You first Michael. Give back the millions you have made off of Capitalism and we will distribute it equally. Another liberal HYPO!!

And here I thought natural resources came from the ground.

Liberal Tormentor said:
You first Michael. Give back the millions you have made off of Capitalism and we will distribute it equally. Another liberal HYPO!!

Which is it off or of, am confused by your confusion.

I want my share of his money first!

Good thing Mr. Moore just announced a million-dollar lawsuit against the Weinsteins, in order to get some of our, er, uh, his money back.

Michael Moore, with a single, curt sentence, fully validates every conservative stereotype of liberalism. Yes America, liberals think that it’s their money, all of it. And, whatever money they let you keep, should sate you because, after all, you’re just a greedy, evil capitalist.

Michael Moore, thank you. Rush Limbaugh could not caricature liberalism any better than you have caricatured it yourself.

Black and Gold Brad said:
Good thing Mr. Moore just announced a million-dollar lawsuit against the Weinsteins, in order to get some of our, er, uh, his money back.

No doubt, shall he win, he will donate to the masses. Where’s my check!

skyfet said:
skyfet

lol,, you know skyfet has got every movie double chins has ever made,,, in BLURAY FORMAT!
and i would bet,, skyfet didnt pay for 1 damn disk
he probably stole off the internet
You’re a good lib sky
YOU UNION?

“We’re not broke. This country is not broke. The state of Wisconsin is not broke. There’s a ton of cash in this country.”

$14 trillion in debt at Federal level alone, you horse’s ass.

“What’s happened is is that we’ve allowed a vast majority of that cash to be concentrated in the hands of just a few people. .”

Like you, you corpulent POS who made over $20 million off the movie “”Farenheit 9/11″ and who is now suing the Weinstein because he wants millions more?

I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.
The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.

notsofast said:
“We’re not broke. This country is not broke. The state of Wisconsin is not broke. There’s a ton of cash in this country.”

$14 trillion in debt at Federal level alone, you horse’s ass.

“What’s happened is is that we’ve allowed a vast majority of that cash to be concentrated in the hands of just a few people. .”

Like you, you corpulent POS who made over $20 million off the movie “”Farenheit 9/11″ and who is now suing the Weinstein because he wants millions more?

You are a total idiot, read what I just posted. Michael isn’t talking about your money or my money that we earned, he is talking about the welfare queens which are the banks, they got trillions of dollars and are sitting on it. Try reading next time.

The snakes are eating each other (Moore laughing all the way to the lawyers office):

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/michael-moore-sues-weinstein-brothers-/hollywood/

“For a guy whose last film was devoted to bashing American capitalism, Michael Moore sure seems to be concerned about his profits.”

Color Me Badd said:
I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.
The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.

Look at this guy trying to distinguish what “kinda” money Moore is talking about
LMAO
That’s pathetic

“He talkin’ about that kinda money,, that kinda money the fat cats have!”

Color me Ignorant, we understand you libs better than you think we do. You’re not that hard to figure out.

COlor Me Bad said:
“I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.
The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.”

Fair enough. Where is the proof? Are you saying that Mediaite took Moore out of context. Because I didn’t hear any of what you said come our of his mouth. Can you please provide proof.

Atticus Draco said:
Look at this guy trying to distinguish what “kinda” money Moore is talking about
LMAO
That’s pathetic

“He talkin’ about that kinda money,, that kinda money the fat cats have!”

No you are an idiot or I guess you agree with welfare is a good thing for banks, it matters what money he is talking about. I know teabags are stupid but at least try.

Color Me Badd said:
No you are an idiot or I guess you agree with welfare is a good thing for banks, it matters what money he is talking about. I know teabags are stupid but at least try.

its a natural resource
THAT’S KINDA MONEY HE IS TALKING ABOUT
LMAO

Hey Color me Ignorant, was “welfare” in the form of giving those who couldn’t afford a house, access to buy one a good thing? You’re liberals buddies sure thought it was.

Color Me Badd said:
You are a total idiot, read what I just posted. Michael isn’t talking about your money or my money that we earned, he is talking about the welfare queens which are the banks, they got trillions of dollars and are sitting on it. Try reading next time.

thanks, miss cleo

More Liberty4 said:
COlor Me Bad said:
“I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.
The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.”

Fair enough. Where is the proof? Are you saying that Mediaite took Moore out of context. Because I didn’t hear any of what you said come our of his mouth. Can you please provide proof.

I dont understand why you need proof, go back and listen to the interview. Do you not agree that the banks were given billions of dollars during TARP and many more billions after that from quantitative easing? Do you even know what quantitative easing is? Go read about it and get pissed, the treasury printed billions of dollars out of thin air to give to the banks without the public really knowing about it, people got rightfully pissed at TARP but if they knew about QE they would be in the streets.

Feel free to defend corporate welfare, I choose not to.

WCinWI said:
And here I thought natural resources came from the ground.

MM is a natural resource: natural gas!

Atticus Draco said:
Color Me Badd said:
No you are an idiot or I guess you agree with welfare is a good thing for banks, it matters what money he is talking about. I know teabags are stupid but at least try.

Atticus Draco said:
its a natural resource
THAT’S KINDA MONEY HE IS TALKING ABOUT
LMAO

cOLOR,, has heat lamps for his money!
down in his momma’s basement
LMAO

Color Me Badd said:
Michael isn’t talking about your money or my money that we earned, he is talking about the welfare queens which are the banks, they got trillions of dollars and are sitting on it.

He said “we need to go back to taxing these people at proper rates”. 1:29-1:30 “Taxing these people” =banks?

Atticus Draco said:
its a natural resource
THAT’S KINDA MONEY HE IS TALKING ABOUT
LMAO

Yes it is a natural resource that money belongs to everyone and was injected into the banks in order to produce capital, which the banks sat on and gave out huge bonuses. I know teabaggers don’t care about what Wall Street does and defends corporate socialism all the time. But honestly if you people were getting mad at the right people you would have a lot of support, right now the tea party is marginal and generates a lot of publicity but their numbers are small.

Atticus Draco said:
lol,, you know skyfet has got every movie double chins has ever made,,, in BLURAY FORMAT!
and i would bet,, skyfet didnt pay for 1 damn disk
he probably stole off the internet
You’re a good lib sky
YOU UNION?

Well, you contradict yourself. You claimed I downloaded films from the net, yet it’s still a blu ray. That’s impossible.

Atticus Draco said:
cOLOR,, has heat lamps for his money!
down in his momma’s basement
LMAO

I know that trying to have an actual discussion about real issues is something the average Mediaite commenter is unable to do, but really that is all you got? Weak

They need to – we need to see these jobs as something that we own, that we collectively own as Americans and you can’t just steal our jobs and take them someplace else.”

What a total POS.

Liberal Tormentor said:
You’re liberals buddies sure thought it was.

Confusing me again! are you talking about him (you’re), or his buddies (your).

Color Me Badd said:
Yes it is a natural resource that money belongs to everyone and was injected into the banks in order to produce capital, which the banks sat on and gave out huge bonuses. I know teabaggers don’t care about what Wall Street does and defends corporate socialism all the time. But honestly if you people were getting mad at the right people you would have a lot of support, right now the tea party is marginal and generates a lot of publicity but their numbers are small.

IF you embrace the Tea Party,, you wouldnt be talkin’ stupid $hit!

alright! michael moore can pay for my health insurance, pension, food, rent, car payment, ANYTIME he wants!

Penguin60 said:
He said “we need to go back to taxing these people at proper rates”. 1:29-1:30 “Taxing these people” =banks?

He is totally right, you are aware that large corporations pay no taxes right? Bank Of American paid zero taxes last year, how do you feel about that? Do you think it is fair that you and I are taxed and BOA and Exxon Mobil arent?

Color Me Badd said:
I dont understand why you need proof, go back and listen to the interview. Do you not agree that the banks were given billions of dollars during TARP and many more billions after that from quantitative easing? Do you even know what quantitative easing is? Go read about it and get pissed, the treasury printed billions of dollars out of thin air to give to the banks without the public really knowing about it, people got rightfully pissed at TARP but if they knew about QE they would be in the streets. Feel free to defend corporate welfare, I choose not to.

I bet Michigan wants their subsidy money back from Michael Moore also, he git huges subsidies to film there.
Of course, with a personal net worth of only around $50 million, he wouldn’t be considered one of those “hoarding and sitting” on the money??

Color Me Badd said:
You are a total idiot, read what I just posted. Michael isn’t talking about your money or my money that we earned, he is talking about the welfare queens which are the banks, they got trillions of dollars and are sitting on it. Try reading next time.

You are the idiot, you POS. Here is what MM said:

This country is not broke. The state of Wisconsin is not broke.”

Yes they are and you and he are liars!

Atticus says:

cOLOR,, has heat lamps for his money!
down in his momma’s basement

He is a she. She looks exactly like Megyn Kelly. Just as her!

Color Me Badd said:
Bank Of American paid zero taxes last year, how do you feel about that? Do you think it is fair that you and I are taxed and BOA and Exxon Mobil arent?

Did they break the tax laws?

Yes or no?

Barry’s DOJ is enforcing the tax laws, son.

Color Me Bad said:
“I dont understand why you need proof, go back and listen to the interview. Do you not agree that the banks were given billions of dollars during TARP and many more billions after that from quantitative easing? Do you even know what quantitative easing is? Go read about it and get pissed, the treasury printed billions of dollars out of thin air to give to the banks without the public really knowing about it, people got rightfully pissed at TARP but if they knew about QE they would be in the streets.”

I didn’t support Bu$h’s bailout with TARP and I didn’t support President “57-states” obama’$ Wall Street bailout or GM bailout. I don’t support such walfare, like I don’t support other forms of welfare.

But Moore specifically mentions individuals, and individuals didn’t get bailed by the government. He’s basically spewing the same crap that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels spewed in the early 19th century. He might as well have been talking about the bourgeoisie oppressing the proletariat.

Michael Moore had up to 42% of “Capitalism: A Love Story” subsidized by Michigan taxpayers.

A true scumbag. Michigan is one of the hardest hit states in this recession and Mirimax, is owned by Disney. Oh, and by the way, he sits on the board that approves which films will receive money. And most of the movie was filmed in NY.

It doesn’t get lower than Moore.

@ Not So Fast,

When he claims that the US and WI are not broke, he simply assumes that all wealth belongs to the government. And as such, the government can just take it. I guess Moore has never heard of that pesky document called the US Constitution.

Color Me Badd said:
Color Me Badd says:
March 3, 2011 at 2:15 pm Color Me Badd(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

BTW, BHO voted FOR the TARP plan, son and since when has a bank not had discretion over how its capital is spent?

Color Me Badd said:
I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.

Are you able to read his mind? He did not say what you typed. I guess when you can’t defend a point you simply lie about it.

More Liberty4 said:
He might as well have been talking about the bourgeoisie oppressing the proletariat.

He was talking about that.. because that’s what you support when you support money in the hands of a few instead of in the hands of everyone.

What will you guys say when your Tea Party plan fails? When our country continues to get worse because of people like Scott Walker and the GOP in Congress?

It’s not Obama doing this stuff anymore, Obama can barely get stuff passed because of Republican house majority.. Republicans are now running us into the ground, while giving rich people the scraps, wake up you idiots. Obama and Michelle are the problem? No, you’re being distracted, Obama wants poor people to have healthcare and a decent wage. What the **** do YOU want if you disagree with Obama? Only the lucky to be able to have money and work? Seems like it. The way conservatives view the world, they only want the richest people enjoying their lives.. screw anyone that doesn’t make over 50,000 a year.

Color Me Badd said:
He is totally right, you are aware that large corporations pay no taxes right? Bank Of American paid zero taxes last year, how do you feel about that? Do you think it is fair that you and I are taxed and BOA and Exxon Mobil arent?

So when he says “these people” he means corporations, is that it? So why no mention of flat tax, or changes in the loopholes. How about if we simplified the tax code, don’t you think that would help. I wonder how much tax Moore pays?

More Liberty4 said:
@ Not So Fast,

When he claims that the US and WI are not broke, he simply assumes that all wealth belongs to the government. And as such, the government can just take it. I guess Moore has never heard of that pesky document called the US Constitution.

Yes, and let us always remember that if you start up a business and create jobs, those jobs are owned by America collectively!

LMAO!

Color Me Bad said:
“He is totally right, you are aware that large corporations pay no taxes right?”

The USA has the second highest corporate tax rate in the world.

http://alhambrainvestments.com/blog/2009/01/29/corporate-tax-rates-by-country-oecd/

notsofast said:
MM is a natural resource: natural gas!

MM is the reason why I shouldn’t have to subsidize his health care.

I’ll give up my money when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.

Snowspot said:
Republicans are now running us into the ground,

LMAO!

They have been in control of the House for just 2 months, just passed a bill to cut spending by a meager $4 billion, and they are running us into the ground?

bawahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Color Me Badd said:
welfare queens

Tee Hee

MM is epitomizes what the Left wants to do to this country; No private ownership of anything- earnings or property.

Moore is correct. There is plenty of money, and taxes need to be raised to draw on it.

Liberal Tormentor said:
He is a she. She looks exactly like Megyn Kelly. Just as her!

Thank you for the compliment.

@ Snowspot,

I’m sorry to break it to you but you are aware that there are more than two different kinds of people correct. The majority of US citizens are middle-class. If people are hard workers, smart and achievers and are able to make money I’m going to congratulate them on their success. I’m not jealous, it just makes me want to worker harder, and attempt to reach my own success, not attack others that are successful.

Just look at your messiah, Obama. He has a great story. He grew up with plenty of disadvantages, and over came those disadvantages. No on handed him anything. While I don’t care for politics I like his story. His story is that hard work pays off, not attack those that worked hard or got lucky.

When you start taking from individuals by threat of prison or at the end of a gun in the name of wealth redistribution you are stomping on individual rights.

Snowspot said:
Only the lucky to be able to have money and work?

Lucky? That’s what hard work, 3 jobs and putting yourself through school is, yeah lucky. Spoken like someone that has not a clue. Thanks for that extra special glimpse into the mind of libtardia.

valkyrie101 said:
Moore is correct. There is plenty of money, and taxes need to be raised to draw on it.

God, I wonder how the stereotype of tax and spend libs ever got started?

notsofast said:
MM is epitomizes what the Left wants to do to this country; No private ownership of anything- earnings or property.

That’s not what he said, at all. Here, see for yourself how inequitable our system has become: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph

How come the song goes: tax the rich, feed the poor, till there are no rich no more?
Why not: tax the rich, feed the poor, till there are no poor no more?

Any socialists want to tackle that one?

Most Americans agree with Moore and think millionaires should higher taxes.

I thought you teabloggers were always squawking about “the will of the people”?

____________________________________________
Day 23 since Henny Glenny was struck by an overwhelming feeling that Egypt is the beginning of a growing evil that is going to spread a global Muslim caliphate and with the help of the communists and progressives create a New World Order ending our way of life as we know it.

Can I get a hell yeah?

valkyrie101 said:
That’s not what he said, at all. Here, see for yourself how inequitable our system has become: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph

Then work to get into a higher level- those who are rich owe neither me, nor you, nor MM a dime, even though MM is one of those in the top 0.01%!

Why is he rich? Explain that- why is he rich with his philosophy?

Yes, spending other peoples’ money is great until their money runs out.

notsofast said:
God, I wonder how the stereotype of tax and spend libs ever got started?

The millionaire tax rate in 1945: 66.4%
The millionaire tax rate in 1965: 55.3%
The millionaire tax rate in 1982: 47.7% (after Reagan tax cuts)
The millionaire tax rate in 2000: 36.4% (before Bush tax cuts)
The millionaire tax rate in 2002: 32.4% (after Bush tax cuts)

notsofast said:
Then work to get into a higher level- those who are rich owe neither me, nor you, nor MM a dime, even though MM is one of those in the top 0.01%!

Why is he rich? Explain that- why is he rich with his philosophy?

Because sheep buy into his crap. Community agitators have a captive audience in sheep.

BFD said:
I thought you teabloggers were always squawking about “the will of the people”?

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, hate to break this to you, son, but America is a Republic not a democracy, thank God!

Gas just hit $3.49 in PA, look out $5.00. Those damn oil men in the White House……oh wait a minute…..

notsofast said:
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, hate to break this to you, son, but America is a Republic not a democracy, thank God!

That’s not how you acted during the health care debate. It was all about popularity back then. That was your ace in the hole and you repeated it ad nauseam.

Remember?

Hmmmm?

Penguin60 said:
Gas just hit $3.49 in PA, look out $5.00. Those damn oil men in the White House……oh wait a minute…..

And didn’t Bush start a war for oil???

BFD said:
Hmmmm?

Remember backroom deals, bribes, tricks and exemptions to shove it through?

Remember?

BFD said:

I thought you teabloggers were always squawking about “the will of the people”?

Will of the People? That’s socialist nonsense and Tyranny of the Majority. Mob Rule.

We’re a Republic.
____________________________________________
Day 23 since Henny Glenny was struck by an overwhelming feeling that Egypt is the beginning of a growing evil that is going to spread a global Muslim caliphate and with the help of the communists and progressives create a New World Order ending our way of life as we know it.

valkyrie101 said:
The millionaire tax rate in 2000: 36.4% (before Bush tax cuts)
The millionaire tax rate in 2002: 32.4% (after Bush tax cuts)

What? the Bush tax cut for the rich was only 11%. Damn, the lowest bracket was cut 33%!

BTW, BHO signed the extension of the Bush tax cuts.

Hey Michael, you’er rich.  What the hell are you doing with my money?  Well, I’m taking it back, NOW!  I think I’ll start with a couple of million bucks.  I’ll see ya in a few days for some more of “my” money.

When the union money laundering slush fund runs out on the democrat party, the race card is played out, DOMA and DADT, aren’t enough, abortion is getting pounded, all that is left (pun?) is class warfare. Blame the rich for their ineptness. Their base and their funding is going bye-bye. Expect desperation.

Valkyrie101 wrote:
“The millionaire tax rate in 1945: 66.4%
The millionaire tax rate in 1965: 55.3%
The millionaire tax rate in 1982: 47.7% (after Reagan tax cuts)
The millionaire tax rate in 2000: 36.4% (before Bush tax cuts)
The millionaire tax rate in 2002: 32.4% (after Bush tax cuts)”

You are forgetting about one of the largest tax cuts for the rich…brought to you by JFK. He lowered the top rate by 20%.

And to quote JFK:
“Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits… In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now.”

notsofast said:
#

BTW, BHO signed the extension of the Bush tax cuts.

Yes obama was wrong for giving tax cuts for the rich in his defense Sarah took his cojones during that time period.

Teablogger when the poll numbers are on his side: It’s the will of the people Goddammit!!!!

Teablogger when the poll numbers aren’t on his side: We’re a republic thank God!!

Color Me Badd said:
Yes it is a natural resource that money

LOL! Well, let’s just drill, or mine for some more since it’s a natural resource

notsofast said:
Then work to get into a higher level- those who are rich owe neither me, nor you, nor MM a dime, even though MM is one of those in the top 0.01%! Why is he rich? Explain that- why is he rich with his philosophy?

Moore, like Warren Buffet and many others, though being rich, believe the rich did not get that way strictly by their own effort. It was a group effort.

The two dumbest posts here come from the avatar 0bama and BFD. One with a dumb smirk, and one that thinks hes just that damn good. Folks, these could be the genuine article. Dumb and dumber on one site.

Is anyone surprised that Moore is a gigantic hypocrite?

Michael Moore Snubs Union Workers in Making ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’
Liberal Filmmaker Hired Some Non-Union Workers for Union Jobs

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/michael-moore-snubs-union-workers-making-capitalism-love/story?id=8715559

Really folks, his duplicity and phoniness is well documented.

BFD said:
Teablogger when the poll numbers are on his side: It’s the will of the people Goddammit!!!!

Teablogger when the poll numbers aren’t on his side: We’re a republic thank God!!

Ahhhhhh, no, son. See the HCR bill DID pass because America is a Republic and it will be repealed because America is a Republic.

Tsk, tsk

More Liberty4 said:
Valkyrie101 wrote:“The millionaire tax rate in 1945: 66.4%The millionaire tax rate in 1965: 55.3%The millionaire tax rate in 1982: 47.7% (after Reagan tax cuts)The millionaire tax rate in 2000: 36.4% (before Bush tax cuts)The millionaire tax rate in 2002: 32.4% (after Bush tax cuts)” You are forgetting about one of the largest tax cuts for the rich…brought to you by JFK. He lowered the top rate by 20%. And to quote JFK:“Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits… In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now.”

Well, ok. Let’s bring the rates back to JFK era.

valkyrie101 said:
Moore, like Warren Buffet and many others, though being rich, believe the rich did not get that way strictly by their own effort. It was a group effort.

Yes, and those who helped them were PAID by them and it doesn’t answer why MM is still rich!

valkyrie101 said:
Well, ok. Let’s bring the rates back to JFK era.

Or the end of welfare like the Teddy Roosevelt era.

notsofast said:
Ahhhhhh, no, son. See the HCR bill DID pass because America is a Republic and it will be repealed because America is a Republic.

Then I’m not sure why you (yes, you specifically) brayed about it being so unpopular it shouldn’t be enacted.
Where was your support for a Republic then?

Hmmmm?

___________________________________________
Recent FOX lies…

1 – A guy just hit me!!

2 – Wisonsin poll numbers reversed

3 – BECK: They are all Reform Jews

4 – Mislabeled Ron Paul CPAC video

5 – Obama refuses to “enforce” DOMA

6 – BECK: Only FOX and Wash. Times covered Pentagon report

valkyrie101 said:
Well, ok. Let’s bring the rates back to JFK era.

Yes, with real unemployment around 17% and with companies not hiring enough to put a dent in the unemployment #, let’s tax them more, reduce the money they have for expansion, job creation, and innovation because that will surely get them hiring again.

It is amazing you guys talk about the “collective” and yet all you think about is what others can do for you.

Great idea, Valk!

BFD said:
Teablogger when the poll numbers are on his side: It’s the will of the people Goddammit!!!!

Teablogger when the poll numbers aren’t on his side: We’re a republic thank God!!

Im trying to tell people… Republicans want big government when they are in control of it… then they go grassroots when they lose control and act like whoever in office is doing illegal things. They don’t care what America chooses, they are selfish like little kids, they care what they chose.. and if who they choose doesn’t win, well, time to be a sore loser and say Obama is a Muslim socialist.

You guys are such losers -_- You should be enjoying your old age and enjoying your final years, but instead, becasue of the 24 hour news cycle, old people just sit around being paranoid and angry all day.. it’s not attractive, and its hard hanging out with my relatives these days becasue they just sit there ranting about how the black obama is ruining the country.. when I ask for facts.. they don’t know any. I feel bad for the older people becasue they will die soon and they are wasting their lives because of people like Glenn Beck.

Valkyre101 said:
“Well, ok. Let’s bring the rates back to JFK era.”

Why? Individuals have the right to keep more of their own property and fruits of their labor. Giving the government more money, regardless of who is steering the ship, will not result in a better life style for anyone. They will simply just spend more money on more useless programs or more decade long wars.

BFD said:
Then I’m not sure why you (yes, you specifically) brayed about it being so unpopular it shouldn’t be enacted.

Why? I was for a number of its provisions but could not support it as it was passed. I have said a number of times that I supported a number of it’s provisions but thought that it could be made much better .

ndanielson said:
Or the end of welfare like the Teddy Roosevelt era.

Or Abraham Lincoln’s era: “The progress by which the poor, honest, industrious and resolute man raises himself, that he may work on his own account and hire somebody else … is the great principle for which this government was really formed,” he said. He went on to say:

I don’t believe in a law to prevent a man from getting rich; it would do more harm than good. So while we do not propose any war upon capital, we do wish to allow the humblest man an equal chance to get rich with everybody else. …. I want every man to have the chance — and I believe a black man is entitled to it — in which he can better his condition — when he may look forward and hope to be a hired laborer this year and the next, work for himself afterward, and finally to hire men to work for him! That is the true system.

INB says:

Really folks, his duplicity and phoniness is well documented.

Yeah, IF liberals cared to look for it.

Penguin60 said:
I wonder how much tax Moore pays?

.
As little as possible after his tax accountants and lawyers milk the code for every dime they can, which is his right.

Unfortunately we all live with that same convoluted insane mess of the Tax Code and suffer from the consequences of the wealthy and big business arranging their affairs to get around the most burdensome parts.

BFD said:
5 – Obama refuses to “enforce” DOMA

“Enforce”???Special “meanings” for word’ to advance your twisted logic. God, you people are pathetic.

notsofast said:
Why?

You still haven’t answered why you were braying about it’s unpopularity back then but are calling me out for doing similar now because “We are a Republic!!”..

The reason is because you are a typical teablogging hypocrite who always wants thing both ways.

Liberal Tormentor said:
You first Michael. Give back the millions you have made off of Capitalism and we will distribute it equally. Another liberal HYPO!!

Pot meet kettle.

RRKING , wishing . If only I louked as goude as Michaeoul Moure !

ImNotBlue said:
Is anyone surprised that Moore is a gigantic hypocrite?

Michael Moore Snubs Union Workers in Making ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’
Liberal Filmmaker Hired Some Non-Union Workers for Union Jobs

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/michael-moore-snubs-union-workers-making-capitalism-love/story?id=8715559

Really folks, his duplicity and phoniness is well documented.

Most liberals are hypocrites.

Another lunatic-left d-crat socialist hypocrite:

“They’re sitting on the money, they’re using it for their own — they’re putting it someplace else with no interest in helping you with your life, with that money. ”

It’s not just “They”. Moore is a MULTI-MILLIONAIRE who doesn’t seem inclined to use his millions to fund his BIG GOVERNMENT socialism. Like the rest of these vermin, he wants “other people’s money” to fund the extremist lunatic-left programs.

Liberal Tormentor said:
INB says:

Really folks, his duplicity and phoniness is well documented.

Yeah, IF liberals cared to look for it.

Liberals don’t care because even if he fibs some thing, or makes it look like Cuba’s healthcare system is awesome (I’m pretty sure it’s not)… he still is someone that, most of the time, fights for what is right.

Say what you want about Sicko but Moore had no ulterior motive for getting everyone healthcare… and the healthcare industry spent millions to try to shut him up. In my book, that means he’s doing something right, why else would they be scared?

BFD said:
BFD says:
March 3, 2011 at 3:13 pm BFD(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Poor child is crying. I would hope that your benighted stupid lib pals when inaugurating the first ever national HC bill would take the time to do enough research to develop a plan that would be acceptable to a majority of the American public.

But no- you guys had to say “Hey, we won” and do your backroom deals to pass a POS that is neither wanted nor efficacious.

So suck on that lib!

notsofast said:
But no- you guys had to say “Hey, we won” and do your backroom deals to pass a POS that is neither wanted nor efficacious.

Are you talking about the new Ohio anti-union bill?

@ Snowspot,

No offense, but you might want to educate yourself a little more. Many of us here are not republicans, I sure the hell am not. Nor an I old. Me, like many others here, hold views that could be considered Libertarian.
We believe that individual liberty, and freedom.

I’m no social conservative. If gay people want to get married, I don’t care – nor do i care if polygamy is legal. Free and private adults should be able to do what they want.
Also, I think pot should be legal for adults, although I won’t smoke it. Free people should be able to smoke what they want, as long as I don’t have to pay their medical bills or for their welfare since they lose their motivation.
Many of us think the government should stay out of our lives, just as you think the govt should stay out of your bong or your bedroom.
Stay out of my wallet, stop bailing out Wall Street, and car companies.
Stop decade long wars.
Stop giving my tax dollars to foreign countries, and corrupt international organizations.
We believe that the government should be able to live within its means by only spending the money it takes.

In short Sunspot, we might has more in common than you think.

Oh look! We’ve got 0bama:

ImJustThatDamnGood said:
Yes obama was wrong for giving tax cuts for the rich in his defense Sarah took his cojones during that time period.

His clown VP:

BFD said:
Teablogger when the poll numbers are on his side: It’s the will of the people Goddammit!!!!

Teablogger when the poll numbers aren’t on his side: We’re a republic thank God!!

And Nancy Pelosi:

Snowspot said:
Im trying to tell people… Republicans want big government when they are in control of it… then they go grassroots when they lose control and act like whoever in office is doing illegal things. They don’t care what America chooses, they are selfish like little kids, they care what they chose.. and if who they choose doesn’t win, well, time to be a sore loser and say Obama is a Muslim socialist.

You guys are such losers -_- You should be enjoying your old age and enjoying your final years, but instead, becasue of the 24 hour news cycle, old people just sit around being paranoid and angry all day.. it’s not attractive, and its hard hanging out with my relatives these days becasue they just sit there ranting about how the black obama is ruining the country.. when I ask for facts.. they don’t know any. I feel bad for the older people becasue they will die soon and they are wasting their lives because of people like Glenn Beck.

All on one page!

Long live the doughnut king!

BR said:
Most liberals are hypocrites.

Like New Gingrich? or Liberal Tormentor? Or damn near every conservative poster here?

BFD said:
Are you talking about the new Ohio anti-union bill?

Ahhh, that is not a Fed law, son.

LOL, I don’t have to read anything in this thread but “Michael Moore” to know the Rep/Cons have gone to DEFCON 1 and launched the missiles. Now they are pouring of of the silos like replicant zombies in search of liberals to scream at.

They have never gotten over the asswaxing he gave them in “Fahrenheit 9/11″.

I’ll save myself some time and go shoot some pool.

Peace out.

notsofast said:
Yes, and those who helped them were PAID by them and it doesn’t answer why MM is still rich!

How is encouraging a higher tax rate on the rich, something that makes him less rich, an hypocrisy? My point was that many rich people do support a higher tax rate on big money, including Moore who is indeed wealthy.

The Tea Weasel® said:
LOL, I don’t have to read anything in this thread but “Michael Moore” to know the Rep/Cons have gone to DEFCON 1 and launched the missiles

Is sit necessary that you repeat this tired, worn-out, overused bromidic preamble to each of your pots, son?

notsofast said:
Ahhh, that is not a Fed law, son.

Oh sorry. I heard you mention “backroom deals” and “pos bill” and I got confused. lolol

____________________________________________
Day 23 since Henny Glenny was struck by an overwhelming feeling that Egypt is the beginning of a growing evil that is going to spread a global Muslim caliphate and with the help of the communists and progressives create a New World Order ending our way of life as we know it.

notsofast said:
Why? I was for a number of its provisions but could not support it as it was passed. I have said a number of times that I supported a number of it’s provisions but thought that it could be made much better .

No, it needed to pass before we could know what was in it. Democracy…oops Republic at it’s finest.

BFD said:
Are you talking about the new Ohio anti-union bill?

You know what’s funny about that is that Kasich’s actions have already garnered him low approval ratings in the honeymoon period. Right now he’s at 40% approval 37% disapproval

valkyrie101 said:
How is encouraging a higher tax rate on the rich, something that makes him less rich, an hypocrisy

Because “HIS money” is really the “collectives” money, not his, so he should be giving it to others.

The Tea Weasel® said:
LOL, I don’t have to read anything in this thread but “Michael Moore” to know the Rep/Cons have gone to DEFCON 1 and launched the missiles. Now they are pouring of of the silos like replicant zombies in search of liberals to scream at.

They have never gotten over the asswaxing he gave them in “Fahrenheit 9/11″.

I’ll save myself some time and go shoot some pool.

Peace out.

Been debunked, thoroughly.

BFD said:
Day 23 since Henny Glenny was struck by an overwhelming feeling that Egypt is the beginning of a growing evil that is going to spread a global Muslim caliphate and with the help of the communists and progressives create a New World Order ending our way of life as we know it.

Hey, I saw that your lib friend, Louis Farrakhan, says the Mahdi is alive on Earth, son- you better run!

ndanielson said:
Or the end of welfare like the Teddy Roosevelt era.

Seriously, when you have been fighting two wars that cost over two trillion dollars, not to mention the domestic war on terror, etc., that’s big money. Higher taxes on the wealthy, that is, those who can afford to pay it, is the normal way to pay off a war debt. Don’t you agree?

BFD said:
Oh sorry. I heard you mention “backroom deals” and “pos bill” and I got confused. lolol

____________________________________________
Day 23 since Henny Glenny was struck by an overwhelming feeling that Egypt is the beginning of a growing evil that is going to spread a global Muslim caliphate and with the help of the communists and progressives create a New World Order ending our way of life as we know it.

The sky is falling, right, chicken little? Oh, and some terrorists are Muslim and want to slit your throat for giggles.

1988, Ted Danson: “We have ten years to save the oceans; we were all going to pay the consequences, which would result in our death”. January 27th, 2006: Al Gore says we’ve got ten years. Ten years left to save the planet from a scorching. We’ve only got a few years left according to the leftist clown Al Gore predicts our doom. Just think, dummies are still whining that someone stole the election from this buffoon! He has also claimed that the polar ice caps will be gone in 2011.

The man, liberals wanted for president. He wrote a book as truthful as Fahrenheit 9-11, and the liberals ate it up!

valkyrie101 said:
Seriously, when you have been fighting two wars that cost over two trillion dollars, not to mention the domestic war on terror, etc., that’s big money. Higher taxes on the wealthy, that is, those who can afford to pay it, is the normal way to pay off a war debt. Don’t you agree?

I can’t believe a liberal thinks we are fighting a domestic war on terror. I think I need to take a shot for that one.

We are bailing out these bankers and they get these bonuses so their socialism system is doing very well for them. Its called corporate welfare.

ndanielson said:
All on one page!

Now that was a good one! Friggin’ 3 ring circus.

Snowspot said:
Liberals don’t care because even if he fibs some thing, or makes it look like Cuba’s healthcare system is awesome (I’m pretty sure it’s not)… he still is someone that, most of the time, fights for what is right. Say what you want about Sicko but Moore had no ulterior motive for getting everyone healthcare… and the healthcare industry spent millions to try to shut him up. In my book, that means he’s doing something right, why else would they be scared?

So what’s a little lie, when the ends justify the means?

One of the absolute worst positions to have, IMO. Just like BFD, who didn’t mind Palin getting attacked with claims of inciting murder, because… well, he dislikes her, so who cares? Of course, if we applied the same logic to FNC (for example), and say, “Sure FNC occasionally lies, but most of the time they do some stuff that helps out the right… so it’s all good.” I doubt either of you would shrug it off so easily.

You support hypocrisy, lies, and distortions because they may or may not help you in the end. What a pathetic and spineless position to have. How you feel you then have any ground to criticize anything afterward, is beyond me.

ndanielson said:
I can’t believe a liberal thinks we are fighting a domestic war on terror. I think I need to take a shot for that one.

Why, surprised we got your number? LOL. But no, I was referring to the cost of our domestic security (e.g. air port screeners, SWAT teams, thicker body armor) born out of our justifiable fear of terrorist attack.

Didn’t Michael Moore in December check into a Pritikin Longevity Center and Spa to help himself lose weight (only $5,000 a week). From this appearance that failed big time.

notsofast said:
Because “HIS money” is really the “collectives” money, not his, so he should be giving it to others.

Yes, precisely, he is attempting to do that by advocating that taxes on the wealthy go up.

jerrybobphil said:
Didn’t Michael Moore in December check into a Pritikin Longevity Center and Spa to help himself lose weight (only $5,000 a week).

He lost 200 pounds; but if he looks behind himself, he will find ‘em.

valkyrie101 said:
Why, surprised we got your number? LOL. But no, I was referring to the cost of our domestic security (e.g. air port screeners, SWAT teams, thicker body armor) born out of our justifiable fear of terrorist attack.

Justifiable??? Damn, another shot!

valkyrie101 said:
Yes, precisely, he is attempting to do that by advocating that taxes on the wealthy go up.

But,raising revenue from raising taxes does NOT GO TO PEOPLE; it goes to the government to waste .

notsofast said:
But,raising revenue from raising taxes does NOT GO TO PEOPLE; it goes to the government to waste .

I probably could give you a list of government expenditures you would approve of. Will that help? Obviously the cost of two wars needs to be paid for.

ndanielson said:
Justifiable??? Damn, another shot!

So, for example, you are against the Patriot Act?

valkyrie101 said:
The millionaire tax rate in 1945: 66.4%The millionaire tax rate in 1965: 55.3%The millionaire tax rate in 1982: 47.7% (after Reagan tax cuts)The millionaire tax rate in 2000: 36.4% (before Bush tax cuts)The millionaire tax rate in 2002: 32.4% (after Bush tax cuts)

You need to take a course in basic honesty. When you take something you get less of that something. This includes people who are willing to invest their money to create jobs.

valkyrie101 said:
Obviously the cost of two wars needs to be paid for.

Actually, we have a 3rd war at the border with Mexico.

First thing is to knock off the bullcrap tax dodge that all these scurrilous scumbags (left and right) claim as charity. None of em have a charitable bone in their body. Its pretty pathetic that some of the most corrupt people in our history (Morgan, Rockefeller, Stanford, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, and others), the Robber Barons, did more for society in the United States than all of Hollywood, Washington, and the Private Sector combined have over the last 50 years.

If we were the Americans that we think we are we would have changed this bull**** a long time ago. WWII = our greatest generation? HAH! They were the ones that sold us down the river and set the stage for today.

notsofast said:
Actually, we have a 3rd war at the border with Mexico.

Maybe we would have won it by now if we weren’t in the other two, just sayin.. 2 trillion could buy a lot of fence.

BFD said:
Teablogger when the poll numbers are on his side: It’s the will of the people Goddammit!!!! Teablogger when the poll numbers aren’t on his side: We’re a republic thank God!!

Democrats when they are the majority party in Congress: We won and elections have consequences!
Democrats when they are not the majority party in Congress: Compromise is the essence of good government!

RichS said:
You need to take a course in basic honesty. When you take something you get less of that something. This includes people who are willing to invest their money to create jobs.

That has no bearing here because we’ve been given numerous tax advantages and still jobs are going overseas. Bottom line; companies are going to search for the cheapest labor available.

RichS said:
Democrats when they are the majority party in Congress: We won and elections have consequences!
Democrats when they are not the majority party in Congress: Compromise is the essence of good government!

You should pay attention more… Obama has been very bi-partisan.. the partisan ones are you guys, that won’t compromise or even try to see where the guy is coming from. You’re the partisan ones, lol. I’d compromise with Republicans, it’s your side that wont compromise and then just complains when it doesn’t get it’s way. Just 24/7 bitching, it should be called the FoX Bitches network.. cause all their shows are just people complaining about how bad America is.

Michael Moore took advantage of a Michigan tax break to fund the making of his film Capitalism – A love Story – which raked in millions. Also, there’s a book called Do as I Say (Not as I Do) which details Moore’s stock holdings and use of a foundation to avoid taxes. So he claims other people’s money doesn’t belong to them, while he goes to great lengths to avoid paying taxes.

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/socialist-hypocrite-michael-moore-to-take-michigan-tax-credit-he-strongly-condemned-others-for-taking
http://www.seattlepi.com/opinion/248438_moore16.html

Michael’s a millionaire. I was going to storm his house and take my share, then realized he’s probably spent it all on food.

Liberals rail againt capitalism then use it to enrich themselves.

Color Me Badd said:
I guess it is a good story to make up stuff about Michael Moore, but that is okay I am sure he is used to it.The money he is talking about is the money that was given to the banks during TARP not to mention the billions that have been injected into the banks with QE, QE2, and QE3. I know the average Mediaite viewer (at least the people that post comments) are uninformed and don’t really know what is going on. But come on Mediaite.

How the hell do you know what money he is talking about?

He clearly stated that “we need to go back to taxing these PEOPLE at the proper rates.

Nothing is made up about Michael Moore.

Dave Richards said:
Liberals rail againt capitalism then use it to enrich themselves.

Total BS. Nothing here.

Snowspot said:
Just 24/7 bitching, it should be called the FoX Bitches network.. cause all their shows are just people complaining about how bad America is.

And your side, MSDNC, complains about Fox. What a joke. You sure you’re OK? Posts are getting stranger and more incoherent by the minute.

valkyrie101 said:
Well, ok. Let’s bring the rates back to JFK era.

There were more loopholes in those days than in a slab of swiss cheese.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Hey Einstein, Michael Moore is a liberal. He rails against capitalism. He got rich from capitalism.
Just like Ralph Nader and Saul Alinsky. Bunch of hypocrites.

Snowspot said:
You should pay attention more… Obama has been very bi-partisan.. the partisan ones are you guys, that won’t compromise or even try to see where the guy is coming from. You’re the partisan ones, lol. I’d compromise with Republicans, it’s your side that wont compromise and then just complains when it doesn’t get it’s way. Just 24/7 bitching, it should be called the FoX Bitches network.. cause all their shows are just people complaining about how bad America is.

Obama bipartisan? There is an old saying. “Watch what he does, not what he says”.

Dave Richards said:
Hey Einstein, Michael Moore is a liberal. He rails against capitalism. He got rich from capitalism.
Just like Ralph Nader and Saul Alinsky. Bunch of hypocrites.

Moron. Your dumb ass said that he “rail (sic) against capitalism then uses it to enrich themselves.” What I’m saying is, you pulled this out of your smelly ass, like most things. You have no clue what you are talking about.

ndanielson said:
And didn’t Bush start a war for oil???

That’s a joke, right?

Garth said:
Moron. Your dumb ass said that he “rail (sic) against capitalism then uses it to enrich themselves.” What I’m saying is, you pulled this out of your smelly ass, like most things. You have no clue what you are talking about.

You have some serious comprehension problems.

Funny. Moore’s a multi-millionaire, yet he talks about ‘the rich’ as if they’re some alien entity. He must be talking about billionaires.

Dave Richards said:
You have some serious comprehension problems.

Not nearly the tea-bagging problems you have. LMAO!!

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth said:
Total BS. Nothing here.

Garth knows Garth.

writer said:
Funny. Moore’s a multi-millionaire, yet he talks about ‘the rich’ as if they’re some alien entity. He must be talking about billionaires.

Are you saying that since he has a lot of money, he should not want people to get a fair share?

You have a seriously warped sense of people, if you think that all rich people want to be selfish and were never poor before.

Moore didn’t always used to be a millionaire, he worked his way up… which is becoming harder and harder because of Republicans and their idea that corporations have more worth than people (even if the people are the only things keeping corporations going).

I’m sure that Moore is the only rich person who has earned his money. We should take it from those others. Now who decides who the others are?

ndanielson said:
Garth knows Garth.

You know how to cut and paste, over, and over and over again. You are highly skilled.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
That has no bearing here because we’ve been given numerous tax advantages and still jobs are going overseas. Bottom line; companies are going to search for the cheapest labor available.

Yep, just like you shop for the best price on what ever you buy.

I got a call today from an IT company in eastern Oregon. Its being put together by several tribes in the area and employ mostly members of the tribal congolomerate but look for talent from the outside also. They said they were trying to compete with off-shore IT companies so they could only pay about half of what I make now and wouldn’t be able to pay any of my relocation expenses.

I have two questions for you: 1. would you take the job, with the cut in pay, cause its a good cause, and 2. do you know anyone in IT who is thinking about retiring and going to eastern Oregon to live.

If you wouldn’t take the cut in pay to take this job why should a company be expected to take cuts in profits to not leave a high tax/high salary area that requires that work forces belong to unions?

Dave Richards said:
That’s a joke, right?

ndanielson said:
Penguin60 said:
Gas just hit $3.49 in PA, look out $5.00. Those damn oil men in the White House……oh wait a minute…..

ndanielson said:
And didn’t Bush start a war for oil???

Why would we have $5.00 a gallon gas if we went to war for oil? Bush was accused of going to war for oil.

Snowspot said:
You should pay attention more… Obama has been very bi-partisan.. the partisan ones are you guys, that won’t compromise or even try to see where the guy is coming from. You’re the partisan ones, lol. I’d compromise with Republicans, it’s your side that wont compromise and then just complains when it doesn’t get it’s way. Just 24/7 bitching, it should be called the FoX Bitches network.. cause all their shows are just people complaining about how bad America is.

Now I’m a “You guys”? I’m not affiliated with any party. I’ve stated on here that the worst type of Federal Government to have in one party government, regardless of the party. Having said that, I well remember the President pointing out that he could do what he wanted because he won. I notice that you simply state your opinion but give no facts so I am disagreeing with your opinion and holding it in low regard.

ndanielson said:
Why would we have $5.00 a gallon gas if we went to war for oil? Bush was accused of going to war for oil.

Bush was accused of going to war for oil by retards. So dont pay it any mind ;)

He is and always has been a fat proud commie. This is not news.

Steve_27 said:
He is and always has been a fat proud commie. This is not news.

Nature hates imbalance. So, to offset Moore you’ve got the Anal Cyst and the Rodeo Clown who are fat and proud and fascist. Seems to work out.

Snowspot said:
Are you saying that since he has a lot of money, he should not want people to get a fair share? You have a seriously warped sense of people, if you think that all rich people want to be selfish and were never poor before. Moore didn’t always used to be a millionaire, he worked his way up… which is becoming harder and harder because of Republicans and their idea that corporations have more worth than people (even if the people are the only things keeping corporations going).

Wrong, Moore got rich telling you fish exactly what you wanted to hear. Think about it, moore makes a propaganda film like sicko, you spend you’re hard earned money to see it, The film lie’s to you by saying something rediculous like cuba has a better healthcare system, And because you, as a “liberal”, who can’t think for himself, Eat’s it up with out question. I have to ask, do you really think MM really cares about you or anybody els?, Do you really think he is fighting for the little guy? I think if he really cared for the people he would donate at least 98% of his total wealth, And untill he does so i will continue to belive he is full of sh!t and you are nothing more than a sucker not worthy of anyone’s time.

Garth said:
Nature hates imbalance. So, to offset Moore you’ve got the Anal Cyst and the Rodeo Clown who are fat and proud and fascist. Seems to work out.

Nature abhors a vacuum. That’s why your head and its vacuous space is abhorrent in nature.

illusive man said:
Wrong, Moore got rich telling you fish exactly what you wanted to hear. Think about it, moore makes a propaganda film like sicko, you spend you’re hard earned money to see it, The film lie’s to you by saying something rediculous like cuba has a better healthcare system, And because you, as a “liberal”, who can’t think for himself, Eat’s it up with out question. I have to ask, do you really think MM really cares about you or anybody els?, Do you really think he is fighting for the little guy? I think if he really cared for the people he would donate at least 98% of his total wealth, And untill he does so i will continue to belive he is full of sh!t and you are nothing more than a sucker not worthy of anyone’s time.

You obviously think the English language is the enemy.

RichS said:
You need to take a course in basic honesty. When you take something you get less of that something. This includes people who are willing to invest their money to create jobs.

Well yea, except the jobs they are investing in are in China.

notsofast said:
Actually, we have a 3rd war at the border with Mexico.

Not to mention our domestic war on drugs.

ndanielson said:
Nature abhors a vacuum. That’s why your head and its vacuous space is abhorrent in nature.

Nature has given up on you and accepts you for what you are, an asshole.

MM must be loving all this attention and LATWTTB. Probably writing and prepping for his next movie, something like “Socialism: A Sad Story”

Capitalism is what fuels the economy. Socialism kills jobs. Put people into jobs, not the welfare system.

This is some good stuff from Michael Moorebidley Obese. The guy takes in more daily calories than the population of Somalia combined and he’s lecturing people about sharing wealth. How about we offer up Michael Moore for the starving people in the third world? They could live off of that portly douche for at least a year and we wouldn’t have to listen to him again. That’s what we call at Harvard Business school a “no brainer’.

You know Mike, Michele Obama is all about healthy eating and such. I can’t help but think that she looks at you and the fist thing comes to her mind is “God, what fat piece of Crap…”

im_lovin_it said:
Bil O’Reilly has frequently railed on Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn, etc. Here is just a few examples. There are plenty more. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,248593,00.htmlhttp://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=23227http://www.celebitchy.com/43745/bill_oreilly_thinks_sean_penn_gives_aid_comfort_to_madmen_despots/

You do notice the difference in criticizing a celebrity for WHAT they say, and not THAT they said it… right?

I recall him praising Renee Zellweger specifically for backing out of giving her opinion when someone asked her about the war.

I don’t recall that… however, there is an argument o me made when someone in Hollywood stands out from the norm, and pushes a right-wing line. It’s so abnormal, it can be seen as courageous, especially since some have told stories of getting blacklisted for not staying in line. But without seeing the story, it’s tough to comment further.

The crux of the argument is frequently that as Hollywood types they don’t know what they’re talking about. Now, as for the expertise of these celebrities versus any TV talking head, I don’t see the difference as being that great. Keith Olbermann was an ESPN jockey. Bill O’Reilly did a celebrity gossip show.

Just a quick note about O’Reilly and the “gossip show.” If you research back to his time at “Inside Edition” (as I have had to do a million and one times for questions on sites like this), he was with the show BEFORE it turned tabloid. At that time, they were doing long format journalism… like “20/20,” or “Dateline.” It only became a tabloid show like “A Current Affair” after he left.

Matt Damon, as a college dropout, has just as much education as Glenn Beck. So by talking heads being paid to talk about it they are assumed to have more expertise than those who choose to be active on their own?

The requirements of a journalist, even an opinion journalist, even a sports journalist, even a radio guy, are different than that of an actor. Yes, they have a different set of skills, which makes their criticism and ability to comprehend complex issues more valid on issue of national and international importance.

Yes, both Beck and Damon don’t have college degrees… and perhaps that’s reason not to listen to either of them. But I don’t really hear that coming from the Hollywood crowds, who promote Damon and attack Beck… and visa versa. The question is, “What experience do these guys have to give their opinion to a wide public audience?” If you feel the answer is insufficient, don’t watch or don’t care. That’s how I see it.

I’m not that concerned what Matt Damon thinks, either. I find it interesting, however, that people will gleefully bash a celebrity’s opinion while at the same time literally adopting the opinion of someone else who is literally doing the same thing. Their opinion, however, is more credible because they have a show named after them?

I’d think that the person who does that particular show daily, who is forced to consume him or herself with news as part of their job, is more informed than the guy who reads a few books while on the flight between his latest movie set, and the beach.

Oops… posted that in the wrong window. Please ignore.. wrong thread.

Eruptor75 said:
This is some good stuff from Michael Moorebidley Obese. The guy takes in more daily calories than the population of Somalia combined and he’s lecturing people about sharing wealth. How about we offer up Michael Moore for the starving people in the third world? They could live off of that portly douche for at least a year and we wouldn’t have to listen to him again. That’s what we call at Harvard Business school a “no brainer’.

Wait, so he’s fat?

That’s all I remember from your post… and lucky for Michael Moore, him being a little overweight doesn’t really effect my point of view of him. I hope you realize someday that reducing yourself to calling him fat doesn’t really make your argument any stronger.

notsofast said:
Is sit necessary that you repeat this tired, worn-out, overused bromidic preamble to each of your pots, son?

LOL, bet ya $500 you can’t find anyplace where I have said this before. You just like to pull shit out of your ass and call it good.

I honestly was enthralled with one of Michael Moore’s earlier movies, Roger Rabbit, I saw it years ago. In a documentary serio comic style, Michael Moore was for me a brilliant and uniquely gifted film maker. To this day I can remember many scenes from that movie such as the time when Moore attempts in vain to go up to the executive suite of General Motors in Detroit. There is a problem I see especially in the transcript of Moore talking about spreading the wealth. Specifically Moore has trouble separating his satirical expose mind from his political pundit lectures. That is why I suggest he sticks to the movies. In a benevolent gesture I would remind Moore that he has not lost any weight since Roger Rabbit. Because this is very unhealthy, our country suffers greatly from this problem, Michael Moore should spend much time going on a healthy diet and exercise program.

Hey Michael Moore, a job just opened up for you in Arizona. http://www.mediaite.com/online/morbidly-obese-spokesman-for-heart-attack-grill-dies-at-age-29/comment-page-1/#comment-351806

Quote: “Yesterday in response to interviewer Laura Flanders asking Moore what should Republican Governor Walker do to address the state of Wisconsin’s budget deficit, Moore didn’t hold back…”

In other news, when someone with more than half a brain was asked what he would do if he was having a coffee at a sidewalk cafe and saw Michael Moore lying in the street after being struck by a car, he responded that he was call the waiter over and ask for a refill.

Ask the workman who built moore’s multi million dollar home in northern michigan how this ugly obesse POS treated them

I like Michael Moore because he likes kittens. He says they taste just like chicken.

Will you buy me a kitten?

It was between Qaddafi and Sheen.

Now there’s a new contender.

Jack Burns said:
You know Mike, Michele Obama is all about healthy eating and such. I can’t help but think that she looks at you and the fist thing comes to her mind is “God, what fat piece of Crap…”

She is most certainly NOT alone. It must really suck to be such a fatass as he. PUTRID.

M. Moore? Duh, I shall repeat this from another blog:

MOST INTERESTING TO ME IS THIS OXYMORON:
Those, the East & West Coast Blog/Meida, DC, Hollywood, et all;
(AND THE MOORES; ETC)
Those who call for ‘U.S.’ to spread our wealth; keep theirs sheltered…

Like Margaret Thatcher said: The problem with Socialism is that
eventually you run out of Other People’s Money” aka O.P.M. – OPIUM

gene said:
Other People’s Money” aka O.P.M. – OPIUM

Nice analogy.

Ummm Obama was the grandson of very wealthy grandparents – he never wanted for anything.. not even tuition to Harvard..