In his final “Closing Argument” segment of the week, CNN host Chris Cuomo took aim the stubborn intransigence and unwavering fealty Republicans in Congress have displayed during the public testimony portion of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
Recounting the nine witnesses, and 30-plus hours of sworn testimony, Cuomo compared the evidence against Trump to the two other most recent impeachment investigations in US history. He then played a clip of House Intel Chair Adam Schiff making the case that the misconduct by Trump transcends that of Presidents Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton.
“So why aren’t Republicans reeling right now?” Cuomo asked. “The difference between then and now is not the difference between Nixon and Trump. It’s the difference between that Congress and this one. We have never seen the party of the president to be more partisan in a process like this than we’re seeing right now.”
“Now, I often go at both sides of Congress for not doing their job enough and for making political plays, but that’s because I know they can do better than this,” Cuomo said. “Trump has brought in a new mentality for his party: Scorched earth, kill or be killed, ride or die. Now, it’s measurable. And I’ll show you.”
Cuomo then rolled archival footage of Republican Senators condemning Nixon and pointed out he bipartisan nature of both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment votes.
“
The Constitution gives Congress the responsibility to exercise oversight and act as a check on the executive branch, Cuomo pointed out. Yet almost every question from the 10 members of the Republican cohort on the Intelligence Committee council was predicated on defending Trump or casting doubt on the witnesses. “They were shielding. They were trying to protect the president,” he said. “There was not one question asked to elicit any negative information. That is not their job…or maybe now it is.”
“And here’s the shame,” Cuomo concluded. “You can own what is obvious here and still argue that the consequence of impeachment, let alone removal, is too severe. You may not like that argument, but it can be argued in good conscience. Ignoring facts, facilitating conspiracy theories about Ukraine interference, that cannot be done in good conscience. But [Republicans] are right to argue one
Watch the video above, via CNN.