Comments on: Rachel Maddow Won’t Toe The Media Line On ACORN

By: Helix

Helix — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:06:27 +0000

Rachel’s spin doctoring doesn’t change the fact that ACORN member(s) were convicted of voter fraud in Nevada. Whether they were successful or competent crooks is not the point. Whether ACORN disbands or changes it’s name or not, the corruption and the convictions still stand. In addition, the news media does not have to include every left-wing talking point in every story about ACORN either(all those percentages above). Basically the organization is corrupt and crooked, just because they got away with many of their crimes because of lack of prosecution(for various reasons) does not make them unjustly accused or saints.

By: AlexabK

AlexabK — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:44:44 +0000

The comparison essay writing will be not very easy to create! Nevertheless, the best writing services will manage with that and even more difficult assignment.

By: Pam1151

Pam1151 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:55:35 +0000

@cmdrgmh is right on both of her posts. Captain America she is far from clueless. I will say that she could use a little of Beck’s manic behavior (just a tad now) to spice up the show. If there is an issue I need to hear about I will watch her show to get the facts but other than that it is like watching paint dry.

The rest of the media should dig as deep as Rachel does on their stories. I mean this on both sides of the isle. Hmmm Could it be the media think “We Can’t Handle The Truth”???

I am not sure about this Newsbusters that some of you use on here. I need to check the site out more.

By: cmdrgmh

cmdrgmh — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:42:58 +0000

One more thing, She does not play favorites. She go’s after Dems just as hard as Repubs.

By: cmdrgmh

cmdrgmh — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:41:22 +0000

Rachel has the highest education of anyone in the media, Like her or hate her, she is one smart cookie. She uses facts behind all of her segments.

By: CaptainAmerica

CaptainAmerica — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:53:48 +0000

Rachel Maddow is clueless. She doesn’t even know basic American history:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2009/04/21/rachel-maddow-displays-puzzling-ignorance-about-basic-american-history

By: JimW

JimW — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:56:51 +0000

Billy Carter…. What a surprise! Thank you so much! I sincerely appreciate it!

By: Billy Carter

Billy Carter — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:31:11 +0000

I don’t usually do this, but I gotta jump in here and defend JimW. Not that he needs me to defend him. I can vouch for this guy. I’ve seen his posts for the past 2-3 weeks on different threads here. His avatar fits his online personality. The guy is nothing but diplomatic whenever he posts anything. Never attacks anyone. If he disagrees with anyone, he just posts his thoughts, which are never offensive.
I’ll admit, I can be an obnoxious low-life in here, but this JimW person is one of the “nice” people in here. I actually thought it was hilarious when I read his post earlier today, because I had never seen him write this sort of thing before. I think he’s sincere about his regrets and apology, not that he HAS TO apologize to anyone.

I feel for ‘ya JimW. Sounds like this really bothered you. Don’t know if you drink, but if you’re still up tonight, roll a fat joint or drink some Jack Daniels and download some Pink Floyd Dark Side of The Moon from Itunes and chill.

As for Maddow, I’m not a fan, but I think she’s a cute Lesbian. Most likely lipstick and not butch. :-)

By: JunkJunk

JunkJunk — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:29:34 +0000

Where do you think you are, JimW, TVNewser? (some of you will get that…)

Rachel’s ACORN segment tonight was quite illuminating. It should get a lot of play in the coming news cycle…

By: JimW

JimW — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:10:03 +0000

Pam1151,
No kidding, my post was very ugly, it made me feel bad all day, and I am completely sorry for having said it. I couldn’t be more serious.
Thanks,
JimW

By: Pam1151

Pam1151 — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:05:57 +0000

@JimW why is it I think you are fooling me?? :o)

By: JimW

JimW — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:19:01 +0000

Pam1151, you are absolutely right. My comment was totally uncalled for. I apologize to all who have been offended by it. Actually, it made me feel crummy all day at work. I won’t make any excuses because there are none. The sentiments of the post are really not me, and I have to learn “internet/anonymity” restraint.
Thank you all!

By: Pam1151

Pam1151 — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:16:53 +0000

@JimW If Rachel Maddow wants to get her hands on some underage Salvadorian girls it should be at her own expense and not on the public dime.

This is toytally uncalled for. So can i say you don’t like out of the closet Lesbians? Even if they are brilliant?

By: Pam1151

Pam1151 — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:14:17 +0000

Care to name a few JimW?????

By: JimW

JimW — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:08:24 +0000

@AgentOrangutan – I’ve been taught by some real snarky left-wing masters on this site.

By: Agent Orangutan

Agent Orangutan — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:01:26 +0000

FNCtards on display… Stay classy, JimW!

By: JimW

JimW — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:55:11 +0000

If Rachel Maddow wants to get her hands on some underage Salvadorian girls it should be at her own expense and not on the public dime.

By: Billy Carter

Billy Carter — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:48:51 +0000

Thank you, Ms Sklar. Great article and attached content. I’m most definitely not a Maddow fan, but will read the content with an open mind. Again, nice job.