Thanks. some great infos. here keep up Culinary Skills Egg Salad Recipe French Onion Soup Recipe the great work. I cannot truly provide a more optimistic commentary as i’m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.

Well, to be honest, I thought about for a while trying to figure out why they
would be excluded from domestic terrorism.

The DC snipers: These guys were more extortionists and ‘crazy serial killers’
than terrorists. Did they terrorize people? Of course. Are they terrorist though?
There are good arguments for both ‘they are’ and ‘they are not’.

Anthrax killer:Again this has good arguments for ‘he’s a terrorist’ and ‘He isn’t a
terrorist.’ Out of curiosity, did they ever catch this guy?

Now maybe you see them as domestic terrorism but maybe Rudy doesn’t?

Probaby because Rudy looks better in a dress than Rachel.:P

Thank you, and I have to agree about her comments. I am finding them smattered all over the internet now – the same repeated attacks, over and over again. Me thinks somebody has some issues… hhaa

Thanks for your nice comments. :O)

Ellacott says:
January 9, 2010 at 10:50 am

Rachel frequently goes after other lefties. She has also been critical of Obama.

She has been critical of Obama for not being Liberal enough… there’s a difference.

The AP has been going after Obama since the election. The AP leans conservative. Another unsubstantiated claim.

Yes, claiming that the AP leans right is an unsubstantiated claim. Why did you make it?

*******************
It’s not unsubstantiated.

[url]http://mediamatters.org/columns/200807220006[/url]

I read this to mean you were calling my comments boring. If I misread, and you were tellimg me to ignore certain people, I apologize. When I first read this, I thought you were being sarcastic, and then calling me boring. reading it again, I think I misunderstood you. If I did, I apologize. I was actually bummed when I read that, because I enjoyed your comments, and have found you to be a fair and entertaining commenter, and we have some things in common, like our dislike of Olbermann, and like of Redeye. I think by the time I reached your comment I was a but defensive, due to the ones by others.

Sorry if I misunderstood.

Rhetoric and demagoguery doesn’t make somebody a “vigilant anti-terror crusader”.

Now go back to SignOnSanDiego and take Sister Sarah from Vatican city with you.

Which I believe was my original point…however my pointing it out led to ugly and rude partisan attacks directed at me, including you.

sarainitaly says:
January 9, 2010 at 9:16 am
Obviously Giuliani left off “since 9/11″ I don’t think anyone can think he *forgot* about that day. The real blatant error was Stephanopoulos not addressing it during the interview. George was quick to defend Obama on his *my muslim faith* slip up, but he doesn’t notice this?

Do you honestly think Giuliani forgot about 9/11?

As a Hillary Clinton supporter and former life long Dem voter, I find many of the uninformed attacks from the liberals on this site hysterical.

personwhomakescomments says:
January 9, 2010 at 1:25 pm
I agree – Sarahinitaly adds nothing of value to this site.

I guess I would be considered valuable if I just wrote repeatedly, “ignorant, stupid, dumbass, teabaggers” over and over again. Unlike you, I prefer a site with varying opinions, and interesting discussion. Apparently this isn’t the place for that.

shootfromthehip says:
January 9, 2010 at 1:16 pm
And on a personal note, I hope you DO leave this site, because you are the reason I don’t come back anymore. You comment on every single post and also in the most nasty, partisan fashion.

That is so funny – you continuously tell me that I am the reason you don’t come to this site anymore…but yet, you keep coming back. And you are so very, very wrong. I do not comment on every single post, far from it. And I do not attack in a nasty partisan fashion – I respond to the partisan content.

roxsteady says:
January 9, 2010 at 12:30 pma
The truth hurst! What would you call anyone who spouts GOP talking points? A genius? Yes, perhaps you should go. Lightweights who spew GOP talking points without facts should head over to their nearest teabagger site where they’re idiocy is accepted.

It’s *where their idiocy is accepted* and *the truth hurts*. When calling people idiots you might want to not reveal your own short comings.

You analysis is like a beacon in the fog of night. Very illuminating indeed!

Sample of the psychos who give them their ratings (and they know it)

June 2009:

Gunman Jim David Atkinson (a big Hannity fan) was arrested by Knoxville police following his killing of two people and shooting eight others at a children’s play. The Tennessee man said he commited the crimes in order to “kill liberals.”

When authorities searched Atkinson’s house among the items found was the book “Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder” by conservative radio talk show host Michael Savage.

“— who opened fire on a Unitarian Church musical performance in July, killing two and wounding seven more, because he hated liberals”

“Jim David Atkinson engaged in a killing spree in February. Last July he had written “This was a symbolic killing. Who I wanted to kill was every Democrat in the Senate and House, the one hundred people in Bernand Goldberg’s Book.” The book to which Atkinson referred was Bernand Goldberg’s “100 people who are screwing up America”

<br

George Stephanopoulos Jan 8, 2009
George’s Bottom Line

I’m curious, did anyone on fox call out Rudy? Or, did they make a feeble attempt like yours to defend this duplicitous adulterer?

Also, there was terrorism on American soil you thicksicle.

Anybody with half a brain knows that Rudy Giuliani was talking about terrorism post-9/11. Does Maddow seriously think that Rudy is a 9-11 denier? For that kind of lunacy you need to talk to Obama appointees like Van Jones.