Gingrich, whose campaign had been struggling for some months and is experiencing something of a second wind after being the most popular Vice Presidential choice at the last debate, made it absolutely clear that he believes that marriage the way it has existed “for all of recorded history” should remain unhampered. The comments via the Des Moines Register:
“I believe that marriage is between a man and woman,” Gingrich said. “It has been for all of recorded history and I think this is a temporary aberration that will dissipate. I think
that it is just fundamentally goes against everything we know.”
RELATED: Senior Gingrich Campaign Aides Resign En Masse
It didn’t take long for the comment to make the rounds on the left, or for Iowan civil rights groups to call Gingrich’s comment “offensive and disrespectful” to many Iowans in same-sex marriages– but that is to be expected, and as Gingrich’s fight is really in the primary at this point and not the general election, whether swing voters and independents are offended makes little difference in the grander scheme. That said, this one was a misfire.
There are many reasons why this comment is likely to backfire, and it took little to no time for someone to bring up the first, obvious point that Gingrich doesn’t exactly have the sort of track record that lends itself to defending the sanctity of marriage. In fact, even before the inevitable headline snark, the piece in the Des Moines Register began the sentence immediately following his statements with “Gingrich, who has been married three times and has previously admitted to being a past adulterer…”
RELATED: Marriage Amendment Popular Among GOP Candidates, But Not The Ones You Think
The more subtle point to make about the political strategy here is that Gingrich made the comments at an event in Iowa– the third of six states to legalize full marriage rights for same-sex couples. With Gallup showing attitudes towards