The shaming of Donald Trump was brutal by both Obama and Meyers! Just beautiful. And Trump was fuming … and the whole room was laughing at him.

There’s a bottle of aspirin in Obamas medicine cabinet and it says “Trump” on it.

Awesome. Trump is a total tool and looked the part tonight. What an idiot. Congrats to the Prez and Seth Meyers for letting that douche have it. Just sitting there stone faced … Hahahahahaha!

The president did great, I was surprised by Seth was expecting he’d bomb.

Trump looked like a sore loser by not taking it well *at all*. You can tell he was not happy, and he deserved every second of it.

Obama always acts tough when he knows the other person isn’t allowed to talk. What a coward.

Just knowing how bad Obama want to have Trump offed makes me all tingly.

Jaurez, looks like you don’t have a sense of humor, like the Donald. C’mon.

Jaurez said:
Just knowing how bad Obama want to have Trump offed makes me all tingly.

This makes SENSE!!!111

Obama in front of his biggest cover-up artists. He is the joke. Trump is a joke but he has Obuma on the run. Obama can’t beat Pee Wee Herman.

Yeah, not sure why Trump even showed up to this. He got hammered pretty good. Then again some of his antics have been brutal as well.

Kinda of surprised the Washington Post invited him. Obviously, they are looking for some sort of handout.

That picture of oba-Mao almost makes it seem like he’s in on a joke that the rest of America isn’t.

Jaurez said:
Obama always acts tough when he knows the other person isn’t allowed to talk. What a coward.

Roflmao! He’s the potus. He’s actually at a disadvantage when it comes to responding to petulant attacks from you wingers. He can not do it and neither can flotus. This was a perfect setting for Obama to mock you birthers and boy did he do it by making you wingnuts look like the morons you are.

ElCapitanAmerica said:
The president did great, I was surprised by Seth was expecting he’d bomb.

Trump looked like a sore loser by not taking it well *at all*. You can tell he was not happy, and he deserved every second of it.

Some of Seth’s jokes were flat, but, those Trump jokes were harsh and on point. They really went at him. The ones especially about the fox on his head were brutal. Obama’s really sarcastic dings at Trump werewell delivered. LOL! I actually felt bad for Trump.

Alice67 said:
The shaming of Donald Trump was brutal by both Obama and Meyers! Just beautiful. And Trump was fuming … and the whole room was laughing at him.

The 2nd Obama video about the “President’s Speech” had me in stitches. Self deprecation is awesome. Trump got slaughtered and it was awesome seeing him sit there and take it haha. At least he was man enough to show up.

Start to finish hilarious! Meyers truly skewered Trump – and C-SPAN. But more importanltly Obama demonstrated how he’s going to sweep the 2012 election despite Tealiban ignorance being sold to the rubes.

Looks like a lot of kool-aid drinkers wanted to get their comments on here first. Both O & Myers were pretty flat in general. Could have done with a “Ricky Gervais” who wouldn’t care about roasting everyone in the room, including the President. Seth Myers was constantly kissing the butt of the President and Michelle – pretty embarrassing.

Newsjunky said:
Awesome. Trump is a total tool and looked the part tonight. What an idiot. Congrats to the Prez and Seth Meyers for letting that douche have it. Just sitting there stone faced … Hahahahahaha!

He also got booed by the corespondents on the way into the dinner. He’s done!

Gasket said:
he 2nd Obama video about the “President’s Speech” had me in stitches. Self deprecation is awesome. Trump got slaughtered and it was awesome seeing him sit there and take it haha. At least he was man enough to show up.

I was pissed at first when I found out the Washington Post had invited him but once i saw the strategically set up camera and then the public shaming …. well I could kiss the Washington Post!

“We’ll put it on cspan!”

Obama was really quite funny!! Seth is hillarious – pretty funny about Katie Couric referring to none other then Queen Moron. Saw bristol – she looked just like a white moose!! Did she think she was back on DWTS? Seth should have had a joke about Queen Moron claiming obama lies.

To bad the funniest lines are the ones Obama says when the teleprompter is off. Who can forget these classics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln0q9hQxwAc

Bill Adkins said:
Start to finish hilarious! Meyers truly skewered Trump – and C-SPAN. But more importanltly Obama demonstrated how he’s going to sweep the 2012 election despite Tealiban ignorance being sold to the rubes.

rubes, lol i dont think the left has all the smarts that you think

Alice67 said:
He also got booed by the corespondents on the way into the dinner. He’s done!

Those “corespondents” were far lefties, dummie. He’s not done he’s just getting started.

Seth Meyer practically kissed Obama’s as*. He didn’t give one good shot to Obama; he is the black calf that people can’t speak ill about, because he is black. That is what Affirmative Action does for America, it has ruined it, and inept people like Obama prove the Peter Principal oh so accurately when he became the president.

Meyer can say goodbye to his career and you just know Obama’s people helped Meyer write his material.
That was not humor or comedy or close to even being funny, it was total humiliation and if Meyer thinks he will get away with that, he is in for a rude awaking.

Trump was not there to be roasted, but Meyer tried to burn him at the stake, he did not succeed because to insult The Donald is like insulting the Godfather and we all know who wins in the end.

Bill Adkins said:
Start to finish hilarious! Meyers truly skewered Trump – and C-SPAN. But more importanltly Obama demonstrated how he’s going to sweep the 2012 election despite Tealiban ignorance being sold to the rubes.

Sweep… OK I’ll hold you to that.

I’m sure Fox will hurry to get Trump on to rant. They can’t have their man stomped on like that.

Bill Adkins said:
Start to finish hilarious! Meyers truly skewered Trump – and C-SPAN. But more importanltly Obama demonstrated how he’s going to sweep the 2012 election despite Tealiban ignorance being sold to the rubes.

It was never more evident that he’s totally has game and will blow away anyone who goes up against him.

commonsensemajority said:
Looks like a lot of kool-aid drinkers wanted to get their comments on here first. Both O & Myers were pretty flat in general. Could have done with a “Ricky Gervais” who wouldn’t care about roasting everyone in the room, including the President. Seth Myers was constantly kissing the butt of the President and Michelle – pretty embarrassing.

Debbie downer is here.

TerryDo
to insult The Donald is like insulting the Godfather and we all know who wins in the end.

Hahahaha, that’s both extremely idiotic and brilliant at the same time!

Great Job Mr. President and Seth, you showed Trump for exactly what he is…..an egotistical bully & loud mouth!! Everyone else laughed along, but he didn’t crack a smile, even people at his table was laughing at him…I had just read that he said the President wouldn’t mention him, how did you like it Trump? He’s done, people can’t stand him, and I hope they don’t renew Celebrity, wouldn’t that hit him in the balls, if he has any real ones……

Jaurez said:
Those “corespondents” were far lefties, dummie. He’s not done he’s just getting started.

Done. Toast. Finished. Over. Kaput.

Back when Fox’s “1/2 Hour News Hour” was on, I remember reading an article about why most most comedians are liberals. The secret is that liberals are usually the underdogs, and self-depreciation comes along with that. No one roots for the jocks in a jocks vs. nerds movie – and the Republicans are always the jocks.

Conservatives are uber-confident, usually to the point of arrogance (see: Limbaugh, Hannity, pretty much everybody). There is nothing funny about that. When people like that try to be funny, they usually come off as mean-spirited or racist. As opposed to liberals, who are far more likely to poke fun at themselves.

The point is, liberals are funny. And comedians are usually liberal, for obvious reasons.

DonnaK said:
Great Job Mr. President and Seth, you showed Trump for exactly what he is…..an egotistical bully & loud mouth!! Everyone else laughed along, but he didn’t crack a smile, even people at his table was laughing at him…I had just read that he said the President wouldn’t mention him, how did you like it Trump? He’s done, people can’t stand him, and I hope they don’t renew Celebrity, wouldn’t that hit him in the balls, if he has any real ones……

i guess its easy to laugh after killing some grandkids huh

Glad to see obama having so much fun while our country falls into the abyss. 2012 can’t come fast enough. Most incompetent president ever.

Rokker said:
I’m sure Fox will hurry to get Trump on to rant. They can’t have their man stomped on like that.

I’d pay to see how really pissed he is.

Alice67 said:
Done. Toast. Finished. Over. Kaput.

Delusional.

Alice67 said:
Debbie downer is here.

In terms of self-deprecation, have a look at this as a benchmark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLpESMBF830&feature=related

…totally in a different league in terms of being able to laugh at oneself.

Jaurez said:
Delusional.

Don’t be so hard on yourself.

rocky road said:
Glad to see obama having so much fun while our country falls into the abyss. 2012 can’t come fast enough. Most incompetent president ever.

Bingo.

ElCapitanAmerica said:
Don’t be so hard on yourself.

Stfu.

cjd ohio 1 said:
i guess its easy to laugh after killing some grandkids huh

What are you on about?

Cubby said:
Back when Fox’s “1/2 Hour News Hour” was on, I remember reading an article about why most most comedians are liberals. The secret is that liberals are usually the underdogs, and self-depreciation comes along with that. No one roots for the jocks in a jocks vs. nerds movie – and the Republicans are always the jocks.

Conservatives are uber-confident, usually to the point of arrogance (see: Limbaugh, Hannity, pretty much everybody). There is nothing funny about that. When people like that try to be funny, they usually come off as mean-spirited or racist. As opposed to liberals, who are far more likely to poke fun at themselves.

The point is, liberals are funny. And comedians are usually liberal, for obvious reasons.

Blue Collar Comedy tour….most successful ever!

Alice67 said:
What are you on about?

just said, after killing some grandkids, which happened

commonsensemajority said:
In terms of self-deprecation, have a look at this as a benchmark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLpESMBF830&feature=related

…totally in a different league in terms of being able to laugh at oneself.

Sorry but he’s so yesterday. lol

Man, I watched part of it and Trump must have really gotten to Obama.

rocky road said:
Glad to see obama having so much fun while our country falls into the abyss. 2012 can’t come fast enough. Most incompetent president ever.

Somebody steal your woobie? :(

Alice67 said:
Sorry but he’s so yesterday. lol

If you’re 65 you’re brain is totally cooked. I’m thinkin more like 19 or 20 and smokes a lot of pot and probably taken a lot of ecstasy, too. Am I close?

No mention of Sarah Palin?

Juarez, why don’t you stop insulting people and comment either;

1) Something interesting and ON topic (re: Correspondent’s dinner)
2) Post something funny, which would be somewhat on topic.

cjd ohio 1 said:
just said, after killing some grandkids, which happened

What grandkids were killed? Who? What? When? Where? How?

DonnaK said:
Great Job Mr. President and Seth, you showed Trump for exactly what he is…..an egotistical bully & loud mouth!! Everyone else laughed along, but he didn’t crack a smile, even people at his table was laughing at him…I had just read that he said the President wouldn’t mention him, how did you like it Trump? He’s done, people can’t stand him, and I hope they don’t renew Celebrity, wouldn’t that hit him in the balls, if he has any real ones……

The room was full of liberals. Remember, it was attended by the media. But the amount of time that Obama spent on Trump was rather un-Presidential, don’t you think. It made Obama look weak 9and i don’t really like Trump, either.)

Edith Massey said:
No mention of Sarah Palin?

Seth had at least one Palin joke which didn’t mention her by name, it was a joke about Katie Couric and her “what newspapers do you read” interview.

I continue to wonder what it’s going to take for you rightwingers to tone down your ‘dislike’ of President Obama. Why is he so evil in your eyes? He’s really trying to help our nation out of a serious mess that he didn’t create, and while he’s making progress, things would be much better if you could be more sensible and supportive. In the liberal ‘alternative’ universe we have sufficient imagination to realize the disasters we’d be in if McCain//Palin had won. You don’t have to agree on everything, but your total resistance to him is doing much more harm than good. But that’s the yin and the yang of the world. Fortunately, most people will support him in 2012 simply because the Republicans have no coherent program and are seriously divided, and we are making progress, albeit slowly.

It’s also nice to see Karl Spensen back in action. You rightwingers may not know this, but he is one of the funniest and most perceptive commentators on Mediaite.

Alz said:
Man, I watched part of it and Trump must have really gotten to Obama.

Obama probably hasn’t slept a wink in weeks. LOL!

Alice67 said:
What grandkids were killed? Who? What? When? Where? How?

libya, the story is here on mediaite

Alz said:
Man, I watched part of it and Trump must have really gotten to Obama.

nah …. Obama laughed right in his face and the whole room laughed with him.

Alz said:
The room was full of liberals. Remember, it was attended by the media. But the amount of time that Obama spent on Trump was rather un-Presidential, don’t you think. It made Obama look weak 9and i don’t really like Trump, either.)

That was the danger, he didn’t keep on Trump that long, it could have been bad if he did. Maybe it seemed longer because Seth really dumped on Trump.

The president did spend quite a bit of time on the birther issue (not Trump directly), but of course everybody expected that (starting from his intro video “Real American”).

Jaurez said:
If you’re 65 you’re brain is totally cooked. I’m thinkin more like 19 or 20 and smokes a lot of pot and probably taken a lot of ecstasy, too. Am I close?

Yep …. except for my age. I’m 65.

Edith Massey said:
No mention of Sarah Palin?

Who?

Alice67 said:
What grandkids were killed? Who? What? When? Where? How?

“Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi escaped a NATO missile strike in Tripoli on Saturday, but his youngest son and three grandchildren under the age of 12 were killed.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/libyan-leader-offers-negotiations-with-nato-powers-as-air-strikes-hit-government-complex/2011/04/30/AFEnb1JF_story.html

We also killed some disabled kids: “Libya disabled children school hit in NATO strike”

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/libya-disabled-children-school-hit-nato-strike-201036691.html

Funny how all of the anti-war protesters have been silent, isn’t it?

ganymede said:
and while he’s making progress,

LOL! Going backwards is progress? gawd.

ElCapitanAmerica said:
That was the danger, he didn’t keep on Trump that long, it could have been bad if he did. Maybe it seemed longer because Seth really dumped on Trump.

The president did spend quite a bit of time on the birther issue (not Trump directly), but of course everybody expected that (starting from his intro video “Real American”).

By spending so much time on it, Obama and Seth are just keeping it in the news. The danger for Obama is people starting to dig more into his past.

President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016

Repeat after me, birfhers, teabaggeds, sore republican LOSERS, !

President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!
President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!
President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!

Alice67 said:
nah …. Obama laughed right in his face and the whole room laughed with him.

That room wasn’t exactly representative of the electorate – it was filled to the brim with liberals.. It’s not like Obama as at the NRA convention.

Alz said:
By spending so much time on it, Obama and Seth are just keeping it in the news. The danger for Obama is people starting to dig more into his past.

People are digging as we speak. I know for a fact. ;)

Skippy said:
President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016

Repeat after me, birfhers, teabaggeds, sore republican LOSERS, !

President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!
President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!
President Barack Hussein Obama 2008 – 2016!

Go back to your book:
“All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten”
http://www.amazon.com/Really-Need-Know-Learned-Kindergarten/dp/034546639X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1304221231&sr=1-1

It was also awesome that Mr. Obama didn’t even bother to mention that attention-seeking quitter Sarah Palin. She’s just crying out for attention the last few weeks and ain’t anybody paying her any attention! LMAO!!! And she’s sitting right there just hoping to get a mention! She’s being out-crazied by the other crazies in her party lately. She needs to ramp it up to get some press! C’mon Sarah, you dingbat! You can do it! Hahahahaha! What a sideshow the right has turned into…

Alz said:
That room wasn’t exactly representative of the electorate – it was filled to the brim with liberals.. It’s not like Obama as at the NRA convention.

Of course not, my little birfher maggot.

The NRA barely know how to read numbers before they shoot themselves in the face.

cjd ohio 1 said:
libya, the story is here on mediaite

Why are you talking about another thread in this thread? Never mind, I don’t want an answer.

Alice67 said:
Yep …. except for my age. I’m 65.

Heroin, too?

Jaurez said:
People are digging as we speak. I know for a fact. ;)

I have your “facts” right here, Jeffy.

Newsjunky said:
It was also awesome that Mr. Obama didn’t even bother to mention that attention-seeking quitter Sarah Palin. She’s just crying out for attention the last few weeks and ain’t anybody paying her any attention! LMAO!!! And she’s sitting right there just hoping to get a mention! She’s being out-crazied by the other crazies in her party lately. She needs to ramp it up to get some press! C’mon Sarah, you dingbat! You can do it! Hahahahaha! What a sideshow the right has turned into…

I find it funny how you liberals have it backwards about Palin being a quitter. Let’s look at the facts from the perspective of the People.

- Palin resigned so someone else could come in and focus on the people’s business. It’s called selfless.
- On the other hand, as soon as Obama won the Senate seat, he started running for President. Instead of resigning to Illinois could get some real representation, Obama USED the PUBLIC OFFICE for his own gain. It’s called selfish.

Alice67 said:
Why are you talking about another thread in this thread? Never mind, I don’t want an answer.

because its a comment board, i mixed both together, the laughing and the killing, dont like it dont read it, let glackin tell you stories on how his mom was drafted then

Remember when the “anti-war” nuts went berserk when Bush killed husseins kids? Obama kills gadaffis grand kids and they couldn’t care less.

Alz said:
Alz says:

This is a Correspondence Dinner thread. Why are you hijacking the thread with a completely different topic?

Alz said:
I find it funny how you liberals have it backwards about Palin being a quitter. Let’s look at the facts from the perspective of the People.

- Palin resigned so someone else could come in and focus on the people’s business. It’s called selfless.
- On the other hand, as soon as Obama won the Senate seat, he started running for President. Instead of resigning to Illinois could get some real representation, Obama USED the PUBLIC OFFICE for his own gain. It’s called selfish.

Dumbsht.

Polar thighs was ready to quit the Alaska post as soon as Mc5th choice picked up for VP. You moron.

The only reason why she quit was because she could make more money as a Fox whore than at her job as Alaska gov.

cjd ohio 1 said:
because its a comment board, i mixed both together, the laughing and the killing, dont like it dont read it, let glackin tell you stories on how his mom was drafted then

ROFL!

Alz said:
That room wasn’t exactly representative of the electorate – it was filled to the brim with liberals.. It’s not like Obama as at the NRA convention.

65% of the American people said they would NEVAH! vote for the Donald.

Alice67 said:
This is a Correspondence Dinner thread. Why are you hijacking the thread with a completely different topic?

Deflect. Rant. Blame LBRULS.

Standard Modus Operandi.

glennbovinekoldys said:
I have your “facts” right here, Jeffy.

You have Obamas grades, thesis and law practice records?

Jaurez said:
Heroin, too?

Quit being a moron pest.

Alz writes: Palin resigned so someone else could come in and focus on the people’s business. It’s called selfless.

This really IS a humor thread!!

Jaurez said:
You have Obamas grades, thesis and law practice records?

Jeffy, I have you milking horses.

Who are you to question people who actually went to college and achieved goals to benefit the country.

All you can say, poor Jeffy, is “but I jacked off horses to protect the barn”

Alz said:
People

Oh the People with a capital (P) huh? is that anything like God with a capital (G) or Him with a capital (H)?

And selfless? HA! I’ll bet you can be sold just about anything.

“President Obama Takes On Trump” WHAT A BOGUS HEADLINE.

Obama doesn’t have the balls to take on Trump one on one; he needed the protection of his corrupt media {a captive Trump} and a loser like Seth Meyer to deliver Obama’s writers “fighting words”.

Meyer will be toasted tonight as their hero, but what about next week when he has to stand alone, he will then recognize himself as a useful idiot for Obama and another idiot will be under the bus.

Meyer, what you did to yourself tonight is what is known in life as self-undoing, you alone are responsible for your own downfall. Have a good life kiddo!

Alice67 said:
65% of the American people said they would NEVAH! vote for the Donald.

I’m in that group.

On the other hand, as Obama keeps working to destroy the economy, he might end up in that group too.

We are seeing firsthand that the drive to force everything to be “equal” sucks for people and the normal drive for success has been and always will be better for people.

Gas-way up-setting records
Foreclosures and short sales-way up
jobs-none
inflation on the rise
55% of Americans think we are on the verge of a depression

You loons think that’s progress?

douggant said:
Alz writes: Palin resigned so someone else could come in and focus on the people’s business. It’s called selfless.

This really IS a humor thread!!

If she had stayed in office and worked on this other stuff, goofy liberals like you would have complained.

Since you liberals are unable to tell the difference, I just pointed it out. You’re welcome.

TerryDo said:
Meyer, what you did to yourself tonight is what is known in life as self-undoing, you alone are responsible for your own downfall. Have a good life kiddo!

Oh piss piss moan moan. Sit back. Relax. You’ve got 6 more years of this. Pace yourself.

Alice67 said:
Oh piss piss moan moan. Sit back. Relax. You’ve got 6 more years of this. Pace yourself.

You’re on ecstasy right now, right?

Jaurez said:
Gas-way up-setting records
Foreclosures and short sales-way up
jobs-none
inflation on the rise
55% of Americans think we are on the verge of a depression

You loons think that’s progress?

Source, Jeffy. source.

Just because you are screaming your head off because nobody is buying your horse milk doesn’t mean things are getting better.

Have you seen Mr. Dow Jones lately?

Skippy said:
Source, Jeffy. source. Just because you are screaming your head off because nobody is buying your horse milk doesn’t mean things are getting better. Have you seen Mr. Dow Jones lately?

no wall st is good lol, $4,00 gas is great now too?

Alz said:
If she had stayed in office and worked on this other stuff, goofy liberals like you would have complained.

Since you liberals are unable to tell the difference, I just pointed it out. You’re welcome.

No dumbsht.

Had she stayed in office, she would have a better reason to complain. She could list that as an accomplishment in her resume, instead of

“Professional QUITTER”

Skippy said:
Have you seen Mr. Dow Jones lately?

Remember when it broke records under Bush and you loons said it didn’t matter? LOL! Dow Jones is not a refection of the economy, stupid! Plus, you own NO stock! ROFL!

Jaurez said:
You’re on ecstasy right now, right?

LOL Too funny.

cjd ohio 1 said:
no wall st is good lol, $4,00 gas is great now too?

skippylongstocking is none too bright

Alz said:
That room wasn’t exactly representative of the electorate – it was filled to the brim with liberals.. It’s not like Obama as at the NRA convention.

Yeah….because an NRA convention is representative of America. Are we sipping on stupid today?

Jaurez said:
Remember when the “anti-war” nuts went berserk when Bush killed husseins kids? Obama kills gadaffis grand kids and they couldn’t care less.

You must be ignorant if you think Obama is not catching flack from the far left. Read the news…dumbass. They are protesting him.

Alz said:
I find it funny how you liberals have it backwards about Palin being a quitter. Let’s look at the facts from the perspective of the People.

- Palin resigned so someone else could come in and focus on the people’s business. It’s called selfless.
- On the other hand, as soon as Obama won the Senate seat, he started running for President. Instead of resigning to Illinois could get some real representation, Obama USED the PUBLIC OFFICE for his own gain. It’s called selfish.

No amount of sophistry will obfuscate the fact that your dumbass lady demagogue QUIT her day job as a representative of the people in government. She QUIT. It’s not only liberals saying that, conservatives are as well — saying it was the BIGGEST mistake she made if she had future aspirations for political office. You just can not QUIT 1/2 way into your term because you hate your job (her words.)

cjd ohio 1 said:
no wall st is good lol, $4,00 gas is great now too?

You do know that oil price is set by international demand / supply? Do you?

Before you go on a tangent, let me tell you something the Donald and the wingnuts won’t tell you.

China is on the verge of becoming the wold’s # 1 consumer of oil. Some people say it already is.

So, China is more than pleased to see morons in the USA trying to keep oil prices down.

謝謝

Trump will out-smart and out-Alinsky all of ‘em!

Go, TRUMP!

Skippy said:
You do know that oil price is set by international demand / supply?

I thought Bush set the prices?

Jaurez said:
Remember when it broke records under Bush and you loons said it didn’t matter? LOL! Dow Jones is not a refection of the economy, stupid! Plus, you own NO stock! ROFL!

That is the simplicity of the uneducated rabble.

Ignorant Fox viewers like you, Jeffy, fail to understand when trends in the GLOBAL stock markets are positive and when they are overbought.

Oh, Jeffy, will you care to guess how many fingers I am holding up?

Jaurez said:
I thought Bush set the prices?

Yes. You and the Donald think so.

Because you are soooo damned stupid.

Bristol seems to have mistaken WHCD for a club, she wore a shot sequence tiny white dress and hooker shoes! Not joking .

Skippy said:
Jeffy, I have you milking horses.

Who are you to question people who actually went to college and achieved goals to benefit the country.

All you can say, poor Jeffy, is “but I jacked off horses to protect the barn”

LMAO! That Jeffy boy write like he’s 12 years old. Maybe he is, I don’t know, but he sure writes like he is… I weep for our youth.

Jaurez said:
Remember when it broke records under Bush and you loons said it didn’t matter? LOL! Dow Jones is not a refection of the economy, stupid! Plus, you own NO stock! ROFL!

Rightwing logic…rewind 2 YEARS ago. Obama’s killing the economy — look at the stock market!
Forward 2 years, stock market = great. Winguts say, stock market has nothing to do with the economy. Haha….

There was no smiles/laugh coming form Fox Table and Washington Table,( they must have felt Trump’s pain LOL)

Newsjunky said:
LMAO! That Jeffy boy write like he’s 12 years old.

Uh oh. Irony.

Gasket said:
Rightwing logic…rewind 2 YEARS ago. Obama’s killing the economy — look at the stock market!
Forward 2 years, stock market = great. Winguts say, stock market has nothing to do with the economy. Haha….

The stock market is up because the dollar is worth less. Gold, silver, oil, commodities, and stocks – all up.

Read up on how Obama and Bernanke are ruining the dollar.

As other countries don’t want the dollar, they’ll move off of it. That’s when inflation really kicks in. Btw, watch the prices for vegetables this summer – through the roof.

Jaurez said:
Uh oh. Irony.

So, Jeffy.

I told you, my boy, instead of wasting your time with your decrepit flea bags, I can hook you up with a Saudi guy who will pay you to take care of his goats.

One condition. You have to service the goats but you cannot take liberties with them. And you have to read the Koran.

Alz said:
The stock market is up because the dollar is worth less. Gold, silver, oil, commodities, and stocks – all up.

Read up on how Obama and Bernanke are ruining the dollar.

As other countries don’t want the dollar, they’ll move off of it. That’s when inflation really kicks in. Btw, watch the prices for vegetables this summer – through the roof.

Don’t expect “gasket” to understand that. He’s got his face buried so deep in the half black presidents ass he can’t see.

Gasket said:
Yeah….because an NRA convention is representative of America. Are we sipping on stupid today?

You must be ignorant if you think Obama is not catching flack from the far left. Read the news…dumbass. They are protesting him.

No amount of sophistry will obfuscate the fact that your dumbass lady demagogue QUIT her day job as a representative of the people in government. She QUIT. It’s not only liberals saying that, conservatives are as well — saying it was the BIGGEST mistake she made if she had future aspirations for political office. You just can not QUIT 1/2 way into your term because you hate your job (her words.)

I know you aren’t wired right so you will never get, but Plain helped the People of Alaska by resigning and hurt herself while Obama hurt the People of Illinois while helping himself. He should have resigned.

Normal people are able to pick up on it.

“then he offered to show his live birth video, which turned out to be a clip from the Disney film, The Lion King.”

Alz said:
The stock market is up because the dollar is worth less. Gold, silver, oil, commodities, and stocks – all up.

Read up on how Obama and Bernanke are ruining the dollar.

As other countries don’t want the dollar, they’ll move off of it. That’s when inflation really kicks in. Btw, watch the prices for vegetables this summer – through the roof.

Good gawd. Morons, I tell you.

CERTIFIABLE MORONS.

The stock market is up because the dollar is worth less. Gold, silver, oil, commodities, and
stocks
– all up.

Skippy said:
And you have to read the Koran.

I don’t read books that preach killing, junky.

Jaurez says: “Gas-way up-setting records
Foreclosures and short sales-way up
jobs-none
inflation on the rise
55% of Americans think we are on the verge of a depression

You loons think that’s progress?”

Well, do you remember the utter free-fall Obama inherited?? This is fantastic progress! Every problem you cite is either a global issue (gas prices) or a Bush byproduct. No, this is not a perfect world. But a damn sight better than if we had a McCain/Palin WH. Although…Sarah would have quit by now. All that work would have been just TOO hard for her.

Vegetables are higher than they have ever been, already. Gas will be 5.50 this summer. Obama will be toast. ;)

douggant said:
But a damn sight better than if we had a McCain/Palin WH

Projection.

Alz writes: “I know you aren’t wired right so you will never get, but Plain helped the People of Alaska by resigning and hurt herself while Obama hurt the People of Illinois while helping himself. He should have resigned.”

Alz, you are serious, yes? Or is this deep irony? How did she “hurt” herself by quitting a job so she could pocket millions off ghost-written books that people who cannot read buy? Please cite ONE single, serious policy position Palin holds. Just one. And I mean a policy position, not an ignorant “death panel” talking point.

Alz writes: “Projection.”

Hardly. Tell me what Obama has done to make things WORSE then they were when he took office. Stocks=up. Jobs=up. Job numbers not great, no. But for you to imply things were somehow rosy two years ago is the worst kind of ignorance.

Alz said:
Normal people are able to pick up on it.

Normal people find Palin less popular than Trump and 65% of Americans say they would NEVAH! vote for Trump. You normal people are going to find yourselves a very lonely teeny tiny group.

douggant said:
Alz writes: “I know you aren’t wired right so you will never get, but Plain helped the People of Alaska by resigning and hurt herself while Obama hurt the People of Illinois while helping himself. He should have resigned.”

Alz, you are serious, yes? Or is this deep irony? How did she “hurt” herself by quitting a job so she could pocket millions off ghost-written books that people who cannot read buy? Please cite ONE single, serious policy position Palin holds. Just one. And I mean a policy position, not an ignorant “death panel” talking point.

Drill, baby, drill!

Jaurez, you haven’t the IQ of a bag of drill bits.

Jaurez said:
I don’t read books that preach killing, junky.

That would exclude the bible for you then too?

Alice67 said:
Normal people find Palin less popular than Trump and 65% of Americans say they would NEVAH! vote for Trump. You normal people are going to find yourselves a very lonely teeny tiny group.

Do you mean the group that voted out over 400 YEARS of liberal Congressional experience last November? .

….and over 600 State seats? I’m in this group.

Alz said:
Do you mean the group that voted out over 400 YEARS of liberal Congressional experience last November? .

….and over 600 State seats? I’m in this group.

Me, too. ;)

douggant said:
How did she “hurt” herself by quitting a job

That’s what gasket said “above”. He said that people in both parties think so. Go ask him too.

Alz said:
….and over 600 State seats? I’m in this group.

We were talking Palin and you changed the subject.

Alice67 said:
We were talking Palin and you changed the subject.

Pound sand.

douggant said:
Alz writes: “Projection.”

Hardly. Tell me what Obama has done to make things WORSE then they were when he took office. Stocks=up. Jobs=up. Job numbers not great, no. But for you to imply things were somehow rosy two years ago is the worst kind of ignorance.

What’s the deficit? How much of every dollar spent goes to servicing our debt?

Alz said:
I know you aren’t wired right so you will never get, but Plain helped the People of Alaska by resigning and hurt herself while Obama hurt the People of Illinois while helping himself. He should have resigned.

Normal people are able to pick up on it.

The only idiot here is the person thinking Sarah’s quitting was thinking about someone else other than her self. Go and cilt-swing some more, loser.

Alz said:
The stock market is up because the dollar is worth less. Gold, silver, oil, commodities, and stocks – all up.

Read up on how Obama and Bernanke are ruining the dollar.

As other countries don’t want the dollar, they’ll move off of it. That’s when inflation really kicks in. Btw, watch the prices for vegetables this summer – through the roof.

Is that also the reason why firms are making record profits, Einstein? Maybe you should go back two years and see what you conservaturds were saying about the stock market. Stuart Varney and Beck are good places to start.

douggant said:
pocket millions off ghost-written books that people who cannot read buy

Why would people who can’t read buy books?
Do blind people buy glasses?
Do deaf people buy CDs?
Does douggant make any sense?

douggant said:
Alz writes: “Projection.”

Hardly. Tell me what Obama has done to make things WORSE then they were when he took office. Stocks=up. Jobs=up. Job numbers not great, no. But for you to imply things were somehow rosy two years ago is the worst kind of ignorance.

Healthcare
EPA
No drilling, continued thwarting our ability to supply ourselves with oil
…which has driven up energy prices.
…which drives up many other prices

I can’t think of much that he has done that is good for America in the long run. I know there must be a few things as even stopped clock is right twice per day.

In reality, we should be in a real recovery by now. Instead the jobless numbers suck.

Watch this site a every few days: http://www.dailyjobcuts.com (The April data is disturbing)

Gasket said:
The only idiot here is the person thinking Sarah’s quitting was thinking about someone else other than her self. Go and cilt-swing some more, loser.

Is that also the reason why firms are making record profits, Einstein? Maybe you should go back two years and see what you conservaturds were saying about the stock market. Stuart Varney and Beck are good places to start.

The companies that are making record profits are mostly multi-nationals as the rest of the world isn’t being destroyed by Obama’s liberalism.

Barack Obama = hilarious!

Seth Meyers = hysterical!

The look on Trumps face……priceless.

_______________________________________________________________
CAUTION: BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THESE EX-BIRTHERS, THEY ARE ARMED AND IGNORANT…

Dem4Ever, The Lantern of Truth, juan, Arkansas Steve, murf, Jaurez
WCinWI, Barack Must Go, NOBAMA, Colorado_Conservative, gordonbloyershow
TeaPartyPatriot, notsofast, Severian, Dronetek, TfT, mitchflorida, skoorbekim
mdanielson, Harry Flashman, OxyCon and NORBIT

Remember this?
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/01/21/mean-street-obama-is-killing-america-by-killing-wall-street/
LOL.
We were told how FinReg was going to kill the economy. DOW’s up ~6,000 in 2 years and private sector growth has continued for 13 months straight! Republican abortion bills notwithstanding. Ha..
Wanna know when the job killing took place?
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/
Get ready to get your clocks cleaned (again) next year, teabaggers!

Alz said:
The companies that are making record profits are mostly multi-nationals as the rest of the world isn’t being destroyed by Obama’s liberalism.

Stop talking out of your ass and look at the data. Look at the number of jobs created just last year by that commie-socialist Obama compared to the number created by that capitalist Bush during his EIGHT years in office…dear. You have no logical argument. Just specious teapublican talking-points.

He killed it!

You’ve gotta have a thick skin to be in politcs, and be roasted by a cast member from SNL!

Cal
http://www.coffeemash.com

Nacho said:
He killed it!

Obama wishes he could kill Trump.

President Obama gets humorous payback at the ignorant bigot birthers right in Trump’s face.

Resistance Is Futile said:
President Obama gets humorous payback at the ignorant bigot birthers right in Trump’s face

Mr . Armwood , * snicker * .

Resistance Is Futile said:
President Obama gets humorous payback at the ignorant bigot birthers right in Trump’s face.

*drink*

Have to give Trump a lot of credit for walking into the lion’s den. Keep up the good work.

Mr Obama, with his mean-spirited attempt at humor, unfortunately demeaned himself, the presidency and the American people. He milked the birth certificate issue for eighteen months after it ceased being an issue, and now he’s trying to keep the issue going in another guise — sorry, POTUS, but the cow is not only dry, it’s dead.

Ralph E. Vaughan said:
Mr Obama, with his mean-spirited attempt at humor, unfortunately demeaned himself, the presidency and the American people. He milked the birth certificate issue for eighteen months after it ceased being an issue, and now he’s trying to keep the issue going in another guise — sorry, POTUS, but the cow is not only dry, it’s dead.

Roflmao. It’s always funny how the rightwingers love to insult Obama, but, when he punches back, even half-heartedly, he’s “demeaning the office of the presidency.” STFU then you blatherskites! Geez….Bush took much harder punches — most below the belt than you little pansies are taking and he walked with his head help up high. You may want to watch WHCD 2006. Proof to why there’s no such thing as comedy with rightwingers. Why so sad? LOL.

Alice67 said:
The shaming of Donald Trump was brutal by both Obama and Meyers! Just beautiful. And Trump was fuming … and the whole room was laughing at him.

Spot on Alice.

Some Obama haters may disagree, but you described the situation perfectly. Trump was seething … and Seth Meyers was still to come in which he zinged Trump’s presidential campaign as a joke.

Gasket said:
Stop talking out of your ass and look at the data. Look at the number of jobs created just last year by that commie-socialist Obama compared to the number created by that capitalist Bush during his EIGHT years in office…dear. You have no logical argument. Just specious teapublican talking-points.

The problem with your argument is the job losses accelerated when it became clear that Obama would win. Add in the job losses from October, November, December and January to Obama’s numbers.

Michael_T said:
Spot on Alice.

Some Obama haters may disagree, but you described the situation perfectly. Trump was seething … and Seth Meyers was still to come in which he zinged Trump’s presidential campaign as a joke.

I don’t like Trump, but it’s Obama’s presidency that is a joke – and the joke is on us.

Ralph E. Vaughan said:
Mr Obama, with his mean-spirited attempt at humor, unfortunately demeaned himself, the presidency and the American people. He milked the birth certificate issue for eighteen months after it ceased being an issue, and now he’s trying to keep the issue going in another guise — sorry, POTUS, but the cow is not only dry, it’s dead.

Well, as long as Obama wanted to milk it, we can now move to the rest of his background. Since they hid it from us, it’s now time to bring it all out.

One of the interesting things to look at is his successes as a Community Organizer on Chicago’s South Side. Oh, that’s right, there are no successes, just a lot of fraud and lost Federal money.

Did you hear that Bachman is Canadian? That means she can’y run for President and should not be in office with that forged U.S. birth certificate. I hear she is from Toronto.

Just when I thought it wasn’t possible for someone to have thinner skin than Sarah Palin, Donald Trump comes around. I’m sure he’ll have lots of whining to do about how mean everyone was to him tonight. Luckily, what Donald Trump lacks in sanity and humanity he makes up for in arrogance and ignorance.

Jaurez said:
Obama wishes he could kill Trump.

Well, he already did…with the spotlight.

Michael_T said:
Spot on Alice.

Some Obama haters may disagree, but you described the situation perfectly. Trump was seething … and Seth Meyers was still to come in which he zinged Trump’s presidential campaign as a joke.

Spot on Michael T! Haters gonna hate.

How racist do you think the jailed soldier was? Take a look at his wife.
http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/

The Correspondents dinner and Roast …pretty funny.

WHarropson said:
How racist do you think the jailed soldier was? Take a look at his wife.
http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/

The Correspondents dinner and Roast …pretty funny.

The same would have happened if he asked for Bush’s credentials…too bad.

WHarropson said:
How racist do you think the jailed soldier was? Take a look at his wife.http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/ The Correspondents dinner and Roast …pretty funny.

Not that your obsession has anything to do with Obama’s masterful handling of a very ugly issue, I think Terry Lakin is both very cowardly and very racist.

Question for you: why do you hate the men and women in the United States military? I mean, you must hate them. Because Lakin’s racist cowardice in refusing to deploy meant someone had to go in harm’s way in his place. That anonymous doctor is a hero and a soldier. And you don’t even acknowledge that brave soldier. To call a dishonorable, selfish weasel like Lakin a soldier is a disservice and a slap in the face to all who wear the uniform.

All I could see was Trump sinking in his seat…lol

Ralph E. Vaughan said:
Mr Obama, with his mean-spirited attempt at humor, unfortunately demeaned himself, the presidency and the American people. He milked the birth certificate issue for eighteen months after it ceased being an issue, and now he’s trying to keep the issue going in another guise — sorry, POTUS, but the cow is not only dry, it’s dead.

Your argument is horse pucky. The president didn’t “milk” the birth certificate- he produced the legal document Hawaii provided to him back in 2008. Just because some of you are foolish enough to listen to idiots who don’t know what they are talking about doesn’t mean the president “milked” it, but some other folks sure did. People like Oily Taitz who managed to separate a bunch of people form their money and got some military people to risk their freedom and careers for her brand of bull crap. Anyone foolish enough to buy into that absolute untruth and lies deserves what they got. The president did all he needed to do in 2008 when he showed his certificate back during the campaign. The fact that he got a special dispensation from Hawaii to obtain a copy of the original certificate and released it is a disgrace on all of you who refused to accept the certificate from 2008. The actual racism that the birther crap masks is what the problem is. I know- you are going to claim it isn’t racism, because you aren’t a racist because “you have black friends” but we all know better. This who;e thing is based in racism and the fact that a bunch of people can’t stand that there is a black man in the White House.

Barack Obama is his own as well as America’s worst enemy. He is so dumb……how dumb is he? He is so _____ing dumb he believes because he and Meyers brutalized Donald Trump in a room 96% filled with people that have actually given Barack a ____job and would’ve again right there in front of the whole world that Trump is finished, over, caput.Seriously Barack you narcissistic moron?

Barack, for supposedly being so smart, and really born in America ( well he was raised in Indonesia by an America hating mom ) obviously never heard of the ‘ he who laughs last ‘ rule or chooses once more to ignore it ( Justice Alito at state of union address ) simply because he’s a cocky sob.

Like he’s finding out from the Suprene court, the same will be true regarding Donald Trump.

Trump will announce he is running in another week which spike his already impresive showing up another 10 points or more. Simultaniosly Barack’s numbers will plummet about the same amount.

Whether or not Trump wins is not the real issue. The fact that Trump personally has approximately the same amout of cash Barack has stolen from the ” real ” American people and he will spend every penny of it to expose Obama for the un – American crook he really is right before the eyes and ears of the entire world.

Anyone that doubts Trumps ability to singlehandedly utterly destroy Obama’s political present as well as future, also believes Barack isn’t just a huge jerkoff that had no intention of releasing his BC until The Donald forced him to.

Some miserable liberal wretches actually believe in their heart of hearts it was just by chance that Barack, after 21/2 years of lying to and stonewalling the ” real ” American people, he released the document because he actually gives a _____ about what he has done to this country and just wants to move on.

Check his poll numbers, they tell the truth of why he was forced, kicking and screaming to do so, not he did so for the good of the country. That was just one more of his bald faced lies directly to the faces of the ” real ” American people, as well as the liberals living among us.

MTinMO said:
Your argument is horse pucky. The president didn’t “milk” the birth certificate- he produced the legal document Hawaii provided to him back in 2008. Just because some of you are foolish enough to listen to idiots who don’t know what they are talking about doesn’t mean the president “milked” it, but some other folks sure did. People like Oily Taitz who managed to separate a bunch of people form their money and got some military people to risk their freedom and careers for her brand of bull crap. Anyone foolish enough to buy into that absolute untruth and lies deserves what they got. The president did all he needed to do in 2008 when he showed his certificate back during the campaign. The fact that he got a special dispensation from Hawaii to obtain a copy of the original certificate and released it is a disgrace on all of you who refused to accept the certificate from 2008. The actual racism that the birther crap masks is what the problem is. I know- you are going to claim it isn’t racism, because you aren’t a racist because “you have black friends” but we all know better. This who;e thing is based in racism and the fact that a bunch of people can’t stand that there is a black man in the White House.

Barack Obama is as racist as the day is long. His entire manifesto is based on him deciding he was within his rights in arbitrarilly taking from the white ( rich ) and giving to the black ( poor ).

He has done NOTHING in his 21/2 years in office for the white middle to upper middle class but make us his scapegoat for all his radical plans.

Why should us ” real ” Americans want anything to do with a man/child that has proven he hates everything about us but our money? He has also turned those among us that have less against us and now you hate us as much as he does.

Well you better try to have him make good on those false promises he made to you because come election day he is history…..ancient at that.

he got a couple of funny liners in there, but not nearly as funny as some of his other comedy bits. the film The President’s Speech was kind of a dud, but the Lion King clip was funny.

The blinged up Trump White House was funny. (it’s kind of funny/odd he did that, after a few people got in trouble – called racist – for their joke versions of an *Obama White House*.)

I wonder if Donald Trump was invited because Obama wanted him there to mock him.

Michelle Obama looked very pretty.

azgrandma said:
Saw bristol – she looked just like a white moose!!

That was very ugly, and nasty of you.

Did anyone notice if Chris Matthews kept both hands on
top of the table the entire time the Prez was talking?

I was pretty offended and outraged when Obamo told the assembled media hacks, “Go out and be my racers; go out and yell the word ‘RACISM!’ every chance you get, just like an arsonist would yell the word ‘FIRE!’”

That’s the part of his speech I disliked the most.

Barack Must Go said:
Barack Obama is his own as well as America’s worst enemy. He is so dumb……how dumb is he? He is so _____ing dumb he believes because he and Meyers brutalized Donald Trump in a room 96% filled with people that have actually given Barack a ____job and would’ve again right there in front of the whole world that Trump is finished, over, caput.Seriously Barack you narcissistic moron?

Barack, for supposedly being so smart, and really born in America ( well he was raised in Indonesia by an America hating mom ) obviously never heard of the ‘ he who laughs last ‘ rule or chooses once more to ignore it ( Justice Alito at state of union address ) simply because he’s a cocky sob.

Like he’s finding out from the Suprene court, the same will be true regarding Donald Trump.

Trump will announce he is running in another week which spike his already impresive showing up another 10 points or more. Simultaniosly Barack’s numbers will plummet about the same amount.

Whether or not Trump wins is not the real issue. The fact that Trump personally has approximately the same amout of cash Barack has stolen from the ” real ” American people and he will spend every penny of it to expose Obama for the un – American crook he really is right before the eyes and ears of the entire world.

Anyone that doubts Trumps ability to singlehandedly utterly destroy Obama’s political present as well as future, also believes Barack isn’t just a huge jerkoff that had no intention of releasing his BC until The Donald forced him to.

Some miserable liberal wretches actually believe in their heart of hearts it was just by chance that Barack, after 21/2 years of lying to and stonewalling the ” real ” American people, he released the document because he actually gives a _____ about what he has done to this country and just wants to move on.

Check his poll numbers, they tell the truth of why he was forced, kicking and screaming to do so, not he did so for the good of the country. That was just one more of his bald faced lies directly to the faces of the ” real ” American people, as well as the liberals living among us.

Barack Must Go said:
Barack Obama is as racist as the day is long. His entire manifesto is based on him deciding he was within his rights in arbitrarilly taking from the white ( rich ) and giving to the black ( poor ).

He has done NOTHING in his 21/2 years in office for the white middle to upper middle class but make us his scapegoat for all his radical plans.

Why should us ” real ” Americans want anything to do with a man/child that has proven he hates everything about us but our money? He has also turned those among us that have less against us and now you hate us as much as he does.

Well you better try to have him make good on those false promises he made to you because come election day he is history…..ancient at that.

tldr

Probably NOT wrong said:
Did anyone notice if Chris Matthews kept both hands on
top of the table the entire time the Prez was talking?

You seem to have the hots for Chris Matthews huh? Curious choice but whatever floats your boat..

LeviCoultify said:
You seem to have the hots for Chris Matthews huh? Curious choice but whatever floats your boat..

Awwww! You are soooo clever Levi!
That will go down in Comeback History!

Barack Must Go said:
Barack Obama is his own as well as America’s worst enemy. He is so dumb……how dumb is he? He is so _____ing dumb he believes because he and Meyers brutalized Donald Trump in a room 96% filled with people that have actually given Barack a ____job and would’ve again right there in front of the whole world that Trump is finished, over, caput.Seriously Barack you narcissistic moron? Barack, for supposedly being so smart, and really born in America ( well he was raised in Indonesia by an America hating mom ) obviously never heard of the ‘ he who laughs last ‘ rule or chooses once more to ignore it ( Justice Alito at state of union address ) simply because he’s a cocky sob. Like he’s finding out from the Suprene court, the same will be true regarding Donald Trump. Trump will announce he is running in another week which spike his already impresive showing up another 10 points or more. Simultaniosly Barack’s numbers will plummet about the same amount. Whether or not Trump wins is not the real issue. The fact that Trump personally has approximately the same amout of cash Barack has stolen from the ” real ” American people and he will spend every penny of it to expose Obama for the un – American crook he really is right before the eyes and ears of the entire world. Anyone that doubts Trumps ability to singlehandedly utterly destroy Obama’s political present as well as future, also believes Barack isn’t just a huge jerkoff that had no intention of releasing his BC until The Donald forced him to. Some miserable liberal wretches actually believe in their heart of hearts it was just by chance that Barack, after 21/2 years of lying to and stonewalling the ” real ” American people, he released the document because he actually gives a _____ about what he has done to this country and just wants to move on. Check his poll numbers, they tell the truth of why he was forced, kicking and screaming to do so, not he did so for the good of the country. That was just one more of his bald faced lies directly to the faces of the ” real ” American people, as well as the liberals living among us.

LOL. Obama has really got a hold of your tail, doesn’t he?

LeviCoultify said:
tldr

zlgd

Alice67 said:
The shaming of Donald Trump was brutal by both Obama and Meyers! Just beautiful. And Trump was fuming … and the whole room was laughing at him.

I’m sure that he knew what he was walking into. But he has a set of balls unlike Obama who is so cowardly that he hides behind his skin color.

commonsensemajority said:
Looks like a lot of kool-aid drinkers wanted to get their comments on here first. Both O & Myers were pretty flat in general. Could have done with a “Ricky Gervais” who wouldn’t care about roasting everyone in the room, including the President. Seth Myers was constantly kissing the butt of the President and Michelle – pretty embarrassing.

But it doesn’t matter what REALLY happened. The leftists will make their own stories. Poor fools.

valkyrie101 said:
LOL. Obama has really got a hold of your tail, doesn’t he?

More like a stranglehold on the collective balls of the ” real ” American people in an antii-American attempt to bring down our sovereign nation.

You libs do not care about what he is doing ( destroying ) everything we’ve worked and sacraficed for simply because he promised you some free cheese at the end……..HE LIED TO YOU ABOUT THAT, JUST LIKE HE’S LYING TO YOU ABOUT THE FUTURE TODAY.

Barack Must Go said:
You libs do not care about what he is doing ( destroying ) everything we’ve worked and sacraficed for

I disagree. Libs are completely on-board with the destruction of the nation they’ve always hated worse than any of America’s enemies, past or present. Why else do they never miss an opportunity to stand against America with our enemies…………….from the North Vietnamese Communists, to the USSR, Muslim terrorists, to Hugo Chavez, liberals have always defended our enemies as somehow, “victims.”

In reference to this thread and as has been posted earlier, Hussein is always brave when his victim cannot defend themselves. Wouldn’t it have been fun seeing Hussein’s face if Trump were allowed equal time?

Barack Must Go said:
More like a stranglehold on the collective balls of the ” real ” American people in an antii-American attempt to bring down our sovereign nation. You libs do not care about what he is doing ( destroying ) everything we’ve worked and sacraficed for simply because he promised you some free cheese at the end……..HE LIED TO YOU ABOUT THAT, JUST LIKE HE’S LYING TO YOU ABOUT THE FUTURE TODAY.

Its all in your imagination, my friend.

Davo said:
Wouldn’t it have been fun seeing Hussein’s face if Trump were allowed equal time?

Are you kidding, Trump has been dominating the air waves for a month with his birther crap, and when he was finally outed as an idiot, the least he deserved was a few jokes.

valkyrie101 said:
Its all in your imagination, my friend.

No, he is most definitely much further South on my body than that.

Barack’s hands, as firmly as such an effeminate man can muster, are sqeezing my Crotchimus Maximus region and he’s holding on for dear life.

Davo said:
I disagree. Libs are completely on-board with the destruction of the nation they’ve always hated worse than any of America’s enemies, past or present. Why else do they never miss an opportunity to stand against America with our enemies…………….from the North Vietnamese Communists, to the USSR, Muslim terrorists, to Hugo Chavez, liberals have always defended our enemies as somehow, “victims.” In reference to this thread and as has been posted earlier, Hussein is always brave when his victim cannot defend themselves. Wouldn’t it have been fun seeing Hussein’s face if Trump were allowed equal time?

The problem with your theory is that from the beginning it was liberals who initiated the American revolution with the conservative Torries siding with the British. The conservatives did not want a free country, they wanted to continue serving the British crown, and the Church of England. Later, the conservatives fought against labor laws, pollution regulation, laws limiting guns, and a woman’s right to choose, and even a woman’s right to vote.

valkyrie101 said:
The problem with your theory is that from the beginning it was liberals who initiated the American revolution with the conservative Torries siding with the British.

The problem with YOUR theory is that you never bothered to study history, our Constitution, or any of the philosophies of our founders. If you HAD, (A) you would know that Socialists hijacked the term “liberal” from conservatives after Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini showed the world the end result of Socialism, and (B) our Constitution was written as a Conservative conspiracy to protect America from MODERN Liberals.

Read it, Val. Or if you graduated from a government Democrat indoctrination center instead of learning to read at a real school, get a Conservative to read it to you. We really are compassionate.

Barack Must Go said:
No, he is most definitely much further South on my body than that. Barack’s hands, as firmly as such an effeminate man can muster, are sqeezing my Crotchimus Maximus region and he’s holding on for dear life.

Like I said, that is just in your imagination. The one holding your balls is more likely Exxon.

Only caught the part where they were eating . Barry wasn’t , but Mrs .O . looked like she was part of a Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating contest . I’m not say she was shoveling it down , but I think I saw sparks from her knife and fork .

Seriously though , if he were smarter than he is arrogant and vain , Obama would do self deprecating jokes and encourage jokes at his expense . But there’s no chance of that . This guy is too often mocking others and that does not play well .

Davo said:
The problem with YOUR theory is that you never bothered to study history, our Constitution, or any of the philosophies of our founders. If you HAD, (A) you would know that Socialists hijacked the term “liberal” from conservatives after Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini showed the world the end result of Socialism, and (B) our Constitution was written as a Conservative conspiracy to protect America from MODERN Liberals. Read it, Val. Or if you graduated from a government Democrat indoctrination center instead of learning to read at a real school, get a Conservative to read it to you. We really are compassionate.

Conservatives resist change, liberals encourage change. Conservative Torries fought against the founding of our country, and the liberals of the day, eg. Jefferson and company, risked everything to create it. Likewise, when children were being packed into sweat shops the liberals fought for reform, while the conservatives insisted that any regulation of labor would hurt our economy, just like they say now.

valkyrie101 said:
Like I said, that is just in your imagination. The one holding your balls is more likely Exxon.

No it’s Barack, and he likes it, HE REALLY, REALLY LIKES IT !

Davo said:
The problem with YOUR theory is that you never bothered to study history, our Constitution, or any of the philosophies of our founders. If you HAD, (A) you would know that Socialists hijacked the term “liberal” from conservatives after Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini showed the world the end result of Socialism, and (B) our Constitution was written as a Conservative conspiracy to protect America from MODERN Liberals. Read it, Val. Or if you graduated from a government Democrat indoctrination center instead of learning to read at a real school, get a Conservative to read it to you. We really are compassionate.

Our Constitution is by no means a conservative document.

Barack Must Go said:
No it’s Barack, and he likes it, HE REALLY, REALLY LIKES IT !

Sure.

valkyrie101 said:
Conservatives resist change, liberals encourage change……………………

Our Constitution is by no means a conservative document.

Obviously, you declined my suggestion to actually READ the Constitution. Ignorance is bliss, right Val?

Another problem you have in addition to ignorance of history, Val, is that you get your definition of “Conservative” from Liberals. Ya see, Conservatives are all about “change” from the Marxist agenda that Democrats have enabled the likes of Hussein and his Communist-infested cabinet to inflict against America in direct contradiction to our Conservative Constitution that makes that agenda highly illegal.

Conservative philosophy is mirrored in the Constitution. as both seek to protect the rights, property, and liberties of the INDIVIDUAL as opposed to the un-American Liberal preference for the dominance of the government over the individual…………………the exact “Liberal” (that’s with a capital “L”) scenario the King of England sought to enforce over American revolutionary individualists.

You’re a classic, Val……………a classic brainwashed drone that statists endeavor to turn all Americans into in order to remove “thinking” as an obstacle to their agenda of governmental dominance.

Stand tall…………….maybe even consider writing a song titled, “Proud To Be An Un-American.” You could probably get Barbara Streisand to record it for free.

Alice67 said:
Done. Toast. Finished. Over. Kaput.

Yeah, he sure is.

Barack Must Go said:
No it’s Barack, and he likes it, HE REALLY, REALLY LIKES IT !

Wait, that’s BP, not Exxon.

Barack Must Go said:
No it’s Barack, and he likes it, HE REALLY, REALLY LIKES IT !

you ever get tired of being a partisan hack?

Davo said:
Obviously, you declined my suggestion to actually READ the Constitution. Ignorance is bliss, right Val? Another problem you have in addition to ignorance of history, Val, is that you get your definition of “Conservative” from Liberals. Ya see, Conservatives are all about “change” from the Marxist agenda that Democrats have enabled the likes of Hussein and his Communist-infested cabinet to inflict against America in direct contradiction to our Conservative Constitution that makes that agenda highly illegal. Conservative philosophy is mirrored in the Constitution. as both seek to protect the rights, property, and liberties of the INDIVIDUAL as opposed to the un-American Liberal preference for the dominance of the government over the individual…………………the exact “Liberal” (that’s with a capital “L”) scenario the King of England sought to enforce over American revolutionary individualists. You’re a classic, Val……………a classic brainwashed drone that statists endeavor to turn all Americans into in order to remove “thinking” as an obstacle to their agenda of governmental dominance. Stand tall…………….maybe even consider writing a song titled, “Proud To Be An Un-American.” You could probably get Barbara Streisand to record it for free.

too long, no one read.

Trump can still say “Got you to look!”

The Lantern of Truth said:
Only caught the part where they were eating . Barry wasn’t , but Mrs .O . looked like she was part of a Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating contest . I’m not say she was shoveling it down , but I think I saw sparks from her knife and fork . .

The First lady engages in a practice that has been engaged in by so many first ladys and suddenly this is some new socialist agenda that deserves scorn. Nice one jackass.

The Lantern of Truth said>Seriously though , if he were smarter than he is arrogant and vain , Obama would do self deprecating jokes and encourage jokes at his expense . But there’s no chance of that . This guy is too often mocking others and that does not play well .

did you see the bit with the lion king video? or were you too busy mocking the first lady for a legitmate effort?

writer said:
Trump can still say “Got you to look!”

So you support liars now writer?

Nope. Just amazed at the things Obama can be distracted by.

Gasket said:
Stop talking out of your ass and look at the data. Look at the number of jobs created just last year by that commie-socialist Obama compared to the number created by that capitalist Bush during his EIGHT years in office…dear. You have no logical argument. Just specious teapublican talking-points.

Look at the job numbers over Obama entire tenure against Bush’s. Obama loses big time. You have only a specious argument. If you’re going to make comparisons, compare apples to apples. Bush never saw an unemployment rate that was as high as it has been since Obama’s been in office. And if you draw the line at January 2007, when Democrats took power, it’s absolutely clear that Democrats are bad news for Americans trying to make a living. January 2007 the unemployment rate was 4.6%. It’s now nearly twice that.

Obama. Kills. Jobs. Except for government jobs.

Ben Pratt said:
too long, no one read.

No, Ben. It’s just you that couldn’t work your way through 184 words.

Pablo said:
Look at the job numbers over Obama entire tenure against Bush’s. Obama loses big time. You have only a specious argument. If you’re going to make comparisons, compare apples to apples. Bush never saw an unemployment rate that was as high as it has been since Obama’s been in office. And if you draw the line at January 2007, when Democrats took power, it’s absolutely clear that Democrats are bad news for Americans trying to make a living. January 2007 the unemployment rate was 4.6%. It’s now nearly twice that. Obama. Kills. Jobs. Except for government jobs.

of course you just have to look at bush’s record towards the end of his presidency to find that out. wasn’t he the one that signed the bailouts?

Pablo said:
No, Ben. It’s just you that couldn’t work your way through 184 words.

ahh of course, so I take it you must have worked your way through the entirety of that random nonsense speech on a message board ? Well good for you.

ganymede said:
I continue to wonder what it’s going to take for you rightwingers to tone down your ‘dislike’ of President Obama. Why is he so evil in your eyes? He’s really trying to help our nation out of a serious mess that he didn’t create, and while he’s making progress, things would be much better if you could be more sensible and supportive.

No, he’s trying to fundamentally transform a nation he’s never really liked. It’s that damned deeply flawed Constitution that keeps getting in his way.

Oh, and this mess is all his. His stimulus didn’t stimulate. His deficit reduction tripled it, and he’s got no plan to rein it in. His foreign policy is utterly incoherent. Quite simply, Obama sucks at this.

Ben Pratt said:
ahh of course, so I take it you must have worked your way through the entirety of that random nonsense speech on a message board ? Well good for you.

Bennie .

Ben wif’ a attitude .

Congratulations on your fine sense of humor and grasp of the issues !

And you’re a good speller . Yes you are .

Yes you are !

Now , go play outside .

Ben Pratt said:
ahh of course, so I take it you must have worked your way through the entirety of that random nonsense speech on a message board ? Well good for you.

I can read 184 words. You obviously can’t. That doesn’t make me brilliant, Ben, it makes you an idiot.

The Lantern of Truth said:
Bennie . Ben wif’ a attitude . Congratulations on your fine sense of humor and grasp of the issues ! And you’re a good speller . Yes you are . Yes you are ! Now , go play outside .

Good of you to respond to a post where I was talking to you. Must be your “common sense” ideals or something.

Pablo said:
I can read 184 words. You obviously can’t. That doesn’t make me brilliant, Ben, it makes you an idiot.

yes I don’t waste my time reading random hate spewed speeches on message boards. Makes me real stupid.

Ben Pratt said:
me real stupid.

Outside , NOW . Take a juicebox if you like .

It’s Sunday , so you can play in the street .

Try the expressway .

lol…how did i know you morons would be over here today crying and bitchin becase Obama put his big black foot in your collective dumb racist asses last nite…..take it like a champ suckers…u got called out….Trump and Fox news got owned…its clear that the president has NO RESPECT for any of you…he did the Cabrini Green Stomp on ya….Meyers told the world how stupid and childish you morons are for saying only in your wingnut world do you compliment a full grown man by calling him an adult….you did find out one thing you liked tho…Obama was born in africa….he admitted it and showed you video proof…..GET READY FOR THE ASS KICKING IN 2012 ….YOU DONT STAND A CHANCE

Pablo said:
No, he’s trying to fundamentally transform a nation he’s never really liked. It’s that damned deeply flawed Constitution that keeps getting in his way. Oh, and this mess is all his. His stimulus didn’t stimulate. His deficit reduction tripled it, and he’s got no plan to rein it in. His foreign policy is utterly incoherent. Quite simply, Obama sucks at this.

saved the country from going into a depression, signed comprehensive healthcare reform, signed a law on credit card reform, ended the process of the government giving out subsidies to private banks to give federally insured loans, gave tax breaks to the middle class, lowest tax rate since the 1950s etc. You want more?>

Nationman said:
of course you just have to look at bush’s record towards the end of his presidency to find that out. wasn’t he the one that signed the bailouts?

He signed TARP, which Obama voted for. Is it Bush’s fault Obama voted for it?

Nationman said:
of course you just have to look at bush’s record towards the end of his presidency to find that out. wasn’t he the one that signed the bailouts?

Bush presided over less than half of the bailouts. Then came Obama:

Geithner prevailed on Obama bailout plan

WASHINGTON — “The Obama administration’s new plan to bail out the nation’s banks ….”

On Monday evening, new details emerged after lawmakers were briefed on the plan. It will call for the creation of a joint Treasury and Federal Reserve program, at an initial cost of $250 billion to $500 billion, to encourage investors to acquire soured mortgage-related assets from banks. The Fed will use its balance sheet to provide the financing, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. may provide guarantees to investors who participate.

A second component of the plan will broadly expand, to between $500 billion and $1 trillion, an existing $200 billion program run by the Federal Reserve to try to unfreeze the market for commercial, student, auto and credit-card loans.

A third component will involve a review of the capital levels of all banks, including projections of future losses, to determine how much additional capital each bank should receive. The capital injections would come out of the remaining $350 billion in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/world/americas/10iht-bailout.2.20073883.html

The Lantern of Truth said:
Outside , NOW . Take a juicebox if you like . It’s Sunday , so you can play in the street . Try the expressway .

aww, lantern is trying to act smart. Shouldn’t you be flirting with your man-crush rrking?

Davo said:
Obviously, you declined my suggestion to actually READ the Constitution. Ignorance is bliss, right Val?

Its not enough to read the Constitution, the historical backdrop and the politics of Europe would clearly indicate it to be a liberal take on governing, granting rights hithertobefore unheard of, and including a republican form of government (as opposed to a monarchy), and separation of church and state (as opposed to a state religion).

ProObamaAgenda said:
lol…how did i know you morons would be over here today crying and bitchin becase Obama put his big black foot in your collective dumb racist asses last nite…..take it like a champ suckers…u got called out….Trump and Fox news got owned…its clear that the president has NO RESPECT for any of you…he did the Cabrini Green Stomp on ya….Meyers told the world how stupid and childish you morons are for saying only in your wingnut world do you compliment a full grown man by calling him an adult….you did find out one thing you liked tho…Obama was born in africa….he admitted it and showed you video proof…..GET READY FOR THE ASS KICKING IN 2012 ….YOU DONT STAND A CHANCE

Hello, POS! Err, POA!

Nationman said:
of course you just have to look at bush’s record towards the end of his presidency to find that out. wasn’t he the one that signed the bailouts?

Signed what?………….the bills to nationalize private businesses that Democrats in Congress passed? Yep, you’re right. You’re also clever enough to notice that Bush was as Liberal as the anti-American Democrats in matters relating to government growth.

So, let’s add-up the score. Anti-American Democrats: 50 years of demanding bigger deficits to buy votes with and bigger government to snuff-out more and more liberty…………….versus one Liberal Republican administration. Hmmmm…………….

How ’bout some honesty, Dims. Just admit that you only hate Bush because (A) he confronted the terrorists Clinton was too cowardly to address, and (B) he grew government like an anti-American Democrat.

ProObamaAgenda said:
big black foot in your collective dumb racist asses last

ProObamaAgenda said:
Cabrini Green Stomp

ProObamaAgenda said:
GET READY FOR THE ASS KICKING IN 2012 ….

ProObamaAgenda said:
morons

ProObamaAgenda said:
crying and bitchin becase

You looked very pretty last night , Michelle .

Pablo said:
He signed TARP, which Obama voted for. Is it Bush’s fault Obama voted for it?

It’s called presidential veto power.

Pablo said:
He signed TARP, which Obama voted for. Is it Bush’s fault Obama voted for it?

Well yes, and TARP saved the day because Obama and other democrats united around Bush.

Davo said:
How ’bout some honesty, Dims. Just admit that you only hate Bush because (A) he confronted the terrorists Clinton was too cowardly to address, and (B) he grew government like an anti-American Democrat.

Weren’t you the idiot yelling about the constitution was conservative? I take it you must have hated bush’s secret prisons.

Ben Pratt said:
flirting with your man-crush rrking?

First , aaaaaaaaaaakkk.

Second , BFD and Robert are now an item , as I read on these here message boards .

ProObamaAgenda said:
its clear that the president has NO RESPECT for any of you

If anyone has a bucket of boiled lobsters and a bucket of golf balls, I think he’d feign respect. And then bow to them afterward.

Yeah…the big-eared cigarette smoker sure is looking forward to 2012. I am.

Ben Pratt said:
It’s called presidential veto power.

Bush vetoed Obama into voting for TARP? Ben, you are a moron.

valkyrie101 said:

Davo said:
Obviously, you declined my suggestion to actually READ the Constitution. Ignorance is bliss, right Val?

Its not enough to read the Constitution…………….

Oh.

Davo said:
Another problem you have in addition to ignorance of history, Val, is that you get your definition of “Conservative” from Liberals. Ya see, Conservatives are all about “change” from the Marxist agenda that Democrats have enabled the likes of Hussein and his Communist-infested cabinet to inflict against America in direct contradiction to our Conservative Constitution that makes that agenda highly illegal.

The expressions “conservative” and “liberal” long pre-date Marx. In general, conservatives oppose change and liberals encourage change, that is the dynamic. In the interaction between doing nothing and doing something, something gets done and we call that progress.

Liberal Myths vs Reality

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/liberal_myths_vs_reality_NhyLcYahQwWrDcRihW1mKL

Pablo said:
Bush vetoed Obama into voting for TARP? Ben, you are a moron.

no you idiot, he could’ve vetoed the law.

Davo said:
Its not enough to read the Constitution…………….

Oh.

Yep. Stick with me and you will be further enlightened, davo.

The Lantern of Truth said:
First , aaaaaaaaaaakkk. Second , BFD and Robert are now an item , as I read on these here message boards .

So you’re looking for a rebound? Sorry, we respect people with your homosexual inclinations on this side of the aisle, but I personally don’t have them.

Ben Pratt said:
no you idiot, he could’ve vetoed the law.

Yes, a president can veto any law. He also could have signed it on Air Force One with purple pens, which is just as irrelevant as the fact that he could have vetoed it.

We were talking about Obama voting for it. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Do you like Wall Street bailouts or not?

Pablo said:
Hello, POS! Err, POA!

I knew you would respond youre the biggest piece of dogshit on this site…u got stung by a bee…Obama tossed a stone into the crowd and first it smacked you in the head then ricocheted and cracked lantern of truths skull….you two racists are the worse america has to offer…..the best day for this country will be the day you 2 decide its not worth it anymore ….AND DO THE RIGHT THING….and JUMP

Ben Pratt said:
I personally don’t have them.

Sure.

valkyrie101 said:
Oh.

Yep. Stick with me and you will be further enlightened, davo.

Just imagine the things you could not bother reading! I feel smarter already.

Pablo said:
Yes, a president can veto any law. He also could have signed it on Air Force One with purple pens, which is just as irrelevant as the fact that he could have vetoed it. We were talking about Obama voting for it. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Do you like Wall Street bailouts or not?

no personally I don’t like it. It’s funny though, bush was a paragon of the conservative movement for so long and now when the comparisons to obama’s policies come you throw him under the bus if it serves to attack a democrat.

ProObamaAgenda said:
I knew you would respond youre the biggest piece of dogshit on this site…u got stung by a bee…Obama tossed a stone into the crowd and first it smacked you in the head then ricocheted and cracked lantern of truths skull….you two racists are the worse america has to offer…..the best day for this country will be the day you 2 decide its not worth it anymore ….AND DO THE RIGHT THING….and JUMP

No, your useless free cheese eating racist looter ass is the worst we have to offer. Get a job and pay some taxes, then you can come talk to me.

ProObamaAgenda said:
piece of dogshit on this site

I don’t think charm school worked out too well for you , Michelle .

Maybe you can do the Cabrini Green Stomp on they haids .

The Lantern of Truth said:
Sure.

like I said, you can hit on me all you want, just know it’s never gonna happen.

Davo said:
Conservative philosophy is mirrored in the Constitution. as both seek to protect the rights, property, and liberties of the INDIVIDUAL as opposed to the un-American Liberal preference for the dominance of the government over the individual…………………the exact “Liberal” (that’s with a capital “L”) scenario the King of England sought to enforce over American revolutionary individualists.

I wish that was a definition of conservative, but it is not. A conservative seeks to preserve the status quo, and the status quo back in the 1700s provided very little liberty. Liberals like Jefferson sought to change the status quo at the risk of their lives. So what was the status quo? Royal power, Church power, and rich people power. our Constitution limits all of three, in favor of individual liberty.

The biggest problem facing us ” real ” Americans today is the way the black community organizer in our White House highjack the narrative and twist what is and is not a right of citizens of this country.

He intetwines social security ( a right ) with social justice ( a cancer ).

He is singlehandedly attempting to covert that which was meant as a social safety net ( welfare, medicaide ) into a social wasteland whereby any poor person in this country is ( by some Obama regime given right ) entitle to everything ( Medical care, housing, food, higher education etc ) just by virtue of existing.

Those are not the founding principles of America, nor are they what has seperated ( Exceptionalism ) us from them ( the rest of the world ) for over two hundred years.

If We the People give in to this radical and the cancer he spreads through our sovereign nation we lose what it truly means to be an AMERICAN and become just like everyone else in the world.

Ben Pratt said:
It’s funny though, bush was a paragon of the conservative movement for so long

He was? Then why weren’t the Republicans on board with him on TARP?

Pablo said:
He was? Then why weren’t the Republicans on board with him on TARP?

please there were plenty on board with him.

Ben Pratt said:
please there were plenty on board with him.

There was much more Democrat support than Republican, and the conservatives were the opposition. That was not a conservative bill, and conservatives were not on board, period.

Do you really think Bush was a paragon of conservatism? Really?

Really?

You’re kidding, right? You can’t be that dense. Can you?

valkyrie101 said:
A conservative seeks to preserve the status quo……………

Still wrong. Repetition is boring and it’ll never change reality, Val. You can define a Conservative as a giraffe if you like, but reality still stubbornly ignores your opinion.

I’ve been a Conservative ever since I left the Democrat Party when I realized that they deliberately protected the existence of social problems because of their need for them come election time. I’ve only heard YOUR definition of “Conservative” coming out of the mouths of those same Democrats.

Pablo said:
There was much more Democrat support than Republican, and the conservatives were the opposition. That was not a conservative bill, and conservatives were not on board, period. Do you really think Bush was a paragon of conservatism? Really? Really? You’re kidding, right? You can’t be that dense. Can you?

bush was for some time the example that conservatives loved. We were all told that we shouldn’t judge him by the mood of the present and that eventually his accomplishments would be in history books. the Reagan comparisons abounded.

Pablo said:
There was much more Democrat support than Republican, and the conservatives were the opposition. That was not a conservative bill, and conservatives were not on board, period. P>

tell that to the 33 republicans who voted for it in the senate. They must have all been liberals. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-213

Ben Pratt said:
tell that to the 33 republicans who voted for it in the senate. They must have all been liberals. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-213

also one of those “liberals” was mitch mconnell, one of the now beloved leaders of the republican party.

Pablo said:
There was much more Democrat support than Republican, and the conservatives were the opposition. That was not a conservative bill, and conservatives were not on board, period. Do you really think Bush was a paragon of conservatism? Really? Really? You’re kidding, right? You can’t be that dense. Can you?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681
even funnier, john boehner voted for it.

of course there’s going to be someone yelling about how, “that’s why there’s a tea party!” well let me ask you, how many of those candidates were voted out of office because of their decision? The tea party was spurred on by the republican establishment in an effort to make the republican party look like a populist opposition party. It did work in 2010, but with the absurd candidates they have now, it’s doubtful they have a chance of winning the presidency.

Ben Pratt said:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681
even funnier, john boehner voted for it.

Right, they got the leadership on board (Boehner and McConnell). Oh, and Obama voted for it. As did Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank. It MUST have been a totally Conservative piece of legislation, huh?

Ben Pratt said:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681
even funnier, john boehner voted for it.

Boehner is another fine example of the Republicans that Conservatives want to cast out of Washington.

It occurs to me that in light of the discussions between Valkyrie and me, and Pratt and Pablo, there needs to be some basic definitions of “Conservative” and “Liberal” agreed to. But what am I thinking………………NOBODY admits to being a ‘Liberal.”

Pablo said:
Right, they got the leadership on board (Boehner and McConnell). Oh, and Obama voted for it. As did Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank. It MUST have been a totally Conservative piece of legislation, huh?

91 republicans in the house voted for it. the tea party must have voted all of them out for being rinos.

Davo said:
Boehner is another fine example of the Republicans that Conservatives want to cast out of WashingtonP>

and the tea party did! That’s the power of the people at work.

Davo said:
It occurs to me that in light of the discussions between Valkyrie and me, and Pratt and Pablo, there needs to be some basic definitions of “Conservative” and “Liberal” agreed to. But what am I thinking………………NOBODY admits to being a ‘Liberal.”

probably because people’s opinions can’t be cast in the mold of “i’m a liberal” or ” I’m a conservative!”. For instance, I actually like the work governor christie has done in my home state of new jersey but the conservative movement at the federal level is just too full of incompetence.

The best line of the night was when Meyer’s referenced the MSNBC hosts, noting: “the President mixes the Kool Aid, and They Drink It!” (paraphrased)
A succinct and humorous verity!

All in all, Obama seemed in his element, with a fawning Democratic Media as his audience, but he’ll still be remembered as an incompetent one-termer! – oh yes, and the first (or second if you count Bill Clinton) black presidet

Davo said:
Boehner is another fine example of the Republicans that Conservatives want to cast out of Washington.

It occurs to me that in light of the discussions between Valkyrie and me, and Pratt and Pablo, there needs to be some basic definitions of “Conservative” and “Liberal” agreed to. But what am I thinking………………NOBODY admits to being a ‘Liberal.”

That’s because we Americans have applied liberal and conservative to parties that are both liberal and conservative in their own ways. That’s why you hear of “little c” conservatives and “big C” Conservatives. Conservative in the little c sense is exactly what Ben Pratt described, protecting the status quo and keeping power to the political/religious establishments. “Little l” liberal is a derivation of liberty which means more personal freedom and responsibility. Libertarians are the closest to this definition of liberal, except when they go all crazy Rand on us. In the US “Liberal” (note the big L) has come to describe the progressive ideas and “Conservative” have come to describe Republican ideas, which are often quite different than little c conservative.

Ben Pratt said:
probably because people’s opinions can’t be cast in the mold of “i’m a liberal” or ” I’m a conservative!”.

Sure they can. Right is right…………Left is WRONG. Simple.

Liberals can be identified in 3 catagories……………..one large one, and two smaller ones. The large group are those who are missing the part of the brain that considers results to be relevant. Otherwise, they can function just fine…………up to and including genius capacity. But as soon as the subject requires consideration of results………….Liberals go blank. It’s the deer-in-the-headlights stare that’s the same as if someone just spoke Chinese to them. They go about their daily lives, satisfied with the short, sound-bites fired at them at 6:00 PM on TV, and no time for further analysis of world events.

A smaller group of Liberals are the politicians. They don’t care whether the hungry get fed or the nation survives an attack by foreign enemies or economic disasters. They shift their views as fast as UpChuck Schumer, and ONLY care about remaining in power…………..NO MATTER WHAT.

Then, there is the third group. These are the dangerous ones who utilize the other 2 groups as “useful idiots” to their evil agenda against individual liberty, prosperity, and self determination. They are the ideologues of government oppression. They consider the only “fair” form of equality to be UNIFORMITY. They work to destroy man’s sense of dignity by turning him into a dependent weakling, thereby feeding their own lust for power over the masses they consider too incompetent to be allowed self-determination.

I choose to give credit to most of the Liberal posters here for being in the first, large group of suckers, emotionally duped into service to the other 2 smaller groups. Without benefit of ability to consider results, they are hopeless in existing apart from their “thinkers”………………..those they bestow with the power to do their thinking for them. They repeat what they’re told to repeat, and accept their instructions without question.

Conservatives, on the other hand, are the very opposite of the Liberals above, and are the congregation following the ideals of America’s founding in individual liberty, property, and pursuit of prosperity. We realize that REAL equality is a level playing field void of discriminate application of rules and regulations. We recognize that justice is blind……………by necessity. We understand that a government that endeavors to control is a government that cannot avoid corruption regardless of the nobility of the original intent. We believe in the government described in the US Constitution……………….a government limited to protection of individual freedom, private property, and individual life. Perhaps the main trait we possess is the un-detractable determination to view results as relevant.

Perhaps the best description of the difference between Conservatives and Liberals was written by C. S. Lewis when he stated, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive……………………the robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated. But those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

Pablo said:
Just imagine the things you could not bother reading! I feel smarter already.

But I have read the Mayflower Compact, our Pilgrim father’s expression of original intent:

” …in the presence of God, and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.

Davo said:
Still wrong. Repetition is boring and it’ll never change reality, Val. You can define a Conservative as a giraffe if you like, but reality still stubbornly ignores your opinion. I’ve been a Conservative ever since I left the Democrat Party when I realized that they deliberately protected the existence of social problems because of their need for them come election time. I’ve only heard YOUR definition of “Conservative” coming out of the mouths of those same Democrats.

Well, sure, what I said is a generalization. But check it out, in the 19th century, conservatives fought for slavery and sought to protect and perserve the status quo on that, Constiutionally, by invoking the 10th Amendment. By me saying that the conservatives of the civil war era fought for slavery, I do not imply that currently conservatiives support slavery, or that slavery is a plank in the conservative platform, but it used to be. The radicals of the day were “social liberals” who fought against the business interests of the status quo, and who sought a federal solution to slavery. The conservative argument then, and now (with regard to several issues) is the same, don’t tread on me, as if conscientious men could ever permit by law, or right, men to abuse their brothers.

Everyone has an opinion about Trump’s motives, therefore, I’ll express my own. First of all, I don’t think Donald’s fragile ego would survive a presidential campaign. Secondly, I do believe when all the wealthy dudes have their annual economic summit, in NY, the main topic is which political party in DC, will best serve their interests. My honest nonpartisan opinion is that Trump, due to his influence and many friends in high places, was chosen by America’s wealthiest to go after Obama, in hopes of replacing him with a more ‘republican’ type of president. Imo, I honestly believe Trump and his wealthy friends, will fight till the end, to keep capitalism alive and well in the US. Obama and the liberal Dems may have a huge fight on their hands, when it comes to raising money for 2012. This could get really down and dirty.

Is Obama racist??? Listen to his voice in a CURSE RANT!! Obama cursed all during his campaign!! got to YOU tube and type inObaa Curse Rant against Reverend Wright. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqZxrtcAG9k

Ben Pratt said:
91 republicans in the house voted for it.

Yup. 108 voted against. You know who they were? Conservatives. Republican does not equal conservative.

the tea party must have voted all of them out for being rinos.

The Tea Party has only influenced one election cycle, and they made quite an impact. These things take time. So, on to the next one.

Ready? Set? Go.

So the point of the White House Correspondents Dinner is to mock Republicans and opponents of Democrat presidents? I remember when Bush was in office it looked more like a roast.

it was nice to see obama get serious at the end because the troops and the devastation down south are not subjects to joke about.
the same could be said about the war criminal (alleged) at one of his correspondence dinners when he got serious and started looking around the oval office and under his desk for wmds.

Obama is not brave enough to curse like a man, he curses in code such as Win the Future = WTF

But I did love Obama’s home video of when he was born entitled ” THE LYING KING” Obama made it official he was definitely born in Africa!

.

valkyrie101 said:
By me saying that the conservatives of the civil war era fought for slavery, I do not imply that currently conservatiives support slavery, or that slavery is a plank in the conservative platform, but it used to be.

Nope. Never was. How many times can one man be wrong in a single morning? You’re moving the bar at warp speed, Val.

Conservatives by definition uphold INDIVIDUAL liberty. The Constitution is a Conservative creation as is our nation’s original founding. Slavery was never condoned by Conservatives or our founders, and is why the Constitution never authorizes ownership of another human being. Can you say, “ALL men are created equal?” The federal government, however, went right on protecting an unconstitutional right to own slaves, just as it goes right on today protecting unconstitutional confiscation of property and businesses…………………….LIBERAL style.

Sorry, Val…………I don’t mean to offend. But you’re working too hard running around the calender trying to gain traction for something that just isn’t factual, and I really don’t care to debate this with you further. Conservatives know who we are and what we believe, regardless of the straw “boogie-man” Liberals need to make us in order to fake some credibility. I would be interested, however, in someone a bit sharper than you explaining just how Liberals claim to be the champions of eliminating slavery with their current determination to enslave people in dependency.

newzmaker said:
Secondly, I do believe when all the wealthy dudes have their annual economic summit, in NY, the main topic is which political party in DC, will best serve their interests.

is that before or after scott walker brings their slippers and cigars? ( oh, and an extra snifter of cognac for the koch brothers)

It was smart of Obama to confront the teleprompter issue head on, but it failed to dispel the obvious problem underlying it.
Self depracating? I guess so. But to contrast it with Bush’s self depricating humor, George was really laughing at himself. With Obama it was,” feel sorry for me because I’m a victim, and I will still succeed because I have this victim advantage thing going.”

Just needed to give Obie’s little talk a thumbs down…..did anyone see the smirks on his face? One of the best parts was the (supposed) live video of Obie’s birth using a clip from the Lion King…….think about it…..

ahh, ok..it is awaiting moderation because i said f***

thank you mediaite…i will refrain using that from now on.

Jay Ray said:
Is Obama racist??? Listen to his voice in a CURSE RANT!! Obama cursed all during his campaign!! got to YOU tube and type inObaa Curse Rant against Reverend Wright. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqZxrtcAG9k

SERIOUSLY SCARY…..

Turning the dinner into a roast would be great. Although I’m not sure what could be said about Obama that wouldn’t be politically incorrect.

Georgia999 said:
One of the best parts was the (supposed) live video of Obie’s birth using a clip from the Lion King…….think about it…..

what gave it away that it was only a supposed video of his birth. the fact the it was cartoon or because there was no angles with trumpets on top of unicorns with rainbows and glitter in the background?

WHarropson said:
It was smart of Obama to confront the teleprompter issue head on, but it failed to dispel the obvious problem underlying it.

the obvious problem underlying? i guess that problem would be that he easily schools republicans with out it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/CraiginPhoenix/obama-budget-freeze-presi_n_813739_75153128.html

Georgia999 said:
Just needed to give Obie’s little talk a thumbs down…..did anyone see the smirks on his face? One of the best parts was the (supposed) live video of Obie’s birth using a clip from the Lion King…….think about it…..

Smirks of condescension.
A window to the soul.
A cruel joke cunningly played (on Americans)
Accented by a killer smile.
A moment to be savored by all who enjoy such evil delicacies.

Somehow I just can’t see Abe Lincoln doing that.
Or George Bush, or… well you know what I mean.

Davo said:
Nope. Never was. How many times can one man be wrong in a single morning? You’re moving the bar at warp speed, Val. Conservatives by definition uphold INDIVIDUAL liberty. The Constitution is a Conservative creation as is our nation’s original founding. Slavery was never condoned by Conservatives or our founders, and is why the Constitution never authorizes ownership of another human being. Can you say, “ALL men are created equal?” The federal government, however, went right on protecting an unconstitutional right to own slaves, just as it goes right on today protecting unconstitutional confiscation of property and businesses…………………….LIBERAL style. Sorry, Val…………I don’t mean to offend. But you’re working too hard running around the calender trying to gain traction for something that just isn’t factual, and I really don’t care to debate this with you further. Conservatives know who we are and what we believe, regardless of the straw “boogie-man” Liberals need to make us in order to fake some credibility. I would be interested, however, in someone a bit sharper than you explaining just how Liberals claim to be the champions of eliminating slavery with their current determination to enslave people in dependency.

The common man is not at fault that there are literally not enough jobs that pay a fair wage. Those jobs were supposed to appear after the Bush tax cuts had a chance to trickle down through the system but instead of those tax savings being reinvested in our economy, and creating new jobs, they were reinvested in the Chinese economy and parked in offshore bank accounts. Since there are literally not enough jobs, I ask, what are the unemployed supposed to do without some help from the government?

The only solution, the only way for our nation to recoup all the money that is being siphoned off, is through taxation

Alz said:
The problem with your argument is the job losses accelerated when it became clear that Obama would win. Add in the job losses from October, November, December and January to Obama’s numbers.

Love how the right writes their own distorted history to makes themselves feel better. Too funny,

BR said:
I’m sure that he knew what he was walking into. But he has a set of balls unlike Obama who is so cowardly that he hides behind his skin color.

What a racist remark.

ChiliPeppersFan said:
what gave it away that it was only a supposed video of his birth. the fact the it was cartoon or because there was no angles with trumpets on top of unicorns with rainbows and glitter in the background?

None of the above. What gave it away was the choice of the video clip to represent Obie’s birth…..think a little more on that……

Pablo said:
Yup. 108 voted against. You know who they were? Conservatives. Republican does not equal conservative. The Tea Party has only influenced one election cycle, and they made quite an impact. These things take time. So, on to the next one. .

Which candidates did they back again? oh that’s right, mostly losers: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/03/5403120-just-32-of-tea-party-candidates-win

Pablo said:
So, on to the next one. Ready? Set? Go.

you realize a good portion of those involved in that poll data are left leaning people who would like to see more liberal policies?

Obimbo has stated that this issue wasn’t worth his time but, here he is again attacking the messenger who made this little punk produce. The embarrassment of being forced to do what he should have done prior to his candidacy has so severely hurt his ego, he can’t stop attacking. Obimbo has called out the dogs to attack Trump. In doing so, he shows America just what his simple-ass is all about. Being forced to adhere to Constitutional requirements for holding the office of president are beneath this clown, and every time he appears in public attacking Trump, he reenforces that fact! Keep it up Obimbo, the hole is getting deeper!

I love the smell of right-wing tears in the morning. :)

Georgia999 said:
None of the above. What gave it away was the choice of the video clip to represent Obie’s birth…..think a little more on that……

wow…from now on it think i should add the tag line “i am making fun of the lack of intelligence.” it would make it easier for you clowns to understand and would save me the trouble of having to explain it.

your obvious reference to saying the ‘supposed video’ of his live birth was that he was born in africa. i got that, but to add a little fun (for me and other people smart enough to get it) i added…

“what gave it away that it was only a supposed video of his birth. the fact the it was cartoon or because there was no angles with trumpets on top of unicorns with rainbows and glitter in the background?”

implying that you were stupid enough to believe what you saw in cartoons and adding the aspect that people on your side (the wrong side) think that people who support obama actually believe him to be the messiah.
see how that works?
if you’re going to comment on my posts, please ask your mom or dad explain them to you first.

Davo said:
Nope. Never was. How many times can one man be wrong in a single morning? You’re moving the bar at warp speed, Val. Conservatives by definition uphold INDIVIDUAL liberty. The Constitution is a Conservative creation as is our nation’s original founding. Slavery was never condoned by Conservatives or our founders, and is why the Constitution never authorizes ownership of another human being. Can you say, “ALL men are created equal?” The federal government, however, went right on protecting an unconstitutional right to own slaves, just as it goes right on today protecting unconstitutional confiscation of property and businesses…………………….LIBERAL style. Sorry, Val…………I don’t mean to offend. P>

are you mental? The south used the excuse of states rights as a reason for having slavery, who does that sound like? liberals who believe in the use of a federal government to enforce god given rights or conservatives who believe we should allow states to do as they will. Southern racists left the democratic party as soon as nixon started talking about how the issue of civil rights should be left up to the states like a classic conservative conartist. Now your party got a ton of racists, congratulations.

valkyrie101 said:
The common man is not at fault that there are literally not enough jobs that pay a fair wage. Those jobs were supposed to appear after the Bush tax cuts had a chance to trickle down through the system but instead of those tax savings being reinvested in our economy, and creating new jobs, they were reinvested in the Chinese economy and parked in offshore bank accounts. Since there are literally not enough jobs, I ask, what are the unemployed supposed to do without some help from the government?

The only solution, the only way for our nation to recoup all the money that is being siphoned off, is through taxation

Who has the authority to decide what someone else should earn…………..what’s a “fair” wage? Never in human history has any collection of people ever been taxed into prosperity. But there is a 100% history of people being taxed into poverty and depression.

As in your aversion to reading the Constitution, don’t read any history of US economics throughout the Bush administration because it’ll show just the opposite of your false assertions. It’ll show that the tax CUTS reduced unemployment and raised our GDP while reducing the deficit despite our economic damage by Muslims on 9/11 and funding wars in the Middle East. The fact is that every time the US has had tax CUTS, more money in the private sector created need for more jobs and caused more money to flow into the treasury from the increase in economic activity…………………..just as it did almost instantly when the tax cuts were passed.

Your “thinkers” in the Demon Party know this full well, Val. They don’t WANT low unemployment or more funding for government. They simply don’t want the public to have our own money……………..it makes us far too free and independent for Liberals to tolerate.

Rippin’ the Donald a new one! SWEEEET!

Why is this President making jokes?  Why was he awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?  Why did he get us into a third war instead of end the two as he PROMISED?  Why did we make such a big mistake with this guy?  

Pablo said:
Yup. 108 voted against. You know who they were? Conservatives. Republican does not equal conservative.

Davo said:

Conservatives by definition uphold INDIVIDUAL liberty. The Constitution is a Conservative creation as is our nation’s original founding. Slavery was never condoned by Conservatives

You guys should talk.

AikidoJoe said:
So the point of the White House Correspondents Dinner is to mock Republicans and opponents of Democrat presidents? I remember when Bush was in office it looked more like a roast.

It looked like a roast because the Bush administration was too dim to realize they hired a satirist…not an actual “right wing commentator”

How presidential- to mock a private citizen. He should have left the comedy to paid comedians but the shallow person in him just couldn’t resist getting his own personal digs.

Trying to impress a room full of journalist, by belittling someone, he lowered the already low bar of journalism and certainly has taken the presidency to another low- something that he at least has been very successful in doing.

I don’t care what you say about Trump or even if you have an opinion at all, he did not mock the President he was asking for a copy of his long form birth certificate – something every media outlet and journalist in that room had requested and been denied at one time.

mlb said:
How presidential- to mock a private citizen. He should have left the comedy to paid comedians but the shallow person in him just couldn’t resist getting his own personal digs. Trying to impress a room full of journalist, by belittling someone, he lowered the already low bar of journalism and certainly has taken the presidency to another low- something that he at least has been very successful in doing. I don’t care what you say about Trump or even if you have an opinion at all, he did not mock the President he was asking for a copy of his long form birth certificate – something every media outlet and journalist in that room had requested and been denied at one time.

he did such a great service by proving once and foreall that the president’s short form bc was indeed not a fake as the president and the majority of americans believed.

BR said:
I’m sure that he knew what he was walking into. But he has a set of balls unlike Obama who is so cowardly that he hides behind his skin color.

Alice67 said:
What a racist remark.

It’s only racist if it was a lie. Unfortunately, he has proved time and again that he is more than happy with the Left crying racism AND the media, in defense of anything and everything he does that does not meet with approval. I didn’t hear him taking the media to task last night, admonishing them to tone down the divisive excuse of racism in their reporting. Why would he? People like you fall for it and use at every opportunity.

ElCapitanAmerica said:
The president did great, I was surprised by Seth was expecting he’d bomb.

Trump looked like a sore loser by not taking it well *at all*. You can tell he was not happy, and he deserved every second of it.

it would have interesting to see if the tables were turned, how Obama would have handled that type of ‘joking’ to his face in a room full of people. I am sure Obama would have ‘faked’ laughed his way through it with a pained/sour/pissed off look as well, all the while planning his revenge. Such class this president- all Obama proved was that he has about as much class as Trump. Both are grandstanders.

mlb said:
It’s only racist if it was a lie. Unfortunately, he has proved time and again that he is more than happy with the Left crying racism AND the media, in defense of anything and everything he does that does not meet with approval.

So you double down. Got it.

Alice67 said:
I love the smell of right-wing tears in the morning. :)

I LOVE the sound of Leftist media hacks dripping with rabies in the evening!

WHarropson said:
It was smart of Obama to confront the teleprompter issue head on, but it failed to dispel the obvious problem underlying it.
Self depracating? I guess so. But to contrast it with Bush’s self depricating humor, George was really laughing at himself. With Obama it was,” feel sorry for me because I’m a victim, and I will still succeed because I have this victim advantage thing going.”

Obama, for the most part, relied on a (very nicely crafted) parody that you know he didn’t put together. He’s not capable of being self-deprecating, so he needs to have that done for him.

No mention of Libya, though.

ChrisNH said:
LOVE the sound of Leftist media hacks dripping with rabies in the evening!

My favorite part …. Obama saying Michele Bachmann was born in Canada then telling her this is how it starts … then his long glaring pause. Priceless!

Alice67 said:
My favorite part …. Obama saying Michele Bachmann was born in Canada then telling her this is how it starts … then his long glaring pause. Priceless!

Was his nose high enough in the air so you could see his boogers? Of course it was!

So far, Obama has treated Trump the way Ali treated Liston.

Alice67 says:

May 1, 2011 at 12:49 pm (Quote)

BR said:
I’m sure that he knew what he was walking into. But he has a set of balls unlike Obama who is so cowardly that he hides behind his skin color.

What a racist remark.
******************

What is racist about that, Obama either hides behinds his skin color or he uses it to his advantage, either way he is the biggest racist because he knows how to use his two colors. His birth video definitely highlights his beginning “The Lying King” was born in Africa. He looked so cute, did you notice Obama big ears, he hasn’t changed much except his speech impediment, no matter what he tries to say comes out as one big lie after another.

Alice67 said:
What a racist remark.

^^^ Alice is what you call a ‘Racer.’ ^^^

Someone who coddles & breast-feeds Obama inside what they believe to be some sort of semi-protective cocoon.

Should we tell them that it doesn’t work, or just laugh at them while they pretend that it does?

Alice67 said:
I love the smell of right-wing tears in the morning. :)
You can smell tears-?

valkyrie101 said:
The expressions “conservative” and “liberal” long pre-date Marx. In general, conservatives oppose change and liberals encourage change, that is the dynamic. In the interaction between doing nothing and doing something, something gets done and we call that progress.

You’re funny.

The Founding Fathers were “Classical Liberals”, what we would call Conservative today. They believed in individual liberty and limited, representative government. Today’s liberals are Leftists – who believe in central control and big government.

valkyrie101 said:
The expressions “conservative” and “liberal” long pre-date Marx. In general, conservatives oppose change and liberals encourage change, that is the dynamic. In the interaction between doing nothing and doing something, something gets done and we call that progress.

A short vid on the subject:
Types of Government Republic vs Democracy vs Oligarchy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRQ76FYvw7M

You can see that today’s Liberals are no where near the Founding Fathers.

And the tears keep on flowing. Poor righties. :(

Nationman said:
are you mental? The south used the excuse of states rights as a reason for having slavery, who does that sound like? liberals who believe in the use of a federal government to enforce god given rights or conservatives who believe we should allow states to do as they will. Southern racists left the democratic party as soon as nixon started talking about how the issue of civil rights should be left up to the states like a classic conservative conartist. Now your party got a ton of racists, congratulations.

You’re missing a lot.

The Southern Democrats left the party because the party was starting to be taken over by the Modern Liberals.

And let’s look at what happened over time, shall we? Gee, at this time these Modern Liberals/Progressives needed more votes. So they got rid of their Progressive Eugenics thinking and decided to co-opt the Blacks in the North through a series of policies and programs designed to make them dependent.

Under the guise of helping them, the Left worked to make the northern Blacks slaves to them. During the 50+ YEARS of this concentrated, liberal control, big parts of Black culture was destroyed.

About all we can say about the RESULTS of the liberalism is that there is a lot of hopelessness, despair and death.

Think about it! You can’t blame Bush, you can’t blame Republicans, but we ALL can blame the Democrats/Liberals/Progressives who have had utter control for 50 years.

What’s worse, the hopelessness, despair and death is ACCEPTABLE to the liberals. Think about it! 50 years of liberalism and its been a disaster, but the liberals don’t care.

Even while most of the audience loves this guy, he start’s off slow…and get’s slower…. The few digs directed toward Trump were, at times, a little funny but not that great. His writers did not score any big hits. The president came down to Trump’s level and his MSNBC/NBC minions with their created sound bites about his teleprompter loved him. He was not that funny…and…

Who did the first ladies hair? Mixmaster?

Alz said:
You’re missing a lot. The Southern Democrats left the party because the party was starting to be taken over by the Modern Liberals. And let’s look at what happened over time, shall we? Gee, at this time these Modern Liberals/Progressives needed more votes. So they got rid of their Progressive Eugenics thinking and decided to co-opt the Blacks in the North through a series of policies and programs designed to make them dependent. Under the guise of helping them, the Left worked to make the northern Blacks slaves to them. During the 50+ YEARS of this concentrated, liberal control, big parts of Black culture was destroyed. About all we can say about the RESULTS of the liberalism is that there is a lot of hopelessness, despair and death. Think about it! You can’t blame Bush, you can’t blame Republicans, but we ALL can blame the Democrats/Liberals/Progressives who have had utter control for 50 years. What’s worse, the hopelessness, despair and death is ACCEPTABLE to the liberals. Think about it! 50 years of liberalism and its been a disaster, but the liberals don’t care.

please, you completely forget the nixon portion. Also forgetting jfk and lbj both signing into law civil rights legislation. “From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don’t need any more than that… but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That’s where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats”- Richard nixon’s strategist Kevin Philips.

TucsonTerpFan said:
Even while most of the audience loves this guy, he start’s off slow…and get’s slower…. The few digs directed toward Trump were, at times, a little funny but not that great. His writers did not score any big hits. The president came down to Trump’s level and his MSNBC/NBC minions with their created sound bites about his teleprompter loved him. He was not that funny…and…

He had everyone in the room roaring with laughter. And I thought his delivery was as good as any comedian. He’s know for this and it’s why comedians dread following him.

TucsonTerpFan said:
Who did the first ladies hair? Mixmaster?

And this is what passes for right-wing humor.

Nationman said:
please, you completely forget the nixon portion. Also forgetting jfk and lbj both signing into law civil rights legislation.

Neither of which are relevant. The analysis by a single member of an administration is as inconsequential as it gets, and in no way matches the devastation to blacks at the hands of their new slave-owners, the Democrat Party. Ghettos are still ghettos and the uneducated are still uneducated.

The civil rights legislation was unnecessary as it is redundant to the Constitution that guarantees equal rights to all. It has been GOVERNMENT elitists that ignored the law and allowed slavery to continue, the same as it’s GOVERNMENT elitists today that strip us of our freedoms in wholesale fashion. They are called, “Democrats.”

Alz said:
And let’s look at what happened over time, shall we? Gee, at this time these Modern Liberals/Progressives needed more votes. So they got rid of their Progressive Eugenics thinking and decided to co-opt the Blacks in the North through a series of policies and programs designed to make them dependent.

Under the guise of helping them, the Left worked to make the northern Blacks slaves to them. During the 50+ YEARS of this concentrated, liberal control, big parts of Black culture was destroyed.

About all we can say about the RESULTS of the liberalism is that there is a lot of hopelessness, despair and death.

That’s unarguable, Alz. Results are hard to ignore, no matter how hard Democrats try to do just that.

Davo said:
Neither of which are relevant. The analysis by a single member of an administration is as inconsequential as it gets, and in no way matches the devastation to blacks at the hands of their new slave-owners, the Democrat Party. Ghettos are still ghettos and the uneducated are still uneducated. The civil rights legislation was unnecessary as it is redundant to the Constitution that guarantees equal rights to all. It has been GOVERNMENT elitists that ignored the law and allowed slavery to continue, the same as it’s GOVERNMENT elitists today that strip us of our freedoms in wholesale fashion. They are called, “Democrats.” That’s unarguable, Alz. Results are hard to ignore, no matter how hard Democrats try to do just that.

it is hard to argue with results. the southern democrats, located in the place where segregation was most popular, left the party for a conservative republican who thought civil rights should take place on a state by state basis. You also have the results of the three democratic presidents signing civil rights legislation, truman, jfk and lbj respectively. So we have the results, you have nothing.

TerryDo said:
Alice67 says:

May 1, 2011 at 12:49 pm (Quote)

BR said:
I’m sure that he knew what he was walking into. But he has a set of balls unlike Obama who is so cowardly that he hides behind his skin color.

What a racist remark.
******************

What is racist about that, Obama either hides behinds his skin color or he uses it to his advantage, either way he is the biggest racist because he knows how to use his two colors. His birth video definitely highlights his beginning “The Lying King” was born in Africa. He looked so cute, did you notice Obama big ears, he hasn’t changed much except his speech impediment, no matter what he tries to say comes out as one big lie after another.

not only are you a racist, you’re not funny either.

Nationman said:
please, you completely forget the nixon portion. Also forgetting jfk and lbj both signing into law civil rights legislation. “From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don’t need any more than that… but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That’s where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats”- Richard nixon’s strategist Kevin Philips.

I didn’t ignore it, but we’ve had today’s liberals keep the inner city Blacks dependent and enslaved for 50 YEARS and it CONTINUES to this day. That’s the issue that no one talks about.

FIFTY YEARS of liberalism in the inner cities and about all we can say is there is a lot hopelessness, despair and death.

Why do you tolerate it? With the damage liberals have done to Blacks, why do you support liberals?

I grew up on Chicago’s South Side and I go there often. It hasn’t changed much and it’s clear that the conditions are ACCEPTABLE to liberals.

Nationman said:
it is hard to argue with results. the southern democrats, located in the place where segregation was most popular, left the party for a conservative republican who thought civil rights should take place on a state by state basis. You also have the results of the three democratic presidents signing civil rights legislation, truman, jfk and lbj respectively. So we have the results, you have nothing.

You’re ignoring the biggest problems. The southern Blacks are doing better than they were, but many of the northern Blacks have been enslved by liberals.

BTW, the liberals screwed the American Indians too – dependent on liberals (slaves).

Nationman said:
it is hard to argue with results. the southern democrats, located in the place where segregation was most popular, left the party for a conservative republican who thought civil rights should take place on a state by state basis. You also have the results of the three democratic presidents signing civil rights legislation, truman, jfk and lbj respectively. So we have the results, you have nothing.

So, exactly WHAT has any of that to do with what I posted? If you’re trying to villify the Constitutional concept of states rights, you failed miserably. The same Constitution that makes civil rights legislation moot, reserves the authority NOT specifically given the federal government, “to the states or the people.” Got a problem with the Constitution?…………..move to Cuba. They don’t bother with technicalities like that.

Alz said:
You’re ignoring the biggest problems. The southern Blacks are doing better than they were, but many of the northern Blacks have been enslved by liberals.P>

So you can back this up with statistics right?

Davo said:
So, exactly WHAT has any of that to do with what I posted? If you’re trying to villify the Constitutional concept of states rights, you failed miserably. The same Constitution that makes civil rights legislation moot, reserves the authority NOT specifically given the federal government, “to the states or the people.” Got a problem with the Constitution?…………..move to Cuba. They don’t bother with technicalities like that.

Are you dense? I’m vilifying the concept that civil rights should be decided on a state by state basis. If you equivocate that with states rights then you would be on the side against mlk jr. and civil rights legislation in general.

Alz said:
I didn’t ignore it, but we’ve had today’s liberals keep the inner city Blacks dependent and enslaved for 50 YEARS and it CONTINUES to this day. That’s the issue that no one talks about. FIFTY YEARS of liberalism in the inner cities and about all we can say is there is a lot hopelessness, despair and death. Why do you tolerate it? With the damage liberals have done to Blacks, why do you support liberals? I grew up on Chicago’s South Side and I go there often. It hasn’t changed much and it’s clear that the conditions are ACCEPTABLE to liberals.

yes there is a serious problem in the inner city and we can’t keep doing the same things that we have done in these places. But liberal slavery? that is a huge stretch. Many of those in the ghetto have moved out of it, to a better neighborhood you couldn’t do that if you were a slave. Honestly we need solutions from both the left and the right to these inner city problems, which are not as you have suggested exclusive to the north, see the houston projects, the atlanta projects etc. you’re making it sound like every problem can be traced back to a government program which is definitly not the case.

Nationman said:
So you can back this up with statistics right?

Why are you ignoring here how liberals keep Blacks enslaved? It’s been going on for over 50 YEARS! Why do you agree with it?

Since the liberals policies you support end up hurting people, why do want to hurt people?!?!

Nationman said:
yes there is a serious problem in the inner city and we can’t keep doing the same things that we have done in these places. But liberal slavery? that is a huge stretch. Many of those in the ghetto have moved out of it, to a better neighborhood you couldn’t do that if you were a slave. Honestly we need solutions from both the left and the right to these inner city problems, which are not as you have suggested exclusive to the north, see the houston projects, the atlanta projects etc. you’re making it sound like every problem can be traced back to a government program which is definitly not the case.

It IS close to enslavement. I don’t want to water down the word “slave”, but the effects are similar.

Also, see the article by Dr. Walter Williams called “Black Progress” at
http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/culture/racism/4840-black-progress-through-politics.html

An excerpt:

“In 1940, poverty among black families was 87 percent and fell to 47 percent by 1960. Would someone tell me what anti-poverty program or civil-rights legislation accounted for this economic advance that exceeded any other 20-year interval? A significant chunk of that progress occurred through migration from rural areas in the South to big Northern cities. Between 1960 and 1980, black poverty fell roughly 17 percent and fell one percent during the ’70s. Might this have been a continuation of a trend starting much earlier, or was it a miracle of the civil-rights movement or President Johnson’s War on Poverty?”

“Dr. Thomas Sowell’s research points out that in various skilled trades, the incomes of blacks relative to whites more than doubled between 1936 and 1959. What’s more, the rise of blacks in professional and other high-level occupations was greater during the five years preceding the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than the five years afterward.”

“In 1940, 86 percent of black children were born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate among blacks was about 15 percent. Today, 31 percent of black children are born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate hovers around 70 percent.”

“In the mid-1960s, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan sounded the alarm for the breakdown in the black family in his book ‘The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.’ At that time, black illegitimacy was 26 percent. Moynihan said,’[A]t the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of the Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family.’ He added,’The steady expansion of welfare programs can be taken as a measure of the steady disintegration of the Negro family structure over the past generation in the United States.’”

“Moynihan’s observations were greeted with charges of racism and blaming the victim.”

Basically, the liberals have destroyed the inner cities. You can’t blame Bush. You can’t blame “the last 8 years”, you can’t blame Republicans and you can’t blame Conservatism. BUT, we can blame Modern Liberalism as they have been in utter control of these areas using the full force of government.

The correct terms for these areas are “liberal-torn” or “liberal-ravaged.”

Alz said:
Why are you ignoring here how liberals keep Blacks enslaved? It’s been going on for over 50 YEARS! Why do you agree with it? Since the liberals policies you support end up hurting people, why do want to hurt people?!?!

I don’t think they do end up hurting people, I think they need to be fixed sure they have a hell of a lot of problems. But in the end I think we as a country with the population that we have need a social safety net. Granted one that doesn’t keep people completely dependent, but we need one nonetheless. The point is, Look at the past poverty of these people and compare it to now, just a guess but I’d say it is far better than it was.

Alz said:
It IS close to enslavement. I don’t want to water down the word “slave”, but the effects are similar. Also, see the article by Dr. Walter Williams called “Black Progress” athttp://www.capitalismmagazine.com/culture/racism/4840-black-progress-through-politics.html An excerpt: “In 1940, poverty among black families was 87 percent and fell to 47 percent by 1960. Would someone tell me what anti-poverty program or civil-rights legislation accounted for this economic advance that exceeded any other 20-year interval? A significant chunk of that progress occurred through migration from rural areas in the South to big Northern cities. Between 1960 and 1980, black poverty fell roughly 17 percent and fell one percent during the ’70s. Might this have been a continuation of a trend starting much earlier, or was it a miracle of the civil-rights movement or President Johnson’s War on Poverty?” “Dr. Thomas Sowell’s research points out that in various skilled trades, the incomes of blacks relative to whites more than doubled between 1936 and 1959. What’s more, the rise of blacks in professional and other high-level occupations was greater during the five years preceding the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than the five years afterward.” “In 1940, 86 percent of black children were born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate among blacks was about 15 percent. Today, 31 percent of black children are born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate hovers around 70 percent.” “In the mid-1960s, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan sounded the alarm for the breakdown in the black family in his book ‘The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.’ At that time, black illegitimacy was 26 percent. Moynihan said,’[A]t the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of the Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family.’ He added,’The steady expansion of welfare programs can be taken as a measure of the steady disintegration of the Negro family structure over the past generation in the United States.’” “Moynihan’s observations were greeted with charges of racism and blaming the victim.” Basically, the liberals have destroyed the inner cities. You can’t blame Bush. You can’t blame “the last 8 years”, you can’t blame Republicans and you can’t blame Conservatism. BUT, we can blame Modern Liberalism as they have been in utter control of these areas using the full force of government. The correct terms for these areas are “liberal-torn” or “liberal-ravaged.”

so you would see these effects exclusively in northern “liberal” cities right?

Nationman said:
Are you dense? I’m vilifying the concept that civil rights should be decided on a state by state basis. If you equivocate that with states rights then you would be on the side against mlk jr. and civil rights legislation in general.

Are you dense? The US Constitution guarantees civil rights for every American, NOT just on a state by state basis. Are you dense? The US Constitution, therefore makes civil rights legislation redundant and your argument demented. Are you dense? That concept has been repeated several times in other posts. Are you dense?

Of course, one MUST be dense to be a Democrat…………that’s why you’re known as “Dims” and must campaign that 10% unemployment and high gas prices are a “good” thing that we need more of. Dense positive.

Davo said:
Are you dense? The US Constitution guarantees civil rights for every American, NOT just on a state by state basis. Are you dense? The US Constitution, therefore makes civil rights legislation redundant and your argument demented. Are you dense? That concept has been repeated several times in other posts. Are you dense? Of course, one MUST be dense to be a Democrat…………that’s why you’re known as “Dims” and must campaign that 10% unemployment and high gas prices are a “good” thing that we need more of. Dense positive.

that is the absolute most idiotic thing I have ever seen written. civil rights were guarenteed on a FEDERAL level numbskull. you are asserting that mlk did all that work for nothing. There goes the idea that there were conservatives involved in the civil rights campaign.

Davo said:
Are you dense? The US Constitution guarantees civil rights for every American, NOT just on a state by state basis. Are you dense? The US Constitution, therefore makes civil rights legislation redundant and your argument demented. Are you dense? That concept has been repeated several times in other posts. Are you dense? Of course, one MUST be dense to be a Democrat…………that’s why you’re known as “Dims” and must campaign that 10% unemployment and high gas prices are a “good” thing that we need more of. Dense positive.

Now we know davo hates the civil rights acts and mlk jr.

Davo said:
Who has the authority to decide what someone else should earn…………..what’s a “fair” wage? Never in human history has any collection of people ever been taxed into prosperity. But there is a 100% history of people being taxed into poverty and depression.

Yes, the usual talking point, but is that true? Several countries are ranked ahead of the U.S. in terms of health care, and they all use some kind of, dare I say, socialist system to manage that, but retaining, in general, capitalist systems. Socialism is not the boogey-man, or Joseph Stalin in drag wearing a Hitler mustache, but an economic model that was adopted by our own forefathers to manage the task of, for example, maintaining our federally owned and run military, which, moreover, follows the socialist model advocated by our Pilgrim fathers in the Mayflower Compact.

Alice67 said:
He had everyone in the room roaring with laughter. And I thought his delivery was as good as any comedian. He’s know for this and it’s why comedians dread following him.

Not necessarily…NOT everyone. There were a lot of moans underneath that phony laughter.

CORRECTION FOR ABOVE: My part starts at NOT necessarily…….

Nationman said:
Now we know davo hates the civil rights acts and mlk jr.

And now we know that your paranoia and ignorance of the Constitution and our founders matches your perceived clairvoyance.

valkyrie101 said:
Several countries are ranked ahead of the U.S. in terms of health care, and they all use some kind of, dare I say, socialist system to manage that,

Ranked by whom? I’ll save you the Google time…………..the “ranking” is by none other than the “World Health Organization.”

You DO remember them, eh Val? They’re the geniuses who banned the use of DDT without so much as a single attempt to corroborate the erroneous claims by Democrat Rachael Carson. That despicable partisan act resulted in the deaths of millions worldwide from malaria when not a single death has ever been attributed to the use of DDT. Nor has there ever been any evidence of DDT harming wildlife, vegitation, water, or soil.

Sorry, but your Progressive “rankers” fail the test of logic, reason, and objective humanity.

valkyrie101 said:
Socialism is not the boogey-man

Yes, Val, it is. The results of Socialism throughout world history prove it. But then, there I go with that ol’ inconvenient “results” thing. Raising taxes has NEVER solved anyone’s economic problem other than the Democrat politicians who prey on the gullible and emotional for their own self-enrichment. Freedom works……………America is proof.

To me its kind of reminescent of how Stephen Colbert so humorously zinged it to Bush at a White House Corresondent’s Dinner some years ago. Now its the president doing the digging. Go for it Obama. Trump with his holier than thou, doing it for the publicity, politics certainly deserves it.

Did Obama “take aim” at people who wonder why he refuses to release his academic records?

Lynda Appell said:
Now its the president doing the digging.

… and there is the difference. You like a President who makes a mockery of private citizens, and media outlets who dare to disagree with him or call his word into question? You would really like North Korea, I hear Jimmy Carter is moving there to start a farm.

William Jacobson, associate clinical professor at Cornell Law School said,
“I’m no fan of Trump, but the conduct of Obama was abysmal. He has proven, once again, that he is temperamentally unfit to be President, he is unable to rise above his ego and his politics.”
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/05/hollywood-began-its-campaign-to-re.html

When referring to Ben Smith’s column at Politico, the beginning of which is, “Perhaps the most striking element, culturally speaking, of last night’s White House Correspondents Dinner was President Obama’s introductory video, crafted in the spirit of South Park and Team America World Police and theColbert Report in what you could interpret either as a ironic, subversive send-up of American patriotism or as a kind of post-ironic homage”. http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0511/Team_Obama_World_Police.html?showall#

From William Jacobson:
“No, this presidency does not seem an odd vehicle, even at a roast, for mocking patriotism. At least no more so than in a private fundraiser in San Francisco, or at the U.N., or in Cairo, or in Europe.”

“Mocking patriotism is Team Obama’s vehicle of choice, and reflects an attitude which is too smug by half.”
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/05/this-presidency-is-not-odd-vehicle-for.html

Alz said:
The Founding Fathers were “Classical Liberals”, what we would call Conservative today. They believed in individual liberty and limited, representative government. Today’s liberals are Leftists – who believe in central control and big government.

Thanks ALZ and all you other thoughtful commenters for hanging around and injecting useful knowledge into these threads that usually deteriorate into nasty insult fests.

I’ve seen that video in your next comment before and it is a favorite of mine.

Republicans (or Constitutional Moderates) are the Liberals now in reality, because after 50 years of Democrat control, what Republican wants to “conserve” what’s been happening? That’s my tongue in cheek evaluaton.

The birth certificate issue does rise from a desperation conservatives feel (using the current meaning) that a marxist has won a democratic election and so every means of defeating him should be employed. This was not a dishonest slander of this president, it was a striving for the rule of law that could rescue a republic. a striving that simply pleaded for transperancy, a desire to know for sure.

Since a marxist has little use of the sanctity of our Constitution, it was nothing to him to withold the source information from his enemies for political gain, because the opportunity to SLANDER those who value the Constitution was too sweet an opportunity. So who requires slander more to achieve their agenda?

As I have said before, trust but verify is how one deals with marxist regimes, and it certainly applied here. It is so boring to call it racist because those like myself had no better attitude about Bill Clinton than Obama now. If it was concievable that fraud was in play with Clinton’s eligability, it would have been the same contoversy until the people are given the hidden proof.

Witholding the BC for political advantage has run it’s course, but a man is still in prison for the sake this democrat slander and deception. The charge of racism is just a smokescreen.

Davo said:
Socialism is not the boogey-man
Yes, Val, it is.

Well then, why did Washington set up the First Bank, a federally owned bank? Federal ownership, isn’t that socialism? The feds own and run the military in a socialist manner as well. Socialism is merely a tool, not a magic beast.

Davo said:
Are you dense? The US Constitution guarantees civil rights for every American, NOT just on a state by state basis. Are you dense? The US Constitution, therefore makes civil rights legislation redundant and your argument demented. Are you dense? That concept has been repeated several times in other posts. Are you dense?.

Davo said:
And now we know that your paranoia and ignorance of the Constitution and our founders matches your perceived clairvoyance.

where was I wrong in saying you didn’t like the civil right act? Where was I wrong in saying you thought mlk was wrong for touting a civil rights bill? Davo you really are a true believing idiot.

TillieGlockenspiel said:
William Jacobson, associate clinical professor at Cornell Law School said,“I’m no fan of Trump, but the conduct of Obama was abysmal. He has proven, once again, that he is temperamentally unfit to be President, he is unable to rise above his ego and his politics.”http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/05/hollywood-began-its-campaign-to-re.html When referring to Ben Smith’s column at Politico, the beginning of which is, “Perhaps the most striking element, culturally speaking, of last night’s White House Correspondents Dinner was President Obama’s introductory video, crafted in the spirit of South Park and Team America World Police and theColbert Report in what you could interpret either as a ironic, subversive send-up of American patriotism or as a kind of post-ironic homage”. http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0511/Team_Obama_World_Police.html?showall# From William Jacobson:“No, this presidency does not seem an odd vehicle, even at a roast, for mocking patriotism. At least no more so than in a private fundraiser in San Francisco, or at the U.N., or in Cairo, or in Europe.” “Mocking patriotism is Team Obama’s vehicle of choice, and reflects an attitude which is too smug by half.”http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/05/this-presidency-is-not-odd-vehicle-for.html

so good of you to provide facts instead of opinion.

mlb said:
… and there is the difference. You like a President who makes a mockery of private citizens, and media outlets who dare to disagree with him or call his word into question? You would really like North Korea, I hear Jimmy Carter is moving there to start a farm.

a private citizen that’s repeatedly talked about running for president and is leading in republican primary polls.

Obama was masterful in his execution of the parody. Those who find it distasteful should remember at one of his correspondence dinners Bush was “looking for W.M.D. under the rug in the Oval Office” while men were still fighting and dying in his war of choice, Iraq. Bush’s version of comedy….not funny. And Bush’s pokes at the MSM took the form of his carrying around a copy of the Bernie Goldburg book “Bias.”