RELATED: Obama Ad Blasts Romney: He Was A ‘Job Destroyer’
“I’m so glad you used that example,” Wasserman Schultz hit back. “That’s another key difference between the way that Mitt Romney would run this country and the way Barack Obama has been. Mitt Romney said we should have let Detroit go bankrupt.”
Cain interrupted Wasserman
“You’re transitioning into — with all due respect, you transitioned into that one. Didn’t they lay off workers,” Cain pressed.
“You asked me a question. I’m going to answer the question, Wasserman Schultz responded sharply and explained that Obama helped save the auto industry. “I may not answer it the way you want me to but I’ll answer that.”
“…Did he not save that industry by laying off workers at the auto companies?” Cain interjected.
“No,” Wasserman Schultz started before Cain again interrupted her.
“And didn’t Mitt Romney produce net job growth through all of the companies that Bain owned when sometimes he had to lay off workers at some companies,” Cain continued.
Wasserman Schultz took the opportunity to draw a sharp distinction between Obama and Romney’s records:
Barack Obama was not, is not and never has been the CEO of any of those automobile companies. Mitt Romney was the CEO of Bain Capital and had direct control over decisions at those companies that Bain took over. He was directly involved in whether to invest or whether to drive those companies into bankruptcy. He controlled — he was the puppeteer and people lost their jobs because of his decisions and creditors never got paid because of his decisions and he and his
partners made hundreds of millions of dollars at the expense of those individuals and creditors. I think voters should have a right to examine that record.
Watch the tense exchange below via CNN: