Advertising

It has now been ten days since President Trump stood on the same Helsinki stage as Vladimir Putin, refused to condemn him, threw our own intelligence agencies under the bus, and then blatantly lied about what he meant to say in a pathetic attempt to spin his way out of his self-made debacle.

For any other Republican president, such a poor performance, especially under the stunning specter of being utterly beholden to Russia, would have easily threatened to bring him down. With Trump, though, we knew from the moment it happened there was very little chance that these events would have that sort of immpact.

Since that unforgettable day, there have been six major national polls so far in the aftermath. As someone who once briefly worked as a polling analyst for Quinnipiac University, I have always believed that we in the media are far too impatient when it comes waiting for enough polling data to determine what, if any, impact a news event has created.

Only now, in my opinion, can we come to some potentially valid conclusions. In short, there is literally

something for everyone in the numbers which, while largely static, are still quite interesting and potentially important.

Trump’s approval ratings for these six post-Helsinki polls average out to just over 42% approval and just under 54% disapproval. (The fact that only 4% on the nation fits in neither category is rather amazing). Quinnipiac, which often produces the worst numbers for Trump, has him “underwater” by 20 points, while Rasmussen, which almost always gives him his best polling, has Trump at minus seven.

Before Helsinki, Trump’s poll numbers had been on a fairly steady increase since their low point at the very end of 2017, just before he signed the tax cuts got into law. These numbers do indicate a small, but discernible slippage for Trump, especially considering the direction in which he has been trending. Basically, it appears his disapproval went up by a little over a point and his approval dipped by about half of that.

Based on traditional analysis, these numbers are obviously an indication that Helsinki didn’t have much effect at all, and could be easily be dismissed as mere statistical “noise.” And while there is definitely some truth in that, there is also validity in the concept that in the Trump era, we are now so incredibly entrenched along partisan lines (thus only 4% having no real opinion) that any discernible movement in the numbers has at least some meaning, especially following a media deluge.

When delving into the internal numbers,

the Quinnipiac poll (which, it should be pointed out, may have had a survey pool that was significantly more anti-Trump than the others) was by far the most fascinating. Check out some of these mind-blowing results:

The logical takeaways from all of this are the following:

That’s polling in the time of Trump.