Saying he’d heard plenty of criticism of the MSNBC interview from friends at the network, Shuster insisted his comments weren’t a feud. “I have no personal animosity towards @dylanratigan. Professionally, his love-in with Breitbart was inappropriate.”
But by afternoon, Ratigan responded, beginning a back-and-forth via Twitter:
RATIGAN: Regarding @AndrewBreitbart, I don’t agree with many of his targets or methodsSHUSTER: Not enjoying the “walk of shame” after his love-in? @DylanRatigan Re: @AndrewBreitbart, I don’t agree with many of his targets or methodsRATIGAN: My purpose: Confront Andrew about his and the “tea-party’s” failure to focus on the biggest problems: OUR BOUGHT POLS and the OLIGARCHYSHUSTER: @dylanratigan Fine to question B-bart about Tea party not confronting oligarchy. But you also asked him about
2012. Yet no time 4 Sherrod?RATIGAN: I’m interested in going after the whales, the truly powerful actually causing the problems bleeding USA. And questioning all who don’t.SHUSTER: @dylanratigan What “whales” were you “going after” when you lavished praise on BBart, elevated him to pundit, and asked him about 2012?
Then, after Ratigan listed a series of issues he considers critical:
RATIGAN: Those were and still are my questions for @AndrewBrietbart — and everyone else who claims they want to be part of the solution in AmericaSHUSTER: @dylanratigan Oh come on. You didn’t ask B-Bart a single question about rigged trade with China, TBTF bank system, health care, or energy.
This may go on all day. So his your Twitter and enjoy.