2) I’ve heard plenty of explanations similar to this (pro and con on the issue) on multiple networks, so I’m not sure what Mr. Feldman means when he says “nobody has covered it.”

3) The lack of specific coverage (if there is indeed a lack), was due in part to the government being unwilling or unable to publish the plan, in a timely manner so journalists and the public could review it. Even Rep. Pelosi said she’d put the “final bill” up for 72 hours… but that never happened. It’s tough to talk about what’s IN the bill, when we’re not allowed to SEE the bill.

4) This opinion piece skips over every concern against Obamacare, glosses over obvious arguments against or questions about such policies, and uses “friendly data” instead of more “unbiased” information. This, in and of itself, isn’t a problem… but that means the article should be presented as an opinion/advocacy piece… not a “report.”