1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Rep. Michele Bachmann Explains Why She Doesn’t Think BP Should Be ‘Fleeced’

video
» 17 comments

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann made possibly the most favorable comments towards BP the company has heard in the past 57 days, suggesting they refuse to “be fleeced” by the Obama administration. Tonight she sat down with CNN’s John King to defend those comments, opening her defense with “I’m not here to shill for BP.” Instead, she argued, she was defending the greater free market from the big government tendencies of the Obama administration.

Bachmann’s tone was calm and her she left her most incendiary vocabulary at home, asserting that “as long as people are getting their claims paid, everyone is happy.” That said, she continued, she didn’t want to see a politicization of the claims payments in the Gulf oil disaster by having the government oversee all the payments. Beyond the political aspect, Bachmann also noted that she was prone not to trust the government because of the experience with the White House in the past year and a half:

“This is a complete difference in the way that the United States was run 18 months ago. But today, it seems like the automatic effort from the government is ‘let’s have the federal government take over private industry.’ We don’t want that to be the automatic response from government because we are a free-market economy. And, unfortunately, the Obama administration hasn’t been making any efforts to unwind the government out of these private industries.”

Without having to use the magic word (“socialism”), Bachmann managed to calmly argue that Obama’s approach involved something too close to nationalization to be in her comfort zone, and indicate that BP needs to stand up against those efforts. Those who were expecting Bachmann to sound a little like her comrade-in-arms Sarah Palin did last night were disappointed: she managed to rephrase a message that initially sounded adamantly pro-BP into reasonable-sounding anti-socialist commentary.

Video from tonight’s John King USA below:

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • Fox News: We proudly pander to Teabaggers

    I don’t know why but MichelleB reminds me of MichelleF.

  • MichelleF

    CNBC’s Matt Nesto was asked whether BP acted appropriately by agreeing to the White House’s terms by cutting its dividend payments and agreeing to a $20 billion escrow account.

    Nesto argued that the administration was circumventing the legal system with such acts.

    “I don’t think they [BP] had a [choice],” Nesto said. “In cutting the dividend or in joining up with that fund? I mean, cutting the dividend – yeah it is smart and prudent to save cash in the face of an unknown liability, but I’m very troubled by the fact, uh, that the President has once again created his own sense of, of a legal system.”

    Nesto cited previous instances where Obama has acted in an unprecedented ways to back up his claim and explained Obama was operating outside the presidency’s intended function.

    “He fired the CEO of General Motors. He circumvented the rights of bond holders in the GM situation and now he’s confiscated $20 billion from a private company – wait a minute – to set up, quote, ‘a financial and legal framework’ that already exists,” Nesto continued. “It’s not his job to create laws. It’s his job to enforce laws.”

    Although BP’s ability to stem the flow of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon well, the oil company has reacted to many of the government’s public requests, including suspending their dividend.

    “They are doing that,” Nesto said. “Why do they have to have a gun to their head? There is a thing called due process my friends. There’s gonna be a lot of litigation, as there should, right?”

  • Iris

    MichelleB and MichelleF, yes like minds and both swimming in the oil of love of BP and Glennie. Seriously how can anyone defend BP (or Glenn Beck for that matter)

  • Ted

    michelleF – apparently a big fan of cut and paste; obviously unable to think for herself; I doubt that she understands what she is cutting and pasting.

  • jesse cornish is an impotent weirdo

    Quite right, Ted. I must say, in addition to the almost discouragingly poor level have commentary here, there’s also a real problem with plagiarism and misattribution.

  • goodolgil

    Ridiculous.

    If you want to take a libertarian view of it, see Richard Epstein in the WSJ today. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575298902528808996.html?mod=rss_opinion_main

    The idea that BP would get to reap all the profits from inherently risky behavior (deep water drilling), but not to have to pay the costs should it go wrong is absurd. There’s nothing “big government” about accountability.

  • tiredofbs

    Let me get this straight:
    BP was forced to dri ll in deeper water against their wishes
    BP was legally given a ceiling of responsibility of 75Million dollars
    BP submitted their very lacking back up plans) to US officials in charge…Fully approved
    BP never refused inspections
    But When The S*** hit The Fan
    Suddenly they alone are the monsters…

    Our President twiddles his thumbs for 2 months,
    refusing available help,golfs vacations & parties like it’s 1999
    Politicizes the disaster for his atrocious agenda..
    Makes personal comments & instructs his ilk to verbally assassinate BP
    down to almost no value
    Then SHakes them down for 20Billion+ against Law, against contractual agreements
    practically declaring them guilty with out trial defense or a chance to prove that they
    intended to pay
    all legitimate claims..
    AND APPOINTS A FAR LEFT WING CLUSTER OF FOOLS W/NO OIL EXPERIENCE TO
    DISTRIBUTE THE 20 BILLION…HMMM

    Ahmadinejad should only have this type of treatment…
    It’s upside down Politics IN SOME PARALLEL UNIVERSE/ Chicago style thuggery in all it’s glory

  • ImNotBlue

    Ted says:
    June 16, 2010 at 9:10 pm

    an impotent weirdo says:
    June 16, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    So I guess you guys have nothing to say about the post itself… just an attack on the poster?

    Gotcha.

    Hey, Michelle… next time, use smaller words. Ted and Impotent want to play…

  • nicholasdiaz

    Ultimately, it is BP’s responsibility. However, had they drilled closer to shore, the problem could have been much easier to solve. Political correctness is leading this world to ruination. The Sierra Club and others of their kind have a share in this blame.
    Quick Trim

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kam-Fet/572005492 Kam Fet

    I can’t believe BP took the bait, it’s unbelievable. The shareholders should sue their behinds.

  • paulmdoro

    BP shares went up yesterday.

  • Iris

    The few of you who are defending BP are obviously the “small people” that BP cares about. I gues that means BP will sprinkle you with their magical fairy dust and the monumental environmental disaster they caused will never ever affect you. Wow, aren’t you the lucky ones.

  • jesse cornish is an impotent weirdo

    Trust me, ImNotBlue, I would looove to see a few polysyllabic words around here. Please, give me something challenging to comment on.

  • nowhearthis

    Two very important facts should have been in this article and taken into account in the Comments:

    1. The $20 Billion, which will be drawn from to get money quicker for those who have claims and don’t want court battles lasting 10 years or more, is placed in an ESCROW ACCOUNT. It will NOT be accessible to or administered by the US government.

    2. The ESCROW ACCOUNT will be administered, and the money controlled and disbursed, by an INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY, NOT the US government.

    Let’s get, know, and stick with the facts people. Bachmann learned from her smack-down and O’Reilly and is just peddling the same disinformation and purposeful distortion, with wilfull ommission of the facts, without the usual incendiary words. Her logic and conclusions are not based on, or acknowledge, the facts. She’s a politician cynically trying to confuse citizens, who don’t take the time to read the facts, to construe a false argument that supports her political self-interest.

  • nowhearthis

    PS The sentence should have read, “Bachmann learned from her smackdown WITH O’Reilly…” etc.

  • nowhearthis

    All of you defending multi-trillion deep-pockets BP as a victim here should ask those whose lives have been tragically affected by BP’s negligence how they feel about our President standing up for them, US citizens, and securing rapidly deployable financial relief (AND NOT AT THE US TAXPAYERS’ EXPENSE). As the congressional hearing brought to light, of all the bug oil companies, BP has the worst track record of consistent and pervasive negligence.

  • nowhearthis

    All of you defending multi-trillion deep-pockets BP as a victim here should ask those whose lives have been tragically affected by BP’s negligence how they feel about our President standing up for them, US citizens, and securing rapidly deployable financial relief (AND NOT AT THE US TAXPAYERS’ EXPENSE). As the congressional hearing brought to light, of all the bug oil companies, BP has the worst track record of consistent and pervasive negligence. BP brought this disaster on itself.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram