O’Reilly surmised that Rolling Stone only did this to get a bit of much-needed publicity, but gave them credit for an article that did not necessarily glorify Tsarnaev, only make him a slightly sympathetic character. Kate Obenshain brought up Rolling Stone‘s defense of the piece, and found it striking they would focus on this “heartbreaking and riveting” story as opposed to those of the Boston victims. She argued this is systematic of a media that has “sympathy
Powers added it’s one thing to have a simple picture of Tsarnaev on the cover, but they went with a picture that appeared to be “glamorizing him.” She said it feels like they’re “rewarding a murderer,” while Obenshain noted the overwhelming backlash on social media over the case.
O’Reilly tied this to the crazy fans Tsarnaev somehow has, and said the cover may only feed into the “nonsense.” Powers agreed, concluding that it’s nothing short of “twisted” that anyone would want to glorify this guy.
Watch the video below, via Fox News:
—–
Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac