Akin’s comments have been disastrous for the Republicans, exposing an apparent rift on abortion policy in the presidential ticket, thrusting the vice-presidential nominee’s support for “forcible rape” language in federal law into the spotlight, and getting the media to finally notice that the party’s view has long been that there should be no exceptions on abortion for rape and incest.
Despite some initially encouraging poll numbers, Akin has fallen well behind incumbent Sen. Claire McCaskill in the polls, but even if he manages to close the
The question is: “If he stays in, is your position eventually going to change? Are you going to have to support him? The Chairman replies “No, no. No. He could be tied. We’re not going to send him a penny.” That’s a pretty definitive answer. Priebus also states that stepping aside from the race and letting someone with a better chance of winning step in would be “putting [the] country first,” and implies that stepping aside is what someone would do if they “really did believe this is about liberty and freedom and the future of this country.”“I just think that the people who want to do something special are always better than the people who want to be somebody special,” says the Chairman.’
That hypothetical may never be tested, as Akin’s polling numbers are decaying faster than Osama bin Laden’s eye socket, but Priebus’ decision to answer the question at all is significant. There’s a flack maxim (a flaxim™) which says you get an automatic pass on any question that you can reasonably call a “hypothetical,” meaning that Chairman Priebus really wanted
It’s ironic that Akin is being so soundly pilloried by a party that’s famous for Ronald Reagan‘s Eleventh Commandment, “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican,” but they must now be considering a Twelfth Commandment: Thou shalt not reveal the bat-shittery of thy fellow Republicans with thine own guano.
Here’s the clip, via Redstate:
Follow Tommy Christopher (@TommyXtopher) on Twitter.