In a wild game of he-said-he-said, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump sparred last night from the top two spots of Fox Business’ Republican Primary Debate stage in South Carolina.
Mr. Trump ramped up his birther allegations against Ted Cruz and the Senator’s Canadian birth. Cruz responded in kind with an allegation of his own: Trump may not be not qualified to be president by virtue of his Scottish mother. A valiant political effort by Senator Cruz but based on absolutely no valid legal questions.
By this logic, neither Trump, Rubio or the now and always obsolete Bobby Jindal would be eligible for the presidency. “I’m not going to use your mother’s birth against you…” Cruz said, to which Trump hastily interjected, “–because it wouldn’t work.”
Ted Cruz does not have to “take legal advice from Donald Trump,” but he should heed
There is no explicit or implicit language regarding that person’s parents, whether it be one or both, and their place of birth. Senator Cruz’s claims are without merit, intellectually dishonest, and flat-out inane.
Has anyone actually made this argument before? Not that I can find. Even if we take birtherism to the extreme (oh yes we have been there before), Cruz is grasping at straws. No plausible reading of the phrase “natural born” merits Cruz’s accusation.
The U.S. Constitution’s eligibility requirement mandates that the president be a “natural born” citizen. As Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard who also happened to teach President Barack Obama, Senator Cruz, and Chief Justice John Roberts, said: there are legitimate questions regarding the interpretation of and intention behind the words “natural-born.” That debate does not include Donald Trump.
As Mr. Trump said,
[Picture via screengrab]