speedwagon song for you Jon huntsman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2L2T7bWQzEs

Indeed – and the only brainwaves “the party of ideas” comes up with wallow in toxicity. This happens when the GOP applauds the demagogues of Fox etc. who usurped the party.

So?

What are you *actually* saying? Having a majority is divisive? And saying that you have won when you, well, won, is now also considered divisive? 

And then you are calling other people “THAT stupid” …

…and when would it not be considered “cover” but actually “bi-partisan” in your opinion?

Nice ‘Jump-of-the-Tracks’ but just to dabble in your neck of the woods for a second, ‘NO’ they did not ”choose” him  to be president now~~~but again, that ‘lightweight’ was chosen to do some heavy work within Republican Administrations, would ”you” agree???

Hmmm, ‘Not Quite’……but, the link is ‘VERY SPECIFIC’…….even with ‘Control’ of both Houses, it was obvious that-that ‘control’ wasnt really what it cracked up to be…..thats what I’m saying!!!!!

Yeah we both know that – but does ‘brdad’ know it? Cheers

The only ones who care that Huntsman is gone are liberals who, truth be known, don’t care either.

Anyone with a brain can see that it is both parties doing that as well as the two party system. Partisan sheep are incapable of seeing it and only whine about the other side while participating in the same. Your post only marginalizes yourself and unfarely those who identify under the same label.

Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out!

Probably–when they share some values, vision and understanding–like a marriage as opposed to a liaison where money is exchanged for value received…

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce? White House staff assistant? Puhleezzeee… Deputy trade rep? You are too easily impressed.

I take it……your RESUME is more ‘IMPRESSIVE’???

No. It’s not. But then–I’m not running for president either.

Whether a voter has a more impressive set of credentials than the candidate running for office should probably not be the focus for most people–it’s assumed that if you are a serious candidate to lead the country you would have done something in life to demonstrate leadership.

Asking the question you did and presenting it as some kind of ‘argument’ speaks volumes about your qualifications to vote.