<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not News? Fox Carried The Most Health Care And Ft. Hood Weekend Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-news-fox-carried-the-most-health-care-and-ft-hood-coverage-last-night/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-news-fox-carried-the-most-health-care-and-ft-hood-coverage-last-night/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-news-fox-carried-the-most-health-care-and-ft-hood-coverage-last-night/#comment-9100</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43809#comment-9100</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;DWHarper says: 
November 9, 2009 at 11:27 am&lt;/i&gt;

A) You still haven&#039;t acknowledged your lie in a previous post, so I&#039;m not sure how you can editorialize about ANYONE or anything with some semblance of credibility.

B) You&#039;re, once again, moving the goal posts and mixing arguments to suit your needs.  What do ratings have to do with anything?  What do budget constraints have to do?  Is that your way of saying the 24-hour cable nets were JUSTIFIED in not airing a very important speech and vote?  Yikes!

FOX was the only network to do their job, and cover the vote... but as a hater, you are incapable of rational case-by-case thought... only more hate.  So FNC does the right thing, provides good coverage of an important event... and instead of being able to praise them for it (just this event, you don&#039;t have to change your mind about the whole operation), you concoct some non-rational as to why they&#039;re still bad.  See, that makes you a hack... you&#039;ve made up your mind BEFORE anything happens, and then warp the reality to back up that opinion... it&#039;s backwards... it&#039;s hack.

FNC covered the event... they did the right thing, and devoted resources correctly.  Sure they editorialize on their opinion shows (duh), and all the networks do that... you don&#039;t like what they say, so it&#039;s different.  But why don&#039;t you man up (or woman up, whatever), and say, &quot;Nice job FOX.  I still disagree with the opinions of some of your hosts, but you got this one right.&quot;  Your hate seems to be clouding the brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>DWHarper says:<br />
November 9, 2009 at 11:27 am</i></p>
<p>A) You still haven&#8217;t acknowledged your lie in a previous post, so I&#8217;m not sure how you can editorialize about ANYONE or anything with some semblance of credibility.</p>
<p>B) You&#8217;re, once again, moving the goal posts and mixing arguments to suit your needs.  What do ratings have to do with anything?  What do budget constraints have to do?  Is that your way of saying the 24-hour cable nets were JUSTIFIED in not airing a very important speech and vote?  Yikes!</p>
<p>FOX was the only network to do their job, and cover the vote&#8230; but as a hater, you are incapable of rational case-by-case thought&#8230; only more hate.  So FNC does the right thing, provides good coverage of an important event&#8230; and instead of being able to praise them for it (just this event, you don&#8217;t have to change your mind about the whole operation), you concoct some non-rational as to why they&#8217;re still bad.  See, that makes you a hack&#8230; you&#8217;ve made up your mind BEFORE anything happens, and then warp the reality to back up that opinion&#8230; it&#8217;s backwards&#8230; it&#8217;s hack.</p>
<p>FNC covered the event&#8230; they did the right thing, and devoted resources correctly.  Sure they editorialize on their opinion shows (duh), and all the networks do that&#8230; you don&#8217;t like what they say, so it&#8217;s different.  But why don&#8217;t you man up (or woman up, whatever), and say, &#8220;Nice job FOX.  I still disagree with the opinions of some of your hosts, but you got this one right.&#8221;  Your hate seems to be clouding the brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWHarper</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-news-fox-carried-the-most-health-care-and-ft-hood-coverage-last-night/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator>DWHarper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43809#comment-9091</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the real story.  The cable news networks all get really bad ratings and can&#039;t afford to put up constant live programming.  In fact, all news networks and news divisions at the major broadcast networks have slashed budgets over the past 20 years in response to the profit motive now in effect for news organizations.  Because Fox covered the House debate and vote doesn&#039;t mean that they are a real &quot;news&quot; network though.  The argument against Fox is about their editorializing of the news not whether they have more live coverage.  The author knows this but deems his audience too stupid to know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the real story.  The cable news networks all get really bad ratings and can&#8217;t afford to put up constant live programming.  In fact, all news networks and news divisions at the major broadcast networks have slashed budgets over the past 20 years in response to the profit motive now in effect for news organizations.  Because Fox covered the House debate and vote doesn&#8217;t mean that they are a real &#8220;news&#8221; network though.  The argument against Fox is about their editorializing of the news not whether they have more live coverage.  The author knows this but deems his audience too stupid to know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImNotBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-news-fox-carried-the-most-health-care-and-ft-hood-coverage-last-night/#comment-9059</link>
		<dc:creator>ImNotBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=43809#comment-9059</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Whatever the case, where were CNN and MSNBC?&lt;/i&gt;

Asleep at the wheel... the same place they&#039;ve always been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Whatever the case, where were CNN and MSNBC?</i></p>
<p>Asleep at the wheel&#8230; the same place they&#8217;ve always been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

