The Republican congressman made clear that he believes disaster relief is “a proper and appropriate function of the government,” but that he cannot support the current Sandy relief bill because of its lack of spending offsets.
The bill is expected to come to vote in the House today. For the previous, smaller Sandy aid package, Mulvaney was one of the 67 Republicans who voted against it.
“My difficulty with [the new relief package] is simply that it is not paid for,” he explained. “We’re borrowing this additional money and I think that’s wrong. I’m hoping we can figure out a way today during the amendment process to find savings elsewhere to pay for this without adding to the debt.”
O’Brien then challenged Mulvaney by listing all the previous disaster
“It’s a fair point,” Mulvaney responded. “I would encourage the governor and everybody else to consider the fact in 1989, and even as late as Katrina several years ago, the debt was much, much smaller. 1989 it was $2 trillion or $3 trillion. It’s five and six times larger than that today.”
He continued: “We cannot continue to do what we’ve done in the past. That’s how we arrived where we are. We have disasters every single year. We don’t know where they’re going to be. But we spend disaster money every single year, something for which we could budget.”
“I’m not against doing this,” he concluded, “but I think the days of just being able to say okay let’s borrow money from China to do this and that have come and gone.”
Watch below, via CNN:
— —
>> Follow Andrew Kirell (@AndrewKirell) on Twitter