<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin Is &#8216;Quite Clear&#8217; America Should &#8216;Create Law Based On The God Of The Bible&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/</link>
	<description>Mediaite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 894366095</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-667476</link>
		<dc:creator>894366095</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-667476</guid>
		<description>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cmauricio2</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-580006</link>
		<dc:creator>Cmauricio2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-580006</guid>
		<description>You are an idiot..and your fear of God is evident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an idiot..and your fear of God is evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disfuncion</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-125109</link>
		<dc:creator>Disfuncion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-125109</guid>
		<description>That sounds good. But if it was sincere&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disfuncionerectiltratamiento.es&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds good. But if it was sincere<a href="http://www.disfuncionerectiltratamiento.es" rel="nofollow">.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Guenzler</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-118967</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Guenzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-118967</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe the crap she has spewed for over the past two years, and Bill shame on you for backing Sara.  Have they not heard of the Treaty of Tripoli!    James Madison &quot;Every new &amp; successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion &amp; Govt. will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together... We are teaching the world the great truth that Govts. do better without Kings &amp; Nobles than with them. The merit will be doubled by the other lesson that Religion flourishes in greater purity, without than with the aid of Govt.&quot;  
This  is what our founding Four Fathers wanted. You cannot change history and twist the words written by our Presidents. She quoted “ Yay, Welcome to America!” makes her sound like the true moron. She preaches tolerance. What is there to tolerate, the fact that not all people pray to her god, or pray at all? That is not tolerance it is boarder line hatred. All we need is to draw another segregation line between Americans. We do not need another holiday or a day to pray. Thomas Jefferson wrote “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man &amp; his God…”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe the crap she has spewed for over the past two years, and Bill shame on you for backing Sara.  Have they not heard of the Treaty of Tripoli!    James Madison &#8220;Every new &amp; successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion &amp; Govt. will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together&#8230; We are teaching the world the great truth that Govts. do better without Kings &amp; Nobles than with them. The merit will be doubled by the other lesson that Religion flourishes in greater purity, without than with the aid of Govt.&#8221;<br />
This  is what our founding Four Fathers wanted. You cannot change history and twist the words written by our Presidents. She quoted “ Yay, Welcome to America!” makes her sound like the true moron. She preaches tolerance. What is there to tolerate, the fact that not all people pray to her god, or pray at all? That is not tolerance it is boarder line hatred. All we need is to draw another segregation line between Americans. We do not need another holiday or a day to pray. Thomas Jefferson wrote “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man &amp; his God…”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesusHadItComing</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-54973</link>
		<dc:creator>JesusHadItComing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-54973</guid>
		<description>America&#039;s future rape law 

&quot;If a man happens to meet a virgin woman who is not engaged to be married and he seizes her and rapes her but is caught in the act the rapist must pay the girl&#039;s father fifty silver shekels she must marry the rapist, because he has violated her. And so long as he lives, he may not divorce her.&quot; Deuteronomy 22:29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America&#8217;s future rape law </p>
<p>&#8220;If a man happens to meet a virgin woman who is not engaged to be married and he seizes her and rapes her but is caught in the act the rapist must pay the girl&#8217;s father fifty silver shekels she must marry the rapist, because he has violated her. And so long as he lives, he may not divorce her.&#8221; Deuteronomy 22:29</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starla Immak</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-54539</link>
		<dc:creator>Starla Immak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-54539</guid>
		<description>5And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

 6But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. Matthew 6:5-6

Looks like Sarah Palin does not read the Bible very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.</p>
<p> 6But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. Matthew 6:5-6</p>
<p>Looks like Sarah Palin does not read the Bible very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: let-me-explainify...</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-54178</link>
		<dc:creator>let-me-explainify...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-54178</guid>
		<description>while i am embarrassed by her ignorance as a woman &amp; appalled by her advocation of violence as an ends to a mean, i am &#039;STUCK&#039; in a place where i must defend my GOD &amp; RELIGION from frenzied hateful athiests who attack it simply because they know she is a staunch believer &amp; has a christian values &#039;agenda&#039;...

*shaking head*

whether you don&#039;t like palin or not, why does this so easily translate into an attack on religion/god as a whole from the left? i generally consider myself to be a liberal as far as government is concerned but whenever the attacks on religion start, the abject hatred from the &#039;left&#039; puts me smack in a position where i am disgusted w/the people i have on most other issues, sided with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i am embarrassed by her ignorance as a woman &amp; appalled by her advocation of violence as an ends to a mean, i am &#8216;STUCK&#8217; in a place where i must defend my GOD &amp; RELIGION from frenzied hateful athiests who attack it simply because they know she is a staunch believer &amp; has a christian values &#8216;agenda&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>*shaking head*</p>
<p>whether you don&#8217;t like palin or not, why does this so easily translate into an attack on religion/god as a whole from the left? i generally consider myself to be a liberal as far as government is concerned but whenever the attacks on religion start, the abject hatred from the &#8216;left&#8217; puts me smack in a position where i am disgusted w/the people i have on most other issues, sided with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annawoods04</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-54164</link>
		<dc:creator>annawoods04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-54164</guid>
		<description>hey&#039;re quite clear that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the 10 commandments, it&#039;s pretty simple.” I think we should kind of keep this clean, keep it simple, go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant. They&#039;re quite clear that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the 10 Commandments. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.houstonpersonalinjurycrim.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Houston personal injury&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey&#8217;re quite clear that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the 10 commandments, it&#8217;s pretty simple.” I think we should kind of keep this clean, keep it simple, go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant. They&#8217;re quite clear that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the 10 Commandments. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstonpersonalinjurycrim.com" rel="nofollow">Houston personal injury</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puck30</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53989</link>
		<dc:creator>puck30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53989</guid>
		<description>Palin speaks, the left blows another gasket.

Priceless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin speaks, the left blows another gasket.</p>
<p>Priceless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shearwater</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53723</link>
		<dc:creator>shearwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53723</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin articulates it very well . . . in spite of her detractors who ridicule her and call her names.  Liberals are good at doing that.  Gracious I guess you would call it because she addresses every issue with rational arguments and sound thought processes.  What ever else she does or is to her detractors, you have to like what she did in Alaska.  That is her badge of honor and her right to speak to Americans across the political spectrum.   The proof of her metal resides in Alaska and I will bet you a dollar to a doughnut Alaskans like it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin articulates it very well . . . in spite of her detractors who ridicule her and call her names.  Liberals are good at doing that.  Gracious I guess you would call it because she addresses every issue with rational arguments and sound thought processes.  What ever else she does or is to her detractors, you have to like what she did in Alaska.  That is her badge of honor and her right to speak to Americans across the political spectrum.   The proof of her metal resides in Alaska and I will bet you a dollar to a doughnut Alaskans like it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davism97</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53570</link>
		<dc:creator>davism97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53570</guid>
		<description>Also, God isn&#039;t mentioned ONE SINGLE TIME in our Constitution or Bill of Rights.  If the founders wanted to establish a Christian nation you think they would&#039;ve mentioned Jesus at some point.  And no the Bill of Rights aren&#039;t based on Christian morals.  This is why Sarah Palin and Bill O&#039;Reilly are complete morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, God isn&#8217;t mentioned ONE SINGLE TIME in our Constitution or Bill of Rights.  If the founders wanted to establish a Christian nation you think they would&#8217;ve mentioned Jesus at some point.  And no the Bill of Rights aren&#8217;t based on Christian morals.  This is why Sarah Palin and Bill O&#8217;Reilly are complete morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davism97</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53569</link>
		<dc:creator>davism97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53569</guid>
		<description>&quot;the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion&quot; 

-- Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8211; Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Viscichini</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53533</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Viscichini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 08:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53533</guid>
		<description>I guess no one commenting on this video has read the First Amendment in awhile.  So, here  you go, I&#039;ve brought it straight to you.  The first two clauses are the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.  Together they are referred to as the Religion Clauses.

&quot;Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;

If you would like some more interesting things to research with regard to the separation of church and state, see the following:

1.)  The Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, &quot;As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,&quot; 1797

2.)  Letter from Thomas Jefferson, 1802, &quot;Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man &amp; his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, &amp; not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should &quot;make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,&quot; thus building a wall of separation between Church &amp; State.&quot;

3.)  Letter from James Madison, 1822, &quot;And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion &amp; Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess no one commenting on this video has read the First Amendment in awhile.  So, here  you go, I&#8217;ve brought it straight to you.  The first two clauses are the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.  Together they are referred to as the Religion Clauses.</p>
<p>&#8220;Amendment I</p>
<p>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you would like some more interesting things to research with regard to the separation of church and state, see the following:</p>
<p>1.)  The Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, &#8220;As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,&#8221; 1797</p>
<p>2.)  Letter from Thomas Jefferson, 1802, &#8220;Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man &amp; his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, &amp; not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should &#8220;make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,&#8221; thus building a wall of separation between Church &amp; State.&#8221;</p>
<p>3.)  Letter from James Madison, 1822, &#8220;And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion &amp; Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Enderlein</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53496</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Enderlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 02:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53496</guid>
		<description>I guess Bill O and Sarah never read the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli where in Article 11 the &quot;founding fathers&quot; clearly and  unanimously voted that we were in no way founded on the Christian Religion. Why do the fundies wish to rewrite history? There is a legal treaty, passed unanimously by congress, printed in 3 papers of the day with no controversy, that unambiguously states we  are NOT a Christian Nation. Is there any other legal document, passed by congress in the early days of our country which states that we are?? Thought not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Bill O and Sarah never read the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli where in Article 11 the &#8220;founding fathers&#8221; clearly and  unanimously voted that we were in no way founded on the Christian Religion. Why do the fundies wish to rewrite history? There is a legal treaty, passed unanimously by congress, printed in 3 papers of the day with no controversy, that unambiguously states we  are NOT a Christian Nation. Is there any other legal document, passed by congress in the early days of our country which states that we are?? Thought not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Joel Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Joel Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53423</guid>
		<description>@Vcaver

Benjamin Franklin was a Deist, Thomas Paine was an atheist, George Washington may have been a Deist and it&#039;s believed that John Adams may have been an atheist.

You&#039;ll find that not all or even the majority of the founding fathers weren&#039;t Christians but that the most widely and influential known were the least religious or most outspoken against organized religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vcaver</p>
<p>Benjamin Franklin was a Deist, Thomas Paine was an atheist, George Washington may have been a Deist and it&#8217;s believed that John Adams may have been an atheist.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find that not all or even the majority of the founding fathers weren&#8217;t Christians but that the most widely and influential known were the least religious or most outspoken against organized religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nachi</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53405</link>
		<dc:creator>Nachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53405</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Let&#039;s throw in some additional apostles of the God Racket.  That moral slum occupied by preachers, priests, archbishops, gurus, divine fuhrers, corn-pone messiahs, grand wizards, various other intellectual renegades.  All those things necessary to make God our very own Bitch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Let&#8217;s throw in some additional apostles of the God Racket.  That moral slum occupied by preachers, priests, archbishops, gurus, divine fuhrers, corn-pone messiahs, grand wizards, various other intellectual renegades.  All those things necessary to make God our very own Bitch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53393</link>
		<dc:creator>writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53393</guid>
		<description>Gouverner Morris of Pennsylvania did most of the actual writing of the constitution, and he was a rational theist,  a mixture of deism and Christianity based more on nature than revelation.  But what&#039;s more important here is that a dumb, irrelevant woman who has no chance of ever holding public office get the left&#039;s panties in such a bunch.  Now that&#039;s entertainment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gouverner Morris of Pennsylvania did most of the actual writing of the constitution, and he was a rational theist,  a mixture of deism and Christianity based more on nature than revelation.  But what&#8217;s more important here is that a dumb, irrelevant woman who has no chance of ever holding public office get the left&#8217;s panties in such a bunch.  Now that&#8217;s entertainment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vcaver</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53381</link>
		<dc:creator>vcaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53381</guid>
		<description>Other than Jefferson who were the rest of the &quot;Deists&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than Jefferson who were the rest of the &#8220;Deists&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Royal King</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53378</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Royal King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53378</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t go there, Texican. I thought everyone knew that most of our founding fathers were Deists until the rightists infested us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t go there, Texican. I thought everyone knew that most of our founding fathers were Deists until the rightists infested us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittlePurpleUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53360</link>
		<dc:creator>LittlePurpleUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53360</guid>
		<description>^^^^ lmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^^ lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEXICAN</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53358</link>
		<dc:creator>TEXICAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53358</guid>
		<description>Wow!! Palin doesn’t know that the majority if not all, of the Founding Fathers, were deists and NOT Christians. Wow, she has NO idea about what the U.S. Constitution. 

Palin, whoa what a MORON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! Palin doesn’t know that the majority if not all, of the Founding Fathers, were deists and NOT Christians. Wow, she has NO idea about what the U.S. Constitution. </p>
<p>Palin, whoa what a MORON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vcaver</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53353</link>
		<dc:creator>vcaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53353</guid>
		<description>This highlights the difference between Palin and the Democrats -- they want to create laws based on Lucifer of the Bible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This highlights the difference between Palin and the Democrats &#8212; they want to create laws based on Lucifer of the Bible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Royal King</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53331</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Royal King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53331</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong, Michelle, I was very much opposed to the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition as well. All churches fall far, far short from the glory of God, as do all people.

The nation has some obligation to keep churches from acting in such a fashion as to prevent them from denyng others the free exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Michelle, I was very much opposed to the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition as well. All churches fall far, far short from the glory of God, as do all people.</p>
<p>The nation has some obligation to keep churches from acting in such a fashion as to prevent them from denyng others the free exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53325</link>
		<dc:creator>writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53325</guid>
		<description>Now Michelle, would the King ever insult or stereotype anyone he disagrees with?  And while the constitution does prohibit establishment of any one religion over another, the term &#039;separation of church and state&#039; isn&#039;t in there.  That was Jeffersnon&#039;s warning against establishing a religion.  I could see it being unfair if someone said, &#039;Let&#039;s make Christianity the national religion&#039;.  Palin wasn&#039;t saying that.  But hey, the left hates her, so let&#039;s pretend she did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Michelle, would the King ever insult or stereotype anyone he disagrees with?  And while the constitution does prohibit establishment of any one religion over another, the term &#8216;separation of church and state&#8217; isn&#8217;t in there.  That was Jeffersnon&#8217;s warning against establishing a religion.  I could see it being unfair if someone said, &#8216;Let&#8217;s make Christianity the national religion&#8217;.  Palin wasn&#8217;t saying that.  But hey, the left hates her, so let&#8217;s pretend she did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelleF</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53314</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53314</guid>
		<description>Sorry King, you aren&#039;t going to draw me into a conversation on religion so you can make back-handed comments about my religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry King, you aren&#8217;t going to draw me into a conversation on religion so you can make back-handed comments about my religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxed</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53313</link>
		<dc:creator>taxed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53313</guid>
		<description>&quot; The Constitution grants power and protection to people by limiting the government. &quot;  That sentence right there should be continually read to liberals.  The growth of govt is out of hand and needs to be limited!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The Constitution grants power and protection to people by limiting the government. &#8221;  That sentence right there should be continually read to liberals.  The growth of govt is out of hand and needs to be limited!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Royal King</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53309</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Royal King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53309</guid>
		<description>MichelleF says:
May 7, 2010 at 11:18 am
I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their “seperation of church and state” talking points, and they don’t even understand what that really means.

---

Actually, I think most of us do, Michelle. The Constitution grants power and protection to people by limiting the government. In this case, it means not allowing the government to make an established order of religion, for example the Church of England, as it once was. A corollary to no establishment is free exercise of belief. The problem with rightists is that they fail to draw a proper line between belief and practice. Polygamy is a very good example of that. Another would be laws prohibiting the wholesale slaughter of &quot;gentiles&quot; to honor good. Mountain Meadow is a good example of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MichelleF says:<br />
May 7, 2010 at 11:18 am<br />
I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their “seperation of church and state” talking points, and they don’t even understand what that really means.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Actually, I think most of us do, Michelle. The Constitution grants power and protection to people by limiting the government. In this case, it means not allowing the government to make an established order of religion, for example the Church of England, as it once was. A corollary to no establishment is free exercise of belief. The problem with rightists is that they fail to draw a proper line between belief and practice. Polygamy is a very good example of that. Another would be laws prohibiting the wholesale slaughter of &#8220;gentiles&#8221; to honor good. Mountain Meadow is a good example of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelleF</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53272</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53272</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their “seperation of church and state” talking points, and they don’t even understand what that really means.

You couldn&#039;t be more right.   It&#039;s like the immigration bill, they twist it to support their template and just expect the rest of us to accept it&#039;s correct.  Maybe their mindless minions will, but those of us with a brain won&#039;t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their “seperation of church and state” talking points, and they don’t even understand what that really means.</p>
<p>You couldn&#8217;t be more right.   It&#8217;s like the immigration bill, they twist it to support their template and just expect the rest of us to accept it&#8217;s correct.  Maybe their mindless minions will, but those of us with a brain won&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writer</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53267</link>
		<dc:creator>writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53267</guid>
		<description>Palin said the national day would champion no one religion over another.  But it doesn&#039;t matter.  Palin said it, so she has to be blasted for it.  How dare she mention that the founding fathers believed in God and mentioned him frequently!  They were Deists for the most part, not Christians for God&#039;s sake!  And while we&#039;re at it, let&#039;s take that offensive &quot;In God We Trust&quot; motto off of our money.  How offensive!  This is an outrage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin said the national day would champion no one religion over another.  But it doesn&#8217;t matter.  Palin said it, so she has to be blasted for it.  How dare she mention that the founding fathers believed in God and mentioned him frequently!  They were Deists for the most part, not Christians for God&#8217;s sake!  And while we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s take that offensive &#8220;In God We Trust&#8221; motto off of our money.  How offensive!  This is an outrage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxed</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-palin-its-quite-clear-that-we-would-create-law-based-on-the-god-of-the-bible/#comment-53263</link>
		<dc:creator>taxed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediaite.com/?p=120699#comment-53263</guid>
		<description>@JZGIRL...what part of the CONSTITUTION supports what you are saying?  The only mention of religion in the constitution says that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification for holding public office.

I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their &quot;seperation of church and state&quot; talking points, and they don&#039;t even  understand what that really means.

I am no fan of Palin, but the obsession of the left for her is pathetic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JZGIRL&#8230;what part of the CONSTITUTION supports what you are saying?  The only mention of religion in the constitution says that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification for holding public office.</p>
<p>I think a lot of liberals are clinging to their &#8220;seperation of church and state&#8221; talking points, and they don&#8217;t even  understand what that really means.</p>
<p>I am no fan of Palin, but the obsession of the left for her is pathetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

